tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-42496771538016591952024-02-21T13:32:05.334+02:00Coach Bill / Dad, Special Educator, American Political Scientist, Writer, Entrepreneur.Build ecosystems & individuals
to strengthen & sustain
integrated community health. @CoachBill007http://www.blogger.com/profile/00964006939825613259noreply@blogger.comBlogger659125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4249677153801659195.post-76847674821399565322023-02-08T14:41:00.010+02:002023-04-29T20:34:36.767+03:00The Gaslighting of our Constitutional Understanding & The Original Purpose of the U.S. Government<p></p><p></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEj7lVv1ZxCDewwsUxsnVITefnFJ6D8_U0EWW4uAdd1FN_fbH_nnx0OFg6sYhstcjjxysZ7sr562H1jjb3D4Ff8r8tP2IdyJM66FQj5TnC3x08bHedcyIecBHLCxgstCcvj8emEhrgenn2CRFnfd3l_vvMANRS-YUuPnZ0zOrXDGpsF3rv4TV9KhuvJV" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"></a><table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><tbody><tr><td style="text-align: center;"><img alt="" data-original-height="628" data-original-width="1080" height="372" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEj7lVv1ZxCDewwsUxsnVITefnFJ6D8_U0EWW4uAdd1FN_fbH_nnx0OFg6sYhstcjjxysZ7sr562H1jjb3D4Ff8r8tP2IdyJM66FQj5TnC3x08bHedcyIecBHLCxgstCcvj8emEhrgenn2CRFnfd3l_vvMANRS-YUuPnZ0zOrXDGpsF3rv4TV9KhuvJV=w640-h372" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" width="640" /></td></tr><tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">John Adams</td></tr></tbody></table></div></div></div><span style="font-size: medium;"><br /></span><p></p><blockquote><p><span style="font-size: medium;"> <i style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral;">“I have found by Experience, that in this Age of the World that Man has an awful Lot, who “dares to love his Country and be poor.”</i></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none; font-size: medium;"><i>Liberty and virtue! When! oh When will your Enemies cease to exist or to persecute!</i></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 17px;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><i></i></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none; font-size: medium;"><i>Our Country will be envied, our Liberty will be envied, our Virtues will be envied. Deep and subtle systems of Corruption hard to prove, impossible to detect, will be practised to sap and undermine Us and the few who penetrate them will be called suspicious, envious, restless turbulent ambitious—will be hated unpopular and unhappy.</i></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 17px;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><i></i></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none; font-size: medium;"><i>But a succession of these Men must be preserved, for these are the salt of the Earth. Without these the World would be worse than it is.”</i></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 17px;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><i></i></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: Helvetica; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none; font-size: medium;">Letter To Abigail Adams, from John Adams, Paris, April 16, 1783</span></p></blockquote><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: Helvetica; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none; font-size: medium;"></span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: Helvetica; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none; font-size: medium;"><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 20px;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none; font-size: medium;">Few generations, said George Washington and John Adams, are fortunate to produce brilliant minds and hearts that are selfless. How shall we fare in our present?</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 20px;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none; font-size: medium;"><i>What is the path of national political unanimity that our elected representatives in government and our Justices should follow, bringing about the gentlest and fastest way to political stability, economic success, and faith in government? </i> </span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 20px;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none; font-size: medium;">Adams saw that the governments encouragement and support of the people to be individually industrious, innovative, and economically self-determined was/ is essential to the strength of the nation. His reasoning of how the U.S. Constitution was put together, defended its legal efficacy and simplicity in being a functional form of self-correcting, self-government procured to work best as a gentle, solemn body.</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 20px;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none; font-size: medium;">The original ‘natural law’ understandings were prescient to the delegates in our Continental Congress, as they assembled themselves as a limited collection of power through ‘collections of authority’ needed to establish the best form of government that championed individual human rights. Namely, these ‘collections’ of power of the people happened with the representative assembly of the people in the ultimate success of the Continental Congress (1774-1787): with the Declaration Of Independence proclaiming a new nation founded upon equal human liberty and justice for all, and with the ratification of the U.S. Constitution.</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 20px;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none; font-size: medium;"></span></p><blockquote><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none; font-size: medium;">John Adams</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none; font-size: medium;">Memorial to the States General of the Netherlands,</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none; font-size: medium;">Leyden, April 19, 1781</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 20px;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none; font-size: medium;"><i>“This immortal Declaration, of the fourth of July one thousand seven hundredseveny six, when America was invaded by an hundred Vessels of War, and, according to Estimates laid before Parliament, by fifty-five thousand of veteran Troops, was not the Effect of any sudden Passion, or Enthusiasm; but a Measure, which has been long in deliberation among the People, maturely discussed in some hundreds of popular Assemblies, and by public Writings in all the States: it was a Measure, which Congress did not adopt, until they had received the positive Instructions of their Constituents: it was then unanimously adopted by Congress, subscribed by all its Members, transmitted o the Assemblies of the Several States, and by them respectively accepted, ratified and recorded among their Archives: so that no Decree, Edict, Statute, Placart or fundamental Law of any nation was ever made with more Solemnity, or with more Unanimity or Cordiality adopted. as the Act and Consent of the whole People, than this: and it has been held sacred to this day by every State with such unshaken Firmness, that not even the smallest has ever been induced to depart from it; although the English have wasted many Millions, and vast Fleets and Armies in the vain Attempt to invalidate it. On the contrary, each of the thirteen States has instituted a form of Government for itself, under the Authority of the People; has erected its Legislature in the several Branches; its Executive Authority with all its Offices; its Judiciary Departments and Judges; its Army, Militia, Revenue, and some of them their Navy: and all these Departments of Government have been regularly and constitutionally organized under the associated Superintendency of Congress, now these five Years, and have acquired a Consistency, Solidity and Activity, equal to the oldest and most established Governments.”</i></span></p></blockquote>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none; font-size: medium;">Adams, a critical thinker, lawyer, farmer, statesman, diplomat and political scientist wrote that a constitutional routine of elections creates a passive lever of power of the people to take legislative action, or clear government office, if need be, through the election of their chosen congressional representatives. He, Hamilton, Madison, and Jay, as well as George Washington saw that the greatest threat to the originalist interpretation of fundamental law and through that, the very essence of the purpose of the American government, would constantly be threatened with factions and the prevalence of factious spirit within government as an instrument that can be manipulated unto narrow ends, rather than the unanimous good of all.</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 20px;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none; font-size: medium;">To provide some self-correcting mechanisms for the people, in the Continental Congresses, the founding fathers thought and reasoned upon the practical and historical significance of balanced government split into a collection of three branches, each having a ‘negative’ on the other, including the additional provision of a strong Executive Office, and a split of the house of senators into the lower house (House of Representatives), and the upper house (Senate). Therein, a limited government could be gently altered with the change of personnel in the legislative and executive branches.</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 20px;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none; font-size: medium;">John Adams, argued in his set of letters, that the process of voting, can, in a calm manner displace the entrenchment of factions within government (self interest distinct from unanimous good of all). </span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 20px;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none; font-size: medium;">The split of three, equally powerful branches of government, Adams put forth, was a natural, uneven number that when applied unto government, creates the necessary balance and tension of governmental powers that is ultimately the most effective form of government to ever exist on Earth. Adams continued that the American Constitution could continue for a millennia as a political science experiment, far surpassing the democracy of Rome as a truly representative constitutional republican government best situated to protect the people; remaining centered as a nation of laws; with its fundamental laws, and the laws derived from these serving the original legal understanding and national agreement upon which the nation formed. Those agreements were & are the Declaration of Independence, for a few years—our Articles of Confederation, and when it was understood by the fathers of our nation that a greater specificity of government, duty, powers, balanced proportions of representatives, and ‘negative checks’ relationship amongst the presidency, the congressional houses, and the Supreme Court, altogether achieving the best collection of authority that will suffice the people’s yearning for such a land of individual equal liberty and justice, withstanding the tests of time and tumult in relative peace, while still maintaining legal compass of the government as an instrument that champions the originalist purpose of establishing the nation, in accordance to the spirit & letter of its fundamental laws, and the will of the people. The law itself exemplifying its <b>purpose of service ‘</b>of us,’ as in, “ we are the people who make the government to work ‘for us,’ the same people who live in the land. </span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none; font-size: medium;"><br /></span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none; font-size: medium;"></span></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEjn4q3ujmMH7ygCxYMfcabaQ3xLMqCQ5vePLwttx0hvkEPM6UZxJGbYNhEGx1FYU4N7_dyRVK-2V7GW7wjf9lj7vuDEAitwBXfcL42RQwgaQ9_GU6uMlZZGsqDZnDqRjXLgX3ihUaC5Ta_PqI-LlPbQaXwLzJty_gA8aPtfgqqaVL-pZ48jNmYZpRVf" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><img alt="" data-original-height="291" data-original-width="440" height="424" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEjn4q3ujmMH7ygCxYMfcabaQ3xLMqCQ5vePLwttx0hvkEPM6UZxJGbYNhEGx1FYU4N7_dyRVK-2V7GW7wjf9lj7vuDEAitwBXfcL42RQwgaQ9_GU6uMlZZGsqDZnDqRjXLgX3ihUaC5Ta_PqI-LlPbQaXwLzJty_gA8aPtfgqqaVL-pZ48jNmYZpRVf=w640-h424" width="640" /></span></a></div><span style="font-size: medium;"><br /><br /></span><p></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none; font-size: medium;">Thus, it behooves us a people primarily seeking to maintain our individual human rights as legal equals in our land, with the safety of having just courts premised on selflessly defending the laws according to that original understanding: making for the gentlest form of government that is answerable to ‘the people.’ Legal equals as human beings, regardless of religion, hereditary titles, skin color, ethnicity, or walk of life; choosing to be a nation of laws that champion the natural rights of humanity. Our first declaration not being some free-standing document, but woven into the creation of our nation, it both declared humanity on the American land individually free, and also declared to create a government to keep that individual liberty.</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 20px;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space: pre;"> <span> <span> <span> <span> <span> <span> <span> <span> <span> <span> <span> <span> <span> </span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span>2</p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 20px;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none; font-size: medium;">Is the best path to force an over-regulation of America’s traditional energy fuel industry? —That a developmental investment clean energy scheme (Global Tax Project) spearheaded by the Democrat Party, the Federal Reserve, Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen, the European Commission & international banks (World Bank), solidify control of our legislative language (Inflation Reduction Act, 2022) siphoning large portions of U.S. tax money into monetary transfers that are collected, managed, and re-distributed according to the plans of a world-based international rules order that does not prioritize the unanimous interest of Americans, or an America that is economically resilient? </span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 20px;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none; font-size: medium;">A strange re-casting of the geoeconomic and geopolitical world balance with America serving as (1) a tributary to the whims & ideologies of an international order of central banks; (2) an elitist group with a business investment strategy (3) requiring the weakening/ delegitimization of American originalist fundamental law interpretation, (4) a disregard for the most careful and thoughtful stewardship of the American national economy, (5) a dramatic default on educational standards that prioritize a racist doctrine (CRT) instead of critical thinking, (6) and a negative targeting of the U.S. traditional energy industry exactly at the time that the U.S. Bureau of Land Management has published that the U.S. has half of all the producible shale oil in the world, and the Supreme Court has published its June 2022 ruling opinion deconstructing the scheme of targeting the U.S. traditional energy market.</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 20px;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none; font-size: medium;"><i>What is the path of national political unanimity that our elected representatives in government and our Justices should follow? Is it not so that the fastest way to political stability, economic success, and faith in government, is also the gentlest?</i></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 20px;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none; font-size: medium;">It would seem that the way would be slow, given that approaching the national agreement of hundreds of millions of Americans who are represented in government through their states elected officials may be downright impossible. </span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 20px;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none; font-size: medium;">Finding the best, center way for the greatest quality of life, economy, and judicial practice of equal liberty and justice for all, must begin and land on the gentlest, harmless principles of America being a nation of laws created from a solemn regard for the natural law of human rights, and the creation of government for said purpose: <i>the original proclamations of fundamental law and the linking of them with the establishment of all the people of the United States of America as one people in 1776, and in 1787 with the Declaration of Independence and our Constitution.</i></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 20px;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none; font-size: medium;">Whereas, his fellow colleagues and founding fathers of the American nation wrote ‘The Federalist Papers,’ (John Jay, Alexander Hamilton, James Madison) introducing the Constitution itself to the people through 85 independently published essays; detailing the structure and its inner workings, powers, duties, limitations, and diverse functions of government offices, <b>John Adams</b>, in his published letters in ‘<i>A Defence of The Constitutions of Government of the United States of America,</i>’ contributes a special literary work of great, practical, judicial, legislative, executive, and prescient national significance for our time due to that he seeks to express the fairness, practicality, and reasonableness of the structure of the American constitutional republic when compared to other experiments in government across time. The threat of faction to the life of a functioning government ‘of & for the people’ was his great thought and forewarning, also joining George Washington in communicating the utter need for the nation’s educational standards to raise up great, independent, critically thinking minds as healthy sentinels of the gentlest, safest path, according to the original spirit of the American law. He saw that the built-in supports and safety checks within the Constitution would make the nation thrive for the longest time possible because its foundational ’spirit of the law’ is the natural, self-evident, unalienable natural law of humanity, this being the gravitational ballast of the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution. </span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 20px;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none; font-size: medium;">In his writings, John Adams, conversational, ‘on-point’ and ‘down-to-earth’ in his letters, expresses the Continental Congress’s deliberation and reasoning in studying the efficacy of different governments across time, how those performed in completion, why they showed promise, where they failed, and finally, his sincerest approach unto the intellect of his reading audience, as he offers why the American system, in the ‘originalist’ understanding that he had of it, is simply the best, safest form of self-government:</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 20px;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; text-align: left;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none; font-size: medium;">The ultimate effect of the constitutional republic government, he put forth as a political scientist & expert diplomat, was that the people be safe, happy, educated and at peace. These conditions would & do naturally flow from the practice of an ‘originalist,’ just interpretation of Constitutional law amongst the Supreme Court personnel, from a vibrant and thriving national economy that is ‘free’ from ideological regulations, and in fact, allowed to be individually diversely distributed: teeming with small business creation. The right conditions flow also from exacting a standard of dynamic education (economically independent, critical thinkers) that shapes truly, objective, analytical, and civic-minded 21st century American citizens, that the whole stability of our nation be assured. So it is, whereas a strong executive office is required to make decisions in a timely manner to effect the continuity of a safe and happy people, without that strong executive office, or in the absence of a president striving lawfully to genuinely attain that unanimity in the tone and action of their leadership, the Presidency can become, and is even today, —a source of national political polarization, rather than a good steward of true political peace, individual economic strength, and skillful diplomacy that is selfless and in allegiance to the founding revolutionary spirit that prizes individual human liberty with government being ‘of us & for us.’ </span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 20px;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none; font-size: medium;">Did John Adams speak of the importance of critical thinking & political science being taught to each American generation? Yes. That from that fountain, the nation may have the best odds at creating dynamic ‘national resiliency,’ with American’s who are objective, analytical, and with a penchant for civility in their advocacy; striving lawfully; valuing the effect of being well-informed ‘constitutional originalist,—’ understanding the spirit & intent of what kind of service the law was created to render, and how that contrasts with how the law is presently being interpreted. </span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 20px;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none; font-size: medium;">How else will we have the informed and independent intellectual reasoning to heed the warnings of the writers of ‘The Federalist Papers:’ that the great threat to all governments has always been a factious spirit of self-interest that is distinct from the unanimous good of all the people?</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 20px;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none; font-size: medium;">Looking at the present divide in the interpretation of Constitutional law (fundamental law) as it pertains to the right to life, between 1973 and 2022, that right to life was interpreted differently amongst the personnel of the U.S. Supreme Court with the ruling opinion being that the beginning of us as humans, in all our uniqueness, glory and fragility, as we grow into becoming these tremendously intelligent humans, could have our life ended while still in the womb. Suddenly, life & liberty, two historical cornerstones that truly brought us together, though we be such a diverse people from all nations, could be decided in such a way that women could get a human in their womb aborted and killed,—legally.</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 20px;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><i></i></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none; font-size: medium;"><b><i>Popular Sovereignty</i></b></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 20px;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><b><i></i></b></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none; font-size: medium;"><b><i>A person could legally own another person, </i></b></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none; font-size: medium;"><b><i>and the government, nor anyone else, </i></b></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none; font-size: medium;"><b><i>can say anything about it. </i></b></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 20px;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><i></i></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none; font-size: medium;">Is political national unity the priority of the Democrat Party, as it exists in its present form as a ‘tent of political lobbying groups,’ each with their self-interest, in example, the international abortion lobby that commandeers half a billion dollars from the U.S. government each year?</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 20px;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">The Democrat Party resurrected ‘popular sovereignty:’ the same governing principle that the Democrat’s expressed as the justification for slavery, through their spokesperson </span>in the 1850’s, Senator Stephen Douglas. This is the same Stephen Douglas that debated Abraham Lincoln, and through their public speeches, one expressing the righteousness of slavery and the spirit and letter of the law as agreeing with the trade, with Lincoln deconstructing his opponents ideological underpinnings, including distinguishing the congressional intent, as found in government record, of the founding fathers to avoid tumult and quietly and quickly end the barbarism of slavery. Their work is recorded in the congressional record, and secondly through their writings, and finally, once again brought forward in Lincoln’s intellectual prosecution of slavery and the unanimous good of the people and American government. Lincoln was striving lawfully for the gentlest, original intent for the purpose of government, seeing that the life of the political unity of the nation was in the fold. George Washington successfully worked with Congress to constrain slavery from expanding into new territories, and with Congress, from being imported into the nation. Whereas, John Adams refused to own slaves, and was resolute with the founding fathers that slavery had to be brought to an end if the nation was to survive as one championing the right to life and liberty.</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 20px;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none; font-size: medium;">These individuals mentioned, saw faction afar off as the great ‘catapulto' and downfall of all nations, because government can, has been, and is used for narrow ends. For what is government, but offices with powers, duties, and limits: our elected representatives filling these offices, with the duty of having to do their work according to the letter and spirit of the Constitution.</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 20px;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none; font-size: medium;">On what shall the political peace and unity of Americans stand then, and is it not a spirit of liberty and justice for all, agreeing to have these rights as long as we lawfully respect the rights of all others, that if these rights are not lawfully respected we can seek redress through the courts and law enforcement? But we also agreed to form as one people that we may form and have an army of soldiers to protect us. And what should that army of soldiers fight for? These ideas at the core of what should be our national unity <i>do matter</i>, our understanding of these things does matter. —It is the greatest country of all time <i>because</i> of its principles of cherishing equal liberty and justice for all. These principles <i>are</i> our fundamental laws. An American can find them written as the definitive letter & spirit of just law in our Declaration of Independence, and in the Bill of Rights within our Constitution. That<i> because we have our fundamental liberties,</i> we can also self-determine our economic life, <i>is the reason that the American economy is also the greatest in the world. </i></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 20px;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none; font-size: medium;">But now there is this strife in the land. The Democrat Party ‘tent of factions’ does not only have environmental business investment alliances with an international, socialist geopolitical / geoeconomic global cabal of elites, but the Democrats are resolute in having the abortion industry entrenched in its instrumentality of government through representatives who had to adhere to the ‘abortion litmus test.’ </span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 20px;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none; font-size: medium;">Again, <i>What is the path of national political unanimity that our elected representatives in government and our Justices should follow, the gentlest and fastest way to political stability, economic success, and faith in government?</i></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 20px;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none; font-size: medium;">Those who are for abortion appear fierce and vehement in their stance and in response to the Supreme Court ruling opinion in the summer of 2022, proclaiming abortion as unconstitutional and not within the historical context of what our land of liberty and justice for all has always been about. The issue of us being human and having our life legally protected is of essential importance to the continuity of our nation. That is to say, the relevancy of the breakdown in national political unity on such a core fundamental law should be such a powerful motivator to awaken the hearts of the people unto lawful action to make ‘being harmless,’ the new ‘normal’ and that the interpretation of Constitutional law once again completely returning to the gentlest interpretation, safeguarding the human right to life, and in doing so, re-legitimizing the strength of the Supreme Court:</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 20px;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none; font-size: medium;">Greater will be the abrasiveness, the tumult & societal polarization if abortion is not rapidly hindered, limited, constrained. Because it is not only the life of the individual, but the people’s faith in the responsible, legitimate stewardship of government, according to the letter & spirit of the Declaration of Independence & the U.S. Constitution. </span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 20px;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none; font-size: medium;">The right to our own life & individual liberty are the most valuable fundamental natural laws of humanity, and we proclaimed and recorded these rights as the most important national ideas that could bring the most unanimous agreement amongst such a diverse citizenry in two great collections of authority from the people, by the people, and for the sake of the people: the Declaration of 1776, and the Constitution (1787) .</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 20px;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none; font-size: medium;">Is it intolerance of the Democrat Party to force a societal normalization of human abortion amongst the people, though there is so much opposition to abortion? Will the selling of abortion pills in all communities of the United States of America bring greater peace, or dramatically increase division in our communities? What shall the Supreme Court say in 2023 as it decides if abortion-on-demand pills from a CVS & Walgreens pharmacy can be sold? How shall its decision edify the strength of the Court’s legitimacy as a gentle, yet strong and just magistrate of fundamental law?</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 20px;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 20px;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space: pre;"> <span> <span> <span> <span> <span> <span> <span> <span> <span> <span> <span> <span> </span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span>3</p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 20px;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none; font-size: medium;">The accomplishment of the people of the American colonies to form and support the first Continental Congress: representatives of each colony establishing the American government was unique in its dynamic attainment of success done with the greatest foresight, with and most solemn attention for the greatest good and regard for individual human life and liberty, that we be safe & happy, age and generation after age and generation; government being established to assure protection of these inalienable, self-evident human rights, that in that gentle mode,— unanimity of national spirit to support equal liberty and justly interpret the law, according to its original meaning.</span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none; font-size: medium;"><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none; font-size: medium;">Otherwise, in the changing of the ‘originalist’ understanding of the establishment of the American nation, what we have is devalued human life: a nation founded on the value of life, having its core principle become altogether opposite in its letter & spirit. The validity of the Supreme Court, the people’s faith that the government is ‘of us and for us,’ according to the original spirit and intent of the founding fathers requires the gentle interpretation of Constitutional law, that the nation and its people be saved from the senseless slaughter of abortion and international economic exploitation.</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 20px;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><br /><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none; font-size: medium;">It was our founding fathers, and the work of champions of liberty & and justice for all, having strived lawfully, having been selfless, understanding that we are best as a people who value human life, and the centering of the purpose of our government around this value; this position being the very gentle nature that allows us to thrive as individuals, members of families, communities, and as one American people:</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 20px;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; text-align: left;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none; font-size: medium;">These <i>are</i> our principles as the people who inherit the Declaration of Independence and our U.S. Constitution. We are about life & liberty, that ‘we the people’ be safe and happy. </span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; text-align: left;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none; font-size: medium;"><br /></span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; text-align: left;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none; font-size: medium;"></span></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEihiyXest79VGfewfSdKKBbS-RVptomf2Vxle6i2gKSwmG9xrwN4bDKqu7bz-jT35BI42fjj6YK5O7zYpCWbf5Vli11BfzC_0IH90kklEnrYPpwMG0YLiA-YysMdDGN2nhlMn6uQ8GKUujGuHVKda9iaWIxR4SWx4pkfAkW1qASULgEJLN3mW2rBh-1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><img alt="" data-original-height="973" data-original-width="1200" height="518" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEihiyXest79VGfewfSdKKBbS-RVptomf2Vxle6i2gKSwmG9xrwN4bDKqu7bz-jT35BI42fjj6YK5O7zYpCWbf5Vli11BfzC_0IH90kklEnrYPpwMG0YLiA-YysMdDGN2nhlMn6uQ8GKUujGuHVKda9iaWIxR4SWx4pkfAkW1qASULgEJLN3mW2rBh-1=w640-h518" width="640" /></span></a></div><p></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 20px;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none; font-size: medium;">But where are our sentinels today? And where are the sons & daughters who will stop the wars from happening before they happen, where are the intellects and the lawful striving for political unity without subverting our economy unto a strange balance of world order where ‘elitist socialism’ dictates the new normal according to their changing narrative?</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 20px;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none; font-size: medium;">Ardent American civilians would undoubtedly need the critical thinking minds of political scientist, rising from their seats to thoughtfully, gently, and solemnly defend and restore, rather than impose, gaslight, and distract. These are not necessarily our brave soldiers with guns, or our dedicated police officers at-the-ready, but civilians. —Our sons and daughters who put on that legal mind of Abraham Lincoln, having read his speeches and writings, finding that we love the selfless man,—because he loved the U.S. first, and put himself, heart and mind into a special kind of fight, one of gentle stewardship and striving for national unanimity. </span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 20px;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 20px;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 20px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="font-size: medium; white-space: pre;"> </span></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-size: 13px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 20px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p><div class="blogger-post-footer">ScalziOriginals.US
Build ecosystems & individuals
to strengthen & sustain
