Skip to main content

Distributed versus Decentralized: Cogs or Pro’s

The April 28, 2025 essay of Dad, American Political Scientist, Entrepreneur Special Educator, musician, & chef,

Coach Bill (ScalziOriginals.US)

The pyramid is the sign of a feudal, decentralized ‘command & control’ social-economic governance.

The varied modes of communication; frequency of message repetition, sequence of narrative construction, and assortment of communication sources that group together for the Democrat and Republican Party, do from a league of decentralized governance, decentralized economics, decentralized education, and a decentralized community and family, that runs in opposition to the original distributed intention of the foundation of the American constitutional republic. The first charter of our union, being a language declaration of the values that were and are best for the American people hinged on unanimity in its focus, that all may equitably attain to innate human rights, that we each be safe and happy. That national focus of unanimity is the centerpiece of our national union, established on the foundational language of the Declaration of Independence, and brought forth and proven through the works of the Continental Congress; of which, a great number of these founding patriots, assuming office in the newly established government that existed through the Articles of Confederation and after, the creation of the U.S. Constitution in 1787; is not a decentralized framework of equal opportunity, for decentralization splits people into a multitude majority, being conditioned to serve and live under the ‘command and control’ of a few, whom cause their loyalists to take the spoil, and to rule over the majority.

But a distributed society, along with a very limited national & state government operating system, arranges the strength of the nation through the proper value of each American; understanding that each citizen is that powerful, dynamic unit, replete with soul and ingenuity. The Declaration of Independence itself, being a unanimous charter that immediately ascribes and heralds the human rights of individuals, is distributed in its essence: a distributed system not being a hierarchy, but an equitable covenant that the measure of best success as a whole, is found in the dynamism of many individuals producing good work as self-employed professionals and, or small business owners. The resilience of that national economy being achieved through the mass increase of individual economic successes, that socio-economic system, being a unanimous opportunity matrix, or complete national operating system that favors unanimous growth through the growth valuing of individual citizen economic success.

That is the operating system of the Declaration of Independence, while decentralization is an opposite league, not opposite team, but opposing league that is akin to monarchy and tyranny, to feudalism, and is simply robbery of the very few, who form their own league with opposing teams, and they form a distracting cabal that provide pledges of future economic success to the multitude, which never arrives. Again, decentralization governance and economics is a scheme of ‘command and control’ of the people, arraying the multitude into a factory setting or worker-employees who will never attain unto much wealth, and are usually operating with less than 6 months of capital before being monetarily broke. That national operating system makes for a country that is partly strong and partly weak, with the split being 90/10. It has led to tumults in our society, to never ending war, to government treasuries being ransacked by a central bank system that is more centralized than it is decentralized, that is to say, it operates in some ways as a global monarchy system that favors an extremism of socialist ideology which is convenient cover for its true game, centralization of local, national, and global socio-economic power through the control flow of currency and government office. All these things are because decentralization is factious; faction being the prioritization of the goals of a small group or a large group upon all. Being factious, decentralization, is oft spoken of through the term ‘faction’ in the Federalist Papers; the essays introducing the powers, limits, and functions of the American government via the U.S. Constitution. In fact, it is so often referenced as the great threat to the unanimity and well-being of the people and government of the United States of America; while the distributed system, as a language vocabulary term, has not been seen as the natural extrapolation of the Declaration of Independence; the distributed system, being an ‘open source’ operating system for the nation that has met its factious challenges in the economic power of the feudalism class that served itself from slavery, in the factious economic oppression of post-slavery, racial disenfranchisement, in the factious gaslighting that proposed abortion as a judicial and innate human right; all these, slanting and warping national understanding of the original spirit/ intention protecting individual human rights of all through the valuing of the rights of each citizen, as described/ stated in the Declaration of Independence.

A thorough understanding that is unbiased, observant and just, can find that a few figures and families have been the key players of the robbery of decentralized (feudal) socio-economic, governing operating system for the American nation; they amassed great sums of wealth, and through that, power to affect and control government, education, national health, and global happenings, including continuous war economies and war as a mainstay of life; all these dynamics being factiously controlled always further solidifying the ‘command and control’ centralized/ decentralized operating system of the very few upon the hindered majority, whom are distracted into binary modes of living that mirrors and functions as a decentralized matrix.

