In the present age, statistics and data are king. By these, calculated decisions are made and courses of action are taken. Concepts, such as 'cost benefit' weigh heavily upon final decision making. But when it comes to the cost/ benefit decision making that can impact the very lives of other people to such an extreme that life is lost, is that ethical? In the world of business, is it ethical that someone bear the burden of making the final decision on the cost/ benefit of giving or taking life? Let's say that the decision to take mercury out of vaccines is postponed until 100,000,000 dosages are given out before making a new batch without (but w/ barium, strontium, aluminum, formaldehyde, human tissue, and adyuvants, which are cancer viruses. This way the money spent on the 'tainted vaccines' is not waisted. In this case, though the cost to human life and neurological health has been high, one bozo thought the cost/ benefit would be doable. This actually h...
For The Good Of The American Family & Individual: Youth, Adults, & Senior Citizens