Skip to main content

The Unanimous Economist & The Natural Economy From Dad, American Political Scientist, Entrepreneur Special Educator, musician, chef,Coach Bill (ScalziOriginals.US)

Jay, Madison, and Hamilton spoke often of faction in government and the threat of it to the republic.

Yet, what is the great economic answer of a nation, and who is the true economist that is unbiased, without agenda, just, and unanimous? Is it those that are factious; those who say, ā€˜trust me, trust me,’ as the time is gained for their sitting down and standing up; for their prolongation in office; these proving their factiousness in that they seek permanency in the seat of power, resorting to politics of distraction and semblances of faithfulness to the people, but in the end, their tenure has been of guarding the decentralized governance of education and maintaining the stagnant economics for the worker-employee, whereas it is an eternal win for the elite of the elite; those very few captains of decentralized industry, whom amass great sums of monetary wealth hamstringing success unto themselves through ā€˜big business industry economics:’ by paying low-wages, and producing costly goods, and cheap goods in great abundance, all the while, the holders of government office, having their election secured through the auspices of those big business, enjoy large sums of capital bankrolling their campaigns into legislative and executive offices; these very few elite of the elite hierarchy, being ā€˜robber captains,’ of the people, displace good values in our society, showing that only such pyramid schemes as decentralized and centralized economic governance can be the best form of capitalism. They, through that process of funneling the money unto themselves, making it impossible for the American people to ever bring forward troves of government representatives that are not bought and paid for by ā€˜big business’ and large corporate industry companies whom control the powers of government, while gaslighting, or distorting the understanding of what form of government the United States of America is, that they may apply unto all sorts of controls and allowances of regulations that favor their development projects, while stunting the growth of dynamic innovation, and rue competition in what should be the fairest form of capitalism, a distributed economy.

The center piece of the distributed system, being that it thrives on individual resilience; therefore, the care and empowerment of the American individual to become a dynamic individual economic creator, is the focus of great national wealth; these being self-employed as professionals, and small business owners, even renaissance professionals, forming a national economy of successful individual economies. The growth of a dynamic multitude of innovative, industrious individuals, even millions of people, being successfully self-employed, creates a thriving marketplace of competition stabilizing cost and prices due to supply of these goods and services meeting and exceeding demand, given the sheer number of a multitude of individuals bringing those goods and services to the market.

But a national education, either through design to engineer that fixed, low-wage worker-employee multitude, defaulting in right action due to political agenda, intellectual ignorance, conditioned indifference, or a combination of all, will not specifically focus on setting an educational curriculum that frees the multitude from low-wage, worker-employees jobs, ā€” that they may create their own businesses and live with dignity. No, both Republican and Democrat Corporate Political Parties have proven that they favor that system of governance which brought them and keeps them in their elite jobs, living and enjoying the life that no manufacturing worker-employee could ever live debt-free: for decentralized structured growth favors the few, and the very few, while the multitude is offered an uninspiring education that focuses on a rewrite of our nation’s history; explicitly gaslighting new generations of Americans; offering America as a ā€˜democracy,’ whereas it is a constitutional republic; whereas, in addition also, though democracy be the ā€˜jingle’ rallying word, it is merely a false offering of justice to the people whom are not being taught to be unbiased, critical thinkers, (for a decentralized system does not, in its framework of function as a pyramid scheme, bring forth the perfect voice of the people, but a manipulated, conditioned, and indoctrinated, emotional message that always behooves the will of the very few elite). They have and shall hinder education, and propagandize through corporatized media culture to enthrall with information distractions of all kinds, including entertainment, misdirection of what is worthy news for the people, engineered idolatrous and political controversies that do not matter, continuous war and war economy that is a business; altogether, a ā€˜controlled theater’ resembling a complex circus performance being offered as the center stage focus, when in fact, it is cover for the decentralized monetary scheme: a robbery of the people’s right to easily be creators of their own economy. The distorted, and ignored understanding of the natural economic manifestation of the Declaration of Independence is for them, never a topic of conversation, consideration, nor does such a concept have ā€˜allowed space’ in the national conversation of the people, (for all channels of communication are algorithmically censored and controlled to serve the desired outcome of success for Wall Street and the merchants and banks on Main Street, but never the streets on the far side of town, whom unto them is reserved factory worker life, which if they accept, is the ā€˜mainstay’ of a decentralized governing, socio-economic system of life, or social-order matrix that serves some, at the expense of most. It is a life of gain and advantage, and of getting rich quick, and of begetting what can be begotten as soon as possible, rather than fine-tuning and polishing, bringing to expert fruition and great professionalism skill, service, and goods; even the localization of national economy within community life.