All presidents, with the exception of John Adams as the forerunner of unanimous, equitable constitutional republicanism, who’s sentiment was for national unanimity; even a gradual end to slavery, and seeing a respect to Native Americans; his son, John Quincy Adams, the diplomatic, and strongly opposed by the slavery faction, American champion who made efforts in each of his federal capacities to integrate people of black skin color and Native Americans into a dignified independent integration of coexistence with the United States, and his proposal, though defeated, but his proposal for expanding national university institutes for the incubation of a critical thinking and just people. Also, the reconstruction actions of Abraham Lincoln were beginning and quite possibly, had he lived, would have been gracefully directed to a better national unanimity, that would have ushered in greater equity in economic opportunity to all, instead of the racial, economic oppression and cronyism that destroyed the human rights spirit of unanimous respect and valuing for individual human life, and the right understanding of the Declaration of 1776 that Abraham Lincoln and Frederick Douglass rallied for; falling back into, or regressing towards factious control of government office and the regulation and purposes of industries; a decentralized mode of hierarchical economic league, with the multitude of people receiving little to no education that established a stronger, more vibrant, dynamic individual who could be a creator of individual economy, and not a cog in a decentralized, societal, economy factory setting of worker-employees, who deliver up most of their time and energy for low-wages, that the few may gain great wealth and a power advantage upon them through the marshaling of their money towards controlling government office, and through that, all sorts of national and foreign policy.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Gaslighting of our Constitutional Understanding & The Original Purpose of the U.S. Government

John Adams   “I have found by Experience, that in this Age of the World that Man has an awful Lot, who “dares to  love his Country and be poor.” Liberty and virtue! When! oh When will your Enemies cease to exist or to persecute! Our Country will be envied, our Liberty will be envied, our Virtues will be envied. Deep and subtle systems of Corruption hard to prove, impossible to detect, will be practised to sap and undermine Us and the few who penetrate them will be called suspicious, envious, restless turbulent ambitious—will be hated unpopular and unhappy. But a succession of these Men must be preserved, for these are the salt of the Earth. Without these the World would be worse than it is.” Letter To Abigail Adams, from John Adams, Paris, April 16, 1783 Few generations, said George Washington and John Adams, are fortunate to produce brilliant minds and hearts that are selfless. How shall we fare in our present? What is the path of national political unanimity that ...

Graciousness Through Christ Jesus Who Is Written In Our Hearts

“Jesus Christ the same yesterday, and to day, and for ever. Be not carried about with divers and strange doctrines.For it is a good thing that the heart be established with grace; not with meats, which have not profited them that have been occupied therein. We have an altar, whereof they have no right to eat which serve the tabernacle.” The Epistle To The Hebrews Chapter 13:8–10 Having Faith, hope in what is not seen; yet, through the Word of God, ‘faith’ having greater meaning, hope through the Word and the gracious power of the Spirit of the Word, Truth & Righteousness, brings one; that is to say, translates one, from the kingdom of spiritual darkness: a life, replete with an attitude, perspective, reasoning, and quality of life that is intrinsically a life of scarcity, vanity, gain & advantage, strife, and selfishness, into THE kingdom of God; the kingdom of Light; an abounding reality overflowing with God, and the fruit of his Spirit: joy, peace, faith, gentleness, temperan...

Being a Maverick Thinker with Your #ExecutiveFunction Skills

Once we understand what our executive function skills are, we move to streamlining how well we use them, how they show up/ don't show up in our life. As we move through our understanding of how to better manage our ideas, feelings and actions, can their be soft and hard forces which are orchestrated with the focus of instilling in us..how to think...how to act... how to respond? Or is 'man' so free in mind, so independent, and so ahead of these forces that he is not affected, not thwarted in his goals, and not redirected easily? If we are to polish and tone these executive function skills so that we can harness the ability of our mind (a tool) to facilitate successful outcomes for ourselves, should we not start by bringing a critical eye to why we think the way we think? Is this not metacognition, or how we use our thought process to approach the world?  Using systems theory, any system that is accepted into a larger system invariably begins to affect tha...