“As avenues to foreign influence in innumerable ways, such attachments are particularly alarming to the truly enlightened and independent Patriot. How many opportunities do they afford to tamper with domestic factions, to practice the arts of seduction, to mislead public opinion, to influence or awe the public Councils! Such an attachment of a small or weak, towards a great and powerful Nation, dooms the former to be the satellite of the latter.
Against the insidious wiles of foreign influence, (I conjure you to believe me fellow citizens) the jealousy of a free people ought to be constantly awake; since history and experience prove that foreign influence is one of the most baneful foes of Republican Government. But that jealousy to be useful must be impartial; else its becomes the instrument of the very influence to be avoided, instead of a defence agains it. Excessive partiality for one foreign nation and excessive dislike of another, cause those whom they actuate to see danger only on one side, and serve to veil and even second the arts of influence on the other. Real Patriots, who may resist the intrigues of the favourite, are liable to become suspected and odious; while its tools and dupes unsure the applause and confidence of the people, to surrender their interests.”
President George Washington, Farewell Address, 1796
The interest of the supra-international European Commission is not the interest of America’s republican government, with its constitutional unction to be assembled ‘of and for’ the people, but instead, it is distinct in its continuous efforts of aggregation of the monetary and tax policy control of other nation’s centralized within a governing council: that it may solidify geopolitical and geoeconomic power, at the expense of the diminishing of nation’s monetary sovereignty, and as an administrative bureaucracy, it may effect its ideological influence as a corporate, globalist international monetary behemoth.
The end result is a centralized accumulation of military and monetary power that is channeled globally according to an ideological doctrine that is divisive and polarizing, and the whims and caprices of the governors and directors of the governing council and the global banks that they collaborate with. Their constant mode or process of administration is to always refute, block, and target attempts to displace it from its entrenchment, and to establish greater solidification of its monetary and tax control scheme through the creation of projects and programs that replicate its continued global growth.
Should the American people be alarmed?
What was the response of England unto the European Union; did they not break away (Brexit) from its monetary and tax requirements? The American people should understand that the European Commission: the governing council of the European Union, is exporting its monetary and tax project beyond the international borders of the European continent, and is in collaboration with an international bank (World Bank) to establish its administrative governing process to include a 130 nation geopolitical/ geoeconomic business cartel, called the Global Tax Program. The centralization of monetary and tax control of sovereign nations by a European supra-international governing council that has a partnership with an international bank is a threat to the independent sovereignty of the people and government of the United States of America; is in opposition to our Constitution, in opposition to our historical tradition of economic self-determination, and a ‘foreign influence’ with a distinct self-interest that is separate from the unanimous economic and societal well-being of all Americans.
Now, if it be so that the American people are not made aware, that in that void of information, the quality of the national conversation becomes stunted and skewed due to the craft of censorship of online information, or if it be that those of a particular politic (Democrats) are indifferent to an internationalization (globalist doctrine) of the United States economy, and its vital traditional energy industry, what recourse do the remaining conservative Americans have, but to join the fray with the utmost responsibility to maintaining complete civility as they earnestly defend and protect the independence and historical constitutional tradition of our individual liberty, and the right to self-determine how our national policy’s affect our personal and national economy, to the end point that we safeguard our sovereignty from the statecraft of the European Commission?
Is it the different people’s of sovereign European nations seeking to impose a quasi-socialist-elitist monetary and tax policy upon the people of the United States, that they may lord control over our economy, or is the governing council of the European Commission, an organization that chooses who is part of their council: these representatives being then approved by its President, completely separate from the standard process of representative government, with power emanating from the people, that is the United States government? Instead, the European Commission’s method of selection requires individuals to agree with the prevailing interest of the president of the governing council, if they are to be on that council. So it is, there is a distinct politic, ideology, and agenda, and all others have to acquiesce unto it. Is that not despotism, and is that despotism being slyly exported to the United States through the World Bank’s Global Tax Program? Already, do we see that congressional Democrats voted for the forerunner of the Global Tax Program with legislation called the ‘Inflation Reduction Act,’ that parallels the European Commission and World Bank’s Global Tax Program. One only has to read both writings to understand that they are nearly identical in aligning control of the economic and tax policy’s of participating countries, including their energy industries.
Why is Janet Yellen, Treasury Secretary in Biden’s Cabinet, the former presiding governor of the Federal Reserve, personally been the lead author of the 130 nation Global Tax Program and a tremendous promoter of the World Bank? Is that a conflict of interest with her duty as a government official to protect the Constitution of the United States? A case can be made that it is treason against the U.S. Constitution (Article 3, Section 3, Clause 1).