integrated community health. </div>@CoachBill007http://www.blogger.com/profile/00964006939825613259noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4249677153801659195.post-76538254928560824182022-12-04T16:28:00.001+02:002022-12-04T20:02:56.860+02:00 Introduction of a Study on The 'Command & Control' Legislation "The Journalism Competition and Preservation Act" And Its Purposed Effect On Civic Journalism: The Champion Outsiders We Must Always Have<p></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEiHRaOslp-xeFT81KfYVy31W0Ao1oV_X8bs_EsEQN2EoIyIlNNmI11WPhcUiBmGbVB-Rrlt0tU_tsR0EsdPoxucM2bC5zh3rA5wLP7pPZawXXb_XdmstKP_4iisY-J9Mzhwgsr_sDiL10GIRdjn-OIv6DTMRXPGfFPb5x3WhrKQ_rJ7MxtlWX7R8rAG" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"></a><table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><tbody><tr><td style="text-align: center;"><img alt="" data-original-height="553" data-original-width="800" height="442" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEiHRaOslp-xeFT81KfYVy31W0Ao1oV_X8bs_EsEQN2EoIyIlNNmI11WPhcUiBmGbVB-Rrlt0tU_tsR0EsdPoxucM2bC5zh3rA5wLP7pPZawXXb_XdmstKP_4iisY-J9Mzhwgsr_sDiL10GIRdjn-OIv6DTMRXPGfFPb5x3WhrKQ_rJ7MxtlWX7R8rAG=w640-h442" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" width="640" /></td></tr><tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">The chair of the individual civic writer has the capacity to be unconstrained by political and monetary pressure. It is the place for intellect and liberty to flow on a common endeavor. It can be a seat that proclaims justice; a place from which the status quo can be shaken; a source through which ill-serving strongholds can be brought down.</td></tr></tbody></table><br /><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEiHRaOslp-xeFT81KfYVy31W0Ao1oV_X8bs_EsEQN2EoIyIlNNmI11WPhcUiBmGbVB-Rrlt0tU_tsR0EsdPoxucM2bC5zh3rA5wLP7pPZawXXb_XdmstKP_4iisY-J9Mzhwgsr_sDiL10GIRdjn-OIv6DTMRXPGfFPb5x3WhrKQ_rJ7MxtlWX7R8rAG" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"></a></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><span style="text-align: left;"><b> The growing tide of humanity is readily entering the fastest growing practice of individual liberty in the 21st century, civic journalism.</b></span></div><br />Does the profession of civic journalism directly compliment the foundational core strength of the United States of America as the highest echelon of responsible, 'thought-out,' ordered expression;' a 'long-form' work of 'individual free speech' that employs the enterprising of critical thinking skills as the writer presents their observations and reasoning to the readers, and through the auspices of the mainstay of the internet to be an 'open source' framework through which to channel intellect, a bulwark of the defense of liberty?<div><p></p><p>It is certainly observed that so many corporate 'mainstream media' news organizations slant their publishing of information in order to promote a politic or national agenda; a polarization of politics that have left off any semblance of objective reporting, and taken on the selection of news as it supports the political party agenda that each corporate news organization seems to support.</p><p>Currently, their is an introduced legislation before the U.S. Congress, "The Journalism Competition and Preservation Act." It is not a legislative action that has originated from a national grouping of civic journalists. It is yet another scheme to control the hierarchy, process and distribution of news information that would place restrictions on the 'free market' entrance of individual writers to create, share & distribute informational content, including the use of links that originate from corporate news media. Likewise, the legislation is aimed at placing a distinction between employee journalists who write for news-media companies, and independent journalists who are self-employed, or working on their own behalf for the good of community in their civic endeavors.</p><p>A reading of the proposed legislation brings to mind that a conglomeration of corporate news media seeks greater control over the flow of information production. This is alarming. The continuation of new regulations that favor the expansion of the slanted journalism practices that have characterized what is called 'mainstream media' will only lead to a populace that is more and more polarized, deprived of critical thinking objectivity, and finally, an absence of what should be most sought after and protected as it pertains to the quality of our national conversation: our voices. </p><p>What the legislation does is invent a new power that can be used to demand monetary payment in a court of law for the use of their work, even if it is an address web link, or if the civic writer has an individual membership to the news platform and accesses information from an article and properly includes it in their published work. The proposed legislation has strict parameters as to who can be identified as an 'eligible broadcaster,' and 'eligible digital journalism provider,' and connects these jobs to a company, identified as a 'covered platform' making a net profit or have a market capitalization of at least $550, 000, 000 per year, and 50,000,000 monthly active users. Such a cartel would only include a few companies, and would definitely stop independent, civic journalist from being able to easily join and contribute to the national and international conversational flow of ideas. Not only would the cartel of large, corporate social media companies be able to limit, if not altogether stop the use of their material as 'a source' in the work of an independent writer or civic journalist, but can bring them to court and exact a tremendous financial cost upon them, thus, limiting and hindering the market entrance of individual civic journalist into the national conversation.</p><p>It is no surprise that this piece of 'command & control' legislation is being channelled through the Democrat Political Party, or that the scheme bears resemblance of two of the other projects of the Democrat Party, namely, the overregulation of America's traditional fuel industry, and its legislation (Inflation Reduction Act) to align the U.S. economy and redistribution of its taxes to be international managed by the World Bank/ European Commission ideological-influence development business investment scheme in Third-World or 'Global South' nations. The behavior politic and scheme to control is the same in the three instances. It is yet another attempt to squelch the defense of liberty by individuals, and to control the flow and production of information, that the ideological objectives may more readily achieve their desired goals without the opposition of independent, civic journalists.</p><p>Writing as a civic work is both, the beginning and continuous source of 'free intellectual' observation and record, and its unhindered growth as a national 'must' is the lawful way for the people to strive as citizens. Therefore, corporate media news attempts to form 'cartels' or unionization of corporatist news media that would control the creation, distribution, and process of information production of individual civic journalists or civic writers through the lobbying, and ultimately, legislation of senators and congressional representatives in our U.S. Congress <i>should be studied and deconstructed</i>; it should be met with alarm, and steadfastly opposed as a degradation of the ability to practice and intellectually, or a the least, civically champion individual human rights, the cornerstone of our national American body.</p><p>Consider Frederick Douglass and Charles Dickens: both of these exemplary champions of liberty began their work as outsiders to the established news media of their time, and both brought railing opposition to the 'status quo' of their day. Dickens workmanship is found in his critique of the allowance of the land-owning class to disregard the plight of the working class of England in the mid-1800s, including its apathy on child-labor laws, and basic human decency amongst the people. He also was adamant in his position against human slavery, as was Frederick Douglass, who was a public speaker and writer, replete with his own newspaper. Douglass was certainly opposed, seeing his printing presses being destroyed at times, and his life in constant peril because of his civic work as a writer. </p><p>Both of these individuals had to make their own way: their work, both in written long-form, and in public speaking was a service to humanity and to the foundation that holds society together, individual human liberty and justice for all.</p><p><b>Individual liberty is winning, and they don't like it; it is a threat to them:</b></p><p>The legislative regulation of the civic writer's process to create, share, distribute and reach the people must not be hindered, and instead, let it be used to bring the conglomeration of narrow-minded, corporate news-self-interest's manipulation of slanted news information production to a grinding halt; calling its biased indoctrination into light; calling out its ploy to censor, diffuse, constrain, and monopolize information. Has it not been found that mainstream news media companies like to control the national conversation through their process of information production and distribution? Such a legislative act, 'the Journalism Competition and Preservation Act," is misleading in its title, and would hinder individual, civic-minded journalism, allowing large corporate news organizations an absolute leverage in the control of the national conversation. </p><p><b>Through whom and with what political party have they introduced the legislation? </b></p><p>Democrat Senator Amy Klobuchar voted for monetary and tax alignment to the European Commission/ World Bank Global Tax project agenda that seeks to control the monetary and tax policy of participating nations and redistribute the strength of their economies to serve poor nations, while also targeting the traditional fuel industries of these wealthy nations with the goal of rapidly bringing these to a closure, that the renewable energy industry may experience an economic investment opportunity. The same polarizing 'command & control' behavior that Democrats have employed in the unconstitutional alignment (with their Inflation Reduction Act objectives being in sync with the European Commission/ World Bank Global Tax Project; both, nearly identical in their objectives), is also in play with 'The Journalism Competition and Preservation Act.' It should be no surprise that the European Commission has threatened to block the world's most well-known micro-blog platform, Twitter, from being available in Europe as a 'distributed' national/ international conversation 'town hall,' now that it is no longer controlled by their favored political party ideology in the United States. The quality of the conversation became much more balanced after serial-entrepreneur Elon Musk purchased it, fired almost all of its staff, and has begun to take actions to approach a more fair and distributed individual expression,-- and this is having a corrosive effect on the implementation of an elite-controlled globalist agenda. </p><p><b>They Are Afraid:</b></p><p>They are afraid of the rising power of individual writers who are joining 'the fray' in including themselves in what matters to them. The large, corporatist social media news companies cannot compete against hundreds of thousands of civic writers; of Frederick Douglass's and Charles Dickens-styled individual voices. The distributed diversification of so many new civilians using the tools, instruments, and media platforms, destabilizes and decreases the imposing singular volume of the 'linearity' of the narratives that these large corporations are seeking to maintain. They are afraid because they recognize the impact of the work of outsiders, and they understand that one individual can be powerful, let alone, hundreds of thousands. So it is, the 'outsiders' are the champions and always will be.</p><p><br /></p><p></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEgTq0BHWO93WHOnMkVDFUTmeX8wcnPhGMNPYjB-z-Y4PL26XELxTvQtIsDwZPhNMuSxjCJ77sfFQkDoqkZ6_Yqi-9Hvq068df_yiMk41yo_VgltUbXtG7HJ6C1qMCyAZQ4v4B3rQVnLWPfJR28gLEGz9eoH-gkIpYXP-Wvo23bW9dxAxbzjTmC9DwEY" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img alt="" data-original-height="1123" data-original-width="1600" height="450" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEgTq0BHWO93WHOnMkVDFUTmeX8wcnPhGMNPYjB-z-Y4PL26XELxTvQtIsDwZPhNMuSxjCJ77sfFQkDoqkZ6_Yqi-9Hvq068df_yiMk41yo_VgltUbXtG7HJ6C1qMCyAZQ4v4B3rQVnLWPfJR28gLEGz9eoH-gkIpYXP-Wvo23bW9dxAxbzjTmC9DwEY=w640-h450" width="640" /></a></div><br /><p><br /></p><p><br /></p></div><div class="blogger-post-footer">ScalziOriginals.US
Build ecosystems & individuals
to strengthen & sustain
integrated community health. </div>@CoachBill007http://www.blogger.com/profile/00964006939825613259noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4249677153801659195.post-48006005358542305112022-11-14T21:08:00.018+02:002023-03-31T21:36:13.715+03:00The Disrespect Of The Strategy Of Ideological Swarm: An Ends in Itself & Also To Internationalize Command Of America's Economy <div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgw9wnRICBs6q9vjZcPBjA6RDBAkmIhVRQub-kf7FyicJwskZcEYMW-xDIy7wIFIVYi38nLsLBVosNFAnuYgVNC3FkXfZgygjeAOThPCDBq90ehxxm3Jbdfai2YtrAptM3bJuDGv52IROdkwpKBaoGivxxW5JL4RnFR_ZAJrEprvsZjD0f67JjStKeB/s842/e6bce99d5799413282348d9ec5972eaf.jpg.webp" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><br /><img border="0" data-original-height="842" data-original-width="770" height="640" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgw9wnRICBs6q9vjZcPBjA6RDBAkmIhVRQub-kf7FyicJwskZcEYMW-xDIy7wIFIVYi38nLsLBVosNFAnuYgVNC3FkXfZgygjeAOThPCDBq90ehxxm3Jbdfai2YtrAptM3bJuDGv52IROdkwpKBaoGivxxW5JL4RnFR_ZAJrEprvsZjD0f67JjStKeB/w586-h640/e6bce99d5799413282348d9ec5972eaf.jpg.webp" width="586" /></a></div><br />
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 20px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; -webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral;">The United States of America, a nation of laws, founded on the unanimous agreement of natural law, immediately decreed that the protection of human rights, to the assurance that the people be safe and happy, with their fundamental rights being foremost the brick and mortar of our establishment, solemnly declared, that it be the mainstay and cornerstone upon which the whole edifice of our national unity both stands and rests. As such, the presence of efforts and actions </span><span style="font-family: STIXGeneral;"><span style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial;">of foreign powers and international financial institutions</span></span><span style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral;"> </span><span style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral;">to meddle with the instrumentality of the offices and powers of the American government with the intent to </span><span style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral;">commandeer its economic strength should be observed, </span><span style="font-family: STIXGeneral;"><span style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">deconstructed, and brought forward to the attention of the people.</span></span></p><p style="font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="font-family: STIXGeneral;"><span style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"><br /></span></span></p><p style="font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="font-family: STIXGeneral;"><span style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">But in a nation that has become ideologically divided and polarized for short-term political gain, consensus will not be reached. Our Declaration of Independence was our only unanimous agreement because it proclaimed that we are a nation of individual human rights; having these rights as long as we lawfully respect each other's rights to the same: our national political unity beginning on the foundational proclamation of equitable individual human rights. It is what makes the U.S.A. a unique superpower with the largest economy and most prosperous middle class in the world, because individual liberty and limited government creates the necessary conditions for a 'free market' filled with self-determination, innovation, competition, and ingenuity.</span></span></p><p style="font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="font-family: STIXGeneral;"><span style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"><br /></span></span></p><p style="font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="font-family: STIXGeneral;"><span style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">Shall we allow a supra-national government commission that is foreign to the United States control our economy, and expatriate our taxes unto their ideological projects in foreign nations? How would that affect our economic and political balance of power in relation to the world? If half of the American nation is against such an action, how shall we preserve the political unity of America? Can we impose a radically different way of life on each other? Should we? Is that pragmatic and the gentlest way to do things?</span></span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 20px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEgthCZBEgMG4c0fJyKngayu919aOse9QNK7AKe8XYcfIorqMXAKJWnuE_bySxfUNvKVD-IhN5h0naFz4sM8ydRHyt7Q-sJkPZUw8g7ak-7ScS2OX7qM3McN_TWAjJ3YJCtIven_ic5XkLCcTUoh06IcHmaC7Wj3-igd4BFRvjAGTkoxBxLlz856M_1j" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img alt="" data-original-height="1206" data-original-width="1600" height="483" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEgthCZBEgMG4c0fJyKngayu919aOse9QNK7AKe8XYcfIorqMXAKJWnuE_bySxfUNvKVD-IhN5h0naFz4sM8ydRHyt7Q-sJkPZUw8g7ak-7ScS2OX7qM3McN_TWAjJ3YJCtIven_ic5XkLCcTUoh06IcHmaC7Wj3-igd4BFRvjAGTkoxBxLlz856M_1j=w640-h483" width="640" /></a></div></div>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 20px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">Who and how shall teach and educate the people to be taught to be independent-minded, critical thinkers, to always be on guard, defending the American way of life from those ever-present schemes and sleights of self-interest that would seek to undermine the economic and political strength of the United States of America? So it be, that although it is the hope that America’s schools produce a maximum number of civilians who are true and unvarnished in their selflessness, that our schools, parents, and communities render a people who are their ‘brother’s keeper,’ the default condition of humanity seems to stray away from assuring such defense and tends to complacency. Most definitely in the age of 'Tik Tok,' and short-amusement videos that do not edify character, but default it into a feeling of indifference; altogether, a drain on young American's mental energy and solemness to civic duty. It is in that complacency that the self-interest of some enters the void left from the required guarding of our liberty’s and the avarice of financial enrichment at the expense of the good of the people occurs; that in the length of time, it unfortunately renders the conditions for factious designs and self-opportunity to advance its position.</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 20px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">And that is what the European Commission has been doing with Janet Yellen, the World Bank, and the Biden administration: an internationalization of ‘commanding & controlling monetary and tax policy, along with an expatriation of vast sums of tax wealth from the United States of America, being channeled through an international central bank that would then deploy the funds according to their chosen ideological solutions in Africa and Asia. Not only is the encroachment on U.S. national sovereignty a disrespect to the people of America, but it is an open attack on our way of life, our Constitution, and the fundamental principles of American’s as an independent people. What is more, the design of self-interest is far into its sprint already: its Global Tax Program initiative is the embodiment of its supra-international, geoeconomic/ geopolitical business influence scheme and a reading of it calls the 130 participating “shareholder” nations who have signed on to the agenda to enact legislation to align their national economy’s as a precursor to fully enabling the machination of the financial/ political power construction.</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 20px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">In the United States of America, the legislation is the Inflation Reduction Act. Both, the World Bank’s Global Tax Program and the Democrats Inflation Reduction Act are aligned in the objective to rapidly bring traditional fuel industries to a halt, in order to create the void for renewable and clean energy markets to profit. As has been carefully described in the U.S. Supreme Courts ruling opinion on West Virginia v. EPA, decided on June 30, 2022, an Environmental Protection Director described the energy transition as more of a business investment opportunity than about climate and pollution stewardship. That particular court’s analysis and decision should not be disregarded, but respected as an independent, and sober study into the transgressions of the EPA as an ideological front for the international agenda that the Democrat Party has aligned with.</span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><br /></span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgcVsPP8n8XIIbEt1rK5L0p4Z1FDFqgjzspaClQ3R-8Bbu0KDIXwoNWkAVndDVs-PR85nxKlhS2bS4AHOQQlWwHWEgD2-qm2d0eCOSDa7VKl1uVkjp5K5L7U4obuiCsF46fhFH7Hjic2Z7KaBZCEOKse1Pr_HorQV75knJt5BvbDG5ESjmQs3HYLxt6/s534/Screen%20Shot%202022-09-29%20at%201.22.26%20PM.png" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="534" data-original-width="324" height="766" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgcVsPP8n8XIIbEt1rK5L0p4Z1FDFqgjzspaClQ3R-8Bbu0KDIXwoNWkAVndDVs-PR85nxKlhS2bS4AHOQQlWwHWEgD2-qm2d0eCOSDa7VKl1uVkjp5K5L7U4obuiCsF46fhFH7Hjic2Z7KaBZCEOKse1Pr_HorQV75knJt5BvbDG5ESjmQs3HYLxt6/w499-h766/Screen%20Shot%202022-09-29%20at%201.22.26%20PM.png" width="499" /></a></div><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 20px;"><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">What is grievous in the matter, and relevant to the people of the United States is that Janet Yellen, Secretary of the Treasury in the Biden Administration, and former presiding central bank Federal Reserve governor, is that she has been the lead proponent in the foreign lobbying of the 130 nations, on behalf of the World Bank. This represents a conflict of interest with her role as a government official, and it is treason against the Constitution (Article 3, section 3, clause 1), in that she has been willfully and openly aiding and helping the European Commission and World Bank to control the instrumentality of the American government, with the intent to undermine its economy and manipulate its wealth unto its ideological financial schemes, causing tremendous economic disruption to vital American industries (oil, coal, natural gas), that in turn have caused an inflation and volatility of price stability in the United States. </span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 20px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">Prior to the Inflation Reduction Act being legislated in Congress in the Sumer of 2022, the same exact actions were outlined in the U.S. Supreme Court’s opinion in West Virginia v. EPA, wherein, a prevailing question was not limited to <b><i>if there was congressional authorization</i></b> for actions that were and are exceedingly disruptive to the nation’s fuel industry, but that it was found that such overregulation of the U.S. traditional fuel industry was simply a scheme to create an investment opportunity.</span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><br /></span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; text-align: left;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><i><br /></i></span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; text-align: left;"><i><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span></i></p><i style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-family: "STIX Two Text"; text-align: left;"></span></i><blockquote><i style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-family: "STIX Two Text"; text-align: left;">John Adams</span></i><br /><i style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-family: "STIX Two Text"; text-align: left;">Paris, July 21, 1781</span></i><br /><i style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-family: "STIX Two Text"; text-align: left;">Letter to the Comte de Vergennes, Charles Gravier, </span></i><div><i style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-family: "STIX Two Text"; text-align: left;">Foreign Minister of France</span></i><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px;"><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px;"></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><div><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-family: STIX Two Text;"><i><br /></i></span></div></div></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><i><span style="font-family: "STIX Two Text";"> </span><span style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: "STIX Two Text";">“By this Constitution, all Power and Authority, of negotiating with foreign Powers is expressly delegated to the United States, in Congress assembled. It would therefore be a public Disrespect and Contempt offered, to the Constitution of the Nation if any Power Should make any Application, whatever, to the Governors, or Legislatures of the Separate States.</span><br /><span style="font-family: "STIX Two Text";">(continued)</span><br /><span style="font-family: STIX Two Text;"><br /></span><span style="font-family: "STIX Two Text";">If the two Imperial Courts Should address their Articles to the States Separately No Governor or President of any one of those Commonwealths, could even communicate it to the Legislature. No President of a Senate could lay it, before the Body, over which he presides. No speaker of an House of Representatives could read it to the House.</span><br /><span style="font-family: STIX Two Text;"><br /></span><span style="font-family: "STIX Two Text";">It would be an Error, and a Misdemeanour, in any of these officers, to receive and communicate any Such Later. All that he could do would be, after breaking the Seal and reading it, to Send it back. He could not, even, legally transmit it to Congress. If such an Application, therefore, Should be made and Sent back, it would consume, much time to no Purpose, and perhaps have other worse Effects.</span><br /></i><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px;"></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><span style="font-family: STIX Two Text;"><i><br /></i></span><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; text-align: left;"></p><div style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-family: STIX Two Text;"><i><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none;">There is no method for the Courts of Europe, to convey any Thing to the People of America but through the Congress of the United States, nor any way of negotiating with them, but by means of that Body. I must therefore intreat your Excellency, that the Idea of Summoning Ministers from the thirteen States may not be countenanced at all."</span> </i></span></div></div></blockquote><div><div style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-family: STIX Two Text;"><i></i></span></div>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 20px; text-align: left;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; text-align: left;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">To be clear, the parameters of that case focused on the ideological command & control of America’s traditional fuel industry with intent to cause a rapid closure of the industry, that a new investment and funding market in renewable energy be created<i>, and not the ‘command & control of America’s monetary and tax policy with final intent of manifesting a funds channel for the expatriation of vast sums of U.S. tax wealth for the ideological funding of investment development programs in foreign nations. </i></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 20px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><i></i></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">The Inflation Reduction Act completes the pivotal piece of the international business investment scheme that purposes to upend the American economy, as if it were with a ‘horse bit’ that it be made subservient to the geopolitical and geoeconomic interests of the Democrat Party/ European Commission/ World Bank ideological investment agenda. Already, congressional authorization has been given for the continuance of the overregulation of the American traditional fuel industry, causing a stop on its ‘distributive diversification’ with new smaller companies into the market who could enhance competition at the inflection point when the U.S. Bureau of Land Management has published that the United States has more than 50% of all shale oil in the world (4.3 trillion barrels of potentially extractable oil).</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 20px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">If we read that above mentioned Supreme Court opinion, the World Bank’s Global Tax Program agenda report, the Inflation Reduction Act, and we observe and listen to the intentions and objectives of the European Commission we see a clear picture that an alignment is being actively pushed into place, and they are openly proclaiming that the imposition must be done for the good of all, or at least for the good of a ‘global-rules order,' as European Commission President Ursula Von Der Leyen exclaims.</span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><br /></span></p><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">Are 'global-rules order' synonymous with America's Declaration of Independence and its Constitution, or is it some different policy that has an ideological construction separate form America's sovereignty and own judicial order as a nation of laws? </span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 20px;"><br /></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">Such ‘command & control’ of U.S. monetary, tax and traditional fuel industry is an imposition and is anathema to the American way of life of economic self-determination and its national sovereignty as decreed in our Declaration of Independence and formally established in our Constitution. We cannot impose on each other national economic upheaval, or legislate away national sovereignty of our economy. Such actions are divisive, polarizing, and cause great societal strife.</span></p></blockquote>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 20px;"><br /><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">The Biden Administration and Janet Yellen openly declare their intentions to legislate away our economy to be an ideological financial economic source of funding with global rule of power being decided in the European Commission’s seat of power in Brussels: this presents a massive shift in the geopolitical and geoeconomic power of the United States, and great imposition of half of its people upon the other half; it being forced through extremist ideological politics to forego its ability to be economically independent and remain as the superpower in the world that is supposed to be the land of liberty, justice, and the opportunity of economic self-determination for all, <i><b>into having it become the political, ideological, and financial underling of a quasi-socialist, and resolutely elitist group of money robbers.</b></i></span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><br /></span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span></p><table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><tbody><tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEgVCpjOOlFHgOL_kTZgH8f2XrvrT1NXScdcJlUnM9vmJkePoxkPpMD6cJ_6xgChqhsAJApfR0ItLfaRwFMxkBG-B3ImWwq--M3SlVOKta6YEKjhD_gyaNZPKlQNYE5HVzvkaoVoFR5Iix9ArD4qGl5IUhNgAm7g1SC0dnCxNUPo3Iszv8p5JIa2BFD_" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img alt="" data-original-height="640" data-original-width="800" height="512" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEgVCpjOOlFHgOL_kTZgH8f2XrvrT1NXScdcJlUnM9vmJkePoxkPpMD6cJ_6xgChqhsAJApfR0ItLfaRwFMxkBG-B3ImWwq--M3SlVOKta6YEKjhD_gyaNZPKlQNYE5HVzvkaoVoFR5Iix9ArD4qGl5IUhNgAm7g1SC0dnCxNUPo3Iszv8p5JIa2BFD_=w640-h512" width="640" /></a></td></tr><tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><i>Abraham Lincoln was for balancing the achievement of preserving political unity under the idea and spirit of liberty and justice for all people, while also preserving the physical and societal integrity of the entire American nation. He understood foreign nations would seek to take advantage of alliances with Southern states. Picture of him on the field of battle with General George McClellan, a traitor to the cause, whom Lincoln questioned again and again as to his loyalties. <br />He later replaced him with General Ulysses S. Grant.</i></td></tr></tbody></table><p></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><br /></span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">The Inflation Reduction Act includes the </span>purposed over-regulation<span style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: initial;"> of the U.S. oil, natural gas, coal identified by our Supreme Court and the premises, goals, and objectives of the European Commission / World Bank's Global Tax Program. It has been adopted on party-line voting in Congress and, as usual, the national conversation was co-opted with fast-paced news media programming before the people had time to discuss the legislation, and its connection to the foreign agenda's being enacted.</span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;">No national conversation was truly had, and the fast-pace of congressional authorization is part of the same behavior politic of swarm and control with biased media narratives that spin approval stories; it is always the same mode of process that Democrats use to control public opinion geared towards electioneering the results that they want.</p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; text-align: center;"><i>Excerpt from John Adams, A Defence of the Constitution, 1788</i></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; text-align: center;"><i><br /></i></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgulVwhO0bOfes2mbR0OEnD_LTPVIHjLAqKF5qakqpiUSGu4VVuHMOYm2x7tPJT3Axs9Bk_fy-zuZrVHJ7as0m0pIkfK098cVFoLEKMvX1BVFwYhljUtkBqPJWRsIf2GqQ7xc9psu3gmKOx0CceCiFKYG3mEfh-e-Fkb037_pZOMbTFNiM9Zj3OgLmz/s917/0-3.jpeg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="917" data-original-width="509" height="640" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgulVwhO0bOfes2mbR0OEnD_LTPVIHjLAqKF5qakqpiUSGu4VVuHMOYm2x7tPJT3Axs9Bk_fy-zuZrVHJ7as0m0pIkfK098cVFoLEKMvX1BVFwYhljUtkBqPJWRsIf2GqQ7xc9psu3gmKOx0CceCiFKYG3mEfh-e-Fkb037_pZOMbTFNiM9Zj3OgLmz/w356-h640/0-3.jpeg" width="356" /></a></div><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 20px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none;"></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none;">Though it be that Janet Yellen and President Biden have no constitutional authority to subdue the United States and its governments in such ways, having actually committed treason against our Constitution, and the basic principles of our fundamental laws meant to preserve our national unity; both helping and aiding what is clearly an enemy to the American people, our historical economic traditions, our sovereign way of life, and its present economy, the silence of the news media, our Congress, and the lack of national conversation on the pressing matter also brings to light the objectivity of mainstream journalism and its relationship to the ideological and economic imposition that is underway. Ultimately, those who impose such agenda on the other half of the nation's people are pushing towards national division, economic upheaval, political polarization, and societal strife. </span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-size: 13px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><br /></span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-size: 13px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><br /></span></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br /></div><br /><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br /></div><br /><br /><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br /></div><br /></div><div class="blogger-post-footer">ScalziOriginals.US
Build ecosystems & individuals
to strengthen & sustain