Therefore, the natural economist does not choose sides, or find angles to speak on within a system; that they may speak wise words of success within a self-serving economic scheme, but steps back and understands the greater picture of what is true national, economic success. Any other economist, even all those whom blindly express on decentralization, offer nothing and speak only to a few, saying what wants to be heard. Their work is not the sober deduction of a unanimous economic perspective that values human rights as described in the Declaration of 1776, unanimity of protecting individual human life, without agenda. They, whom are factious, with political agendas, not unanimous, are creators of strife and indifference; sly ā€˜gaslighters’ whom never arrive at being fair, and whose strength is to sit still.

A truer economist study’s the political science approach unto economics, and allows themself to unbiasedly understand that it is a worthwhile, and right education that must be practical in its curriculum of self-employed and homeowner independence, that each individual thrive according to their hopes, aspirations and professional goals; the upbringing of a people to be innovative, industrious, dynamic, and caretakers of community being taught in our public schools, and not some silent codification of attitude and social agenda from either decentralized political party, (both in the same decentralized league/ different teams), that is distinctly slanted to favor one decentralized political party platform over the other decentralized political platform: both of which compromise and negotiate with each other, that they may be incubators of factious agenda, that they and those whom set them in their positions may prolong their scheme and effects, propaganda, and control of the informational narrative.

So prevalent is the tyranny of decentralization of government and society, that the people are not respected in their youth, but indoctrinated into a perspective and politic, before being oe ever being taught to be unbiased, critical thinkers. Public school curriculums and their libraries, have openly embraced critical race theory doctrines, which is binary divider of people; a convenient ā€˜forever’ review of racial tensions, offer a reproach through book selection and book censorship, that there be an indoctrination of people as ā€˜social justice warriors,’ and not critical thinkers; that as these confrontational or passive confrontation ā€˜front-persons’ they offer and harangue with an attitude reproach that is emotionally-charged, factious and opposing living peaceably; seeking instead to foment an environment of animosity; of cultural retribution void of critical thinking and civility. The multitude of the people then, treated as a mass, are not viewed as with the possibility of being astounding creators of economy and healthy community life, but educated blandly into vain attitudes and behaviors of indifference; the very manner and purpose of distraction of decentralized socio-economics. They are, as it is, treated as low-wage cogs whom can never enjoy that pleasant life that is begotten by those whom are the captains of industry, and the hierarchical pyramid order of employees who serve them.

But what if it were possible, that in spite of the Democrat/ Republican decentralized Parties control of educational standards, and factious control of government office, which favors to offer ā€˜national success’ as the success of ā€˜Wall Street’ and the ā€˜glitzy Main Street,’ what if it were possible that mothers and fathers; yea, individuals with families, could practice being experts and professionals in their work, and grow their own economies separate from any present responsibilities they have in the decentralized system of worker-employees?

What would an unbiased, practical economist, whom is not factious, but with understanding of the said difference and factiousness of centralized and decentralized systems of economic-societal governance versus the equitable distributed system that is unanimous in its ā€˜value prioritizing’ (of instilling and inculcating economic resilience and relative prosperity in a nation through the focus of the educational, professional empowerment of each citizen), put across as the best economic matrix? ā€” Does not the natural economic manifestation of the United States of America’s Declaration of Independence directly and primarily declare the innate right to life and liberty of each individual; the foundation of the nation being the protection of human rights? Should such a true economic understanding and economist focus on decentralized doctrines and manners, whereas the centerpiece of the national economic success is the individual, domestic economic success of the multitude? The power of that nation’s national economy being the needed leverage to demand the best foreign trade environment; for what work should there be that cannot simply and efficiently be completed domestically? The massive success of the distributed governance; recognizing that the power source driver of economy cannot be government, but that government office be skillfully brought to achieve, through a national educational shift; with each family and individual readily at liberty to begin shifting into self-employment, be that gradually in degrees, or as best suits the individual, from that fixed, low-wage that caps the ingenuity and market reward of each individual’s performance (decentralized worker-employees), unto an adventure and quality of life, that though may have its uncertainty of success, is the free form economy that is that ā€˜American dream.’