Why is the Federal Reserve, under the leadership of Jerome Powell, signaling to all national and international banks to continuing to increase interest rates on loans for small businesses, and residential purchases? Is it not so that such an action will have a suppressing economic effect on the number of loans that are made, and as such, will this not slow down America’s national economy?
Why is it that all other central banks across the world seem to follow and implement the same actions of the Federal Reserve; within 24 hours of the Federal Reserve expressing a change in the loan interest rate, most central banks replicate the same action, causing a simultaneous effect on the economy of the countries the reside in?
The monetary policy of central banks, be they in the U.S., or across the world, are in lock step accordance with the monetary / tax policy of the Global Tax Program of the World Bank, of the European Commission, of President Biden, his Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen, who moonlights as a spokesperson for the World Bank, and it is confederate with the command & control quasi-socialist-elitist policy of Congressional Democrats. That said, what these actions lack is unanimity amongst the people of the United States, and that makes these command & control economic schemes ‘factious:’ that is to say, a self-interest distinct from the unanimous approval and good ‘of and for’ all the American people.
Without unanimity of agreement, the national well-being of the American people can be divided. And to those who would seek such a route of causing division we must carefully observe, and with the greatest adherence to civility, refute. Think of the Declaration of Independence and the deliberation that went into establishing a nation on such principles as safeguarding individual human rights: it was only on such ideas that unanimity of liberty could be found: we have the right to life, liberty; to be safe & happy, and, after it has been clearly understood after a long train of abuses, to alter of abolish government that is not in alignment with these rights. Nothing else brings us together except the defense and championing of our liberties; our fundamental individual human rights, and this includes the sovereignty of economic self-determination.
Therefore, though it be the ‘many’ or the ‘few’ in government, the imposition of legislating a drastic monetary and tax policy that is not in line with the historical traditions of economic self-determination that are originated from the individual human rights precepts of our Declaration of Independence and our Constitution: that a ‘command & control’ of the U.S. economy by a supra-international cartel that takes its orders from central banks and the European Commission is unconstitutional:
1. it would manifest tremendous societal strife and political division,
2. needlessly manifests economic upheaval that is directed
and placed upon all the people,
3. threatens the original formulation of the sovereignty of the United States
In the legal, pragmatic approach of Abraham Lincoln, earnest in preserving the national geopolitical unity of the people of the United States as a priority he maintained; he also resolutely seeked to end the economic system that was borne upon the exploitation of an enslaved people purposely kept uneducated, that their wherewithal of the promise of ‘liberty and justice for all’ that was the foundational principle of the American nation be kept from them. But these two objectives, he balanced. He understood that foreign nations would contend to make alliances with the Democrats in the confederate states, and so his job was to achieve victory, while preserving the union. Hence, he initiated a capital reconstruction project for the southern states, and was genuine in his resolve to preserve national political unanimity.
That spirit of maintaining national political unanimity is not with the Biden administration, nor is it with the foreign lobbying of Janet Yellen on behalf of the World Bank’s Global Tax Program, nor is it with the Inflation Reduction Act Congressional Democrats unilaterally voted on that targets the distributive diversified growth of the American oil, natural gas, and coal industry at the inflection point when our own U.S. Bureau of Land Management has published an official finding that the United States actually has 4.3 trillion potentially extractable barrels of shale oil; more than 50% of all the combined oil in the world. That would make the United States ‘cost of living’ for each of its people a much more worthwhile endeavor. And it would also solidify America’s geopolitical and geoeconomic resilience amongst nations, re-certifying its economic independence and the undisputed economic strength of its economy.
As such, the foreign influence of the European Commission, of the world’s central banks, including the Federal Reserve, and the international World Bank, have already infiltrated our government as it was in the time of slavery, when slavery Democrats had their representatives in all branches of the U.S. government.
They are open about it and actively proclaim their globalist agenda
with condescension unto American conservatives.
How shall Americans of all political parties, ethnicities, religions, and walks of life respond? Shall some of us think that we can achieve some victory in imposing dramatic economic upheaval and societal division upon half of the country’s people? The individuals who established our government understood that we only have unanimity of mind and politic in respects to safeguarding our individual liberty, and their we stop,—without imposition unto each other, because it renders liberty and justice for all.
Comments