integrated community health. </div>@CoachBill007http://www.blogger.com/profile/00964006939825613259noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4249677153801659195.post-91195738624541467962022-11-09T14:33:00.009+02:002023-03-01T22:57:29.920+02:00They Actively Proclaim Their Globalist Agenda With Condescension Unto American Conservatives<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgqc3RoaMJd1Gm0uukK-qpdaGZ0Lcza5vX2A8kys6efMr9i2p9Zj3kc_0DHdSFockU7ymPAT8nLeKbFn__-AJhx7hx0pgY30hf1GTkNmVKHg38E4QeT4V-_GHK9WiTHLmIJXoOax8xq0Zx8x9NMhLiXnRDpxoGJa9rH8BWoyWeaDckTO45tf_7YhiRd/s600/114958.jpg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="337" data-original-width="600" height="360" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgqc3RoaMJd1Gm0uukK-qpdaGZ0Lcza5vX2A8kys6efMr9i2p9Zj3kc_0DHdSFockU7ymPAT8nLeKbFn__-AJhx7hx0pgY30hf1GTkNmVKHg38E4QeT4V-_GHK9WiTHLmIJXoOax8xq0Zx8x9NMhLiXnRDpxoGJa9rH8BWoyWeaDckTO45tf_7YhiRd/w640-h360/114958.jpg" width="640" /></a></div><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><p style="text-align: left;"><b> <span style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral;">“As avenues to foreign influence in innumerable ways, such attachments are particularly alarming to the truly enlightened and independent Patriot. How many opportunities do they afford to tamper with domestic factions, to practice the arts of seduction, to mislead public opinion, to influence or awe the public Councils! Such an attachment of a small or weak, towards a great and powerful Nation, dooms the former to be the satellite of the latter.</span></b></p></blockquote><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; text-align: left;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><b>Against the insidious wiles of foreign influence, (I conjure you to believe me fellow citizens) the jealousy of a free people ought to be constantly awake; since history and experience prove that foreign influence is one of the most baneful foes of Republican Government. But that jealousy to be useful must be impartial; else its becomes the instrument of the very influence to be avoided, instead of a defence agains it. Excessive partiality for one foreign nation and excessive dislike of another, cause those whom they actuate to see danger only on one side, and serve to veil and even second the arts of influence on the other. Real Patriots, who may resist the intrigues of the favourite, are liable to become suspected and odious; while its tools and dupes unsure the applause and confidence of the people,</b></span><span style="text-align: left;"> </span><b>to surrender their interests.”</b></p></blockquote></blockquote>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><b><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></b></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; text-align: left;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><b><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space: pre;"> <span> <span> <span> <span> <span> </span></span></span> <span> </span></span></span></span></b></span><b><span><span> </span></span>President George Washington, </b><b>Farewell Address, 1796</b></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; text-align: left;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><b><span> <span> <span> <span> <span> <span> <span> <span> <span> <span> <span> <span> <span> <span> <span> <span> <span> <span> <span> <span> <span> </span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></b></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(26, 26, 26); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #1a1a1a; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><b>The interest of the supra-international European Commission is not the interest of America’s republican government, with its constitutional unction to be assembled ‘of and for’ the people, but instead, it is distinct in its continuous efforts of aggregation of the monetary and tax policy control of other nation’s centralized within a governing council: that it may solidify geopolitical and geoeconomic power, <i>at the expense of the diminishing of nation’s monetary sovereignty</i>, and as an administrative bureaucracy, it may effect its ideological influence as a corporate, globalist international monetary behemoth. </b></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(26, 26, 26); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #1a1a1a; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><b></b></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(26, 26, 26); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #1a1a1a; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><b>The end result is a centralized accumulation of military and monetary power that is channeled globally according to an ideological doctrine that is divisive and polarizing, and the whims and caprices of the governors and directors of the governing council and the global banks that they collaborate with. Their constant mode or process of administration is to always refute, block, and target attempts to displace it from its entrenchment, and to establish greater solidification of its monetary and tax control scheme through the creation of projects and programs that replicate its continued global growth. </b></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(26, 26, 26); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #1a1a1a; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><b></b></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(26, 26, 26); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #1a1a1a; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><b>Should the American people be alarmed? </b></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(26, 26, 26); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #1a1a1a; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><b></b></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(26, 26, 26); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #1a1a1a; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><b>What was the response of England unto the European Union; did they not break away (Brexit) from its monetary and tax requirements? The American people should understand that the European Commission: the governing council of the European Union, is exporting its monetary and tax project beyond the international borders of the European continent, and is in collaboration with an international bank (World Bank) to establish its administrative governing process to include a 130 nation geopolitical/ geoeconomic business cartel, called the Global Tax Program. The centralization of monetary and tax control of sovereign nations by a European supra-international governing council that has a partnership with an international bank is a threat to the independent sovereignty of the people and government of the United States of America; is in opposition to our Constitution, in opposition to our historical tradition of economic self-determination, and a ‘foreign influence’ with a distinct self-interest that is separate from the unanimous economic and societal well-being of all Americans.</b></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(26, 26, 26); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #1a1a1a; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><b></b></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(26, 26, 26); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #1a1a1a; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><b>Now, if it be so that the American people are not made aware, that in that void of information, the quality of the national conversation becomes stunted and skewed due to the craft of censorship of online information, or if it be that those of a particular politic (Democrats) are indifferent to an internationalization (globalist doctrine) of the United States economy, and its vital traditional energy industry, what recourse do the remaining conservative Americans have, but <i>to join the fray </i>with the utmost responsibility to maintaining complete civility as they earnestly defend and protect the independence and historical constitutional tradition of our individual liberty, and the right to self-determine how our national policy’s affect our personal and national economy, to the end point that we safeguard our sovereignty from the statecraft of the European Commission?</b></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(26, 26, 26); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #1a1a1a; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><b></b></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(26, 26, 26); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #1a1a1a; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><b>Is it the different people’s of sovereign European nations seeking to impose a quasi-socialist-elitist monetary and tax policy upon the people of the United States, that they may lord control over our economy, or is the governing council of the European Commission, an organization that chooses who is part of their council: these representatives being then approved by its President, completely separate from the standard process of representative government, with power emanating from the people, that is the United States government? Instead, the European Commission’s method of selection requires individuals to agree with the prevailing interest of the president of the governing council, if they are to be on that council. So it is, there is a distinct politic, ideology, and agenda, and all others have to acquiesce unto it. Is that not despotism, and is that despotism being slyly exported to the United States through the World Bank’s Global Tax Program? Already, do we see that congressional Democrats voted for the forerunner of the Global Tax Program with legislation called the ‘Inflation Reduction Act,’ that parallels the European Commission and World Bank’s Global Tax Program. One only has to read both writings to understand that they are nearly identical in aligning control of the economic and tax policy’s of participating countries, including their energy industries.</b></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(26, 26, 26); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #1a1a1a; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><b></b></span><br /></p>
<blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(26, 26, 26); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #1a1a1a; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><b><i>Why is Janet Yellen, Treasury Secretary in Biden’s Cabinet, the former presiding governor of the Federal Reserve, personally been the lead author of the 130 nation Global Tax Program and a tremendous promoter of the World Bank? Is that a conflict of interest with her duty as a government official to protect the Constitution of the United States? A case can be made that it is treason against the U.S. Constitution (Article 3, Section 3, Clause 1).</i></b></span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(26, 26, 26); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #1a1a1a; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><br /></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(26, 26, 26); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #1a1a1a; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><b><i>Why is the Federal Reserve, under the leadership of Jerome Powell, signaling to all national and international banks to continuing to increase interest rates on loans for small businesses, and residential purchases? Is it not so that such an action will have a suppressing economic effect on the number of loans that are made, and as such, will this not slow down America’s national economy? </i></b></span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(26, 26, 26); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #1a1a1a; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><br /></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(26, 26, 26); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #1a1a1a; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><b><i>Why is it that all other central banks across the world seem to follow and implement the same actions of the Federal Reserve; within 24 hours of the Federal Reserve expressing a change in the loan interest rate, most central banks replicate the same action, causing a simultaneous effect on the economy of the countries the reside in?</i></b></span></p></blockquote>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(26, 26, 26); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #1a1a1a; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(26, 26, 26); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #1a1a1a; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><b></b></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(26, 26, 26); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #1a1a1a; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><b>The monetary policy of central banks, be they in the U.S., or across the world, are in lock step accordance with the monetary / tax policy of the Global Tax Program of the World Bank, of the European Commission, of President Biden, his Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen, who moonlights as a spokesperson for the World Bank, and it is confederate with the command & control quasi-socialist-elitist policy of Congressional Democrats. That said, what these actions lack is unanimity amongst the people of the United States, and that makes these command & control economic schemes ‘factious:’ that is to say, a self-interest distinct from the unanimous approval and good ‘of and for’ all the American people.</b></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(26, 26, 26); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #1a1a1a; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><b></b></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(26, 26, 26); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #1a1a1a; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><b>Without unanimity of agreement, the national well-being of the American people can be divided. And to those who would seek such a route of causing division we must carefully observe, and with the greatest adherence to civility, refute. Think of the Declaration of Independence and the deliberation that went into establishing a nation on such principles as safeguarding individual human rights: it was only on such ideas that unanimity of liberty could be found: we have the right to life, liberty; to be safe & happy, and, after it has been clearly understood after a long train of abuses, to alter of abolish government that is not in alignment with these rights. Nothing else brings us together except the defense and championing of our liberties; our fundamental individual human rights, and this includes the sovereignty of economic self-determination.</b></span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(26, 26, 26); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #1a1a1a; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><b><br /></b></span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(26, 26, 26); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #1a1a1a; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgU-KWkdgki9gRubX3wi_b8oOSVKpnVAgViX-PZLTuhheRO-uICsBmAR8c28_zdSN0MP2_YGnVHez0yq1y9BiEvWbUUrxy2I_erlJPb4ud9m0o_g3HWbyvJp9s52ePUAX7wQEEPfH8gg8dLB_qH-dewO37-YreXrKExRHbhl3DovFwD6G8bR693_HI6/s1800/happy-birthday-to-the-us-navy.-the-united-states-navy-was-originally-established-as-the-continental-1-1.jpg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="1800" data-original-width="1440" height="640" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgU-KWkdgki9gRubX3wi_b8oOSVKpnVAgViX-PZLTuhheRO-uICsBmAR8c28_zdSN0MP2_YGnVHez0yq1y9BiEvWbUUrxy2I_erlJPb4ud9m0o_g3HWbyvJp9s52ePUAX7wQEEPfH8gg8dLB_qH-dewO37-YreXrKExRHbhl3DovFwD6G8bR693_HI6/w512-h640/happy-birthday-to-the-us-navy.-the-united-states-navy-was-originally-established-as-the-continental-1-1.jpg" width="512" /></a></div><br /><p></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(26, 26, 26); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #1a1a1a; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><b>Therefore, though it be the ‘many’ or the ‘few’ in government, the imposition of legislating a drastic monetary and tax policy that is not in line with the historical traditions of economic self-determination that are originated from the individual human rights precepts of our Declaration of Independence and our Constitution: that a ‘command & control’ of the U.S. economy by a supra-international cartel that takes its orders from central banks and the European Commission is unconstitutional:</b></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(26, 26, 26); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #1a1a1a; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><b></b></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(26, 26, 26); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #1a1a1a; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><b><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space: pre;"> </span>1. it would manifest tremendous societal strife and political division, </b></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(26, 26, 26); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #1a1a1a; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><b></b></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(26, 26, 26); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #1a1a1a; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><b><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space: pre;"> </span>2. needlessly manifests economic upheaval that is directed </b></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(26, 26, 26); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #1a1a1a; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><b><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space: pre;"> </span>and placed upon all the people, </b></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(26, 26, 26); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #1a1a1a; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><b></b></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(26, 26, 26); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #1a1a1a; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><b><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space: pre;"> </span>3. threatens the original formulation of the sovereignty of the United States</b></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(26, 26, 26); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #1a1a1a; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><b></b></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(26, 26, 26); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #1a1a1a; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><b>In the legal, pragmatic approach of Abraham Lincoln, earnest in preserving the national geopolitical unity of the people of the United States as a priority he maintained; <i>he also </i>resolutely seeked to end the economic system that was borne upon the exploitation of an enslaved people purposely kept uneducated, that their wherewithal of the promise of ‘liberty and justice for all’ that was the foundational principle of the American nation be kept from them. But these two objectives, he balanced. He understood that foreign nations would contend to make alliances with the Democrats in the confederate states, and so his job was to achieve victory, while preserving the union. Hence, he initiated a capital reconstruction project for the southern states, and was genuine in his resolve to preserve national political unanimity.</b></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(26, 26, 26); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #1a1a1a; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><b></b></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(26, 26, 26); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #1a1a1a; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><b>That spirit of maintaining national political unanimity is not with the Biden administration, nor is it with the foreign lobbying of Janet Yellen on behalf of the World Bank’s Global Tax Program, nor is it with the Inflation Reduction Act Congressional Democrats unilaterally voted on that targets the distributive diversified growth of the American oil, natural gas, and coal industry at the inflection point when our own U.S. Bureau of Land Management has published an official finding that the United States actually has 4.3 trillion potentially extractable barrels of shale oil; more than 50% of all the combined oil in the world. That would make the United States ‘cost of living’ for each of its people a much more worthwhile endeavor. And it would also solidify America’s geopolitical and geoeconomic resilience amongst nations, re-certifying its economic independence and the undisputed economic strength of its economy.</b></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(26, 26, 26); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #1a1a1a; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><b></b></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(26, 26, 26); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #1a1a1a; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><b>As such, the foreign influence of the European Commission, of the world’s central banks, including the Federal Reserve, and the international World Bank, have already infiltrated our government as it was in the time of slavery, when slavery Democrats had their representatives in all branches of the U.S. government. </b></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(26, 26, 26); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #1a1a1a; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><b></b></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(26, 26, 26); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #1a1a1a; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; text-align: center;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><b><i>They are open about it and actively proclaim their globalist agenda </i></b></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(26, 26, 26); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #1a1a1a; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; text-align: center;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><b><i>with condescension unto American conservatives.</i></b></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(26, 26, 26); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #1a1a1a; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><b></b></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(26, 26, 26); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #1a1a1a; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><b>How shall Americans of all political parties, ethnicities, religions, and walks of life respond? Shall some of us think that we can achieve some victory in imposing dramatic economic upheaval and societal division upon half of the country’s people? The individuals who established our government understood that we only have unanimity of mind and politic in respects to safeguarding our individual liberty, and their we stop,—without imposition unto each other, because it renders liberty and justice for all.</b></span></p><div><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><b><br /></b></span></div><div class="blogger-post-footer">ScalziOriginals.US
Build ecosystems & individuals
to strengthen & sustain
integrated community health. </div>@CoachBill007http://www.blogger.com/profile/00964006939825613259noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4249677153801659195.post-21376891997720601372022-10-25T18:40:00.020+03:002022-12-17T16:16:10.518+02:00The Unanimous Good Of All Americans: A Study of America's Successful Historical Tradition of Individual Economic Liberty <p> </p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjLflaLlA6fq0TKU8AoJge9_dyA9ZIwxAFID9Xzqc5cRwin1sqN5E_Nw1talaqiLdzuRI1N5RPROL3b7vMu1oMiHFmJwK6yNml6CQQzWqQZrWxS3jkV1qucmzC5wY1WBpyasHCMqClWV748y1QutKdPPI2GW5IVFW5_7ZN4AhPne0omO-yG6LTvXZPi/s910/usa-america-globe-world-power.jpg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="603" data-original-width="910" height="424" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjLflaLlA6fq0TKU8AoJge9_dyA9ZIwxAFID9Xzqc5cRwin1sqN5E_Nw1talaqiLdzuRI1N5RPROL3b7vMu1oMiHFmJwK6yNml6CQQzWqQZrWxS3jkV1qucmzC5wY1WBpyasHCMqClWV748y1QutKdPPI2GW5IVFW5_7ZN4AhPne0omO-yG6LTvXZPi/w640-h424/usa-america-globe-world-power.jpg" width="640" /></a></div><br /><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">How we go about establishing long-term resilience in the American economy; avoiding war with Russia and China while protecting our national interest; asserting peace, and also safeguarding those historical traditions that have made the United States of America the last remaining superpower: <i>how we approach these objectives sais more about our self-interests, than the actual task itself.</i> The power of our vote as individuals, and the writing and speaking of sober-minded Americans can help inform the people, that they may at the end, having that more profound knowledge, make the right decision.</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">Is that enough protection for preserving our American way of life that has allowed such tremendous economic prosperity being diversely distributed across the land? Understanding 'what are' & 'how' we established and solidified our traditional historical strengths that have formed such economic success is crucial for any voter, writer and speaker, that from that standpoint, they may provide the best, most informed work of defense and offense to the agendas of self-interest.</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">How was economic prosperity 'diversely distributed?' Was government the source of economy, or did the working of the tradition of our championing individual liberty create the economic space for entrance into the market? It is the freedom of the individual and our right; our individual ability to enter the 'free market' at any time that allows the potential possibility of economic success: the triumph or failure of our venture strengthening and fine-tuning the requirement of ingenuity and innovation, in order to have a chance at being successful. This is enterprise, entrepreneurship, and small business growth, and it is woven into America's historical tradition of equal individual liberty: it is what we are about. Our economy; our capacity to earn a living through the creation of goods and services that are deemed as practical through the give and take of the 'free market' <i>is</i> the magic of America.</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">But our public schools are not teaching that anymore. Instead, they have altogether been nationalized; taken over with ideological mental colonization that shuns the critically thinking independent mind that is entrepreneurial and capitalist. Our public schools have been instructed to teach a doctrine that dwells on racial divisions and claims that people of white skin color are historical aggressors who must enter into an apologetic perspective of American history. Such education is no education at all. It is a passive-aggressive ploy to divide the people and emotionally-charge the nation. No longer is their a prioritization of individual self-determination that respects and values champions of liberty as George Washington, John Quincy Adams, Frederick Douglass, and Martin Luther King. Their is no teaching of the self-determination and actual writings of Abraham Lincoln. There is no focus on economic self-determination in our public schools.</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEiqCnRQhqE5JcAyvYLv8TTbPNsQmVko4x5nT3BUfPESKpooq0fsp1etEJ9YSOsfV1V3vdcUDbbfw3RvjZUD2ZlO0d6c5c3OZX1UWV_mY84HTrL7mM_WcunHQIKIuMltkXkW7goL-PlLYbSKfGOTy951RPFOVsgWnOM4fumTiye3Q2EBKqRoGcolC2wd" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img alt="" data-original-height="784" data-original-width="609" height="640" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEiqCnRQhqE5JcAyvYLv8TTbPNsQmVko4x5nT3BUfPESKpooq0fsp1etEJ9YSOsfV1V3vdcUDbbfw3RvjZUD2ZlO0d6c5c3OZX1UWV_mY84HTrL7mM_WcunHQIKIuMltkXkW7goL-PlLYbSKfGOTy951RPFOVsgWnOM4fumTiye3Q2EBKqRoGcolC2wd=w496-h640" width="496" /></a></div><br /></div><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">We only have the intolerance of 'wokeness,' a pseudo-socialist ideology that is simply a swarm of national distractions that polarize the people from realizing the larger play: the Inflation Reduction Act of the Democrats precedes the stipulations of the World Bank's 130 nation consortium called the Global Tax Umbrella Program: it requires internationalization of the tax wealth of sovereign nations to be channeled through international banks unto...development projects in Africa and Asia. It is neo-colonial economic control that finally arrives at its end point: a global power balance aimed at decentralizing the economic strength of the United States and individual sovereign European nations, that a new global order of international banks and quasi-socialist leadership may create a new business environment that favors their interests... their self-interests.</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">To effect this, the monetary and tax policy, along with a control of the energy markets of sovereign nations must be internationalized and placed under the command and control of these international bank and government institutions: it goes against the grain of America's historical traditions; it goes against the spirit of our fundamental laws as established in 1776 and 1787, and it goes against the spirit of individual liberty and self-determination that has made America a nation with the greatest middle class wealth on the planet.</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">Time may flesh out the schemes of politicians, and the individual vote approves or disapproves of it: but what people can remain practical in their decision-making; in their thought process as they partake in the national conversation and ultimately, the right preservation of the United States,<i> if critical thinking skills that render an independent-minded people are skewed and warped with ideologies from the time of their youth?</i> What hope is their if the self-interest of an elite few nationalize a new set of educational norms to shift the values of a nation; soften and construct educational standards that play on racial divisions, emotionally-charge and politicize the people, and have them doubt the integrity of the signers of the Declaration of Independence and our U.S. Constitution?</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">Well, in the spirit of the critical thinking, legal approach of Abraham Lincoln, <i>whom understood that the unvarnished facts and construction of the slavery Democrats had to be laid out in the sun before the people</i>, the effect of the choices, plans, and agendas of elected & chosen government officials surely must be brought forth into the people's awareness, that our national conversation be informed <i>of the trajectory of actions and constructed works of their true intentions. </i></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">But what of social media micro blog platforms whom we are beginning to understand, have colluded with the Democrats to censor national conversation on their internet platforms? Is it so that we must fight to get to the fight? Then let us count it all joy, for it will only strengthen our affinity and solemn unction to refine our defense, and bring greater agility of mind to preserve an American way of life that champions individual liberty, and the economic self-determination that is our right. </div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">In the United States, the historical tradition of individuals being able to speak and write as a means of deconstructing and comparing agendas unto the fundamental laws, and the spirit of our laws as written and established in our Declaration of Independence and Constitution IS singular to our American historical tradition of liberty and justice for all. We need not switch our America for the socialist policies of an international order that denigrates the magnanimity of our Declaration of 1776 to bring together a people with such unanimity of spirit or the dynamism of our Constitution with its checks and balances: we need to defend it, and in that defense, we need to assert it.</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">To those who proclaim a new order for a new time, we must bring the living documents of our Declaration of Independence and Constitution and show them that these are written on parchment AND in our hearts and minds. To those international banks and inernatonal government institutions who call for a centralization of economy, we must hold steadfast and unmovable in our liberty: bringing them proof of our individual economic ingenuity for business enterprise. </div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">In terms of the 'historical traditions' of the United States and its people, are these not rooted in the formation of our nation starting with the Continental Congress, followed by the proclamation of our Declaration of 1776, and given its best construction in 1787 with the creation of our Constitution? Are we to look elsewhere to understand what foundation has made America exact its exceptionalism as a people of equitable liberty and justice for all, and that from this foundation of individual human rights, that we have experienced the historical tradition of an economic self-determination that has built the greatest and most prosperous middle class in the world?</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">Should we go ahead and upend it with new policies foreign to the tried and true fundamental standards that allowed us to become a superpower? But at this time, is it not so that President Biden and his Democrats in Congress are legislating and embroiling us into economic policies that are foreign to our historical economic tradition, and even having our legislators legislate alignment unto a dynamic that shuns America's economic tradition with a 'globalist' approach that would re-disribute our middle class tax wealth unto foreign nations?</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">Is that not a strange and foreign concept for Americans?</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEgRGNSbYDYyVZI7e6iq6uJf20E98u_4fVFKvT6II1rTMsIp1iNZ1B-ZA13XnuLayFmXKSxvKaUz6qGWCQKIM0oS-YTSNET3hvyFUI-k_Rt3sa71XLlSlKsESqNZ4497V3PpZis5BoIQBKHqg8EKo9sdFd6D5szbFdf9yxrSjwhKIRd9Oy3gXfiwlBjQ" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img alt="" data-original-height="773" data-original-width="371" height="709" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEgRGNSbYDYyVZI7e6iq6uJf20E98u_4fVFKvT6II1rTMsIp1iNZ1B-ZA13XnuLayFmXKSxvKaUz6qGWCQKIM0oS-YTSNET3hvyFUI-k_Rt3sa71XLlSlKsESqNZ4497V3PpZis5BoIQBKHqg8EKo9sdFd6D5szbFdf9yxrSjwhKIRd9Oy3gXfiwlBjQ=w340-h709" width="340" /></a></div></div></div><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">What has become of the quality and flow of our national conversation that our awareness of such grave matters is not being addressed? What is this democracy that our national conversation is suppressed, spinned, and stunted to favor self-interest above the unanimous good of all the people? Should a few people decide what that 'unanimous good' should be, and in this 'the many,' or can we return to the original fundamental agreements that began our nation, and from that standard unanimity of national spirit proceed onward, that we may be able to further along and help conclude the best, most informed national conversation on achieving such a national and international dynamic?</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">The gentleness, slower pace of individual liberty is not to the liking of the international banks and international central governments, because it does not serve their financial bottom line, and if it does not, then their geopolitical strength has no anchor. So they seek the strength of the United States of America, and of England, and of European nations, and they seek the control of the energy markets and the centralization of as many economies as they can command. They want to affect and reap in their economic gains from upending the traditional energy markets of sovereign countries, and redeploy the tax wealth of nations immediately. They have big plans, and individual self-determination is not in their cards, nor is the preservation of the American way of life. Would it be so farfetched to say that they envy the last remaining superpower and seek to have control over it is economy?</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><div style="text-align: left;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none;">The demand of a geopolitical and geoeconomic foresight free from ideological politization, that the unanimous good of the American family and individual may be reached is fundamental law (alter/ abolish) in our Declaration Of Independence, and is the heritage that must be defended from generation to generation. Will Americans be clever a serpents, and harmless as doves; will they be steadfast to join the national conversation, ... our unanimity as a nation is being challenged, our economy and way of life is being played with, as are our living traditions that have kept us anchored as one nation for nearly 250 years.</span></div></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br /></div></div><p></p><div class="blogger-post-footer">ScalziOriginals.US
Build ecosystems & individuals
to strengthen & sustain
integrated community health. </div>@CoachBill007http://www.blogger.com/profile/00964006939825613259noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4249677153801659195.post-47167483124075459482022-10-06T01:49:00.007+03:002022-10-14T16:55:17.853+03:00"Trust the People"--The Triumph of Ronald Reagan: He Addressed The American Economy as a Pragmatic Business Capitalist<p></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEhMYDnZAc82wzc94pi1Mi1ZzLgbhSBcaTjollXf0UlQcNJ8Gky6Rc53Gi42WFlxf6WmIgncCwo4xhUko7eZmbKutyPRsGETbSPxbf96pgRW9BFGRVOtUMZaw0hnrkbWaWMBSqoyOtFsB-vArljk_eldkPlVqCTi5Or7FDxn5vvErVmjE2kXZaYKMLT9" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img alt="" data-original-height="294" data-original-width="400" height="470" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEhMYDnZAc82wzc94pi1Mi1ZzLgbhSBcaTjollXf0UlQcNJ8Gky6Rc53Gi42WFlxf6WmIgncCwo4xhUko7eZmbKutyPRsGETbSPxbf96pgRW9BFGRVOtUMZaw0hnrkbWaWMBSqoyOtFsB-vArljk_eldkPlVqCTi5Or7FDxn5vvErVmjE2kXZaYKMLT9=w640-h470" width="640" /></a></div></div><br /><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">The degree of regard unto the simple American principle that government be 'of and for' shows itself in the character of those who have been elected or entered political power. How well a nation's leader, their administration's policy makers, representatives of our U.S. Congress, and finally, the Justices in our Supreme Court respect, value, and understand the dual role of solemn stewardship and leadership requires personal humility and a selfless sense of service to the people that may oft be placed aside when the same individuals in positions of government power realize that they can affect national policy, according to their political self-interest distinct from the unanimous good of all the people.</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">In that regard, what does stewardship and leadership in government signify to a Supreme Court Justice, to the holder of the office of the American Presidency, and with our members of Congress? How do they do their job in such a way that their work distills a spirit of liberty and justice for all, instead of political and ideological favoritism that certainly polarizes the national body of Americans? Isn't it so that these officials must swear allegiance to our U.S. Constitution, and uphold the spirit and word of our fundamental laws as written and intended from our founding fathers in that Constitution, and our Declaration of Independence with the congressional actions from these same founders of government being proof of their intentions to establish a national unity based on the equitable right to life, liberty; the right to be safe and happy, and to assure that said government is justly 'of and for' all the people?</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">But how do we assure the right stewardship and leadership in the midst of political party machinations? Perhaps we never will, and so, what safety do we have than to strengthen the people to be a responsible, independent-minded critical thinking national body? What safety do we have than to focus on our Justices that they interpret fundamental laws, and the laws created from these to exemplify the allegiance to the unalloyed spirit of liberty and justice for all as understood in its 'originalist' intention from our founders and proved through their public writings, and official works?</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">It is a hard thing to do a solemn work of gentle stewardship and strong leadership. It is an easy thing to do a solemn work of gentle stewardship and strong leadership. </div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">Our 40th President, Ronald Reagan, once said that there is no left or right in politics, but an up and down: 'above' the role of government decreases, and yet is not disintegrated, while individual liberty, civility, <a href="https://lifeskillstrainer-info.blogspot.com/2022/08/the-original-powers-of-economy-control.html" target="_blank">economic self-determination rise unto an ideal of a civil society of empowered individuals with government in service to the people</a>; and below there is that increase in government office and policy as the economic welfare source and educational policy creator to shape the minds of the people. The former is inspirational, motivating, and a breath of fresh air, whereas the latter delegates the passion, fortitude and mental strategy of the national people into the purview of a few people. History has taught us that great power in the realm of a few sets the conditions for cronyism, and factious self-interest.</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">Ronald Reagan understood the dichotomy of being in the position of having command over the strongest most advanced armed forces in the world, and also discerning the correct equilibrium of direction and support to the domestic economy of the United States. He also understood that the value of individual self-determination was core to the American experience. As such, was he resolute in his understandings that we must trust the people's ability to economically self-determine the course of their lives while placing an emphasis on the historical economic tradition of the U.S., that of establishing small businesses?</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">Yes, he was. And in time, as official reports of the positive progress of Reagan's policies became clear, Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher of England, and a number of European national governments reversed their quasi-socialist course, and applied the same, successful economic formula that Reagan first pioneered as Governor of California, and later as President of the United States of America.