It would needs require that each create for-profit and non-profit foundations, and small businesses, and to be excellent in their trade, craft, workmanship, and expertise; and that through these, they may create business ventures; the first generation of such entrepreneurial practice being greatly built upon and streamlined unto efficacy, efficiency, and profitable success by future generations of family members, whom need not necessarily be self-employed in the same work, trade, or craft as their fathers and mothers, grandparents, or uncles, but as they were in general before them, enterprisers, experts, professionals, and small business owners at that that they enjoy. The sum of it, being a thriving nation of awakened dynamism that are creative and readily focused in how they create profit, which altogether as a multitude of these millions of individuals, national economic success that is not hinged on factory manufacturing, but diversifying towards that distributed, self-employed economic-society of proprietors and professionals. That multitude of individuals enjoying a greater quality of life; the growth of distributed economic markets brimming with that supply of individualized goods and services, causing the national economy to increase its economic resiliency because of the combined success of that multitude of individuals; these self-employed professionals, experts, community entrepreneurs, and small business owners, instead of a decentralized outcome of economics that favors wealth accumulation unto the ā€˜few’ through the manipulation of the time, energy, and wages of the multitude.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Gaslighting of our Constitutional Understanding & The Original Purpose of the U.S. Government

John Adams   ā€œI have found by Experience, that in this Age of the World that Man has an awful Lot, who ā€œdares to  love his Country and be poor.ā€ Liberty and virtue! When! oh When will your Enemies cease to exist or to persecute! Our Country will be envied, our Liberty will be envied, our Virtues will be envied. Deep and subtle systems of Corruption hard to prove, impossible to detect, will be practised to sap and undermine Us and the few who penetrate them will be called suspicious, envious, restless turbulent ambitious—will be hated unpopular and unhappy. But a succession of these Men must be preserved, for these are the salt of the Earth. Without these the World would be worse than it is.ā€ Letter To Abigail Adams, from John Adams, Paris, April 16, 1783 Few generations, said George Washington and John Adams, are fortunate to produce brilliant minds and hearts that are selfless. How shall we fare in our present? What is the path of national political unanimity that ...

Graciousness Through Christ Jesus Who Is Written In Our Hearts

ā€œJesus Christ the same yesterday, and to day, and for ever. Be not carried about with divers and strange doctrines.For it is a good thing that the heart be established with grace; not with meats, which have not profited them that have been occupied therein. We have an altar, whereof they have no right to eat which serve the tabernacle.ā€ The Epistle To The Hebrews Chapter 13:8–10 Having Faith, hope in what is not seen; yet, through the Word of God, ā€˜faith’ having greater meaning, hope through the Word and the gracious power of the Spirit of the Word, Truth & Righteousness, brings one; that is to say, translates one, from the kingdom of spiritual darkness: a life, replete with an attitude, perspective, reasoning, and quality of life that is intrinsically a life of scarcity, vanity, gain & advantage, strife, and selfishness, into THE kingdom of God; the kingdom of Light; an abounding reality overflowing with God, and the fruit of his Spirit: joy, peace, faith, gentleness, temperan...

Being a Maverick Thinker with Your #ExecutiveFunction Skills

Once we understand what our executive function skills are, we move to streamlining how well we use them, how they show up/ don't show up in our life. As we move through our understanding of how to better manage our ideas, feelings and actions, can their be soft and hard forces which are orchestrated with the focus of instilling in us..how to think...how to act... how to respond? Or is 'man' so free in mind, so independent, and so ahead of these forces that he is not affected, not thwarted in his goals, and not redirected easily? If we are to polish and tone these executive function skills so that we can harness the ability of our mind (a tool) to facilitate successful outcomes for ourselves, should we not start by bringing a critical eye to why we think the way we think? Is this not metacognition, or how we use our thought process to approach the world?  Using systems theory, any system that is accepted into a larger system invariably begins to affect tha...