As it pertains to the American tradition of economic self-determination, governments best duty is the empowerment of the people’s growth of business, and not promoting, furthering, or supporting a reliance on the split priority of financial service organizations not in allegiance to the people and Constitution of the United States of America , nor in the impractical over-regulation of sectors of the economy for the purpose of implementing interest distinct from the unanimous good of all the American people. Likewise, it has been noted in the U.S. Supreme Court’s majority opinion on West Virginia v. EPA, June 30, 2022, the furtherance of policies causing excessive economic damage upon important sectors of the national economy, in this case, the Environmental Protection Agency’s undue burden in targeting the the oil, natural gas, and coal industries of the United States without legislative approval from the U.S. Congress was found to be unconstitutional, and an overstep of authority by said government agency.
Good governance does not produce volatility; it renders economic prosperity; and so political self-interest policies that seek to drastically reform the historical tradition of the American national economy of economic self-determination that sustains the flow and process of free markets must be met with observation, analysis, and ultimately, responsible, informed, oppositional advocacy from the people, that the cause of equal liberty, including that cause of economic self-determination be safeguarded.
To this end, in regards unto the split priority of international financial service organizations, such as the World Bank, the World Economic Forum, and the International Monetary Fund, these entities have a decidedly political slant that favors socialist economic policies that are resolutely distinct from the historical economic tradition in the United States of self-determination. Now, --especially so, when those entities are politically slanted in their ideological construction of how domestic and foreign economy should flow and process, can it be understood that the instrumentality of the legislative and executive office of government as controlled in its present form by the Democrat Party is at odds with the Republican Party in its goals and objectives on how to best strengthen the national economy of the United States? If so, how is the self-interest of the Democrat Party distinct from the economic good for all the American people; not the majority of the people, but unanimously of all of the American people?
To bring light on to the matter, given that the U.S. Bureau of Land Management has published in official government reports that more than half of the world’s extractable shale oil is in American soil, are ‘climate change economics’ an imposition of economic policy that is receiving unanimous approval from Americans of all political parties, or is there enough political opposition to clearly see a polarization of thought and ideas on the practical efficacy of prioritizing ‘climate change economic policy,’ instead of increasing and sustaining the traditional energy industry of oil, coal, and natural gas in the United States?
Though noted in the Supreme Court’s West Virginia v. EPA 6.30.2022 opinion that congressional process and authorization supersedes government agency’s authority and is required prior to the Environmental Protection Agency’s ‘climate change’ policies being ordered upon the American traditional energy fuels industry, the court’s opinion delved with great judiciousness and detail into its study of the matter, and its efficacy to identify the prevailing issues on the case: it found the the EPA’s actions were going to reform the oil, coal, and natural gas fuel American market into a dynamic that would hinder, limit, and finally, cause great damage to that important sector of the U.S. national economy.
One only has to read the opinion to readily understand the court’s study of observations and analysis to plainly understand its conclusion to the prevailing issues. It is then from that opinion in early summer 2022 up through the present time of Autumn 2022, at the time of this writing, that the Democrat Party got congressional approval in a party line senate vote of 51-50, with the Vice President placing the final vote on the Inflation Reduction Act: a legislation of odds & ends that spliced together health care regulation cost, U.S. soldier health care, with what could be said is the actual purpose of the legislation, a reformation of the U.S. tax code and the Internal Revenue Service. So the Democrat Party got its congressional approval to hinder, limit, and suppress America’s traditional energy market entrance, diversification, and blocking of important fuel physical distribution & transportation (Keystone XL oil pipeline blocked by the Biden administration January 21, 2022) at the inflection point when the U.S. Bureau of Land Management has published that the United States has more than 50% of all extractable shale oil in the world.
Since the onset of the Democrats having control of the Executive Office and congressional majority, the ‘cost of living’ for the American people and their economy has increased, though the United States could be producing all of its energy fuel needs without importing oil, coal, or natural gas, and yet,-- it imported oil from over 73 countries in 2021, including Russia and China. In addition, large American oil companies had a record-breaking profitable year because (1) the supply of the fuel has been cut, and (2) government over-regulation of the drilling lease market has halted market growth and entrance into the traditional energy fuel industry, creating a near-monopoly of large oil producers enjoying large profits due to the policies and executive orders from the Democrat-controlled legislature and Executive Office.
Through all this, a separate program is in the works from international financial service banks, and its goals and objectives can be read online: it is the World Bank’s Global Tax program. If one has read the Democrat’s Inflation Reduction Act, and then reads the World Bank’s Global Tax Program, it would not be farfetched to understand that both documents are nearly exact in their details of objectives, and this includes hindering the domestic traditional energy fuel sector of wealthy countries and reforming the tax code of each to align with the Global Tax Program goals: capital redistribution of middle class wealth unto impoverished nations with the international financial service banks being in charge of collecting and distributing capital revenue through their specific development projects for each participating nation.
Is the priority of the international financial services banks unto the American people, or unto a globalist development agenda distinct from the interest of the American people and our historical traditional of economic self-determination? The Federal Reserve, an independent financial service entity that is connected to the U.S. government through the appointment of its leaders by the U.S. President and U.S. Congress, has its former president, Janet Yellen, promoting the Global Tax Program of the World Bank. She is the U.S. Treasury Secretary and serves in President Biden’s cabinet in that job. Is it practical to observe that independent financial services with globalist economic policies have a split priority that is not completely in allegiance to the people and Constitution of the United States of America, and its economy?
Is it within the American spirit of its constitutional law, and its historical tradition of individual economic self-determination that the Democrat Political Party has openly taking action to legislate an alignment of its tax code and tax enforcement reformation to the World Bank’s Global Tax Program?
How will the American people of all politics respond?
Perhaps with silence. The people do not read the Inflation Reduction Act, nor the World Bank’s Global Tax Program, nor do they comprehend that ‘climate change economics’ is simply the wallpaper media soundbyte that is pushed while the international financial services banks complete their control of the Democrat Political Party’s instrumentality, as a means to ‘command & control’ a redistribution of the wealth of the U.S. middle class.
Why is the media silent? They are supposed to be objective; and why are our American schools teaching the polarizing racial difference awareness of critical of the white race theory at this time of great economic danger, instead of critical thinking and allegiance to the founding principles of why and how the United States of America is the greatest nation on earth, and the fact that the best domestic and foreign policy of America is in the strength of its economy: its middle class and their businesses.
Comments