</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">Reagan did not take the opportunity to drastically disrupt the economy or to sign executive orders that enforced politically-ideological monetary actions to impose upon the different sectors of the economy. Instead, he sought to lessen the role of government manipulation of the economy, and worked to remind the American people that it was them who had to be in the driver's seat; creating their own individual economies, without the imposition of government office being used as a politically-intrusive instrumentality. So, he lowered taxes, simplified the tax code, wherein Americans would pay according to three separate percentage brackets, and spoke to the people about plan to support the people's economic self-determination. Within two years, employment drastically increased, the economy began to thrive after stagnating under the economic policies of Democrats, and revenue from taxes increased due to the strength of the economy.</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">What do the Democrats do but call for an <a href="https://lifeskillstrainer-info.blogspot.com/2022/08/the-world-bank-its-collusion-with-us.html" target="_blank">internalization of our economy</a>, a hindering with objective to <a href="https://lifeskillstrainer-info.blogspot.com/2022/08/american-foreign-policy-its-national.html" target="_blank">rapidly destroy our self-sufficiency in energy independence</a>, and a pronounced <a href="https://lifeskillstrainer-info.blogspot.com/2022/09/good-governance-is-not-volatile-it.html" target="_blank">attempt to polarize the people into a reactionary mode of politics?</a></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><b><br /></b></div><p></p><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><p></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: justify;"><b>It seems as if the reverse of Ronald Reagan's domestic and foreign stewardship and leadership is the mode of the Biden presidency, his administration, and the Democrats in Congress:</b></div><p></p></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><p></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">Where Reagan sowed an emphasis on reducing the number of government offices, reducing taxes, simplifying the tax code and practicing a dynamic doctrine of trusting and supporting the people's economic self-determination, Biden and the Democrat Party have enacted legislation (Inflation Reduction Act) to:</div><p></p></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><p> </p><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><p></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><ul style="text-align: left;"><li>increase the size of the government's Internal Revenue Service with 87,000 employees, with the objective of increasing tax revenues and increase strategic efficiency in making Americans pay what is owed</li></ul></div><p></p></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><p></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><ul style="text-align: left;"><li>targeting of the U.S. sector of oil, coal, & natural gas with the aim of blocking its market diversification, including ability of smaller oil companies to enter the market, limiting its distribution (Keystone XL pipeline), <a href="https://lifeskillstrainer-info.blogspot.com/2022/10/the-design-of-faction-to-control.html" target="_blank">and choosing options on how present oil companies can reduce production and end their business in oil</a></li></ul></div><p></p></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><p></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><ul style="text-align: left;"><li>unconstitutional alignment of national tax code to an international bank's ideological development program scheme (World Bank and its Global Tax Program), </li></ul></div><p></p></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><p></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><ul style="text-align: left;"><li>encouraging U.S. Treasury Secretary, Janet Yellen, to work a double role of promoting the Global Tax Program that she has endeavored on for a number of years, personally recruiting 130 participating countries on behalf of the Global Tax Program development scheme, and to lead an effort to bring the United States domestic economic and foreign economic policy in line with the objectives of the World Bank, while also supposedly doing her job as U.S. Treasury Secretary to the people. </li></ul></div><p></p></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><p></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><i>Point of order</i>, breaking the energy independence of a nation does not strengthen its geopolitical or geoeconomic power amongst nations,-- it decreases it. Aligning the U.S. tax code to an international banking scheme does not protect the economic resiliency of the U.S. economy, it erodes it with the redistribution of its capital to be invested outside of the U.S., and using the office of the presidency, the seat of our U.S. Congress, and the instrumentality of the office of the Supreme Court to cloak ideological-based policy, that is to say, 'to legislate from the bench,' in constitutional words (judicial aggrandizement), only serves self-interest distinct from the unanimous good of all the American people.</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">What the Democrats have done in order to maintain power is to conflate a number of controversial issues and mix these in with legislation and issue executive orders with tremendous consequences for our national economy and the sense of political peace amongst the people. They do this in order to divide the people on issues, that with the people divided they may maintain control of the instrumentality of government powers and attach their legislations, such as the Inflation Reduction Act that aligns the U.S. economic policy, both foreign and domestic, unto a globalist order. Civilian Democrats are then handed the tough option of being presented the possibility that they may achieve their political self-interests while having to also accept the unconstitutional and economically disruptive legislation that Janet Yellen and the World Bank want the federal government to participate in.</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">Outside of the 'Western' alliance of leftist, globalist governments that are pushing the 'climate change economics' that is quickly appearing to actually be the World Bank's Global Tax Program, other national governments, including the Saudi Arabian monarchy, the Chinese Communist Party, Vladimir Putin and his absolute, totalitarian control of the Russian state, and the Iranian government are all to happy to step into the geopolitical/ geoeconomic void of power that has been artificially created in the obstruction of 8<a href="https://lifeskillstrainer-info.blogspot.com/2022/09/the-design-of-faction-to-control.html" target="_blank">0% of America's energy market production and distribution.</a></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">Is the decision-making of the Biden administration and Democrats in Congress fault of these national governments? Should they limit their production of oil or step into the economic void as it pertains to the best interest of their government and their people? News reports in October of 2022 describe that the OPEC oil cartel alliance of countries that include a plethora of Middle Eastern, African, and South American nations have moved to cut production with the intention of safeguarding the best price point for their oil. Should Saudi Arabia, for example, hinder its own economy at the behest of a globalist economic order of national governments? </div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">It should not. </div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEgFzcLor0aChVxv7WjG2je9tlV5rau3IYRLBAQnI8lytGnm5aSP6R1oUqY5QVLRw3Jezsj7pvpwkieMEe38h15jAAyZMIva01MjZ6Uu22uGE_A-zlC2xG6srgpsv-ul56bwAokKrkj321RGuuTU-9xzDL1jdl3HbKriC-QDV9WMYuXqfmcZZxzg4eEi" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img alt="" data-original-height="349" data-original-width="620" height="360" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEgFzcLor0aChVxv7WjG2je9tlV5rau3IYRLBAQnI8lytGnm5aSP6R1oUqY5QVLRw3Jezsj7pvpwkieMEe38h15jAAyZMIva01MjZ6Uu22uGE_A-zlC2xG6srgpsv-ul56bwAokKrkj321RGuuTU-9xzDL1jdl3HbKriC-QDV9WMYuXqfmcZZxzg4eEi=w640-h360" width="640" /></a></div><br /><p></p><p>Should the people of the United States of America, as one political, national body, allow the downward economic trajectory that the Biden administration is telling us to patiently endure, or should we oppose, through the power of the vote, the Democrat Party that is imposing its failed economic policies at the expense of America's middle class, and its leverage as an economic superpower of and for liberty and justice?</p><p>At this point, the entire Democrat Party has to be reformed, and the economy has to be saved, as does the geopolitical and geoeconomic position of the United States.</p><p>The government of Saudi Arabia has done well in protecting its priority's of maintaining a heterogenous society that compliments the tradition of its national sovereignty, an economy that suits its goals, and a military force to defend its people and resources within the Middle East. Undoubtedly, its abundance in a natural resource, oil, and ability to produce, sell, and distribute it to the world is the historical foundational basis in achieving these goals, and provides for its continued economic and political stability, and this strengthens its geopolitical and geoeconomic leverage in that region and the world. </p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">Its sanctioned communications herald and prepare for a new age that builds on their present success with an internal focus on increasing the quality of life for its people, and aims to place before the world a new narrative: individual educational empowerment, an increase in women's rights, and a desire to be understood as a civil, professional society.</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">That's great news... for Saudi Arabia.</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">But what and when was the triumph of gentle stewardship and strong leadership in the United Sates at its height, if not during the Reagan presidency? The notion of ideological imposition was not there. It was more a 'business administration' to lay the best foundation for a strong domestic economy that would in turn, yes... lay the foundation for a strong foreign policy, based on the domestic economic strength of the U.S. as the core support of it military strength, and this in turn, solidify that geoeconomic and geopolitical balance of world power wherein America was the last remaining superpower.</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">Civilian Democrats have been disrespected by the Biden administration in that they are being offered a counterfeit option of selling out their nation to an international bank's self interest in exchange for a shallow promise that their short-term social issues will be addressed. <b>But the continuance of that position can only source more national political animosity, instead of unanimity as one people.</b> Only a resounding vote for conservative Republicans in Congress at this time will give the Democrat Party the most powerful opportunity to reformulate itself; not to rebrand itself, but to recreate itself with a greater degree of regard unto the simple American principle that government be 'of and for' the people, and that the dual role of principled, solemn and gentle unanimous domestic stewardship is the best and strongest form of true leadership, and this requires personal and professional humility and a selfless sense of genuine service to the people.</div><p></p><div class="blogger-post-footer">ScalziOriginals.US
Build ecosystems & individuals
to strengthen & sustain
integrated community health. </div>@CoachBill007http://www.blogger.com/profile/00964006939825613259noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4249677153801659195.post-66609017669502218682022-10-03T21:48:00.016+03:002022-10-04T14:15:18.463+03:00(CONTINUED) The Design of Faction To Control & Destroy The American Fossil Fuel Industry: Lessons Learned From The Supreme Court's 6.30.2022 Ruling Opinion on West Virginia v. EPA <p><br /></p><table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><tbody><tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEihb3Rr2aolNu7MaKrHZn-32u2_Nkgznbq6bfda3VRzUtFPCd9osXmOoDBdSGDPY98nC_bQ8uTTiJ46wXxTBKnVpPbE4u2Su8GjPVah_i3NAtK-SkOj2DjhvEa5qr47puepIlIjj_w4nsZLLnqY2nhEGBKhr-ZZ-h01kdrdjapPFUXCJesLNtFOtiuu/s1200/great-depression_dust-bowl_wagon-wheels-against-barbwire-fence_corbis-2.jpg" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" data-original-height="1200" data-original-width="1193" height="640" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEihb3Rr2aolNu7MaKrHZn-32u2_Nkgznbq6bfda3VRzUtFPCd9osXmOoDBdSGDPY98nC_bQ8uTTiJ46wXxTBKnVpPbE4u2Su8GjPVah_i3NAtK-SkOj2DjhvEa5qr47puepIlIjj_w4nsZLLnqY2nhEGBKhr-ZZ-h01kdrdjapPFUXCJesLNtFOtiuu/w636-h640/great-depression_dust-bowl_wagon-wheels-against-barbwire-fence_corbis-2.jpg" width="636" /></a></td></tr><tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">The Supreme Court's West Virginia v. EPA 6.30.2022 ruling opinion describes how the fossil fuel industry is being targeted, and expresses the observation that such policies are knowingly purposed to have a massive economic cost on Americans and our economy.</td></tr></tbody></table><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br /></div><p>Due to its national economic significance, the fossil fuel industry of oil, coal, and natural gas, --amounting to 79% of all fuel production and use for the powering of the American economy in 2021, should be understood as a political and economic power that directly affects the strength and ability of America's domestic and foreign monetary strength, and that in turn, affects its decision-making, options, leverage, and position in the balance of power amongst other nations.</p><p>Therefore, attempts and actions to hinder, limit, or constrain the American fossil fuel market's domestic production, must be carefully observed, deconstructed, and the root causes of such negatively disruptive efforts brought to the awareness of the American people's national conversation, to such effect that the wisest course of action for all Americans be accomplished: our economy, resting on the individual self-determination of its people, and largely powered through fossil fuels, should not experience major disruptions due to the unilateral self-interest of a political party's instrumentality being distinct from the unanimous good for all Americans.</p><p>The Supreme Court's June 30, 2022 ruling opinions on West Virginia v. EPA gives the American people an objective source of information that gives a backdrop to the true intentions of the Democrat Party. In that case, aside from the Environmental Protection Agency trying to purposefully place a heavy economic burden on America's fossil fuel industry without clear congressional authority being given, <b>it chose the options on how the fossil fuel companies could respond to their demands within the market place. </b></p><p>The Inflation Reduction Act that was voted on 68 days after the Supreme Court ruling is the same plan that the Democrat Party was pushing with their control of the EPA: control with intent to end the American oil, coal, and natural gas companies. What the Inflation Reduction Act accomplished was create congressional approval from Democrats, with no Republicans voting for it. </p><p>As has been described in previous <a href="https://lifeskillstrainer-info.blogspot.com/2022/09/the-design-of-faction-to-control.html" target="_blank">essays</a>, America is experiencing a negative disruption of its economy, and since the first day that Biden became President, the targeting of the growth and diversification of the fossil fuel market has been negatively impacted. Because it is such a critical sector of our economy, the targeting of the fossil fuel industry's ability to produce is of pivotal importance to the 'cost of living' of Americans;<i> the strength of the American economy being crucial to the domestic and international peace amongst nations, wherein the United States</i> truly shine as a light of liberty and justice for all.-- </p><p>To that end, if and when it is not economically strong, foreign and international entities will strive in self-interest with their schemes and crafts to fill the void created from it not being able to command a balance of world power based on its ability to economically self-sustain itself. </p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhNVFs5HZGV2c65KHAFwR22vxjXY9LYFD1VNXbfDBUUh1wR9HH-ZYrs0zB7AdSLs3jG51C3BWVRkz_HRJaa7GWgjRPDrdUhRR_eGjdQh_Yw_uN7UHTjqqcWAYaoFR6bgWfHU2VffQeLN_YwAOlne6rm9OL6unMaz7t6RZv2vMBOrObwcKMERFEfU0iP/s710/Screen%20Shot%202022-10-03%20at%201.25.10%20PM.png" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="433" data-original-width="710" height="390" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhNVFs5HZGV2c65KHAFwR22vxjXY9LYFD1VNXbfDBUUh1wR9HH-ZYrs0zB7AdSLs3jG51C3BWVRkz_HRJaa7GWgjRPDrdUhRR_eGjdQh_Yw_uN7UHTjqqcWAYaoFR6bgWfHU2VffQeLN_YwAOlne6rm9OL6unMaz7t6RZv2vMBOrObwcKMERFEfU0iP/w640-h390/Screen%20Shot%202022-10-03%20at%201.25.10%20PM.png" width="640" /></a></div><br /><p><br /></p><p>The 'Inflation Reduction Act ' a 'command & control' policy to rapidly hinder, limit, constrain, and bring to a halt the sources of energy that power 79-80% of our homes and economy-- <b>is poised to align unto an internationalization of the American economy,</b> with drastic conscequences for the American middle class, and the national economy's ability to self-sustain itself. The Democrat Party's self-interest has gone on record in its proclamations to end the fossil fuel industry, and it has been using the offices and powers of the American government to to make allegiances with international bank institutions (World Bank) to drastically upend the domestic economy and the tax code policy to align it with a dual business scheme of (1) expatriating (stealing) and channeling American wealth unto the World Bank for the use of it to be deployed in development projects in African and Asian countries, (2) and the creation of a timed immediate void in fossil fuel production in America to be supplanted with major investments in renewable energies. </p><p></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiYr9KRFe5jwZr-yoPt9ve76OAnPanXlWjPpBBcSqkh-PGsBpnTm6sBIETDIjwmINaJD6_5JBJldqMv-J6GWbu0zDxFQtf39sesARo495wuO3xpF2xxpVxdyJ8gWXqbdasZJJPP5Esq9omyI05QeryfU9T6OTRZWSdkOqQ1Y8bQvm-y8DFiuRB2DVqE/s534/Screen%20Shot%202022-09-29%20at%201.22.26%20PM.png" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="534" data-original-width="324" height="690" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiYr9KRFe5jwZr-yoPt9ve76OAnPanXlWjPpBBcSqkh-PGsBpnTm6sBIETDIjwmINaJD6_5JBJldqMv-J6GWbu0zDxFQtf39sesARo495wuO3xpF2xxpVxdyJ8gWXqbdasZJJPP5Esq9omyI05QeryfU9T6OTRZWSdkOqQ1Y8bQvm-y8DFiuRB2DVqE/w458-h690/Screen%20Shot%202022-09-29%20at%201.22.26%20PM.png" width="458" /></a></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">These intents of self-interest, if analyzed closely in their machinations, are not what is being told to the American people through the mainstream media, and as such, the national conversation is often devoid of important understandings that can better inform the people in their insights, and ultimately, how they vote. Further, <i><b>the rapidity of speed</b></i> in targeting and subverting of America's source of fuel production and distribution has already begun to destabilize the strength of America's power amongst the nations. This is so because the Democrat Party's unilateral self-interest of 'climate change economics' is actually a triple-play scheme that is not actually about pollution control, but a new massive investment opportunity for Wall Street, banks, and international business. </div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">The triple play:</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"> (1) World Bank creates a business pipeline to channel American middle class tax wealth after an alignment of its tax code agrees with its financial policies, and redistribute portions of it unto African & Asian nations; </div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">(2) business investment opportunity in renewable energy industry is artificially boosted with the constraining of the American fossil fuel market; </div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">(3) international banks create tremendous leverage for themselves, becoming global powers of geoeconomic and geopolitical significance at the expense of America's economy, and the economies of other industrialized nations participating in the World Bank politically ideological business scheme.</div><br /><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">For the American family and individual, Democrat, Republican, or Independent, the present mode of self-interested actions from the Democrat Party should be met with caution and alarm, instead of what the Democrat Party cue signals as how they want the people to respond,- in a reactionary, emotional, and politically polarized way that drives disunity of national spirit. This places civilian Democrats in a tough situation, because their leaders are working against the resiliency of our national economy and making allegiances with foreign banking institutions that would and are creating severe global power balance disruptions that are detrimental to the economic flow and societal unity of the people of the United States of America.</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">Where should we stand as a national people? The answer is easy, but it would require that Americans of all parties collectively respond to the Biden administration with civil opposition in the congressional elections in November, and with responsible participation in the national conversation. </div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">What the Supreme Court's West Virginia v. EPA ruling opinion furnishes the American people with is an incredible source of information that allows us to glean and infer the intentions of the Democrat party to break the self-reliance of the American middle class economy and attach our domestic and foreign monetary and tax policy to an international bank institution that bears no allegiance to our Constitution. The court's opinion serves as a trustworthy and scholarly input into the national conversation: the objectivity and research of the case is presented to the reader, as are the thoughts and understandings behind the opinions of the Justices. For the sake of the enrichment of the national conversation, it is critically important to be able to find these trustworthy sources of information that prioritize unbiased, critical thinking, instead of mainstream media political spin aimed at controlling the attitudes and understandings of the people. The Supreme Court, in this particular case, clearly describes the purposes and ulterior motives of the (EPA) Environmental Protection Agency, as an extension of the ideological 'command & control' politic that is the Democrat Party. With no giant leap of the imagination, we can understand that the fossil fuel industry was being targeted without congressional authority, and in such a way that monetary demands and constraints were being placed on it that could not be reasonably met in the timeline that was demanded. That was done on purpose and the court's opinion brings that understanding to the light.</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">Thus, the construction of boosting the renewable energy industry at the direct expense of the fossil fuel industry's demise, and the timed national domestic and foreign economic policy campaigning of the Biden administration's unconstitutional allegiance unto the domestic and foreign monetary policy dictates of an international bank signals a trespass of Article 3, Section 3, Clause 1 of the U.S. Constitution:</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><i>"Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court."</i></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br /></div></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br /><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjr6um34YNCq5Ma6mrOSQ6OX8VFCAuuUVUDdk4xYXKkmSh5VQKGIXqabBksW6FxP2M5cZOtvls79NkV-Z0ntxE_imS4sjUq4NMoKuzdcJ9Ew6mY6l3eqF1rvaf4-HF4elPLTwWoq3J_AGSipVgPDvfc9Y9xzbaq5wuV618jzT4LqD-zcH1U3-esksK-/s671/Screen%20Shot%202022-10-03%20at%202.21.50%20PM.png" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="671" data-original-width="423" height="640" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjr6um34YNCq5Ma6mrOSQ6OX8VFCAuuUVUDdk4xYXKkmSh5VQKGIXqabBksW6FxP2M5cZOtvls79NkV-Z0ntxE_imS4sjUq4NMoKuzdcJ9Ew6mY6l3eqF1rvaf4-HF4elPLTwWoq3J_AGSipVgPDvfc9Y9xzbaq5wuV618jzT4LqD-zcH1U3-esksK-/w404-h640/Screen%20Shot%202022-10-03%20at%202.21.50%20PM.png" width="404" /></a></div><br /><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhDt4NYybGTRdMHWk8N5D8Vsp828nWwixxVWLq6aSj_46_YHySAP8iqnSn37MNQN2FZFagEGl6Hpwz-dEbSPp0e9_cRV0bAHYqFIgRcveigLvn0o5ZjOoEanmykBb6qj-EFRUc2u9CRPsP-jsgX01HWgy2h1DDqknnkfFPdgOxX-lyQEH2xcL9hX52n/s1211/Screen%20Shot%202022-10-03%20at%202.12.30%20PM.png" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="482" data-original-width="1211" height="127" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhDt4NYybGTRdMHWk8N5D8Vsp828nWwixxVWLq6aSj_46_YHySAP8iqnSn37MNQN2FZFagEGl6Hpwz-dEbSPp0e9_cRV0bAHYqFIgRcveigLvn0o5ZjOoEanmykBb6qj-EFRUc2u9CRPsP-jsgX01HWgy2h1DDqknnkfFPdgOxX-lyQEH2xcL9hX52n/s320/Screen%20Shot%202022-10-03%20at%202.12.30%20PM.png" width="320" /></a></div></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">The Biden administration is continuing the progression of the Obama administration, and when we look at the construction of the matter, the triple play described above, and the ulterior ideological development motive of the international World Bank, it need not be inferred, but can be clearly understood from their actions as described above and in previous essays, that the World Bank's priority is to establish a global financial business scheme in multiple nations at the expense of its participating donor nations in Europe and Australia. The treason agains the Constitution exists in the open actions of the Biden administration and Democrats in Congress to align the United States unto the Global Tax Project of the World Bank. In promoting the World Bank's Global Tax Project scheme, Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen, who is the former presiding governor of the Federal Reserve bank, admits through her actions that she is actively trespassing the Constitution's Article 3, Section 3, Clause 1: <span face="arial, sans-serif" style="caret-color: rgb(32, 33, 36); color: #202124; font-size: 16px;"><b style="font-style: italic;">adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.</b></span></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><i style="caret-color: rgb(32, 33, 36); color: #202124; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;"><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br /></div></i></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">The World Bank's intentions in its Global Tax Project go far beyond the media headline of taxing multi- national corporations; in fact, they target the fossil fuel industries of the United States, and as such, the economic scheme targets American economic sovereignty, proclaiming its position as a globalist financial ideological business with no allegiance to the United States, our Constitution, our economy, or the American people. Its dual business scheme and overreach for geoeconomic power would solidify its geopolitical across the 130 nations that have agreed to its plan, and that is in opposition to the historical American tradition economic self-determination. </div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br /></div><p><br /><br /></p><p><br /></p><div class="blogger-post-footer">ScalziOriginals.US
Build ecosystems & individuals
to strengthen & sustain
integrated community health. </div>@CoachBill007http://www.blogger.com/profile/00964006939825613259noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4249677153801659195.post-77272222108765962832022-09-30T18:21:00.032+03:002022-10-06T17:23:25.376+03:00The Design of Faction To Control & Destroy The American Fossil Fuel Industry: Lessons Learned From The Supreme Court's 6.30.2022 Ruling Opinion on West Virginia v. EPA <div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg5htURqBQX2XgFXoRgsWyyFGJ9WZoiKbmrGV1X3OtKZTrmnjfAgqW7XIsu6_jTl2lmy-lj4n3pNsJXrOa1EJ2FPueCDUVEinEwvcsvY2oOV5b3F79flLJvQ_jGUKUVe0kWONbd6Fzo6fVFzoE87q_x3MWKCGU6-ZCKy4-ovwscQYQSIxNF6Et0it9q/s690/John-Quincy-Adams-effort-gag-rule.jpg.webp" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><br /><img border="0" data-original-height="388" data-original-width="690" height="360" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg5htURqBQX2XgFXoRgsWyyFGJ9WZoiKbmrGV1X3OtKZTrmnjfAgqW7XIsu6_jTl2lmy-lj4n3pNsJXrOa1EJ2FPueCDUVEinEwvcsvY2oOV5b3F79flLJvQ_jGUKUVe0kWONbd6Fzo6fVFzoE87q_x3MWKCGU6-ZCKy4-ovwscQYQSIxNF6Et0it9q/w640-h360/John-Quincy-Adams-effort-gag-rule.jpg.webp" width="640" /></a></div><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-size: 16px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><br /></span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none;">On February 22, 1811, John Quincy Adams was appointed to be Associate Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court; a position he declined. </span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><br /></span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">After reading his published writings, we learn of a man who clung to the purpose of living a life as Godly and as best as he could accomplish. Those efforts of bringing all his intellectual might and maintaining of integrity to be what can be called, 'a professional Christian,' a 'work' that calls the practitioner to be mindful of being continuously gentle, in genuine peace, loving & kind, good, and of excellent temperance, serve to position attitude and perspective to readily agree with being 'national' in political understandings. As such, we find John Quincy Adams to exhibit and practice a strong political action that seeked to end slavery, increase the human rights of Native Americans, and establish a national university for the enrichment of the people's minds. </span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 24px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">Protecting the founding American spirit of individual liberty and justice for all; a notion of valuing human equality with a government 'of & for' the people tasked for the protection of the people, was of singular priority and importance to him. The Constitution had been recently written and put into order in 1787, along with 'The Federalist Papers' explaining the powers, function, duty and dangers unto said government and within said government, and the business of enslaving humans of black skin color was being brought to a halt, being hindered, limited, and constrained with repeated congressional legislation up until 1820 (Missouri Compromise). </span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 24px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">What we have before us, as an American tradition of liberty and justice is the recognition early on in the founding of our nation that we are all created equal, and have those inalienable rights being universal, self-evident, and God-endowed: the awareness and claim of these fundamental laws of humanity serving as the historical ballast and anchor of the true American judicial tradition and national society: unalloyed liberty and justice for all as a people who are a nation of just laws, and not a nation that rests on ever-changing popular doctrines or personality's of charismatic politicians. </span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 24px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">Again, what is the baseline of the historical jurisprudence that is the foundation of the United States of America; it is the awareness, claim, and defense of an unalloyed spirit of individual liberty and justice for all. An exemplification of that work is clearly seen in the selfless dedication of John Adams and his son, John Quincy Adams, unto ingraining their integrity and passion to do good and be good with all their intellect to accomplish the best solemnity in effectuating the right start of character for the U.S. government as 'of and for' the people.</span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 24px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">Their writings constantly address the importance of staying on course with integrity, the right attitude, perspective, professionalism and selflessness of solemn spirit unto the 'American cause.' They understood that faction, the work of people who's self-interest is distinct from the unanimous good of all the people, was continuously always seeking entrance and instrumentality of the powers and offices of government.</span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><br /></span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">The instrumentality of government, that is to say, the control of its powers to achieve a self-interest occurred with the business of slavery. The presidency, Congress, and the Supreme Court had people who agreed and defended the self-interest of slavery in the 1800's. Should some people be slaves and others slave owners (Abraham Lincoln, </span><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none; text-decoration: underline;">Draft Of a Speech</span><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">, 8.21.1858)? This was a prevailing question of Abraham Lincoln on the preservation of the United States. The Declaration of Independence was clear to him: it did not say only white Americans, but it asserted that people have the right to life, liberty, to be happy, and to assure government remained in that unalloyed mode of being of and for the people. Lincoln countered Stephen Douglas, a Senator, who himself had been on the Illinois Supreme Court, asking the rhetorical question if the Declaration only included American white men, or also Germans and French, and Russians who lived in America; and so, Lincoln said, the American slave of black skin color is human and also is included in that Declaration.</span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 24px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">The parlance of discussion can be centered on the rights of humanity, on ascertaining again what is the true unalloyed American tradition of individual liberty and justice, and if people, in the capacity of government office, or as civilians, have the right to legally impose a construction on the true intent and spirit of the law upon all the people, with the sum end result of their scheme that their narrative is overlaid above the basic, fundamental understandings of the Declaration of Independence and the right interpretation of the U.S. Constitution, and the laws created from those first laws.</span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 24px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">In effect, the cloaking of political self-interest (faction) presented as legal doctrine dressed in constitutional words has been done before (judicial allowance of the business of slavery), and it is called judicial aggrandizement. Thus, the unconstitutional invention of 'judicial review,' and the unspoken precedent of 'judicial activism' allows people and political factions to place themselves supreme above the Declaration of Independence and our Constitution, and the law making process within the judiciary, legislative and executive branches of government instead of an originalist understanding of the word and spirit of intention as purposed of the framers of our American republic. </span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 24px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">Therefore, it is not merely a difference of political opinion as to what American society should be, and how it should be educated to maintain the right ideals, but more specifically, what should be the correct interpretation of fundamental, constitutional laws as it regards cases and situations that will always arise? How can that be achieved if our judges and justices are not ideologically independent from the sleights and self-interests of factions, and how can we raise up new generations of righteous future Justices and magistrates, if political factions target our educational standards of instruction to favor their politic, and disfavor the politic of another party? </span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;">Is it so that we, as a national people, can settle agreement of our minds to achieve consensus as a people the the most unanimous agreement that brings us together as a national community is the Declaration of Independence? Undoubtedly, many would say it is something that can prudently be accepted as having the most universal agreement amongst Americans. The interpretation of the powers, duties, functions, and restraints written that are our U.S. Constitution were also written with such great solemnity as the 'Declaration,' and yet we have this sounding bell of warning in The Federalist Papers of the dangers of faction as the gravest threat to our constitutional republic with its representatives, and we have the work of faction clearly seen in our history, most obvious and poignantly in the business of slavery, and of the multi-billion dollar international business of human abortion, with the prolongation of congressional, executive, and judicial approvals. That the reader may disagree or agree with the writer that abortion is a work of liberty or murder is separate from abortion having unanimous agreement amongst the people. It does not have unanimous agreement, and due to the severity of the action of abortion being life ending on a human being in one of its stages of life, a pause to consider how abortion, as it was with slavery, ‘is’ or ‘is not’ — a direct trespass of the historical American tradition of defending those fundamental laws that are the preserving ballast and anchor of our nation.</p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">So it is, <i>we do</i> have a political interplay of the American people's sentiment on distinct matters and judicial ruling opinions <i>certainly have had an effect and been affected</i> because of that interplay. We can see the effect of this each time there is not a unanimous agreement with the justices in our Supreme Court. The professionalism of our Justices and magistrates should be independent of political ideology and seek to accomplish its work; that they be altruist and selfless critical thinkers who are objective in perspective, solemn in attitude, and professional their allegiance to the spirit of unalloyed liberty and unanimous justice for all to rightly discern the interpretation of fundamental laws, and the laws emanating from these. </span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><br /></span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none;"><i>Anything else is self-interest,</i> and we call this 'judicial aggrandizement;' when constitutional language is used to cloak political ideology that is alloyed with constructs distinct from the unanimous interest that is good for all the people. Such practices are unconstitutional, and yet it is the distinct duty of our judges and justices to discern what the Constitution and the spirit of the law opines on specific cases and situations; <b>and therein is where John Quincy Adams opposes the instrumentality of faction in government office: </b> only the</span><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; text-decoration: underline;"><b><i> selfless</i></b></span><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none;"> spirit<b><i> </i></b>of preserving individual liberty and justice for all that exists (or should exist) should be the presiding hallmark necessary to preserve true peace, according to the original spirit of the law in the United States. To attain such selflessness in our government; in our courts, in our legislatures; this may never be completely possible. Notwithstanding, it so happens that in some generations we have individuals who value being genuinely selfless, being graced with the right understanding of that unalloyed spirit of liberty; placing forth their intellect and might for the unanimous good of all the people.