Coach Bill / Dad, Entrepreneur Special Educator, American Political Scientist, Writer, Musician.

  U.S. Constitution, Article 6, clause 2:   “This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.”   But in 1803, in Marbury v. Madison, Supreme Court Justice John Marshall opposes, and sais: “too extravagant to be maintained that the Framers had intended that a case arising under the constitution should be decided without examining the instrument under which it arises.” As we move forward in the American historical timeline from his 1803 opinion we find that the Supreme Courts were arbitrairly silent on the fundamental right to life & liberty, and ‘activist’ in constitutionalizing their ideologies. 'Judicial review,’ an instrument creating an additional power n...

A sentinel with the 'spirit of liberty'  makes his case to the slavery faction: "When you make these declarations, you have a specific and well-understood allusion to an assumed Constitutional right of yours, to take slaves in the federal territories, and to hold them there as property. But no such right is specifically written in the Constitution. That instrument is literally silent about any such right. We, on the contrary, deny that such a right has any existence in the Constitution,  even by implication.” & "When this obvious mistake of the judges shall be brought to their notice, is it not reasonable to expect that they will withdraw the mistaken statement, and reconsider the conclusion based upon it? And then it is to be remembered that "our fathers, who framed the Government under which we live" --the men who made the Constitution --decided this same Constitutional question in our favor, long ago --decided it without division among themselve...