Coach Bill / Dad, Entrepreneur Special Educator, American Political Scientist, Writer, Musician.

Abraham Lincoln's relentless appeals unto the people were tactical and direct; that they return to the gentle waters of the promise of the Declaration of Independence.     George Washington To Marquis de Lafayette Mount Vernon 10th May 1786 “…It is one of the evils of democratical governments that the people, not always seeing & frequently mislead, must often feel before they can act right—but then evils of this nature seldom fail to work their own cure. It is to be lamented nevertheless that the remedies are so slow, & that those who may wish to apply them seasonably are not attended to before they suffer in person, in interest & in reputation.” What expectancy of national peace can be effected if the foundational spirit and original intentions of our founding fathers for America are misconstrued in ignorance and with designed purpose to change its meaning, with the desired end that present generations of the people become untethered from the understanding of...

What is the right spirit for the people of the United States of America, and should a diversity of thought be brought to change the originalist establishment of the American republic, or is that diversity of thought alive because of that established foundational liberty of self-determination? Is an amendment of ideological activism unto that first construction required, therein reorganizing the understanding of our nation and opening the reinterpretation of the original intentions of our founders unto the first, natural laws? Unto whom shall we appeal if we motion to stand fast in our defense of the gentle promise of our Declaration of Independence, that the public good be secured without imposition? In the Federalist Essays, the warning of the works of ‘faction’ is greatly deliberated upon as the singular danger to government of and for the people, and in the 1850’s the selfless Abraham Lincoln continued the footsteps begun before the foundation of America was established, and since ...

Painting of Alexander Hamilton   “We have warned them   from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.”                       Declaration of Independence, 1776 As faction increases in government, the intentions of the process of its self-interest working the gears of government: legislating, creating laws, and managing according to the id...

What is the character of the United States Supreme Court, if not an office that has been proven to change according to the change of its personnel?  What is its duty? And what is the duty of the people unto the processes of that court? If the personnel in our U.S. Supreme Court can say that they are the ultimate word on what our fundamental law is (Declaration of Independence & U.S. Constitution); what the original intentions of the framers of our government were, and what 'was' and 'is'  the spirit of  liberty, how should the people exercise the power balance to make the Supreme Court accountable to the original understanding, intention, and spirit of liberty of our fundamental laws, and laws that have eschewed forth from those first proclamations of liberty? What should be the rigors and duties within our American schools, and  political science instruction to assure such a people who care about the processes of our republican consti...