</span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 24px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none;">In the June 30, 2022 Supreme Court opinion on West Virginia v. EPA, we find the work of political self-interest seeking to use the instrumentality of our government for their desired ends, instead of for the unanimous good of all the people. The case began in the Obama administration when the EPA was directed to command & control the fossil fuel industry of oil, coal, and natural gas, with the intent of forcing its demise and rapidly shift the national energy grid into renewable energy (solar, wind, ect.). Thus, the EPA, without clear congressional authorization, ordered extravagant, costly upgrades to present oil, coal, natural gas processing companies to comply with an unattainable timeline of about ten years requiring a national grid energy mix ratio that would favor renewable energy and disfavor fossil fuel energy, creating massive and drastic economic monetary investments in renewable energy, and force the fossil fuel industry to pay if they could not comply according to the EPA time benchmarks. </span></p><div><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><br /></span></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhyRccfjGpuRA7V565SQC1RJdZwzhqFuQ-khyjfqQ-Dz7yw0yeMSaMOWPKIV1d7qdt8GfyvOQ1WeRv6LabAEtmnYldhL-E5wNkhPAFVMPUNDzHYfNAAXUaQ_PoV-4w-voB69uqdbw8JtAn7qv020VbQpapg_XhanAFRo8LwLAJBU7483F43iu14HVUo/s504/Screen%20Shot%202022-09-30%20at%2010.14.00%20AM.png" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="504" data-original-width="351" height="640" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhyRccfjGpuRA7V565SQC1RJdZwzhqFuQ-khyjfqQ-Dz7yw0yeMSaMOWPKIV1d7qdt8GfyvOQ1WeRv6LabAEtmnYldhL-E5wNkhPAFVMPUNDzHYfNAAXUaQ_PoV-4w-voB69uqdbw8JtAn7qv020VbQpapg_XhanAFRo8LwLAJBU7483F43iu14HVUo/w446-h640/Screen%20Shot%202022-09-30%20at%2010.14.00%20AM.png" width="446" /></a></div><p><br /></p><p> </p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEicA0v_0TaOWp3st9LVxJFeQStkACw2U1vKzlBB-BSTHrcWlkxgW0nc4xz8tSqcXVXVnaO4-PSJUxp1ZsljoZd7aCpT8FjDzFIyGAjAh5K95pJeUvbynw-YBgKwjACv89Bs_kCQDrzbyjGjgpzsTy4hbepJj-3FtLMlRuXjBr-95-Bn_MW210WL3vAy/s544/Screen%20Shot%202022-09-29%20at%2012.17.56%20PM.png" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="544" data-original-width="336" height="713" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEicA0v_0TaOWp3st9LVxJFeQStkACw2U1vKzlBB-BSTHrcWlkxgW0nc4xz8tSqcXVXVnaO4-PSJUxp1ZsljoZd7aCpT8FjDzFIyGAjAh5K95pJeUvbynw-YBgKwjACv89Bs_kCQDrzbyjGjgpzsTy4hbepJj-3FtLMlRuXjBr-95-Bn_MW210WL3vAy/w442-h713/Screen%20Shot%202022-09-29%20at%2012.17.56%20PM.png" width="442" /></a></div><br /><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br /></div><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjFzLjjEsbHQp2dcGnfFoQtUtX6jkIFcWhm1d-oEwz-GtB3jDW-OymZlUuWKB9rjRboR6FlmqnriqTPJEMlWrVVWHT0l4Oia2PS7mg3Y73MLqchdLUywQppmg35db_HahaQEpm0wFpTMDOvC7jogAuPFYnq2q7g--hIF2QUEmSP6DYMkGqQy7E2f607/s566/Screen%20Shot%202022-09-29%20at%2012.16.54%20PM.png" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="566" data-original-width="336" height="721" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjFzLjjEsbHQp2dcGnfFoQtUtX6jkIFcWhm1d-oEwz-GtB3jDW-OymZlUuWKB9rjRboR6FlmqnriqTPJEMlWrVVWHT0l4Oia2PS7mg3Y73MLqchdLUywQppmg35db_HahaQEpm0wFpTMDOvC7jogAuPFYnq2q7g--hIF2QUEmSP6DYMkGqQy7E2f607/w428-h721/Screen%20Shot%202022-09-29%20at%2012.16.54%20PM.png" width="428" /></a></div><br /><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br /></div><br /><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgpiA9Jj9Rs6GYSzgyiQNEB-uVouN2ERBbLlWPNanLflFGndF8z5O3GpIe_1CZVqL4Qshb-Rnp8WBHGBDEHRO8jt5Ma2VV_n70zxtUIWcBK5r3083n7n8WLIh3rbCj6inzaObeCWt5MiZjHnI-ySK6625lkcdbPNczW3qjc9nmYy2XFhEfZmIyqo7XW/s534/Screen%20Shot%202022-09-29%20at%201.22.26%20PM.png" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="534" data-original-width="324" height="732" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgpiA9Jj9Rs6GYSzgyiQNEB-uVouN2ERBbLlWPNanLflFGndF8z5O3GpIe_1CZVqL4Qshb-Rnp8WBHGBDEHRO8jt5Ma2VV_n70zxtUIWcBK5r3083n7n8WLIh3rbCj6inzaObeCWt5MiZjHnI-ySK6625lkcdbPNczW3qjc9nmYy2XFhEfZmIyqo7XW/w446-h732/Screen%20Shot%202022-09-29%20at%201.22.26%20PM.png" width="446" /></a></div><br /><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi74vMUXmb62lBqFLGBJHWZfSbPMN38OoUclpXkukWxe2Mranb6wEaR9GAB4MLyGWGYpxel2A_6rsykqiILw7jADzwuz_8XB_6RT5q0n9tPix_AS_6BxyqI8OgKJkZbIYtSPkLTz8lH4DSwUrZ-iB8r-l8CcQ0IsdCshEpJtOYpJvMBDzyUWDa7JUVu/s550/Screen%20Shot%202022-09-29%20at%2012.28.35%20PM.png" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="550" data-original-width="338" height="690" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi74vMUXmb62lBqFLGBJHWZfSbPMN38OoUclpXkukWxe2Mranb6wEaR9GAB4MLyGWGYpxel2A_6rsykqiILw7jADzwuz_8XB_6RT5q0n9tPix_AS_6BxyqI8OgKJkZbIYtSPkLTz8lH4DSwUrZ-iB8r-l8CcQ0IsdCshEpJtOYpJvMBDzyUWDa7JUVu/w425-h690/Screen%20Shot%202022-09-29%20at%2012.28.35%20PM.png" width="425" /></a></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br /></div><br /><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhvcrmpCSUKx50V0YP-Q4hTxLdsBlBKUAnTFTmM_v48O--cwaYUMBc6oUS_Ged1m7jwikdPfi1mzb7YjapjssA_bRwNVzR8jGczRE1t0ybR2cw4B0jsA5HZdCyg8EwH17SXJ8KE29PgQE8pVsOwi5jyoe3xnNmDRlNnQmXg3UaJ2vxofKvn20jq2bNK/s543/Screen%20Shot%202022-09-29%20at%2012.38.38%20PM.png" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="543" data-original-width="325" height="690" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhvcrmpCSUKx50V0YP-Q4hTxLdsBlBKUAnTFTmM_v48O--cwaYUMBc6oUS_Ged1m7jwikdPfi1mzb7YjapjssA_bRwNVzR8jGczRE1t0ybR2cw4B0jsA5HZdCyg8EwH17SXJ8KE29PgQE8pVsOwi5jyoe3xnNmDRlNnQmXg3UaJ2vxofKvn20jq2bNK/w414-h690/Screen%20Shot%202022-09-29%20at%2012.38.38%20PM.png" width="414" /></a></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">The preservation of the United States of America, and the peace amongst the people is of paramount importance. To that, should John Quincy Adams done the nation a better service in appeasing the slavery Democrats instrumentality of controlling government? But what about the cause of unanimity of our inalienable, self-evident individual right to liberty and justice for all that is the basis of our fundamental laws as intended in word and spirit in our Declaration of 1776 and the Bill of Rights in our Constitution?</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 24px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">How do we preserve the political union if political self-interest <b><i>distinct </i></b>from the unanimous good 'of and for’ all the people' (faction) controls key offices in our government? </span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 24px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">We must root it out with personal and professional integrity as participators in our national conversation. That is right. We must all join the 'fray.' We must be continuously selfless and observed to be objective, independent, and altruist in setting aside our politic and meeting one another at the ballast and anchor level, as national Americans. Certainly, it is the making of awareness, and of bringing clarity to our allegiance to that unanimous unalloyed spirit of liberty and justice for all; of joining the national conversation with solemnity of speech and conduct that we become national in our attitude, our perspective, and our duty as Americans to defend our historical traditions of ordered liberty.</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 24px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">With that in mind, the writer claims upon the readers with their different politics to consider eclipsing the polarizing baseless ploy of factious self-interest and to work the work of patience: surely, as it regards the care of our natural physical environment there should be unanimous agreement that we be most excellent stewards. The narrative, or plan of the Democrat Party is not that though: it is self-interest, and it is a business scheme. Right then and there, the civilian Democrat and civilian Republican should meet in allegiance to oppose that, because their is not unanimous agreement as to the genuineness, methods, pace, or actual purpose of the Biden presidency, Democrats in Congress, or as she is self-reporting her intentions, former Federal Reserve bank president Janet Yellen, our current Treasury Secretary. All these are in government and controlling its instrumentality in a way that is politically divisive and polarizing to the preservation of the American people to be one national people: the agenda of self-interest, as said above, intends a rapid shift in redistributing the national grid energy mix, according to a tight timeline, purposing to destroy the fossil fuel industry and creating massive investment flows into renewable energy industries, altogether causing economic volatility, with an increase in the 'cost of living' (inflation), that their vision of a new business industry can be exacted.</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 24px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">The Supreme Court ruling opinion in West Virginia v. EPA deconstructs the scheme. The question to the Democrat people is if they will ignore the value of preserving peace and unanimity that we be one people in political, national peace, or will they disrespect the importance of preserving that ballast and anchor that is the foundation of our nation?</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 24px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none;">The Inflation Reduction Act, a mixed bag of legislation was crafted to divide the people. It includes grants of money and economic sustenance to different groups of people with different issues, that they may look the other way as to the actual self-interest agenda of the legislation: the monetary and tax policy in it is exactly the same monetary and tax policy that Biden's Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen is promoting with her alliance to the World Bank's Global Tax Program: both measures target the fossil fuel industry of wealthy countries with the same exact agenda that the Supreme Court deconstructed in West Virginia v. EPA, and both measures (the Inflation Reduction Act & Global Tax Program), demand that participating countries drastically reform their tax code to agree with the ideological self-interest (faction) of the World Bank's business development scheme. </span></p></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEjhqWkKIH1bRzRCbOuHtKVvG--MC-88B47ycueI4lr8ZuyL9ajbvBNW5AdlJ8nBa2vmcp1GPVIsWKfqQwam5kz1uSVHASD2N8KL6AXlMiJa3dST5BvtFjw9eTZ_XgFTZC-Rnv7WIznNvbe7RfWAesH7f7bhgiu0ijwIQ07b41_m_ES5ARqEOcwtqN55" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img alt="" data-original-height="809" data-original-width="634" height="640" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEjhqWkKIH1bRzRCbOuHtKVvG--MC-88B47ycueI4lr8ZuyL9ajbvBNW5AdlJ8nBa2vmcp1GPVIsWKfqQwam5kz1uSVHASD2N8KL6AXlMiJa3dST5BvtFjw9eTZ_XgFTZC-Rnv7WIznNvbe7RfWAesH7f7bhgiu0ijwIQ07b41_m_ES5ARqEOcwtqN55=w501-h640" width="501" /></a></div><br /><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none;">So Biden, along with the Democrats in Congress got congressional authorization on a party line vote of 51-50 in the U.S. Senate, while Janet Yellen is promoting an alliance of America's domestic economic policy unto the globalist, self-interest of the World Bank. A bank that does not prioritize the economy of the American people, be they Democrats or Republicans, but seeks to internationalize the control of the U.S. economy with a money-redistribution scheme that expatriates its wealth to its development projects in nations in Africa and Asia. Both measures, if the reader takes the time to review them, include a targeting of the American fossil fuel industry and a rapid shift to renewable energy. So they are trying to create to businesses: stealing American tax money that is channeled through the World Bank for their own ideological self-interest projects in Africa and Asian countries, and the business of destroying the fossil fuel industry in order to create an economic situation where massive investments are made into renewable energy at the expense of American's 'cost of living.'</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 24px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">The design of faction to control and destroy the American fossil fuel industry is far more than a 'do-good' for the environment, it is not about climate pollution control, it is the making of an investment scheme that benefits a globalist bank alliance scheme, and it has no qualms in dividing and polarizing the American people in order to attain its desired ends of heaping up wealth and a world balance of power that destroys America's ability to self-sustain itself economically,--because it targets and exploits are energy independence at a time when the U.S. Bureau of Land Management has published that the U.S. has more shale oil than all other nations combined.</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 24px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none;">The preservation of the American nation cannot be accomplished without unanimity on our right to life, liberty, and right to be happy: that final right, a fundamental law that does certainly imply the right to peaceful self-determination as a free people, is disrespected and denigrated when we allow political self-interest to force upon each other a command & control of the instrumentality of government powers in self-interest: such actions are against the political peace and unity of the American people and should be met with unanimous, responsible, lawful opposition on behalf of Democrats and Republicans.</span></p></div><p></p><div class="blogger-post-footer">ScalziOriginals.US
Build ecosystems & individuals
to strengthen & sustain
integrated community health. </div>@CoachBill007http://www.blogger.com/profile/00964006939825613259noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4249677153801659195.post-36805753108237060182022-09-16T20:58:00.007+03:002022-09-19T13:53:51.603+03:00The Control of America's 4.3 Trillion Barrel Inflection Point & The People's Awareness Of It<p></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi57YB5j58SD4ebG7VEqBdkqtTFuri1yWzAH4yN5iAGZh7UFSDy-8xSgK6KyXN-1FLPs73FWkLD3H5A19eCKuzy4e69bW3jKH5dk_4-ouEDUHZvGnX7_vuzunvNvm3yPIzN3CU1Qi0XDP6pyBvEMfLvKfQGxImWUOS_xlLdpU_Zc7HrgkGuUG7YIyJe/s330/Screen%20Shot%202022-09-16%20at%201.54.09%20PM.png" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="287" data-original-width="330" height="556" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi57YB5j58SD4ebG7VEqBdkqtTFuri1yWzAH4yN5iAGZh7UFSDy-8xSgK6KyXN-1FLPs73FWkLD3H5A19eCKuzy4e69bW3jKH5dk_4-ouEDUHZvGnX7_vuzunvNvm3yPIzN3CU1Qi0XDP6pyBvEMfLvKfQGxImWUOS_xlLdpU_Zc7HrgkGuUG7YIyJe/w640-h556/Screen%20Shot%202022-09-16%20at%201.54.09%20PM.png" width="640" /></a></div><p></p><p><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; -webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral;">As it pertains to the American tradition of economic self-determination, governments best duty is the empowerment of the people’s growth of business, and not promoting, furthering, or supporting a reliance on the split priority of financial service organizations not in allegiance to the people and Constitution of the United States of America</span><b style="font-family: STIXGeneral;"><i> </i></b><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; -webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral;">, </span><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; -webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral;"><b><i><u> </u><u>nor</u></i></b></span><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; -webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral;"> in the impractical over-regulation of sectors of the economy for the purpose of implementing interest <i>distinct</i> from the unanimous good of all the American people. Likewise, it has been noted in the U.S. Supreme Court’s majority opinion on West Virginia v. EPA, June 30, 2022, the furtherance of policies causing excessive economic damage upon important sectors of the national economy, in this case, the Environmental Protection Agency’s undue burden in targeting the the oil, natural gas, and coal industries of the United States without legislative approval from the U.S. Congress was found to be unconstitutional, and an overstep of authority by said government agency.</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">Good governance does not produce volatility; it renders economic prosperity; and so political self-interest policies that seek to drastically reform the historical tradition of the American national economy of economic self-determination that sustains the flow and process of free markets must be met with observation, analysis, and ultimately, responsible, informed, oppositional advocacy from the people, that the cause of equal liberty, including that cause of economic self-determination be safeguarded.</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 21px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">To this end, in regards unto the split priority of international financial service organizations, such as the World Bank, the World Economic Forum, and the International Monetary Fund, these entities have a decidedly political slant that favors socialist economic policies that are resolutely distinct from the historical economic tradition in the United States of self-determination. Now, --especially so, when those entities are politically slanted in their ideological construction of how domestic and foreign economy should flow and process, can it be understood that the instrumentality of the legislative and executive office of government as controlled in its present form by the Democrat Party is at odds with the Republican Party in its goals and objectives on how to best strengthen the national economy of the United States? If so, how is the self-interest of the Democrat Party distinct from the economic good for all the American people; not the majority of the people, but unanimously of all of the American people? </span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><br /></span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiTDVrc8iID_iEm93cADCYqViJpGv_4EXK1iiKr9Kk0UFjX1chY28jTgw6d_yleTifRfjXl2pQrdsl2NNI0T11vjp27BePqYHi_8k1XZy30zTQEKmOxtKw0Oj7PncPDu-lTS1jlRgF0TkqXqrWHTcd4JXazmIZh8ZmddCkMb2-VXPdRgrSd-0X9Qahk/s500/LemonadeStand.jpg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="500" data-original-width="462" height="640" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiTDVrc8iID_iEm93cADCYqViJpGv_4EXK1iiKr9Kk0UFjX1chY28jTgw6d_yleTifRfjXl2pQrdsl2NNI0T11vjp27BePqYHi_8k1XZy30zTQEKmOxtKw0Oj7PncPDu-lTS1jlRgF0TkqXqrWHTcd4JXazmIZh8ZmddCkMb2-VXPdRgrSd-0X9Qahk/w592-h640/LemonadeStand.jpg" width="592" /></a></div><br /><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><br /></span><p></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 21px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">To bring light on to the matter, given that the U.S. Bureau of Land Management has published in official government reports that more than half of the world’s extractable shale oil is in American soil, are ‘climate change economics’ an imposition of economic policy that is receiving unanimous approval from Americans of all political parties, or is there enough political opposition to clearly see a polarization of thought and ideas on the practical efficacy of prioritizing ‘climate change economic policy,’ instead of increasing and sustaining the traditional energy industry of oil, coal, and natural gas in the United States?</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 21px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">Though noted in the Supreme Court’s West Virginia v. EPA 6.30.2022 opinion that congressional process and authorization supersedes government agency’s authority and is required prior to the Environmental Protection Agency’s ‘climate change’ policies being ordered upon the American traditional energy fuels industry, the court’s opinion delved with great judiciousness and detail into its study of the matter, and its efficacy to identify the prevailing issues on the case: it found the the EPA’s actions were going to reform the oil, coal, and natural gas fuel American market into a dynamic that would hinder, limit, and finally, cause great damage to that important sector of the U.S. national economy.</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 21px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">One only has to read the opinion to readily understand the court’s study of observations and analysis to plainly understand its conclusion to the prevailing issues. It is then from that opinion in early summer 2022 up through the present time of Autumn 2022, at the time of this writing, that the Democrat Party got congressional approval in a party line senate vote of 51-50, with the Vice President placing the final vote on the Inflation Reduction Act: a legislation of odds & ends that spliced together health care regulation cost, U.S. soldier health care, with what could be said is the actual purpose of the legislation, a reformation of the U.S. tax code and the Internal Revenue Service. So the Democrat Party got its congressional approval to hinder, limit, and suppress America’s traditional energy market entrance, diversification, and blocking of important fuel physical distribution & transportation (Keystone XL oil pipeline blocked by the Biden administration January 21, 2022) <i>at the inflection point when the U.S. Bureau of Land Management has published that the United States has more than 50% of all extractable shale oil in the world. </i></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 21px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">Since the onset of the Democrats having control of the Executive Office and congressional majority, the ‘cost of living’ for the American people and their economy has increased, though the United States could be producing all of its energy fuel needs without importing oil, coal, or natural gas, and yet,-- it imported oil from over 73 countries in 2021, including Russia and China. In addition, large American oil companies had a record-breaking profitable year because (1) the supply of the fuel has been cut, and (2) government over-regulation of the drilling lease market has halted market growth and entrance into the traditional energy fuel industry, creating a near-monopoly of large oil producers enjoying large profits due to the policies and executive orders from the Democrat-controlled legislature and Executive Office.</span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><br /></span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEipEBKCqhNO_qpwHPFXfwFNRRAika8Pvoo_2qdU1GRlbiwZEZcVsUtUF83MyA5BqZz6XgM5_rkOkXYZEYtQkM_oqpvRyu0Gn9c3HWuzb9Dy6N_b4CIAA2mPtnbhovn1xINfh9JhXtxVqcRWM3OP2kN7vy-ymcWUwrmZIQELJvSA2jQ6nTXl9LrIyzfe/s368/rockwell-visits-a-rationing-board-by-norman-rockwell.jpg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="270" data-original-width="368" height="470" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEipEBKCqhNO_qpwHPFXfwFNRRAika8Pvoo_2qdU1GRlbiwZEZcVsUtUF83MyA5BqZz6XgM5_rkOkXYZEYtQkM_oqpvRyu0Gn9c3HWuzb9Dy6N_b4CIAA2mPtnbhovn1xINfh9JhXtxVqcRWM3OP2kN7vy-ymcWUwrmZIQELJvSA2jQ6nTXl9LrIyzfe/w640-h470/rockwell-visits-a-rationing-board-by-norman-rockwell.jpg" width="640" /></a></div><br /><p></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">Through all this, a separate program is in the works from international financial service banks, and its goals and objectives can be read online: it is the World Bank’s Global Tax program. If one has read the Democrat’s Inflation Reduction Act, and then reads the World Bank’s Global Tax Program, it would not be farfetched to understand that both documents are nearly exact in their details of objectives, and this includes hindering the domestic traditional energy fuel sector of wealthy countries and reforming the tax code of each to align with the Global Tax Program goals: capital redistribution of middle class wealth unto impoverished nations with the international financial service banks being in charge of collecting and distributing capital revenue through their specific development projects for each participating nation. </span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 21px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">Is the priority of the international financial services banks unto the American people, or unto a globalist development agenda distinct from the interest of the American people and our historical traditional of economic self-determination? The Federal Reserve, an independent financial service entity that is connected to the U.S. government through the appointment of its leaders by the U.S. President and U.S. Congress, has its former president, Janet Yellen, promoting the Global Tax Program of the World Bank. She is the U.S. Treasury Secretary and serves in President Biden’s cabinet in that job. Is it practical to observe that independent financial services with globalist economic policies have a split priority that is not completely in allegiance to the people and Constitution of the United States of America, and its economy?</span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><br /></span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhSR3hU4-DDmQZelsOyvoIwjYbupAihMQjinnSio8Z1qZxlVeW-mNQDO78_WQvolpzlgAKlTvtbb4gL1OlTjBm4ArerW2_hibHE4VjVtZiawOvg6dkSDQmTJ03bOHLWawuuQ_HsKc5L05U5oPQbIpfHQfPmSkR_m-7NpNl-D1Q9GCHmkjB4MveCh9X9/s900/small-town-usa-geno-peoples.jpg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="673" data-original-width="900" height="478" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhSR3hU4-DDmQZelsOyvoIwjYbupAihMQjinnSio8Z1qZxlVeW-mNQDO78_WQvolpzlgAKlTvtbb4gL1OlTjBm4ArerW2_hibHE4VjVtZiawOvg6dkSDQmTJ03bOHLWawuuQ_HsKc5L05U5oPQbIpfHQfPmSkR_m-7NpNl-D1Q9GCHmkjB4MveCh9X9/w640-h478/small-town-usa-geno-peoples.jpg" width="640" /></a></div><br /><p></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">Is it within the American spirit of its constitutional law, and its historical tradition of individual economic self-determination that the Democrat Political Party has openly taking action to legislate an alignment of its tax code and tax enforcement reformation to the World Bank’s Global Tax Program? </span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 21px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">How will the American people of all politics respond? </span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 21px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">Perhaps with silence. The people do not read the Inflation Reduction Act, nor the World Bank’s Global Tax Program, nor do they comprehend that ‘climate change economics’ is simply the wallpaper media soundbyte that is pushed while the international financial services banks complete their control of the Democrat Political Party’s instrumentality, as a means to ‘command & control’ a redistribution of the wealth of the U.S. middle class.</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 21px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">Why is the media silent? They are supposed to be objective; and why are our American schools teaching the polarizing racial difference awareness of critical of the white race theory at this time of great economic danger, instead of critical thinking and allegiance to the founding principles of why and how the United States of America is the greatest nation on earth, and the fact that the best domestic and foreign policy of America is in the strength of its economy: its middle class and their businesses.</span></p><div class="blogger-post-footer">ScalziOriginals.US
Build ecosystems & individuals
to strengthen & sustain
integrated community health. </div>@CoachBill007http://www.blogger.com/profile/00964006939825613259noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4249677153801659195.post-11263073177299228512022-09-11T22:19:00.008+03:002022-10-13T22:43:01.749+03:00The Command & Control of The Middle Class Tax Money: International Banking Institutions Development Projects Mirror China's GeoEconomic Loan/ Debt/ Influence Schemes in Africa & Asia<p></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi_nnDMHFt52fMZb0ey8YGUolfurc2NhBoJ054xnhRotFQaC_hIYTROQEHVqrbSbaBNHPxFpq7NBgVeKfSHXE9GGK4gooT8UU6zc6s7xB_VdxEiAz5PtWuo59Flv7Gz5DjI3GeEZZwKGaZL-S6DLLsFNVNulHdQ3llncDhWZrWaaQM5L82OgobOLuMc/s622/C2F264E9-D521-41C8-AFC3-B74B77EF3D73.jpeg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><span style="font-family: georgia;"><img border="0" data-original-height="622" data-original-width="498" height="640" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi_nnDMHFt52fMZb0ey8YGUolfurc2NhBoJ054xnhRotFQaC_hIYTROQEHVqrbSbaBNHPxFpq7NBgVeKfSHXE9GGK4gooT8UU6zc6s7xB_VdxEiAz5PtWuo59Flv7Gz5DjI3GeEZZwKGaZL-S6DLLsFNVNulHdQ3llncDhWZrWaaQM5L82OgobOLuMc/w512-h640/C2F264E9-D521-41C8-AFC3-B74B77EF3D73.jpeg" width="512" /></span></a></div><span style="font-family: georgia;"><br /></span><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><span style="font-family: georgia;"><br /></span></div><span style="font-family: georgia;">What was so incredible about Frederick Douglass, and why is he not championed as he ought to be in our schools? What is it about how he approached his work that made him a formidable challenge to the status quo; such a complex force of unstoppable passion and intellect continuing the work of John Adams & John Quincy Adams: both a defense of unalloyed individual liberty and equal justice for the individual, <b><i>and</i></b> the exemplification of solemn duty to transform from ordinary to extraordinary for the good of others; for the love of people; the exercise of the power of the individual to effect the American way of life for good, and without self-interest. To become 'hotter than fire for others.' How can such length of success in his endeavor find fuel, if it were not that his cause was a righteous cause,-- for the good of all, without harm unto any, but in protection of life and liberty, and that pursuit of being safe and happy?</span><div><span style="font-family: georgia;"><br /></span></div><div><div><span style="font-family: georgia;"><br /></span></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjcEzllbaWgMCNSojhhiGxCwC7O8xqWQJ1Bo5PY7kfqF_PQvAbGg02EJcfcV1oXiNLtZHJ4_EL5cydGvuYxwetiFrTaWW6Y_YA9rRlMdV4rYj5a3y-imlEJLmH5fPi2gaciIrPMjEFXgnxzDlV3e1mLtQOPRpSlklJN8RTJg2UmBdoc5lNubJqQCGzx/s350/220px-LifeOfFrederickDouglassCover-1.jpg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><span style="font-family: georgia;"><img border="0" data-original-height="350" data-original-width="220" height="640" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjcEzllbaWgMCNSojhhiGxCwC7O8xqWQJ1Bo5PY7kfqF_PQvAbGg02EJcfcV1oXiNLtZHJ4_EL5cydGvuYxwetiFrTaWW6Y_YA9rRlMdV4rYj5a3y-imlEJLmH5fPi2gaciIrPMjEFXgnxzDlV3e1mLtQOPRpSlklJN8RTJg2UmBdoc5lNubJqQCGzx/w402-h640/220px-LifeOfFrederickDouglassCover-1.jpg" width="402" /></span></a></div><div><span style="font-family: georgia;"><br /></span><p></p><p><span style="font-family: georgia;">The heart and mind of the power of one is a legacy unto the American tradition of the defense of individual human rights. Such a real idea it is that it is the purpose of our Declaration of Independence: a promise of these rights and a call to generations of Americans to defend. Thus, we must need critical thinkers who are independent-minded, formal and dignified in their purpose, being responsible in our work of reasoning with the American people, in being ready to deftly call out the ever-present factious self-interest that Jay, Madison, and Hamilton repeatedly warned us of in the Federalist Papers. We must be taught to value being astute and selfless, diplomatic and allegiant unto the original unalloyed spirit of American liberty and justice; as it was in the settled values that fortified the heart and mind of George Washington, of John Adams, of his son, John Quincy Adams, and of our American champion, Frederick Douglass. These few geniuses understood that they had to be meek in personal ambition, valuing temperance, goodness, justice, and a love of people, in short, political geniuses for choosing a love of the good of all people instead of, and before self-interest.</span></p><p><span style="font-family: georgia;">The defending of a way of life wherein individual liberty and justice as a nation of laws, and not of men, makes America a great nation. See far across the world at those nations whose governments control the expression of political dissent, and you will find a people who's society is oppressed at the heart and mind. Only where the people intuitively know that they are free will innovation, art, music and business flourish with great strength; only where the people are in control of the government, will the distribution of power be found to reside in the people.</span></p><p><span style="font-family: georgia;">The present-day reality of the end goal of international banking institutions (World Bank, World Economic Forum, International Monetary Fund) outlines a redistribution revenue scheme that collects tax money, channels it through intergovernmental corporate banking accounts and uses portions of it for development projects that are resolutely socialist. Their schemes do not prioritize the growth of the American middle class, or the strengthening of the European middle class, though they may pay 'lip service' unto such ideals, instead, the priority of the collected actions of these international banking institutions is to control the economic policy of each nation, even its tax code and enforcement protocols, that they may be able to streamline their objective of 'commanding & controlling' the global flow of money. They have a scheme, and the Democrats in Congress are for it. They aim to align U.S. economic policy with that of international banks that have zero allegiance to the American tradition, nor do they have respect for the power and rights of the American individual to assure that government is 'of us & for us.'</span></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi_kNo6PlaPcne80J6o991OaEeDA7h5E5GWO4Y5sZMRDfEQZ3HUDXIptBcJFLeqvH3VdJNdLzBtVFE8IkiY8UDMjmjeI44z9683ZxwhAT9aZrQPkJcXInGF1--ZbwzwbaA9EqFXRoioK3U2AH_wm4x3QSCGC9egRQ3u9jOETlB8uxg_HvXhraAUa57B/s612/istockphoto-598798738-612x612.jpg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><span style="font-family: georgia;"><img border="0" data-original-height="612" data-original-width="612" height="640" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi_kNo6PlaPcne80J6o991OaEeDA7h5E5GWO4Y5sZMRDfEQZ3HUDXIptBcJFLeqvH3VdJNdLzBtVFE8IkiY8UDMjmjeI44z9683ZxwhAT9aZrQPkJcXInGF1--ZbwzwbaA9EqFXRoioK3U2AH_wm4x3QSCGC9egRQ3u9jOETlB8uxg_HvXhraAUa57B/w640-h640/istockphoto-598798738-612x612.jpg" width="640" /></span></a></div><p></p><p><span style="font-family: georgia;">How else are we as independent-minded, critical thinkers are to understand the World Bank's Global Tax Project after we have read the Inflation Reduction Act and noticed the it is nearly identical in its words; in its details and aims as the Global Tax Project? The redistributing of money from wealthy nations to poor nations with spotty respect of individual liberty, implies that those governments are willing to accept welfare from the international institutions whom will have financial influence in these countries in EXACTLY THE SAME WAY & WITH THE SAME END PURPOSE AS CHINA DOES IN AFRICA with its loan investment/ influence debt scheme. It is a scheme to 'command & control.'</span></p><p><span style="font-family: georgia;">The people of these poor nations in Africa, and Asia cannot truly object or have a national discussion on the internationalization of their tax codes or national financial policy. The varying degrees of government control on the freedom of speech stifles and oppresses the sounding voice of individual liberty, making such nations ripe for the manipulative schemes of these international banking institutions.</span></p><p><span style="font-family: georgia;">The ploy to create accounts with international central banking institutions is ventured on 'systems theory;' meaning, these international banking institutions must first get approval from sovereign nations to legislate an alignment of their tax code to mirror the global tax revenue scheme they have in place. In other words, the conditions for the money to start flowing into accounts with international central banking institution has to begin with an orchestration of the ideological trajectory and composition of a nation's political party. The scheme is to amass economic power from the wealth of rich nations, in order to establish their ideological development financial influence in poor nations. The fact that China is already doing this in Africa and Asia creates a world balance of power that is (1) increasingly polarized, (2) edges out the national economic sovereignty and American economic tradition of self-determination and ingenuity of small business growth as the true strength of a nation's power, (3) and establishes an international banking institution of countries with priorities that have nothing to do with an energy-independent United States, or a growing and strengthening of its middle class.</span></p><p><span style="font-family: georgia;">Finding that the instrumentality of government for their self-interest is in direct opposition to the historical tradition of individual liberty and equanimity of justice that the United States of America was founded upon, seems as if it is of no regard to these central banks. As such, we must defend the economic sovereignty of the people of the United States, a people of all nations, politics, ways of life, and religions, and should call out the treason of the Democrat Party for being unAmerican, and dishonest in their intentions and maneuvers of tricking the people with mixed legislation (Inflation Reduction Act) that jumbles together a weaponization of our Internal Revenue Service (as a precursor in aligning it with the international banking institution requirements) with health care protections for soldiers, environmental reforestation, and medicine cost controls. Why not make separate legislation for each of these needs to not complicate, but simplify the politics?</span></p><p><span style="font-family: georgia;"><i>The United States of America is the greatest nation on Earth because of its foundation of protecting individual human rights and a historical tradition of valuing justice that has created the right balance between government and the people;</i> its magic being the economic strength of its middle class, and this itself, stemming from the ground conditions that have generated its prosperity: <i>a nation of laws that has positioned its government to be 'of & for' the people.</i> And therein can be found the awesomeness of Frederick Douglass and also why he is not championed as he ought to be: He effectively challenged the status quo as a writer and public speaker. He could not be made to stop in his passion and endeavor to preserve America as a nation of laws founded on the promise of the Declaration of 1776 and the strength of our Constitution. He was a born a slave, and yet, along with the help of families and communities in America, Ireland, and England, Douglass rose to excellence BECAUSE of his selflessness in relentlessly pursuing the shaping of the nation as one of equal rights. He did so as a critical thinker who was independent-minded. His individual endeavoring was itself a blessing of the exemplification of what it means to solely defend our human rights. To study him; and to study John Adams and his son John Quincy, and Abraham Lincoln through the reading of their works is to be inspired as an individual with the understanding that the power of one person who is selfless, can move mountains.</span></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p></div></div><div class="blogger-post-footer">ScalziOriginals.US
