The April 28, 2025 essay of Dad, American Political Scientist, Entrepreneur Special Educator, musician, & chef,
Coach Bill (ScalziOriginals.US)
 |
| The pyramid is the sign of a feudal, decentralized ‘command & control’ social-economic governance. |
The varied modes of communication; frequency of message repetition, sequence of narrative construction, and assortment of communication sources that group together for the Democrat and Republican Party, do from a league of decentralized governance, decentralized economics, decentralized education, and a decentralized community and family, that runs in opposition to the original distributed intention of the foundation of the American constitutional republic. The first charter of our union, being a language declaration of the values that were and are best for the American people hinged on unanimity in its focus, that all may equitably attain to innate human rights, that we each be safe and happy. That national focus of unanimity is the centerpiece of our national union, established on the foundational language of the Declaration of Independence, and brought forth and proven through the works of the Continental Congress; of which, a great number of these founding patriots, assuming office in the newly established government that existed through the Articles of Confederation and after, the creation of the U.S. Constitution in 1787; is not a decentralized framework of equal opportunity, for decentralization splits people into a multitude majority, being conditioned to serve and live under the ‘command and control’ of a few, whom cause their loyalists to take the spoil, and to rule over the majority.
But a distributed society, along with a very limited national & state government operating system, arranges the strength of the nation through the proper value of each American; understanding that each citizen is that powerful, dynamic unit, replete with soul and ingenuity. The Declaration of Independence itself, being a unanimous charter that immediately ascribes and heralds the human rights of individuals, is distributed in its essence: a distributed system not being a hierarchy, but an equitable covenant that the measure of best success as a whole, is found in the dynamism of many individuals producing good work as self-employed professionals and, or small business owners. The resilience of that national economy being achieved through the mass increase of individual economic successes, that socio-economic system, being a unanimous opportunity matrix, or complete national operating system that favors unanimous growth through the growth valuing of individual citizen economic success.
That is the operating system of the Declaration of Independence, while decentralization is an opposite league, not opposite team, but opposing league that is akin to monarchy and tyranny, to feudalism, and is simply robbery of the very few, who form their own league with opposing teams, and they form a distracting cabal that provide pledges of future economic success to the multitude, which never arrives. Again, decentralization governance and economics is a scheme of ‘command and control’ of the people, arraying the multitude into a factory setting or worker-employees who will never attain unto much wealth, and are usually operating with less than 6 months of capital before being monetarily broke. That national operating system makes for a country that is partly strong and partly weak, with the split being 90/10. It has led to tumults in our society, to never ending war, to government treasuries being ransacked by a central bank system that is more centralized than it is decentralized, that is to say, it operates in some ways as a global monarchy system that favors an extremism of socialist ideology which is convenient cover for its true game, centralization of local, national, and global socio-economic power through the control flow of currency and government office. All these things are because decentralization is factious; faction being the prioritization of the goals of a small group or a large group upon all. Being factious, decentralization, is oft spoken of through the term ‘faction’ in the Federalist Papers; the essays introducing the powers, limits, and functions of the American government via the U.S. Constitution. In fact, it is so often referenced as the great threat to the unanimity and well-being of the people and government of the United States of America; while the distributed system, as a language vocabulary term, has not been seen as the natural extrapolation of the Declaration of Independence; the distributed system, being an ‘open source’ operating system for the nation that has met its factious challenges in the economic power of the feudalism class that served itself from slavery, in the factious economic oppression of post-slavery, racial disenfranchisement, in the factious gaslighting that proposed abortion as a judicial and innate human right; all these, slanting and warping national understanding of the original spirit/ intention protecting individual human rights of all through the valuing of the rights of each citizen, as described/ stated in the Declaration of Independence.
A thorough understanding that is unbiased, observant and just, can find that a few figures and families have been the key players of the robbery of decentralized (feudal) socio-economic, governing operating system for the American nation; they amassed great sums of wealth, and through that, power to affect and control government, education, national health, and global happenings, including continuous war economies and war as a mainstay of life; all these dynamics being factiously controlled always further solidifying the ‘command and control’ centralized/ decentralized operating system of the very few upon the hindered majority, whom are distracted into binary modes of living that mirrors and functions as a decentralized matrix.
All presidents, with the exception of John Adams as the forerunner of unanimous, equitable constitutional republicanism, who’s sentiment was for national unanimity; even a gradual end to slavery, and seeing a respect to Native Americans; his son, John Quincy Adams, the diplomatic, and strongly opposed by the slavery faction, American champion who made efforts in each of his federal capacities to integrate people of black skin color and Native Americans into a dignified independent integration of coexistence with the United States, and his proposal, though defeated, but his proposal for expanding national university institutes for the incubation of a critical thinking and just people. Also, the reconstruction actions of Abraham Lincoln were beginning and quite possibly, had he lived, would have been gracefully directed to a better national unanimity, that would have ushered in greater equity in economic opportunity to all, instead of the racial, economic oppression and cronyism that destroyed the human rights spirit of unanimous respect and valuing for individual human life, and the right understanding of the Declaration of 1776 that Abraham Lincoln and Frederick Douglass rallied for; falling back into, or regressing towards factious control of government office and the regulation and purposes of industries; a decentralized mode of hierarchical economic league, with the multitude of people receiving little to no education that established a stronger, more vibrant, dynamic individual who could be a creator of individual economy, and not a cog in a decentralized, societal, economy factory setting of worker-employees, who deliver up most of their time and energy for low-wages, that the few may gain great wealth and a power advantage upon them through the marshaling of their money towards controlling government office, and through that, all sorts of national and foreign policy.
Comments