Build ecosystems & individuals
to strengthen & sustain
integrated community health. </div>@CoachBill007http://www.blogger.com/profile/00964006939825613259noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4249677153801659195.post-54315948075738785772022-09-07T18:59:00.009+03:002022-10-06T19:54:13.676+03:00Good Governance Is Not Volatile, It Renders Prosperity<p><span style="font-family: STIX Two Text;"> </span></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjClg8d95oTP651IM4Buoz8V6soBRW3fXfYxRGq6HDhVYJeNMWORI3d2axiFH1RDV5AV_3ACCr2mZeocJ-K0_k45aFaTJrH0fK5qEo0OhQcdhXN4yHnwcmXLKyi-gl9h8O9-lNmqmI7X6oeIxYef-reLICZcuBnNNO0pXsTQAKjbU0f5fI3yiKNHiSa/s550/carpentry_u-l-pjja700.jpg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><span style="font-family: STIX Two Text;"><img border="0" data-original-height="550" data-original-width="413" height="640" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjClg8d95oTP651IM4Buoz8V6soBRW3fXfYxRGq6HDhVYJeNMWORI3d2axiFH1RDV5AV_3ACCr2mZeocJ-K0_k45aFaTJrH0fK5qEo0OhQcdhXN4yHnwcmXLKyi-gl9h8O9-lNmqmI7X6oeIxYef-reLICZcuBnNNO0pXsTQAKjbU0f5fI3yiKNHiSa/w480-h640/carpentry_u-l-pjja700.jpg" width="480" /></span></a></div><span style="font-family: STIX Two Text;"><br /></span><p></p><p><span style="font-family: STIX Two Text;">How shall we defend and preserve if we allow our hearts and minds to be defaulted into being politically divided, when we should be united? The Declaration of Independence is our base line of agreement, since we are such a diverse people from all nations. We must at the least agree to each other's right to life, to each others right to liberty, to each others right to be happy, and to each other's right to endeavor to assure government is aligned with those fundamental natural laws. These first laws are not given, but are self-evident, God-endowed.</span></p><p><span style="font-family: STIX Two Text;">Was it so that the founders of the United States of America sought a powerful government to condescend upon the people and to impose its agenda on their way of life with the instrumentality of said national government being commanded and controlled by political party? Or is our Declaration of Independence a living document that claims and asserts our individual life & liberty; not a letter to some foreign king only, but a declaration of human spirit, that the individual human being would live at peace, self-determining their life, and maintaining the guarantee to assure government be 'of and for' the people?</span></p><p><span style="font-family: STIX Two Text;">Have we not a Constitution that frames our nation as its own sovereignty amongst nations, and as such, should we now begin to enter into treaties and alliances that place international banking institutions with globalist, non-American allegiances as our lords? But what America do we have if we have not the self-determined critical thinkers with that original spirit of liberty and justice for all? What people do we become if we are not allegiant unto that founding cause of human rights, that we remain a safe and happy nation?</span></p><p><span style="font-family: STIX Two Text;">So when a political party that is in control of government legislates and takes action <i><b>to erode the strength and clear understanding of those fundamental laws,</b></i> the people are tasked with a responsible and lawful form of defense; outlining the usurpations, and with the most rigorous, formal and dignified adherence to a respect of the general peace,--arise to warn and reason with the people on the grievances:</span></p><p></p><ul style="text-align: left;"><li><span style="font-family: STIX Two Text;">The presidency of the Biden administration and the Democrats ideology legislated an alignment of the American tax code <b>(Inflation Reduction Act) to agree with the conditions of the World Bank Global Tax Project:</b> a scheme that creates a global central development bank with a socialist ideological agenda to redistribute sovereign wealth from countries that have a middle class unto countries in Africa, the Middle East, and Asia.</span></li></ul><ul style="text-align: left;"><li><span style="font-family: STIX Two Text;">The aggressive weaponization of the American taxing authority, <b>the Internal Revenue Service</b>, with 87 thousand new employees, including a substantial increase in technology and transportation capabilities to equip them to target and track the American people in their communities, and enforce payments unto the government with faster and more precise enforcement powers.</span></li></ul><ul style="text-align: left;"><li><span style="font-family: STIX Two Text;">The intentional blocks to over-regulate, hinder, limit and destroy the growth and diversification of the <b>American traditional energy supply market of oil, natural gas, and coal </b>at the time that official government reports have posted that the U.S. has more shale oil than the entire world (4.3 trillion barrels of potentially recoverable oil) with the purpose of initiating a rapid, economically disruptive shift from these energies unto renewable energies, triggering an increase in the cost of living for the American people as it moves as quickly as it can to impose its agendas, causing a price depreciation of the purchasing power of the U.S. dollar (inflation).</span></li></ul><ul style="text-align: left;"><li><span style="font-family: STIX Two Text;">Negligence in protecting our sovereign border in allowing thousands of migrants to enter each day into the United States.</span></li></ul><ul style="text-align: left;"><li><span style="font-family: STIX Two Text;">The politically polarizing rhetoric of President Biden, Democrats in Congress, and the national media news organizations that have left off being objective, and instead seek opportunity to alarm their own Democrat base of constituents against the Republican base of constituents, with the sum strategic goal of dividing the American people, that they may maintain control of government.</span></li></ul><div><span style="font-family: STIX Two Text;">Constructions upon the pillars of our constitutional republic must be in agreement with the spirit of the law,<b> <u style="font-style: italic;">and not against </u><i>the ordered liberty that can be found in our historical tradition of solemnly defending individual justice without partiality.</i></b> These historical traditions are found in the words of the Declaration of Independence, in our Constitution, and in the complete writings and works of the most unalloyed defenders of individual human rights. Their efforts, recognizing that civility can be achieved in our agreement that our life, liberty, and right to be happy is ours; that government should not overstep its limits; that the people reserve power (9th Amendment) not enumerated in our founding documents; that we can live, and agree to live in peace as a people of all nations, religions, politics, and ways of life.</span></div><div><span style="font-family: STIX Two Text;"><br /></span></div><div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhckDtLuPHOPFc5U6997gvPT_VDbn0kISJZZfK-5w-u6cKB77wyH9CPWxq7ZT5LPdKDrwZhsUiM_jnoAmmnz0CSyySA5yCG1DeQaIFcgvXk93WuHGL9VCvg1aiCbNExkTEDdOV0x7mjqx-0shTvFokpqSTc2vpMp3hNhI9ZOTyEQUACBInKNNY17MvO/s2700/18xp-lincoln-image-mobileMasterAt3x.jpg" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><span style="font-family: STIX Two Text;"><img border="0" data-original-height="2700" data-original-width="1800" height="640" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhckDtLuPHOPFc5U6997gvPT_VDbn0kISJZZfK-5w-u6cKB77wyH9CPWxq7ZT5LPdKDrwZhsUiM_jnoAmmnz0CSyySA5yCG1DeQaIFcgvXk93WuHGL9VCvg1aiCbNExkTEDdOV0x7mjqx-0shTvFokpqSTc2vpMp3hNhI9ZOTyEQUACBInKNNY17MvO/w426-h640/18xp-lincoln-image-mobileMasterAt3x.jpg" width="426" /></span></a></div><span style="font-family: STIX Two Text;">Will contentions cease when we enter into a common respect free from agendas and condescensions that the Democrat Politic of self-interest has forced upon all the people? Good governance is not volatile, nor does it plant self-interest ahead of the individual liberty and peaceful economic self-determination that is good for the people. The heart and mind of the leader 'of and for' the United States must be careful in its approach, with a solemn manner of being, prioritizing the protection of the American people and the strength of our economy, according to the spirit of American law. Such an equilibrium is both easy and hard to attain; it demands altruism,-- that is to say,--selflessness.</span></div><div><span style="font-family: STIX Two Text;"><br /></span></div><div><span style="font-family: STIX Two Text;">Dynamic leadership in the management of how our government places itself in service to the people and the growth of our economy demands selflessness in order to be efficient and effective unto the good of all. As such, the support of the American middle class must be increased to render it increasingly wealthy, resilient and independent, because the domestic economic strength of a nation's people defines its geopolitical and geoeconomic strength on the global level. Our schools should be tasked with the goal and objective of producing Americans that achieve financial independence. They should be tasked with producing independent-minds that protect the original spirit of the Declaration of 1776 and the pillar that is our Constitution. So it renders that the strengthening of the people's intellect, sense of civic duty, and economic independence, lessens the strength of factious ruling party elitism and the schemes they practice to polarize the people and effectualize their actual end goal: maintaining control of government, and implementing their distinct agendas of self-interest.</span></div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><br /><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br /></div><br /><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br /></div><br /><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><p></p><div class="blogger-post-footer">ScalziOriginals.US
Build ecosystems & individuals
to strengthen & sustain
integrated community health. </div>@CoachBill007http://www.blogger.com/profile/00964006939825613259noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4249677153801659195.post-88387199247148495582022-08-24T21:25:00.012+03:002022-09-20T19:20:32.370+03:00The Gentle Waters of Our Tradition are Self-Determination & Independence: Will It Be Only "Your America," Or Will It Be "Our Home?"<p> </p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgaI2Dr4nF_9E6STUNyQp4dGhMlT4oUinrWLuQrMf6fh1cklgAoOzU1RDMqdtzKrqMWwn68VjCguetKq7DHlqvwAInjUbGmtTP77vGZ8TLYE8FvUqHjXDwmArs6fdrCs5XCFbZR5GG6jbfWopwXhkN8gBLkrhxCI7Uqqv8JJvlhd5CD7kNO_rn_TpAk/s575/tiny-dancer-wade-aiken.jpg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="400" data-original-width="575" height="446" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgaI2Dr4nF_9E6STUNyQp4dGhMlT4oUinrWLuQrMf6fh1cklgAoOzU1RDMqdtzKrqMWwn68VjCguetKq7DHlqvwAInjUbGmtTP77vGZ8TLYE8FvUqHjXDwmArs6fdrCs5XCFbZR5GG6jbfWopwXhkN8gBLkrhxCI7Uqqv8JJvlhd5CD7kNO_rn_TpAk/w640-h446/tiny-dancer-wade-aiken.jpg" width="640" /></a></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">Is it important for the people of the United States of America <i>to be informed</i>, <i>and to understand</i> what is or are the pathways for the best, most resilient economy? Should we be destined to move through economic cycles of recessions, monetary inflation, and fragmented economic prosperity? Is there a safer, and yet more adventurous, more individually empowering economic path? What is the national financial situation that the current economic management of the past century and present time period brought to the American middle class?</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><i><b>Do we have, do we see, are we experiencing an ample, resilient economic prosperity in the individuals and families that are our middle class, and has our America school education been an integral, initial creator of small business development and entrepreneurship? </b></i></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">For the purpose of their participation in national discussion, and that through the potentially extraordinary power of the written and spoken word of ordinary people; that through our exercise of voting, and our ability to assemble our thoughts and efforts on best economic practices and that through, both, our own voices, and our representatives in Congress, it may be good to reason with one another on the presented economic pathway options that are being offered as viable alternatives.</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">That the spirit of our national discussion and chosen economic pathway be in alignment with our founding documents, our Declaration of Independence and our Constitution, and that the historical tradition of the defense of individual liberty, judicial justice and self-determination emanating from these two sources,--cause a dignified gravity to our conversation, and serve to further add a ballast and scaffolding ordered framework to such national deliberations amongst the people.</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjVu_NPZztwnqQftTH1KQvvo1yOp2vwe-5zlrflmWdOttMz98K_Bwrntkatqum-YaZ0OD1L9ImNeugSwCq73X_L6KPhWZs-oqv07Oc73UmzbQlDEsXOXy7C7xatWI4m811ZKzDd3HwoJxaLhYXkwXjkLwL_uHKDoU41SN-rbBYVcJZA_DOtjD9dXVZ9/s800/people-beginning-preamble-to-united-states-constitution-people-beginning-united-states-173179193.jpg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="533" data-original-width="800" height="426" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjVu_NPZztwnqQftTH1KQvvo1yOp2vwe-5zlrflmWdOttMz98K_Bwrntkatqum-YaZ0OD1L9ImNeugSwCq73X_L6KPhWZs-oqv07Oc73UmzbQlDEsXOXy7C7xatWI4m811ZKzDd3HwoJxaLhYXkwXjkLwL_uHKDoU41SN-rbBYVcJZA_DOtjD9dXVZ9/w640-h426/people-beginning-preamble-to-united-states-constitution-people-beginning-united-states-173179193.jpg" width="640" /></a></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">To that effect, it is important to keep in mind a specific understanding and warning of John Adams in his February 12, 1808 letter to his son, John Quincy Adams:</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(13, 16, 19); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #0d1013; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><span style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); caret-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); color: black; font-style: italic;">(Excerpt from a Letter from John Adams to John Quincy Adams)</span></span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(13, 16, 19); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #0d1013; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><br /></span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(13, 16, 19); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #0d1013; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi_2w0suBJGrlmB83zuARCjolL0QsAq6GIpFK_ap6VyN1ZnwXYSXbemt_8YnPQQ0b12nB-rh4AzDRmov_vV7bVIGUwlv7rx0uKIDPNWl_6Lt-50S5311PgssQls_xW9Gt-fde5urZnCa1P_odi24Gs3FXIFeEQLBjhO2ib2azviJxH0vWGSpuvbMXFu/s550/48CF38D5-611D-4E0F-9511-126399C76A1D_4_5005_c.jpeg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="189" data-original-width="550" height="220" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi_2w0suBJGrlmB83zuARCjolL0QsAq6GIpFK_ap6VyN1ZnwXYSXbemt_8YnPQQ0b12nB-rh4AzDRmov_vV7bVIGUwlv7rx0uKIDPNWl_6Lt-50S5311PgssQls_xW9Gt-fde5urZnCa1P_odi24Gs3FXIFeEQLBjhO2ib2azviJxH0vWGSpuvbMXFu/w640-h220/48CF38D5-611D-4E0F-9511-126399C76A1D_4_5005_c.jpeg" width="640" /></a></div><p></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><i></i></span><br /></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><i>February 12, 1808</i></span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><i> </i></span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"></p><blockquote><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><br /></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><i>"Our Parties will perpetually produce Such Characters and Such revolutions and as our Legislature and Executive will be always under the Influence of the Prevailing Party, I say We have no Security, but in the total and absolute Independence of the Judges.”</i></span></p></blockquote><p><br /></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiB0r2x4Nh93dvQiDa0YAiluO54zWZDd8bOskykKDY28dYOcAiG9zUaami9O6noRatFv8Et2YHG4ws4uUAlsrmuDbrLrASoKaiIrg4vkiDjNd-ZohMIW-RSsEvH4yarS9yLcIU1Aa6WmxsCchA71xm0Bdh1JDIP2BGBnBnYw_dK8qWIRduaRMBpSUsY/s635/840A692F-80FB-4116-B2E6-E59FF3E2FF37_1_201_a.jpeg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="635" data-original-width="471" height="640" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiB0r2x4Nh93dvQiDa0YAiluO54zWZDd8bOskykKDY28dYOcAiG9zUaami9O6noRatFv8Et2YHG4ws4uUAlsrmuDbrLrASoKaiIrg4vkiDjNd-ZohMIW-RSsEvH4yarS9yLcIU1Aa6WmxsCchA71xm0Bdh1JDIP2BGBnBnYw_dK8qWIRduaRMBpSUsY/w474-h640/840A692F-80FB-4116-B2E6-E59FF3E2FF37_1_201_a.jpeg" width="474" /></a></div><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhk0lUgJ3V1wjO_8Kzs6dfFzKtIDnbJa9RfatHsse9ANRFvEbnGpA0HXMQiYZ8LFKGOgIY04d0gD7sNw0biJfWrJP3C8JDPK-T0eEH9BfotE0z6sIwe7G6l-T_mJbtAw4yZ-PxT4oL9xQn-Iv_11eMZdgCONhA3IICW1SEZnL2LAvd_rKeAjOut5nMM/s586/124EA95A-ECFE-4217-A64E-AC866D1CDDBC_4_5005_c.jpeg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="586" data-original-width="345" height="640" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhk0lUgJ3V1wjO_8Kzs6dfFzKtIDnbJa9RfatHsse9ANRFvEbnGpA0HXMQiYZ8LFKGOgIY04d0gD7sNw0biJfWrJP3C8JDPK-T0eEH9BfotE0z6sIwe7G6l-T_mJbtAw4yZ-PxT4oL9xQn-Iv_11eMZdgCONhA3IICW1SEZnL2LAvd_rKeAjOut5nMM/w376-h640/124EA95A-ECFE-4217-A64E-AC866D1CDDBC_4_5005_c.jpeg" width="376" /></a></div><br /><br /><p><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEik0FMMTxUg7oMnRgQIbFcQ52cRJe9_nrqubJ36xlzB4CVckLBzfH6Wq2Rm42a0Kx1ZrUcdVlOlPad_Y7bHhnUKKW24Xb64TclIvdqe2rmBtc3-yHB4OQKSb0rEkpt-QsQVh9QH1yuRNINHjI_eOfrZl_ybCeOou9Ke27u4EH165ie3_GjlxLjknnDF/s640/A98F2ECB-9DC9-43E8-8C1C-A1EFDDE7F546.jpeg" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="640" data-original-width="454" height="400" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEik0FMMTxUg7oMnRgQIbFcQ52cRJe9_nrqubJ36xlzB4CVckLBzfH6Wq2Rm42a0Kx1ZrUcdVlOlPad_Y7bHhnUKKW24Xb64TclIvdqe2rmBtc3-yHB4OQKSb0rEkpt-QsQVh9QH1yuRNINHjI_eOfrZl_ybCeOou9Ke27u4EH165ie3_GjlxLjknnDF/w284-h400/A98F2ECB-9DC9-43E8-8C1C-A1EFDDE7F546.jpeg" width="284" /></a>As a nation of laws, with a constitutional representative republic, it is so that the agendas of political party's can be legislated into laws through slim majority's of congressional votes. Such was the recent case with the (August 2022) Inflation Reduction Act that passed on a party line vote of 51-50. A tactically mixed legislation that offered price controls on health care, medical support for injured soldiers, federal grant money to support the planting of trees, while the actual brunt of the Act is three fold:</p><p>1. create financial government credits for renewable energy markets, and rapidly diminishing credits for traditional energy fuel (coal, oil, natural gas) companies <i><b><u>and</u></b></i> regulate the entrance into and market diversification of that industry with the objective of hindering the issuing of oil leases, and blocking the distribution of oil with the Keystone XL project, a continental pipeline bringing oil from Canada and the U.S. to the Gulf of Mexico for global export supply</p><p>2. weaponizing the Internal Revenue Service with hundreds of millions of dollars for hiring 86 to 87 thousand employees, outfitting their enforcement operations with guns, and a robust investigative technological and physical presence in American communities to assure that the people pay their taxes.</p><p>3. reform the American tax code to be in alignment with the World Bank's Global Tax project, an internationalist order of nations seeking a global tax on large companies <b><i>and also having its own development project portfolio that would be funded through the project.</i></b></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh_-K83G8hrTqbdZ1pKRNkw_8nQ_xzRrITERxHOIGhOi--laVcNvxVsPu9rhDTaXXgVmnAb2ZYbg2_Cbf7kH71-Vjf019bYw2eae0IE3PzY7Wv11IOFZ1vQMwvgaSIwz3f-xhHa-UrQtgRG3Y8oz_t0jgLwfS9DnsJPiATLW4qNye7K-jOWtr_Hzci5/s682/Screen%20Shot%202022-08-24%20at%202.10.27%20PM.png" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="682" data-original-width="593" height="640" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh_-K83G8hrTqbdZ1pKRNkw_8nQ_xzRrITERxHOIGhOi--laVcNvxVsPu9rhDTaXXgVmnAb2ZYbg2_Cbf7kH71-Vjf019bYw2eae0IE3PzY7Wv11IOFZ1vQMwvgaSIwz3f-xhHa-UrQtgRG3Y8oz_t0jgLwfS9DnsJPiATLW4qNye7K-jOWtr_Hzci5/w556-h640/Screen%20Shot%202022-08-24%20at%202.10.27%20PM.png" width="556" /></a></div><br /><br /></div></div></div></div><p>They certainly scheme an economic trajectory that splices together their agenda with that of the Biden/ Democrat political party,-- that they may, in their self-interest, 'command & control' the instrumentality of government funding to influence a legislative change allowing the instrumentality government funding, and the manipulation by foreign international institutions seeking to siphon the sovereign wealth of the American people & their economy for their international development programs.</p><p> As can be read in the below NBC, May 9, 2020 Chris Hayes interview of Saule Omarova, nominee of the Biden administration and Democrat Party for the office of Comptroller of U.S. Currency, --a plan to construct a different economy based on the agenda of a political party signals the intention of the thinking and focus of the Democrat political agenda, and it has nothing to do with the direct empowerment of the American people: overhaul the economy with a hybrid corporate-governmental institution that chooses how exceeding large amounts of money get channeled into favored development projects through a new central bank, separate from the Federal Reserve.</p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br /></div></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg5tytMdY8G6GeWnIuqrpBlCiwH-le1YqneAxe5K2HPreBe8sAA1CF5OHMiwiz_Kj4Epn85W8BUod801QKl8NmD1ybCMnVLxvcN7IhzbzHDur1WDuKW_uSAd5uXCz1ZMB25Pw3tB-9QZFPFo0kHEsnG3AIp-_GjB4sw3UEarRve2j3B2XwyJxLKBrCN/s841/378C6159-561E-44BC-987D-81DD182FA2C0_1_201_a.jpeg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="652" data-original-width="841" height="496" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg5tytMdY8G6GeWnIuqrpBlCiwH-le1YqneAxe5K2HPreBe8sAA1CF5OHMiwiz_Kj4Epn85W8BUod801QKl8NmD1ybCMnVLxvcN7IhzbzHDur1WDuKW_uSAd5uXCz1ZMB25Pw3tB-9QZFPFo0kHEsnG3AIp-_GjB4sw3UEarRve2j3B2XwyJxLKBrCN/w640-h496/378C6159-561E-44BC-987D-81DD182FA2C0_1_201_a.jpeg" width="640" /></a></div></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgDjs4yRxppYlWaXZHX5r3LJYmmoMSUHW8jMy5AHQ5z7iDHP1sHOsBi1eWpT43BXC7w2u30Es5hMVSBWufTRw-3kAnU_7KwPCVJKh1iKi3lkaIU5MrNEel9M3H5A6Xs8jRvrth_e8-pE-4YkTJiK1pzgDH898ABD8lddrY7xyViiNNRtaUogPwec3Mf/s852/Image%208-24-22%20at%208.57%20AM.jpeg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="679" data-original-width="852" height="510" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgDjs4yRxppYlWaXZHX5r3LJYmmoMSUHW8jMy5AHQ5z7iDHP1sHOsBi1eWpT43BXC7w2u30Es5hMVSBWufTRw-3kAnU_7KwPCVJKh1iKi3lkaIU5MrNEel9M3H5A6Xs8jRvrth_e8-pE-4YkTJiK1pzgDH898ABD8lddrY7xyViiNNRtaUogPwec3Mf/w640-h510/Image%208-24-22%20at%208.57%20AM.jpeg" width="640" /></a></div><br /><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br /></div><br /><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhaVF0Vp6Qe9pIzgb6lTBRIoy1uRoQ6G0Z07D8vQQ-iPjM_aEawQs3dQhVREkEZTcosqjXr2IqmBIAiAj2fBl1u072JShGrkv-yuoOjChKKCxHVCrky2f50O4C447tlgJmN6y7d32VLvasctXF68drRMx589AWd_m3zpXXHlEWWMUlHBZ4h-SqR-4J9/s871/Image%208-24-22%20at%209.16%20AM.jpeg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="662" data-original-width="871" height="486" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhaVF0Vp6Qe9pIzgb6lTBRIoy1uRoQ6G0Z07D8vQQ-iPjM_aEawQs3dQhVREkEZTcosqjXr2IqmBIAiAj2fBl1u072JShGrkv-yuoOjChKKCxHVCrky2f50O4C447tlgJmN6y7d32VLvasctXF68drRMx589AWd_m3zpXXHlEWWMUlHBZ4h-SqR-4J9/w640-h486/Image%208-24-22%20at%209.16%20AM.jpeg" width="640" /></a></div><br /><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br /></div>Nowhere is the traditional idea of simply strengthening the American tax payer with an educational initiative to grow small business and entrepreneurship. Such a reality would switch the centralized and decentralized economic models that the Democrat Party favors, since it maintains them in the center of government power decision making to effectuate their agendas, instead of creating a distributed, 'people-first' economic model of economic self-determination.<div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEie5vIF4zH8J8TjC75XZfHevFeg24grC6aHY9eZIJ2BRRGvnMphG9GHmjjoB4Mz6BleDjtlq0SzGEUGFaBLJ6hFHICEFZWCHOGLg3FsHq49ZH6jdUhegVLWCXDPT1p-k6Yio85HtHAKjpXN1jKH3mloPPwBjimM4gYdb2yYUov-jbrPg7rzviP2TjQw/s1636/0.png" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="941" data-original-width="1636" height="368" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEie5vIF4zH8J8TjC75XZfHevFeg24grC6aHY9eZIJ2BRRGvnMphG9GHmjjoB4Mz6BleDjtlq0SzGEUGFaBLJ6hFHICEFZWCHOGLg3FsHq49ZH6jdUhegVLWCXDPT1p-k6Yio85HtHAKjpXN1jKH3mloPPwBjimM4gYdb2yYUov-jbrPg7rzviP2TjQw/w640-h368/0.png" width="640" /></a></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br /></div>What benefits the best economic path for the people is actually old-fashioned; a distributed network, free market economy. In that paradigm, government is displaced as the instrumentality mechanism for the self-interest of a political party agenda, and the people become increasingly financially independent, with the national community creating a diversified cornucopia economy of individual economies. This manner of economic prosperity blocks the need for a complicated, liberty-erasing, and most likely, unconstitutional centralization of the manipulation of monetary flows with its favoritism of massive governmental investments that can cause unneeded, negative economic disruptions in essential industry's, such as the traditional energy fuel market. </div><div><br /></div><div>The intention of the Democrat Party, its current control of Congress and the Executive Office, is not in line with the American tradition of free markets, or the economic self-determination of the American individual, but is more akin to a condescending 'command & control' of economy and future trajectory purposed to be imposed upon all of the people, rather than maintaining a regard for the growth of an American middle class and its economic prosperity.<br /></div><div><br /></div><div>The sovereignty of the United States of America is being impinged upon by the Democrat Party, its control of the Executive Office, Congress, the promotion of the global tax project by U.S. Treasury Secretary (former Federal Reserve President) Janet Yellen, <b><i>and the narrative is that the American people will greatly benefit from a 'command & control' of our national sovereignty, our economy, and of our government that is supposed to be 'of us and for us', </i></b>so we can expect the American middle class to be more aggressively investigated, and hounded, but we are not to expect that our schools be tasked with self-empowering our ability to be a financially independent people with an entrepreneurial economy of small businesses.</div><div><br /></div><div>Let it be so that our U.S. Supreme Court stops such a factious pathway of political self-interest, as they did in <a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/20-1530_n758.pdf" target="_blank">West Virginia v. EPA (June 30, 2022).</a></div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div class="blogger-post-footer">ScalziOriginals.US
Build ecosystems & individuals
to strengthen & sustain
integrated community health. </div>@CoachBill007http://www.blogger.com/profile/00964006939825613259noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4249677153801659195.post-12972250085847837402022-08-22T22:19:00.020+03:002023-06-08T19:06:08.776+03:00The World Bank & Its Collusion With U.S. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen, the Democrat Party v. A Defense of American National Sovereignty, the U.S. Supreme Court's Original Duty, & the Protection of The People <div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgcXQnD2Ehoz7uMZQDcaveEuZP480i2swBdyyP_lYCXcEkHKlQCcvPD3CvefSlnSo0YLy26OTdKcVK-fVYYckm7uO-yz9GjPMmSg_muSNeJy7-ufq9PkYFcHU46l_1P5jREVEjmFQMYMQcj4HljCbDTJISYMsr-mRl20Zs-s23aY7btC9D55ja7Xx3m/s1000/Justice.jpg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><span style="font-family: georgia;"><br /><img border="0" data-original-height="667" data-original-width="1000" height="426" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgcXQnD2Ehoz7uMZQDcaveEuZP480i2swBdyyP_lYCXcEkHKlQCcvPD3CvefSlnSo0YLy26OTdKcVK-fVYYckm7uO-yz9GjPMmSg_muSNeJy7-ufq9PkYFcHU46l_1P5jREVEjmFQMYMQcj4HljCbDTJISYMsr-mRl20Zs-s23aY7btC9D55ja7Xx3m/w640-h426/Justice.jpg" width="640" /></span></a></div><span style="font-family: georgia;"><br />
</span><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">The self-sufficiency of a nation purposed in establishing and be able to truly effectualize a strong domestic economy of the people, sets the pillars of the foundation of its best foreign policy. <b><i>But can such a reality be had without a specific economic independence in its source of energy</i></b><i> for its varied industries, its manufactures, its transportation, and in the 21st century, the source of energy to power its technology?</i></span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 21px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">Truly, the sovereignty of the United States of America, —land steeped in the tradition of the defense of equal justice and individual liberty unto all its diverse people is singular in its wealth: built upon the strength of the vibrancy of economy in its middle class, finds that it will be the continual focus of foreign entities seeking to advantage themselves from its dynamism, and altogether, if it be possible, subduing and harnessing its wealth. <i> What can such an America be, without the independence of its judges? </i>How shall its people defend its foundations; and how shall the most formidable altruist, critical thinkers respond? To what length of time can its defense be expected from its individuals? With what degree of complexity shall the individual responses be to foreign encroachments? In speaking of American individuals, what profoundness of duty can be expected, and how many of the people will be found to place the necessary effective bulwarks to block such subtle attacks on its sovereignty?</span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 21px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">What is the duty of America’s parents, and of its school education in such instances, and how is this weaved into a practical curriculum that raises up not simply a people who look to their own livelihood, but unto a shared ownership of their national sovereignty?</span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 21px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; text-align: center;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">2</span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 21px; text-align: center;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">If we read are brought to read the complete writings of John Adams and Abraham Lincoln, we will sadly find that these both arrived at the conclusion that such individuals are few, if any, in each generation. Both of these Americans, nay, enlightened humans, seeked not their own wealth, as much as they affirmed their hearts and minds with selflessness to a greater cause; the cause of preserving, effectuating, and defending an ‘open source’ plan of individual American liberty, justice, and self-determination, that we be a safe and happy people. —That government be ‘of and for’ the people, and not some burdening, condescending apparatus of factious, self-interest bearing down upon the people.</span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 21px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; text-align: center;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">3</span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 21px; text-align: center;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">As it stands, is it not so that the administration's of internationalist institutions, are continuously seeking to deploy agendas with strange foreign self-interests distinct from the best interest for the American people; and is it not so that their global plans are not in line with the American Constitution, its national sovereignty, or its unalloyed American tradition of equal liberty, individual justice, and self-determination? Does not the World Bank seek to implement an international agenda that requires each participating nation to reform how it taxes its people, its corporations, and to even re-structure an economically disruptive, rapid shift of its traditional energy fuel source unto renewable energies? How do we find that non-participating nations, such as Russia and China, are generally responding to the changes in geoeconomics and geopolitical signals that are emanating from the Biden administration and European Union countries that are pushing such polarizing policies? Are they seeking and responding to these geoeconomics and geopolitical agenda trajectories with economic and political consolidations of their own to counter such possibilities? </span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 21px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">It does seem so. We see the leaders of the Russian and Chinese government approaching each other with requests for alignment of geopolitical and geoeconomic interests that do seem to counter-balance the Democrat Party's position on foreign policy: a reality where the United States is not energy independent (though it has the natural resources to be), but artificially beholden to foreign energy importation; a reality where the Democrat Party is ramming through legislation on party-line voting to re-purpose the objectives of American education, instead of an independent, entrepreneurial & financially-savvy, critical thinking citizenry; a reality of quick and massive influx immigration through the southern American border, of seeking 'command & control' of the traditional energy industry and market of American oil, natural gas, and coal, and as it now can be recognized, a continuation of internationalization of U.S. law, tax and economic policy that is subservient to a body of internationalist institutions.</span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 21px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(12, 14, 16); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #0c0e10; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; -webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); color: black;">The </span><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">'Inflation Reduction Act' weaponizes the Internal Revenue Service in lockstep with an internationalist 'global tax' agenda that has the workings of a collusion being promoted by former Federal Reserve Chairwoman and present U.S. Secretary of the Treasury, Janet Yellen, President Biden, and the World Bank: participating countries are asked to align their economic & tax policies with that of its ideological, revenue-making business portfolio of international goals. A reading of the World Bank's Global Tax Umbrella Program outlines its development goals for the control of the flow of money in a number of African nations and other low-income nation-states in Asia. Is the global tax project only a one page document that starts and finishes with the media narrative sound byte that it is simply a '15% tax on large corporations,' or an international global tax reform & business revenue scheme requiring nations to weaken their sovereignty, and reform their tax code to advantage a portfolio agenda of 'political left' development projects? How does the weaponization of the Internal Revenue Service link with the World Bank's global tax program in five years? How about in ten years? </span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 21px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 21px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><b><i>The priority politic of the Democrat Party agenda always positions itself in ‘command & control’ of economy as an artificial source or manipulator of money flow.</i></b></span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 21px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 21px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(12, 14, 16); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; color: #0c0e10; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; background-color: white; font-kerning: none;">Why should American leave the traditions of a quality of life that champions the people & our economy as the priority, instead of a new construction with an internationalist body politic that is strange to the ways and means of Americans? Economic self-determination, and a national </span><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">sovereignty proclaimed in its start with the Declaration of Independence, our Constitution, IS close to the heart of what America stands for! Our economy is built on entrepreneurship (economic self-determination), and the flow of money from small businesses. The reduction of fiscal inequality, as the World Bank's premise wrongly sais, has to be lowered with taxation. That simply sounds like a redistribution of money with an international monetary group placing itself in the middle of the flow of that money. What they are proposing is a business! Their business! They want to apportion funds from their revenue scheme to fund their ideological 'command & control' of the economies of sovereign nations. The fact that so many nations have signed up to their scheme is not a sign that they must be correct, but that these are all small economies when compared to the super power country with the greatest middle class ever created; the United States of America.</span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 21px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 21px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 21px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEiKKuDB0hirs6UMP64irAohacaOW7OoBQiRx5ULVSCSWZLMRk_4oYU884s8FUQ10LYtfF6xxLxiQ4uSRc7fzpaU4c6A_8PsfvkJ0NuUfh0K5P3uwPr861PPo4vua2byV6h5rV57NBI6rftVteYP--a98E2JkmhuIFXSa2yWunr_aeD9wPxhwJJbDb4T" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img alt="" data-original-height="398" data-original-width="639" height="398" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEiKKuDB0hirs6UMP64irAohacaOW7OoBQiRx5ULVSCSWZLMRk_4oYU884s8FUQ10LYtfF6xxLxiQ4uSRc7fzpaU4c6A_8PsfvkJ0NuUfh0K5P3uwPr861PPo4vua2byV6h5rV57NBI6rftVteYP--a98E2JkmhuIFXSa2yWunr_aeD9wPxhwJJbDb4T=w640-h398" width="640" /></a></div><p></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 233); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; color: #0000e9; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 21px; text-align: center;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><br /></span></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEgGx2TGRhfHe0iq9Gd2vWUi6n7z3TO7NF8DetNnK-aVOgDeDqBU0mXSDD3NvDnNtGOfr6u58ObNwgmjr0v9r-SL1iYWYRw_crKRVtblajOhhGmgfgmQXJgtn3F5LHfXDa14sGhwzW5nhcYYlBhNRwZyHgW29XbE88Mmj0AnMU-H6Ht_m3_pR5UHOH5j" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img alt="" data-original-height="181" data-original-width="320" height="181" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEgGx2TGRhfHe0iq9Gd2vWUi6n7z3TO7NF8DetNnK-aVOgDeDqBU0mXSDD3NvDnNtGOfr6u58ObNwgmjr0v9r-SL1iYWYRw_crKRVtblajOhhGmgfgmQXJgtn3F5LHfXDa14sGhwzW5nhcYYlBhNRwZyHgW29XbE88Mmj0AnMU-H6Ht_m3_pR5UHOH5j" width="320" /></a></div><p></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(12, 14, 16); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; color: #0c0e10; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 21px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 21px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(12, 14, 16); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; color: #0c0e10; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; background-color: white; font-kerning: none;">Empowerment of people to be entrepreneurs & small business owners DOES NOT serve the premise of the Democratic Party, nor the World Bank. The goal of these entities is to maintain power. They have an elitist spirit of self-interest. The 'open-source' economy of individual </span><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">self-determination gives them nothing; so they look to see how to govern its wealth, --and its wealth is in our middle class. <b>Its <i>greatest potential wealth, </i>a longterm project, is in the benefits from a reform of American education that produces these independent-minded, financially-savvy, critical thinkers. </b>But the shaping of extraordinary Americans through such educational standards will not have its support from the Democrat Party,--because an independent people who are wealthy, community advocates become empowered co-sovereigns who will defend their way of life.</span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 21px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">As it behooves the best interest of the American people, a reading of the World Bank’s global tax project sequence of phases mirrors the initial requirements in the ‘Inflation Reduction Act’ that the Democrats in our U.S. Congress passed on a strict party-line vote of 51-50 (August 2022). Will our U.S. Supreme Court defend America's sovereignty and deem such a global tax project initiative as unconstitutional? Will it be a unanimous opinion or will there be an ideological division in that court?</span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(12, 14, 16); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #0c0e10; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 21px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(12, 14, 16); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #0c0e10; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 21px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEgqP40GBf8AVA2ZbRunBV0QK_2QCFYpDqPf3a-0tyNzdeQPyRmb5uTJvRQC4QqXaQVYtRwg2Ujb35K8rK820Wv__9e2DkOHakhA4AKkuOegmSm42wvnav8lyjgscMnY9d3fKrQLjwcLQ74p_CKOlzhJQYaxLtuC1tZz0mKfUCNAyyKnJROMPF3Y8MUx" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img alt="" data-original-height="329" data-original-width="640" height="330" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEgqP40GBf8AVA2ZbRunBV0QK_2QCFYpDqPf3a-0tyNzdeQPyRmb5uTJvRQC4QqXaQVYtRwg2Ujb35K8rK820Wv__9e2DkOHakhA4AKkuOegmSm42wvnav8lyjgscMnY9d3fKrQLjwcLQ74p_CKOlzhJQYaxLtuC1tZz0mKfUCNAyyKnJROMPF3Y8MUx=w640-h330" width="640" /></a></div><p></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 233); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; color: #0000e9; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 21px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"> </span></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEgcEwE_TE06uiagPckCBB0w3r1y8rNG1npFZO2N3lL5aLPvAMr-VDyNecV89k1hoMFaIqS7CLRHuX_g7lHI-eSf3U-9zxF0ovY7JWCiEE6_92zv9lgx_lQ5PadatIznLgktTBPd6ZVfpPnKJMp2fXIlGvXYvkZAf4uwy23g33Y8-mKnXy7DKtzjDmU_" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img alt="" data-original-height="640" data-original-width="598" height="640" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEgcEwE_TE06uiagPckCBB0w3r1y8rNG1npFZO2N3lL5aLPvAMr-VDyNecV89k1hoMFaIqS7CLRHuX_g7lHI-eSf3U-9zxF0ovY7JWCiEE6_92zv9lgx_lQ5PadatIznLgktTBPd6ZVfpPnKJMp2fXIlGvXYvkZAf4uwy23g33Y8-mKnXy7DKtzjDmU_=w597-h640" width="597" /></a></div><p></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 21px;"><br /><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(12, 14, 16); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #0c0e10; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">The prevailing question of the ulterior motives, political attitude, and actions of the Biden administration and the Democrat Party in Congress places before us what their true intentions are; having found record of their concerted actions to hinder, limit, and bankrupt the American traditional energy market and ignorant and/ or willful efforts to negatively disrupt the national economy (1. Biden's nomination of Saule Omarova as Comptroller of the U.S. currency and her recorded comments to 'over-regulate' the bankrupting the oil, coal, natural gas industry, 2. the Supreme Court's June 30, 2022 opinion on west Virginia v. EPA, the blocking of the continental Keystone XL oil pipeline.) </span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(12, 14, 16); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #0c0e10; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 21px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(12, 14, 16); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #0c0e10; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">What does the Democrat Party stand to gain from a domestic economic and foreign policy agenda that does not favor the unfettered growth and economic success of the American middle class, but instead, uses its instrumentality of government office; the Executive Office (Presidency) and Congressional legislature to work in such manner as to foster small and large politically divisive contentions and issues, and also deepen a polarization of Western & Eastern nations? The Biden administration, as an extention of the Democrat Party agenda, seems to issue a politic and use of government office that does not respect American independency as rooted in its traditional rule of law founded upon equal justice and liberty, but wants to 'sell out' the national sovereignty and economic self-determination of the American people.</span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(12, 14, 16); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #0c0e10; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 21px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(12, 14, 16); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #0c0e10; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">Why do the people have to experience such economic and societal turmoil? Why was the Inflation Reduction Act, a legislation that mixed a reformation and weaponization of the Internal Revenue Service with provisions for soldiers who experienced health issues from 'burn pits,' and with provisions for environmental protections, and health care cost reductions?</span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(12, 14, 16); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #0c0e10; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 21px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(12, 14, 16); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #0c0e10; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">Answer: Because the mixed bag of legislation was purposed to divide the people politically: the environmental agencies and groups that stood to gain from the billions of dollars that would be granted saw the legislation as a win, and their indifference to the other aspects of the legislation as a mere triviality. Why not make separate legislation that was specifically for the Internal Revenue Service; and legislation specific for the health care of soldiers; and legislation specific to the reduction of health care costs?</span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 233); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; color: #0000e9; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 21px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"> </span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(12, 14, 16); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #0c0e10; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 21px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEhGvK8TjXaRb2iGEvj5XMv8BConWDcW8yjlx8VXRiq6FeEX4nZ3BZYbf84YedWM5rGrLrzrzc6PmVWl1D2FQ-_U4kbdky5H53g_4N4lja6J7XdNqJdh4TwxxCCxY7xf6lxYu81LzZR-MVjfA0EOSWUoVrVYBwRmFCUxKD6mJzn_9JVMRPZwBZJPi6Wt" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img alt="" data-original-height="573" data-original-width="625" height="586" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEhGvK8TjXaRb2iGEvj5XMv8BConWDcW8yjlx8VXRiq6FeEX4nZ3BZYbf84YedWM5rGrLrzrzc6PmVWl1D2FQ-_U4kbdky5H53g_4N4lja6J7XdNqJdh4TwxxCCxY7xf6lxYu81LzZR-MVjfA0EOSWUoVrVYBwRmFCUxKD6mJzn_9JVMRPZwBZJPi6Wt=w640-h586" width="640" /></a></div><br /><p></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(12, 14, 16); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #0c0e10; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 21px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(12, 14, 16); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #0c0e10; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">May it be that the U.S. Supreme Court Justices be unanimous in their opinion that the internationalization of the U.S. tax code (especially after it has been weaponized), is unconstitutional and that their political ideologies not play into their opinion. The legitimacy of that court is upon its Justices and is paramount as an important bulwark of American independence against the unfortunate prevailing influences of political party's.</span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(12, 14, 16); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #0c0e10; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 21px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(12, 14, 16); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #0c0e10; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">American people should not be spectators in defending the best American way of life, even in a representative republic where we have our representatives in Congress 'speaking for us.' No, we need to write and speak, advocate, and strive to be intellectually balanced in our ability to observe, think analytically, and consider what is the right way to achieve the best quality of life in the United States, and as a nation amongst nations, prioritizing our geopolitical and geoeconomic advantage that we be an America that is energy-independent, and a people who are aware that a strong domestic economy is the best foreign policy we can have.</span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(12, 14, 16); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #0c0e10; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 21px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #0c0e10; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><i>(Excerpt from a Letter from John Adams to John Quincy Adams)</i></span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(12, 14, 16); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #0c0e10; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 21px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 233); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; color: #0000e9; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 21px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEh09OZvqQISbj1Uz7g_vwMOqqRGH2l0zxmtye_cJQfwT2EmlVWDljsko8pf75Wz74GWYpHg3RyK6o3KV4wUd_NtGOAQlJShSvnAdCxkAu5F624ahDC101bJet2Qgv4emkoH1SEywRy_R4qvX9_MvfEuTy-OvelEDlw0fY55Y3JUy7FBVptQfTYTVsWa" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img alt="" data-original-height="189" data-original-width="550" height="110" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEh09OZvqQISbj1Uz7g_vwMOqqRGH2l0zxmtye_cJQfwT2EmlVWDljsko8pf75Wz74GWYpHg3RyK6o3KV4wUd_NtGOAQlJShSvnAdCxkAu5F624ahDC101bJet2Qgv4emkoH1SEywRy_R4qvX9_MvfEuTy-OvelEDlw0fY55Y3JUy7FBVptQfTYTVsWa" width="320" /></a></div><br /><p></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 21px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 21px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><i>February 12, 1808</i></span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 21px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><i> </i></span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><i>“Our Paper Money our Banks and Corporations are made the Instruments of Accumulating Wealth, which is loaned at two per Cent a Month Fortunes of Creditors grow up like Musrooms and impoverished Debtors break by dozens and others by hundreds live in continual fear of failing. This is another Source of Envy and hatred of the common People against the Gentry.</i></span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 21px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><i>Washington like Camillus and Cincinnatus, by professing disinterestedness as Sincerely as either, gained an immense Popularity among the common People, and by espousing the Cause of Proprietors ad Creditors acquired an equally transcendent Applause among them. Hamilton by professing a disinterest which no body believed, but by aiding and Abetting the Creditors, became their Idol.</i></span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 21px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><i>Jefferson and Madison and Burr, by Seeming to favour the Debtors and by opposing the Claims of the Creditors, undermined their Influence and became the favorites of the Debtors. Burr too by the Same System obtained his Popularity: but he could Speculate and form a Manhattan Bank, the great Catapulto that beat down the Walls of federalism, and preserve his popularity with the Debtors at the same time. He got rid of his great rival Hamilton, not quite so cleverly or legally as Cincinnatus did of Maelius and Camillus of Manlius, but very effectually and has hitherto Set the Laws at Defyance.</i></span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 21px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none;"><i>Our Parties will perpetually produce Such Characters and Such revolutions and as our Legislature and Executive will be always under the Influence of the Prevailing Party, I say We have no Security, but in the total and absolute Independence of the Judges.”</i></span></p><div class="blogger-post-footer">ScalziOriginals.US
Build ecosystems & individuals
to strengthen & sustain
integrated community health. </div>@CoachBill007http://www.blogger.com/profile/00964006939825613259noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4249677153801659195.post-65465920473181825662022-08-16T20:18:00.015+03:002022-08-21T00:52:50.847+03:00American Foreign Policy & Its National Self-Sufficiency in Traditional Energy<p></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhflHHTGoFCR8KUVaEQlOxPnS7JYr02HVh-Z3GxqwyZZKs0gWMjBobSdLlCMPbWWMWkyXTPY4q7xONLRR8TvKVv92Fuq3h5TBc5WPBJlnakmJ8v4whXoIZuV-BD_-dxOvHYo5mpSj5Ohu8gOUCUNrr3q7Yxl5ef8IEAOXIR0lpJochacmoUXvQalYjI/s612/istockphoto-600692188-612x612.jpg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><br /><img border="0" data-original-height="408" data-original-width="612" height="426" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhflHHTGoFCR8KUVaEQlOxPnS7JYr02HVh-Z3GxqwyZZKs0gWMjBobSdLlCMPbWWMWkyXTPY4q7xONLRR8TvKVv92Fuq3h5TBc5WPBJlnakmJ8v4whXoIZuV-BD_-dxOvHYo5mpSj5Ohu8gOUCUNrr3q7Yxl5ef8IEAOXIR0lpJochacmoUXvQalYjI/w640-h426/istockphoto-600692188-612x612.jpg" width="640" /></a></div><br /><span style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-size: 12px;"><br /></span><p></p><p><span style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral;">The idea that a nation-state’s domestic and global economy and political dynamism calibrates upon the strength and independence of its ability to be self-sufficient amongst other nations is the immediate cornerstone that outlines the best foundation of its foreign policy. That said, it important to underscore </span><i style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral;">that the United States of America can have a foreign policy that is either, (1) completely independent of having to make allowances unto other nation-states that it exports goods and natural resources unto (i.e.: oil and precious metals), (2) an economic hybrid of national self-sufficiency interdependent with other nation-states for the trade of goods and natural resources, or, (3) having a global need to import all of its requirements with the purchase and importation of traded goods and natural resources.</i></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal;">At this present time, the foreign policy of the United States of America is in the second tier, with an instrumentality of the offices of administrative national government </span><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; text-decoration: underline;"><i>pushing it closer to the third tier.</i></span><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal;"> </span><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><b>Because the Biden/ Democrat Party foreign policy is positioned on an economic agenda path of international interdependency that does not support, but instead is seeking to blockade America’s traditional energy fuel independence, -- it prioritizes its policy decisions in such a way that it supports global economic and political polarization instead of what is best for the American people, their economy, and ultimately, the global environmental impact of its agenda, placing the economic domestic strength of the U.S. far behind its own political goals.</b></span><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal;"> Priority to this imbalance of geopolitical and geoeconomic power-- that does not favor the resiliency of the U.S. economy, but instead, its ‘climate change’ doctrine, becomes a detrimental economic/ political anchor, and this in turn establishes a different dynamic of the balance of each nation state’s global power in relation to the U.S. The Biden administration & Democrat Party’s use of government office as an extension of an agenda distinct in its self-interest from what is best for the American nation, prescribes an erroneous balance of global geoeconomics and geopolitical power positioning American global power in a weakened state: creating a geopolitic/ geoeconomics reality that plays into the political, economic, and military strategy of the governments of Russia, China, and Iran, along with the host of regional smaller nation-states in Africa, Asia, & South America that are entering agreements and trade pacts with them.</span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal;"><br /></span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhSrGcHwIV87M04DF7lUgAaH9z1wi5KvAr30BbflNOY-_qsqncbj45OzB0vpv94QZyn7me9fcloBfi6GjC7s-vf8B148YXAIVpmrMOusK6eZ70QpNUOvM6AvLd_eOsufq2ZHjzXvXUvya7Sj1r6RLvnwJ0VgYMDuMQN0QfoXPmNio9k-_i-qLM1sElK/s612/istockphoto-867003362-612x612.jpg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="408" data-original-width="612" height="426" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhSrGcHwIV87M04DF7lUgAaH9z1wi5KvAr30BbflNOY-_qsqncbj45OzB0vpv94QZyn7me9fcloBfi6GjC7s-vf8B148YXAIVpmrMOusK6eZ70QpNUOvM6AvLd_eOsufq2ZHjzXvXUvya7Sj1r6RLvnwJ0VgYMDuMQN0QfoXPmNio9k-_i-qLM1sElK/w640-h426/istockphoto-867003362-612x612.jpg" width="640" /></a></div><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal;"><br /></span><p></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">That Russia and China, for example, have an agenda of establishing a geopolitical and geoeconomics nation-state alliance pact with countries in Asia, Africa, and South America that includes the creation of a separate currency, banking system, and regional economic and political agendas supporting other like-minded agendas, leading to a strengthening of an interdependency of foreign policy agendas, <b><i>is therefore</i></b>, gaining strength in the power void created by the targeting of disallowing American energy independence. </span>The foreign policy decisions from the White House, in this balance dynamic, are helping Russia and China form that conglomerate ‘bloc’ to counter a U.S./ Western economic/ political regionalism of international powers, founded upon the shared instrumentality of their economic and political plans.</p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">This creates a polarization effect in the global balance of power that increasingly positions geoeconomic and geopolitical hostility between two major hubs of centralized regional power conglomerates, each having a host of (potential proxy’s) smaller nation-states that further supports their narrative that their must be a mainstay of its ideologically polarized agenda. The problem with that, aside that it is not the best political, economic, or environmental equilibrium for the U.S.A., is that it is ‘circular reasoning.’— In the year 2022, the Biden administration and nearly all European Union nations subscribe to that same geopolitical/ geoeconomics ideology that prioritizes an interdependency of international powers, <i>instead of an American energy independence that is extremely vital to its economic interest and its ability to successfully employ a foreign policy that furthers its domestic economic strength.</i> Hence, what is suiting up to be a Western ‘bloc’ is sharpening a Russia/ China geopolitical attitude <i>to not slacken the tendency to continue to establish its own regional counterweights.</i> That it would be best for the United States of America, a people that represent people of all nations to be self sufficient and independent, in at least its extraction, production, and use of traditional energy fuels, of which the U.S. Bureau of Land & Management has verified that there are 4.3 trillion barrels of potentially recoverable oil within the U.S., is being ‘spinned' as a fact that can be disregarded and ignored as a topic of national conversation or sustained media reference because the Biden presidency and Democrat Political Party deem it environmentally necessary to create a generational shift (within 10-15 years) in the rapid lowering of the production of energy from oil, to natural gas, and finally, an increasing replacement of traditional energy with renewable energy. The tight timeline is an economic/ political, and eventually, potential military-conflict disaster in the making.</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">As can be well-understood from numerous, credible sources, the prerogative of the Biden administration and the Democrat Party is to trouble and bankrupt the traditional energy fuel industry: </span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<ol>
<li style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="font-family: Helvetica; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal;"></span><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">in the Supreme Court’s June 30, 2022 opinion of West Virginia v. EPA</span></li>
<li style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="font-family: Helvetica; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal;"></span><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">in comments from Saule Omarova, nominated by President Biden in 2021 to be Comptroller of U.S. Currency</span></li>
<li style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="font-family: Helvetica; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal;"></span><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">in the targeted contrast of the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act that has passed strictly on a polarized Congressional party line voting</span></li>
</ol>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">The domestic national policy that the air climate of our environment be protected and maintained free of pollution has been made the economic agenda priority, and this in turn has outsourced U.S. domestic demand of over 3 billion barrels of oil from 76 different countries, including Russia and China in 2021. <b><i>Thus, the global importation of traditional energy resources from nation-states with l</i></b></span><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none; text-decoration: underline;"><b><i>esser environmental-efficiency standards for the extraction, production, and transportation of these fuels</i></b></span><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><b><i> has been given tacit approval from the Biden administration and the Democrat Party he represents.</i></b></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><b><i></i></b></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">Foreign policy agenda is affected with such interdependency, and the practical question of why America is outsourcing its regulation of environmental standards for the extraction, production, and distribution of traditional energy fuels remains as a reality that scoffs at the environmental agenda of the Biden presidency and Congressional Democrats.</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px; text-align: center;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><i></i></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; text-align: center;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><i>The idea that a nation-state’s domestic and global economy and political dynamism calibrates upon the strength and independence of its ability to be self-sufficient amongst other nations is the immediate cornerstone that outlines the foundation of its foreign policy. </i></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">With 79% of calendar year 2021 energy usage in the U.S. being oil, natural gas, and coal, in light of the research conducted from the U.S. Supreme Court in its opinion of West Virginia v. EPA, the setting of a nation’s domestic and foreign economic policy that pivots on ‘climate change’ and a favoring of an international balance of power that strategizes to maintain an agenda trajectory that continues to prompt a furtherance of geopolitical/ geoeconomics polarization, placing the strength of the United States of America in an artificial position subservient to this order is a dangerous policy to follow and in antagonistic opposition to the natural state of mutual peace amongst nations.</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; text-align: center;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">2</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">The best foundation for the right trajectory for America’s people, their economy, and physical environment should not support a disequilibrium that greatly destabilizes the domestic national economy, but an ability to successfully accomplish a domestic and foreign policy that establishes an outcome that favors domestic economic vitality, mutual global peace, the right balance of global trade, and a furtherance of geoeconomics policy decisions that unify Americans, in spite of their political differences. It is the domestic economic strength of a nation that settles the strength and perspective of its foreign policy. Such a dynamic has to be achieved through the generational shift of our educational goals and objectives to favor the individual economic strength of the American people. It is the entrepreneurs and the founding and mainstay of small businesses that makes America a resilient economy, and its ability to stay wealthy does greatly bank on the ‘cost of living.’ Henceforce, with the understanding that 79% of America energy fuel requirements operate on oil, natural gas, and coal; that 4.3 trillion barrels of potentially recoverable oil can be extracted in the U.S. alone, that industry should not experience governmental opposition, but supported with market entrance incentives that it may diversify and increase its supply with the competition of new companies, and secondary industries focused on innovating the most excellent up-to-date environmental-efficiency standards may flourish.</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">American energy independence is vital as a support unto the best geopolitical and geoeconomics foreign policy agenda equilibrium as it relates to other countries, and its allowance to lead as the best stewards on the globe should support traditional energy environmental-efficiency technology as key to maintaining a central path that acknowledges our responsibility as human beings to care for a way of life founded on individual equal liberty, justice, and self-determination as individuals who form and shape economy to serve the needs of each other.</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">A<i>n economic hybrid of national self-sufficiency interdependent with other nation-states for the trade of goods and natural resources </i>is most likely the best option to address its strongest foreign policy stance, and with the factual awareness that we have the natural resources to be 100% energy independent and a net exporter of traditional fuels to foreign states, the balance of power can be primed to increase the geopolitical and geoeconomic strength for the foreign policy of the United States of America. Should we ignore the opportunity to weaken the political/ economic polarizing dynamic of foreign nations hostile to the U.S.? A stronger American domestic economy can certainly, if wisely effected into application, introduce a weakening of geoeconomic/ geopolitical polarization that disrupts that divisive strategy of superpowers and their economic proxy host nation-state alliances into two separate ideological/ economic/ political camps. Failure to establish the best equilibrium for the economic foundation in America would create the conditions to allow Russia and China to acquire an increasingly hostile politic, and that could result in proxy military confrontations, an increasingly divided American domestic political environment, and a continued importing of traditional energy fuels from foreign countries who’s process of extraction, production, and distribution of such fuels are not beholden to the environmental-efficiency standards in our oil, natural gas, and coal industry.</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p><div class="blogger-post-footer">ScalziOriginals.US
Build ecosystems & individuals
to strengthen & sustain
integrated community health. </div>@CoachBill007http://www.blogger.com/profile/00964006939825613259noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4249677153801659195.post-36408703593144012832022-08-01T16:50:00.005+03:002023-01-04T04:33:03.800+02:00The Original Powers of The Economy & The Control Of The Market<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEivEu6exfSGIT2jwWbe3ENld9h6f_sn-G8cj4wV0v8tI9KcxvVeDUgXgnjU9W5irLQjm_di8YNQk9pMJjZ52-ZlIG5b7trC3B89WOu7VEYLUE1BNSFaSBpXy8RaUa49WI1ylWX3RNthx_B8QhpfrRBUkKkQe_oXGqtJo05tm3-07NaU_RXJk8JwOaYi/s874/3BF0B982-AC25-4B2D-BAFE-F28B67695400.jpeg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="535" data-original-width="874" height="392" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEivEu6exfSGIT2jwWbe3ENld9h6f_sn-G8cj4wV0v8tI9KcxvVeDUgXgnjU9W5irLQjm_di8YNQk9pMJjZ52-ZlIG5b7trC3B89WOu7VEYLUE1BNSFaSBpXy8RaUa49WI1ylWX3RNthx_B8QhpfrRBUkKkQe_oXGqtJo05tm3-07NaU_RXJk8JwOaYi/w640-h392/3BF0B982-AC25-4B2D-BAFE-F28B67695400.jpeg" width="640" /></a></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br /></div><p><span style="font-family: times;"><span style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial;">The workshop of an individual who prioritizes its use as his or her means of sustenance </span><i style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial;">can be</i><span style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial;"> oft times a think tank; a seat of possible ingenuity; an entrepreneurial place of ideas; a well-spring of epiphany and an opaque path without signs or guarantees. Dynamic creativity, patience and self-determination being the tip of the proverbial spear. Time and effort always exacting the cost of labor; the individual ultimately understanding that the basics of life demand financial costs that must be met. Failure being common only to those that endure; strange and finite to those whom push away and leave off. The place itself accruing clarity of purpose according to the critical thinking and physical effort of the aspirant; the power of ideas gaining and losing steam in direct proportion to the successful efficacy</span><span style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial;"> </span><span style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial;">of the goal-directed persistence of the sole worker.</span></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><span style="font-family: times;">In the mid 1700’s to early 1800’s, Scottish extraordinare’ James Watts, crafter and engineer of musical instruments, sailing ship instruments, and toys, also had to become a business man; that he bring his work to the market place and receive agreeable and just recompense for his expertise, if it be found of practical use. So it is that the mathematical engineer had to also be savvy at business; understanding how to access the marketplace, and have his work and himself to be known within the market; a challenge itself to all who venture entrepreneurially. </span></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><span style="font-family: times;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><span style="font-family: times;">How should our American schools respond to the practical understanding that the establishment and growth of economy is best sustained in the wealth of generations of individuals taught to appreciate the responsibility, privilege, and right to be financially independent? Is it not the responsibility of parents and schools to strengthen individuals to be as independent as can be? Is it common sense that financial independence would be a great priority? In so accomplishing such a reality, is it not so that an economy of individual economies becomes dynamic, vibrant, and stronger than an economy that is made through the defaulting of individual financial independence, and instead, through the secondary stewardship of political representatives who apply often times ideological economic policies for the masses? </span></span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><span style="font-family: times;"><br /></span></span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgVYTIdaxYFnRxqx2TJETirtL2zxEpmamj2fvZbs-HzEP0VpcNKwJ1hzUG44fFaImme6sCAuObvA7oEcjnOCYcN8Aqu0CYXPaIX0ShYRaTDQJkl5zJVRWRxeshIuqB8xmZjNnn-Tx4uobEVlwgnXgBuGfR89OWAd_O6QII7n0y5SbAjmZY3AdInsuTO/s2880/featured12.jpg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><span style="font-family: times;"><img border="0" data-original-height="1800" data-original-width="2880" height="400" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgVYTIdaxYFnRxqx2TJETirtL2zxEpmamj2fvZbs-HzEP0VpcNKwJ1hzUG44fFaImme6sCAuObvA7oEcjnOCYcN8Aqu0CYXPaIX0ShYRaTDQJkl5zJVRWRxeshIuqB8xmZjNnn-Tx4uobEVlwgnXgBuGfR89OWAd_O6QII7n0y5SbAjmZY3AdInsuTO/w640-h400/featured12.jpg" width="640" /></span></a></div><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><span style="font-family: times;"><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><span style="font-family: times;">Watt’s began a path that favored his interest, and then later on, with the advancement of his experience and proficiency, bringing his work to the market place through the catalyst of business partnerships. His start was in the workshop of his father; using his own separate tools, plus the resource of having access to a fiery forge to heat metals and give them shape with a hammer. Being homeschooled, his mother taught him how to read; his father taught him mathematics and how to write, and in later years, he was able to go to a school to study mathematics, and languages (Greek & Latin). His affinity and chosen interest though, was being in the workshop, and ironically, the study of these two languages was not two his liking though mathematics, a language itself, was. </span></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><span style="font-family: times;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="font-family: times;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">That he is credited with ‘re-tooling’ the steam engine to make it more efficient in its heating & cooling process, and that <b><i>that </i></b>accomplishment positively disrupted the economy of nations and the world itself is the common story that is known of Mr. Watts. —It was the Watt’s steam engine that greatly accelerated the economic development of the American western frontier—That he was a mathematical craftsman, engineer, and ‘community entrepreneur’ </span><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none; text-decoration: underline;"><b><i>who was able to make a living from successfully welding his expertise with the ‘free market’</i></b></span><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"> </span><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; text-decoration: underline;"><b><i>is</i></b></span><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"> the nucleus of his original power: creating his own economy and dramatically impacting the greater economy of his country and the world, is the story oft not told, and the magic that needs to be integrated into American schools,—that future generations enter life with a sense of self-determination, adventure, and responsibility for the trajectory of their life,— being resilient risk-takers and dignified initiators of welding their interests unto capitalistic endeavors. The fruit of their continuous unrelenting efforts finding (or not finding) practical success in the ‘free market.’</span></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><span style="font-family: times;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><span style="font-family: times;">Can the American families, the parents; our school educators, or local, state and federal government representatives, see that education should be a process of becoming independent,—and yes, being of value unto others and the community; and if independent, financial wealth would be of immediate importance for individuals to pursue their goals. Government can never be the permanent answer. The national economy is the largest market of a country and the people must be learned in being proficient within it. That is be so that some people prefer at this time to not be dynamic, to not be of value unto others, to not want to be entrepreneurial or self-determine their life beyond their comfort zone is their regard and they have a liberty to stay in such a perspective and situation, but that our schools not instruct in such life-building opportunity; not teach individuals in how to apply the possibility of each venturing forth to improve their life and the enrichment of their future family, along with failing to teach people to be critical thinkers-that would be a failure in the goal of educating Americans to be their best. </span></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><span style="font-family: times;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><span style="font-family: times;">James Watt’s may have not thought of himself as an ‘entrepreneur,’ but he certainly understood himself to be an expert in is field and he understood that he would have to find a away to earn a living through the efforts of his own work. He brought his craft to the market place, and that market was open to him. His original power was not his musical and ship instruments, nor was it the steam engine that he perfected or in the university job that he landed, —his power was his perseverance, his patience, his clarity of thought, his belief in what he was doing. That power is innate, and intrinsic; it does not initiate in the halls of national government, nor is it a limited source that can only be understood by some; that original power can create economy, it can motivate a multitude, it can move hearts & minds; only, we must have that ‘know how’ in our field(s) of expertise and we must bring it to the free market. </span></span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><span style="font-family: times;"><br /></span></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="font-family: times;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span></span></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiBCKOhjQ4Uc0NqaXgDVPBQgprOMCfAHKWAqRU0TsLA6VKIUk-fP5YemVhflE7pfwnui4lsP_jaswaosw1ZBu0QiesROu1cktiIJIOnQIqIYIDTs-5R7Imiq7lh9WPqQfrfcqmhDcyx1tbvCtDNvCCdvRLNg-1wdyZEbaNIUaClVnumVXJssE1jaERQ/s452/0E59CA29-555A-4184-91A2-956E3ACB0F8B_4_5005_c.jpeg" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><span style="font-family: times;"><img border="0" data-original-height="452" data-original-width="356" height="400" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiBCKOhjQ4Uc0NqaXgDVPBQgprOMCfAHKWAqRU0TsLA6VKIUk-fP5YemVhflE7pfwnui4lsP_jaswaosw1ZBu0QiesROu1cktiIJIOnQIqIYIDTs-5R7Imiq7lh9WPqQfrfcqmhDcyx1tbvCtDNvCCdvRLNg-1wdyZEbaNIUaClVnumVXJssE1jaERQ/w315-h400/0E59CA29-555A-4184-91A2-956E3ACB0F8B_4_5005_c.jpeg" width="315" /></span></a></div><span style="font-family: times;"><div><span style="font-family: times;"><br /></span></div>Now, as it regards a market being ‘free,’ or some, if not all of its varied sectors being under the regulation and control of a government, of a cartel of companies, or an alliance of a few nations, such self-interested constructions directly impose upon the liberty of the market. Nations with despotic or tyrannical governments tend to be obvious ‘over regulators’ of markets,—‘commanding & controlling’ the flow of domestic and international trade as it relates to their country, the valuation of domestic currency, and the self-interest of favoring certain companies over others, and profiteering from the instrumentality of geopolitical tactics to control the economy of smaller nations through loan and debt programs (China & African countries). In such situations, the original power of the liberty of an individual to create, invent, innovate, and to own the capitalization process of their venture becomes stifled and entrepreneurial activity diminishes. Again, this is why China imports technology and then reverse-engineers technology to then replicate it ‘lower-quality production’ with cheap labor. </span><p></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><span style="font-family: times;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="font-family: times;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span></span></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg91jmDOWgG6RwtPAVMlvCy_7aSz3LFddXrFLXoD1bvKPEf7x73q23abBsH783R0eSeHijUQKdNxNM55Im7Im3FvRWVQYsO5ae4__n53JRxKkecbumGxIy6Do1KT02W1O6sjUIG6STNz0_9hL10JdBAPPgKREG11QopWXsh4TSMFoHVcv73PukxODAy/s629/CDFC0679-FC95-4DE5-A888-746C837EB6C6.jpeg" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><span style="font-family: times;"><img border="0" data-original-height="629" data-original-width="366" height="640" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg91jmDOWgG6RwtPAVMlvCy_7aSz3LFddXrFLXoD1bvKPEf7x73q23abBsH783R0eSeHijUQKdNxNM55Im7Im3FvRWVQYsO5ae4__n53JRxKkecbumGxIy6Do1KT02W1O6sjUIG6STNz0_9hL10JdBAPPgKREG11QopWXsh4TSMFoHVcv73PukxODAy/w372-h640/CDFC0679-FC95-4DE5-A888-746C837EB6C6.jpeg" width="372" /></span></a></div><span style="font-family: times;"><br /><br /></span><div><span style="font-family: times;">The United States of America was and is the leader in technological innovation and scientific breakthroughs because of the existence of a ‘freer’ market. That said, on June 30th, 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court, in its West Virginia v. EPA opinion put forth that the constitutional duty of Congress cannot be supplanted by a federal agency directed to control U.S. oil, coal, natural gas industry into a mode that hinders output, profit, or limits production. In this case, it appears that the Biden Administration, instead of promoting and supporting the U.S. being a leader in the cleanest standards of oil, coal, and natural gas production, placing a focus on technological development to further hasten best possible practices and standards with smart de-regulation of U.S. shale oil market, —that the competition itself be a driver of environmental efficiency,— openly tried to implement an ideological economic trajectory called “Generational Shifting,” wherein it purposed to rapidly force the oil, coal, natural gas markets from simply being efficient & integrating clean energy production standards, unto being forced to limit production, and finally being forced to switch to renewable energy production. </span><p></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><span style="font-family: times;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><span style="font-family: times;">That would be an example of the office of government being used as an instrument to control an important market, nay, along with other verified reports,<i> of seeking to irresponsibly target and destroy it.</i> Of great importance, if the over-regulation of that particular market is being targeted, the ‘tightening’ of entrance into that same market is also being blocked through the multi-step permit process that the traditional energy fuel companies must go through in order to own land, extract, produce, and distribute. That there be environmental regulations to establish the cleanest oil, coal, natural gas extraction and production through the application of leading edge technology is good; and this creates a new market that caters to the traditional energy industry. But that the traditional energy producing market be forced to limit production and also be forced to become a renewable energy company,—something altogether different, that is ‘command & control,’ and is a manipulation of the offices and powers of government that is altogether an estrangement in the mode of business from the American tradition of the ‘free market’ that has made America the greatest economic power in the world.</span></span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><span style="font-family: times;"><br /></span></span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(13, 16, 19); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #0d1013; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><b><i><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none;"><span style="font-family: times;"></span></span></i></b></p><blockquote><b><i><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none;"><span style="font-family: times;">Biden administration’s regulatory targeting of oil, gas, coal industry: </span></span><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial;"><span style="font-family: times;">LIMITS market growth decentralization with entrance of new players </span></span><span style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: times;">allows easier regulatory CONTROL of large players.</span></i></b></blockquote><b><i><span style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: times;"></span></i></b><p></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(13, 16, 19); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #0d1013; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"></p><span style="font-family: times;"><br /></span><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><span style="font-family: times;"><br /></span></div><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><span style="font-family: times;">Of great interest, the timing of the implementation of the more extreme plans of the political party that represents the Biden administration (the Democrat Political Party), occur at a time when the federal government’s Bureau of Land Management has announced that the United States of America has the greatest resource of shale oil in the world! This means that the geoeconomics and geopolitical balance of power in the world places America in the possibility of being completely energy independent, and as an exporter of traditional energy fuel to the world. Europe could be getting all its energy fuel needs met with American exports. The political leverage of governments of countries, and national cartels would not have an effect on an American reality where we are one hundred percent energy independent. </span></span><p></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(13, 16, 19); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #0d1013; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><span style="font-family: times;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(13, 16, 19); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #0d1013; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhRT7MB_tKdjg8EHJw_XlaIGNUIM8cQ7p-BM-1BHq4JeU_5Gil2sUGlRtNY6Sx3OemVC9mmsrmT0j7EF5XVzwc3suyRIV78smxRS7mEYrYRM8yakbcKTNR-6V0zGSKG-RVtf0p51MUWonnZngNm13vsCZHU-J4A8RKL5nHzs-EsFBmD4RO3pslEEI-B/s630/76614536-16F4-4966-B757-D063877F73DB_4_5005_c.jpeg" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><span style="font-family: times;"><img border="0" data-original-height="630" data-original-width="343" height="400" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhRT7MB_tKdjg8EHJw_XlaIGNUIM8cQ7p-BM-1BHq4JeU_5Gil2sUGlRtNY6Sx3OemVC9mmsrmT0j7EF5XVzwc3suyRIV78smxRS7mEYrYRM8yakbcKTNR-6V0zGSKG-RVtf0p51MUWonnZngNm13vsCZHU-J4A8RKL5nHzs-EsFBmD4RO3pslEEI-B/w217-h400/76614536-16F4-4966-B757-D063877F73DB_4_5005_c.jpeg" width="217" /></span></a></div><span style="font-family: times;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><br /><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">But the Biden administration and the Democrat Political Party would rather not pursue a hastening of technological innovation in traditional energy fuel extraction, production, and distribution. They have told the American people to get used to them limiting American fuel production (over regulation and tightening of permit process) and blocking Canadian shale oil distribution access (Keystone XL pipeline) to the world; narrowing supply while domestic and global demand of oil, coal, and natural gas continues. <b><i>Thus, the tightening of regulatory entrance into the American traditional energy fuel market directly impacts new competition within it; entrance of small business into U.S. shale oil market of potentially extractable 4.3 trillion barrels becomes near impossible, and this means that that industry becomes increasingly centralized amongst a few established global companies, instead of further decentralized with smaller business enterprises that would decrease costs of goods & services on a national basis </i></b></span><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none; text-decoration: underline;"><b><i>due to that increased decentralized competition of the oil supply it renders, & efficiency standards it brings.</i></b></span></span></span></div><div><div><span style="font-family: times;"><b><i><u><br /></u></i></b></span></div><div><span style="font-family: times;"><b><i><u><br /></u></i></b></span></div><div><span style="font-family: times;"><b><i><u><br /></u></i></b></span></div><div><br /></div><div><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(13, 16, 19); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.03); color: #0d1013; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span></p><blockquote><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(13, 16, 19); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.03); color: #0d1013; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none;"><b><i>North America has cleanest oil production technology in the world, but Biden is scuttling our oil industry & chooses to import </i></b></span><b style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: initial;"><i>3,091,550,000 billion barrels of oil into the U.S. in 2021 from 73 countries, including Russia, China, & Saudi Arabia.</i></b></p><p></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><i style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="396" data-original-width="294" height="640" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgnANM-5sD5M1p_U5mybxmJ6VX0NK35WU0zFqAWRMmbVp1UQ70QFPRjYBxZ_Wr8rvgmD68lQCcWVL9MpRMKqZFYoyoBBHaxvuY_A5V4o_HNPy7Zq5X5-NUWrJyBb-DDcuR6i1WUooggTShHLW7eE79x0MIdiC7fI5SqmU4dwo3TQZvAhVCnSTh2sxmt/w477-h640/55357262-F62B-41BF-B538-0312D395374A_4_5005_c.jpeg" width="477" /></i></div></div></blockquote><p><span style="background-color: white; color: #0d1013; font-family: times;">Mr. James Watt’s path to be financially independent was not the end goal for him, though it was assuredly important and desired. His affinity and interest in his work and his ability to bring it to the market was the continuation of that path that gave him hope to progress in his progression from making musical and sailing ship instruments, toys, and finally, re-creating a more technologically advanced steam engine that would be more efficient in its process of heating and cooling. His understanding that he could bring his valuable work to the market spurred him to continue his work, whereas the individual that lives in a country where the entrance into a market is closer to an ‘over-regulated’ ‘command & control paradigm will think and feel as if they cannot improve their life, and this squelches innovation and progress.</span></p><table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><tbody><tr><td style="text-align: center;"><span style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><a href="https://www.youtube.com/clip/Ugkx34kWQ6g01wZb8mlx1NFWGBfF5K3LMzci" target="_blank"><img border="0" data-original-height="481" data-original-width="655" height="470" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjT3RKFrQQ2-8csyVUytSMyKWACwosAD_6F4MOgIal0GoGFxCaQsV-qRgXf5VvJU7w7TJnX7L03tyCQiO7Srl1MdipKDySwqdk9xXxAtAD77ohmW5Aq0DXr0glgrC_7KPrZ3mATlwCtakn7xdhWo3gdIJfk4llWHNLzahwjz8jJYhz9e9V9kL3u42Ui/w640-h470/CE96DF5D-21AD-4D4B-9234-FA137F9D971B.jpeg" width="640" /></a></span></td></tr><tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><span face="TwitterChirp, -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, "Segoe UI", Roboto, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif" style="background-color: white; caret-color: rgb(15, 20, 25); color: #0f1419; font-size: 23px; text-align: start; white-space: pre-wrap;"><a href="https://www.youtube.com/clip/Ugkx34kWQ6g01wZb8mlx1NFWGBfF5K3LMzci" target="_blank">President Reagan: Spectacular Progress in Economy Pivots on A Free & Dynamic Market Place. </a></span></td></tr></tbody></table><br /><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(13, 16, 19); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.03); color: #0d1013; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(13, 16, 19); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #0d1013; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><span style="font-family: times;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(13, 16, 19); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #0d1013; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><span style="font-family: times;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(13, 16, 19); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #0d1013; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><span style="font-family: times;"> </span></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(13, 16, 19); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #0d1013; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><span style="font-family: times;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(13, 16, 19); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #0d1013; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><span style="font-family: times;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(13, 16, 19); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #0d1013; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><span style="font-family: times;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(13, 16, 19); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #0d1013; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><span style="font-family: times;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(13, 16, 19); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #0d1013; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><span style="font-family: times;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(13, 16, 19); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #0d1013; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><span style="font-family: times;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(13, 16, 19); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #0d1013; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><span style="font-family: times;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(13, 16, 19); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #0d1013; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><span style="font-family: times;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><span style="font-family: times;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(13, 16, 19); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #0d1013; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(13, 16, 19); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #0d1013; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><span style="font-family: times;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(13, 16, 19); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.03); color: #0d1013; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(13, 16, 19); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #0d1013; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><br /></p></div></div><div class="blogger-post-footer">ScalziOriginals.US
Build ecosystems & individuals
to strengthen & sustain
integrated community health. </div>@CoachBill007http://www.blogger.com/profile/00964006939825613259noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4249677153801659195.post-63906936223616164712022-07-25T18:01:00.011+03:002022-10-06T18:22:42.050+03:00Ingenuity & Self-Determination/ The True Economic Force Of The American Individual<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiCm8xfpt5nyAxudTESOoVgCB1Pbc2IdbyYDpMnZRV53A8SdwN2chzG7C44quC7nz0PC6FCfaHFps63sMdW1hdiAWGD5btEMNfpXOrKsUBXOC-sqtYBZdJ26ErQtANqDajGbe04Tl_55L7EmT7D5luUIkB_PB-BOvcerfYUdwqCyZXYjjIB3tCCAGGr/s600/986181768-f6b103ec1bf60d003c0d378e7a3c062e.jpg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><br /><img border="0" data-original-height="600" data-original-width="600" height="640" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiCm8xfpt5nyAxudTESOoVgCB1Pbc2IdbyYDpMnZRV53A8SdwN2chzG7C44quC7nz0PC6FCfaHFps63sMdW1hdiAWGD5btEMNfpXOrKsUBXOC-sqtYBZdJ26ErQtANqDajGbe04Tl_55L7EmT7D5luUIkB_PB-BOvcerfYUdwqCyZXYjjIB3tCCAGGr/w640-h640/986181768-f6b103ec1bf60d003c0d378e7a3c062e.jpg" width="640" /></a></div><p> <span style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(22, 22, 22); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: whitesmoke; color: #161616; font-family: STIXGeneral;">Is it the prerogative of the Federal Reserve to guide and protect the American economy? What tools and strategies have they nominally employed in order to effect this in the short and long-term?</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(22, 22, 22); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: whitesmoke; color: #161616; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">What is their legacy in the 20th century, and how should the understandings of their work in the past century help inform the reliance of Americans to continue looking unto that same ‘non-Federal,’ Federal Reserve in the 21st century?</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(22, 22, 22); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: whitesmoke; color: #161616; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(22, 22, 22); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: whitesmoke; color: #161616; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">Created in 1913 through an act of Congress, the Federal Reserve is an independent bank that centralizes its influence of monetary power in an administrative role amongst all major American banks, wherein they set interest rates, inform the Federal Government on strategies they deem proper for the domestic economy, can print money, and control the purchasing power of the U.S. dollar,—this having a global effect on the global flow of money. Likewise, as a central bank, the Federal Reserve can work in consortium with other central banks from other nations in alliances, in order to attain desired ends.</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(22, 22, 22); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: whitesmoke; color: #161616; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(22, 22, 22); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: whitesmoke; color: #161616; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">There are seven governors, or members in the highest echelon of the Federal Reserve central banking system, and they are nominated by the President of the United States and confirmed through U.S. Senate approval.</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(22, 22, 22); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: whitesmoke; color: #161616; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(22, 22, 22); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: whitesmoke; color: #161616; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">Now, as it regards the nomination process that the Office of the President makes officially public, and the U.S. Senate confirms, is it farfetched to assume that the financial ideologies of a political party with its representative as the Executive in the office of the President, and has a U.S. Senate controlled-majority, may differ in monetary policy from another political party? If so, would the difference in monetary perspective be great between both parties, and would it have a palpable effect on the nomination and confirmation process of member-governors to the Federal Reserve?</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(22, 22, 22); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: whitesmoke; color: #161616; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(22, 22, 22); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: whitesmoke; color: #161616; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">As can be gleaned from the national economic legacy of the Federal Reserve in the 20th century, wherein both political parties have been in control at one time or another of both, the Executive Office of the President and one or both houses of Congress, the work of the Federal Reserve has been close to the same with one exception in time: the administration of President Ronald Reagan. Under President Reagan, monetary policy was largely set forth according to the understandings of the President from his time as Governor of the state of California: he lowered taxes, simplified the tax system into three tax brackets, worked to reduce the size of government bureaucracy, and to increase its racial diversity; he cut away at unnecessary financial & labor regulations, and very importantly, was a champion of financial self-determination through the vehicle of entrepreneurship, having a steadfast, and passionate belief that the resolve and ingenuity of the American individual was the true economic force that could drastically improve the American economy. A major advantage the Republican President had was his understanding that in talking directly to the people, he could best reason with them, and inspire them to think, feel, and realize that this was THEIR economy, and that the federal government, as he understood it, was supposed to be ‘for and of the people,’ rather than some separate, increasingly large entity functioning separately of the people: setting rules, creating regulations, and establishing ideological trajectories.</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(22, 22, 22); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: whitesmoke; color: #161616; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(22, 22, 22); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: whitesmoke; color: #161616; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">Reagan believed in the American tradition of self-determination; that the national economy find its roots in the strength of individual economies; and so, entrepreneurship and a ‘free market’ was fundamental to his economic endeavor. </span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(22, 22, 22); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: whitesmoke; color: #161616; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><br /></span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(22, 22, 22); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: whitesmoke; color: #161616; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgS4Hx--BUsXqnuZ9d0uTS6QRFaZakTlQ0RkPOudtcPThW0sI0-2hkU2tQxN3nBbc0nU_wQ87JWhBCJ4P3t0Nx8d1LKgTAx_wKa9FDxhZPTDzupB-Tb1sMAaJsxy8cz42M87Jnar-uTIY19w-GA9UTlzk0t8vwcH8Ag8fFtcAue-ECJagx4l4ij88ez/s794/il_794xN.1118991058_833k.jpg.webp" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="544" data-original-width="794" height="438" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgS4Hx--BUsXqnuZ9d0uTS6QRFaZakTlQ0RkPOudtcPThW0sI0-2hkU2tQxN3nBbc0nU_wQ87JWhBCJ4P3t0Nx8d1LKgTAx_wKa9FDxhZPTDzupB-Tb1sMAaJsxy8cz42M87Jnar-uTIY19w-GA9UTlzk0t8vwcH8Ag8fFtcAue-ECJagx4l4ij88ez/w640-h438/il_794xN.1118991058_833k.jpg.webp" width="640" /></a></div><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><br /></span><p></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(22, 22, 22); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: whitesmoke; color: #161616; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(22, 22, 22); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: whitesmoke; color: #161616; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">The contrast here is that though the Federal Reserve was still seeing interest rates in order to control the value of debt, the U.S. dollar, and the domestic/ international global flow of money, the actions of the Executive of the Office of the President made financial policy endeavors that would transform the national economy with greater effect. Again, the Federal Reserve was taking actions to affect the economy with its tools and strategies, but the President made greater moves that were able to positively turn the economy around. <b><i>Whereas </i></b>the Federal Reserve typically communicates in a vocabulary of words that express its guiding norms and modes of monetary policy in response to its understandings and observations of domestic/ international economic money flows and how a myriad of internal & external economic factors may play into their short and long-term outlooks, President Reagan simplified the governments tax relationship to the American people, communicated his plan and took action to reduce the size and cost of government, and seeked to reason, remind and inspire the people with an awareness<b><i> that their self-determination to use the free market to entrepreneurially accomplish their dreams is the actual economic force. </i></b>The Federal Reserve does not speak to the people, its construction primes it to speak a vocabulary that is not directed to ‘Main Street,’ but to the largest movers of market forces, governments, and those investors who speculate in it on ‘Wall Street.’</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(22, 22, 22); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: whitesmoke; color: #161616; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(22, 22, 22); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: whitesmoke; color: #161616; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">The true interest of government is to serve and protect all the people, according to the word & spirit of the American tradition of liberty and justice for all as found in our Declaration of Independence & Constitution. At best, the Federal Reserve has a split interest; that is to say, it is both independent and semi-public. Its construction defaults it into a split priority of purpose, and left unchecked,— its endeavors, strategies and market-affecting tools have not historically been an inspiration delivering a shaping or rise in entrepreneurial self-determination for the American people, but a continuity of cyclical economic recessions, and finite, artificially-created market ‘bubbles,’ that benefit a continuously decreasing sum of people who are able to rise out of debt and own their own homes. Most people are less and less able to own their own homes outright, or to not be burdened with debt, or the effects of a continuously depreciated U.S. dollar as the price of goods increases. The Federal Reserve that has favored an international financial ideological perspective balance can never drum up the true American engines of economic growth: the ingenuity and self-determination of the American individual as an economic force because of its split priority. No, the people of America should not have the Federal Reserve at the helm of the economy because history has shown that the central bank’s economic priority is not the economy of ‘Main Street.’ Instead, we must empower ourselves to become resilient wellsprings of economic self-determination. It is only that steadfast individual resiliency of the determined mind and continued action of belief in our ability to achieve for ourselves, (and in turn, our families and communities), that can create true economic strength.</span></p><div class="blogger-post-footer">ScalziOriginals.US
Build ecosystems & individuals
to strengthen & sustain
integrated community health. </div>@CoachBill007http://www.blogger.com/profile/00964006939825613259noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4249677153801659195.post-85372985070100327002022-07-03T23:04:00.024+03:002022-07-06T18:40:32.595+03:00 What Is The True Interest Of Government?<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><b><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhfOvpWhBWDMZXPciEGOYrb38LQDMqi_BGRMDZqE99-dETqy0BAYrP8mFf4RqJdaKsJeZCYRZ0qnt3uoJeP4Zi7ISEAMF39kL83LJ3Qkkjr1IiQwyihVxJjTC67jkUsSydlYqtWDlm3Jl5A02UmuYCea5Kaa3LGEzfGUKnEZWvdct0tVX-glzwyRxAO/s494/Screen%20Shot%202022-07-03%20at%202.16.00%20PM.png" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><span style="font-family: STIX Two Text; font-size: medium;"><br /><img border="0" data-original-height="483" data-original-width="494" height="626" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhfOvpWhBWDMZXPciEGOYrb38LQDMqi_BGRMDZqE99-dETqy0BAYrP8mFf4RqJdaKsJeZCYRZ0qnt3uoJeP4Zi7ISEAMF39kL83LJ3Qkkjr1IiQwyihVxJjTC67jkUsSydlYqtWDlm3Jl5A02UmuYCea5Kaa3LGEzfGUKnEZWvdct0tVX-glzwyRxAO/w640-h626/Screen%20Shot%202022-07-03%20at%202.16.00%20PM.png" width="640" /></span></a></b></div><b><span style="font-family: STIX Two Text; font-size: medium;"><br /><i><br /></i></span></b><p></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(29, 29, 29); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: #f7f7f7; color: #1d1d1d; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; text-align: center;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><b><i><span style="font-family: STIX Two Text; font-size: medium;">The plowing forth of the path of liberty is not unto new ground, </span></i></b></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(29, 29, 29); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: #f7f7f7; color: #1d1d1d; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; text-align: center;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><b><i><span style="font-family: STIX Two Text; font-size: medium;">but upon a soil that does not tire or deplete;</span></i></b></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(29, 29, 29); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: #f7f7f7; color: #1d1d1d; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; text-align: center;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><b><i><span style="font-family: STIX Two Text; font-size: medium;">the tilling of its understanding and then its defense generating its vitality once more—</span></i></b></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(29, 29, 29); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; color: #1d1d1d; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px; text-align: center;"><span style="font-family: STIX Two Text; font-size: medium;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><b><i></i></b></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(29, 29, 29); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: #f7f7f7; color: #1d1d1d; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; text-align: center;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><b><i><span style="font-family: STIX Two Text; font-size: medium;">Trodden first in the reading of the Declaration of Independence, </span></i></b></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(29, 29, 29); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: #f7f7f7; color: #1d1d1d; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; text-align: center;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><b><i><span style="font-family: STIX Two Text; font-size: medium;">closely thereafter in the recognition of the altruist selfless servants of liberty,</span></i></b></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(29, 29, 29); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: #f7f7f7; color: #1d1d1d; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; text-align: center;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><b><i><span style="font-family: STIX Two Text; font-size: medium;">and finally, in the present, </span></i></b></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(29, 29, 29); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: #f7f7f7; color: #1d1d1d; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; text-align: center;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><b><i><span style="font-family: STIX Two Text; font-size: medium;">with our relentless defense of the same.</span></i></b></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(29, 29, 29); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: #f7f7f7; color: #1d1d1d; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 21px;"><span style="font-family: STIX Two Text; font-size: medium;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(29, 29, 29); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: #f7f7f7; color: #1d1d1d; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><span style="font-family: STIX Two Text; font-size: medium;">What is the true interest of our American republic as a constitutional representative government; that ordered array of elected and chosen of the people to care and protect the people as a nation of laws, according to its fundamental laws, and the laws created from these? How shall we order the interpretation of laws, guarding against self-interest, and the sleights that have characterized the few, or the majority to accumulate an imbalance of power, thus shifting the equilibrium of American government from serving all, to serving some? Who is responsible for rendering and enforcing the selfless distillation of equal justice? Unto whom is the duty to assure such a process maintains purity or the endeavoring to always approximate such exactitude of unvarnished justice?</span></span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(29, 29, 29); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: #f7f7f7; color: #1d1d1d; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><span style="font-family: STIX Two Text; font-size: medium;"><br /></span></span></p>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><span style="font-family: STIX Two Text; font-size: medium; margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="1500" data-original-width="1185" height="640" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjv0VavctSSiaAE8pWNF7i8LS5UcztLMrbzkEKu3JH49cbLAwJGOLU6-JGUGqGUAlHQjfXerWRhuZHBjrsZts-1hR-c4LKpWqQ9fgDgd6TtFwex14ESN9pemQHc3y4XdxpOEXx6GsHe4y-3lr_4FQRdo3dQE7cibdPb4RGTq5bXisoLRkIHX23hPeGt/w506-h640/l_npg.19.95_edmonson-sisters.jpg" width="506" /></span></div><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(29, 29, 29); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: #f7f7f7; color: #1d1d1d; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 21px;"><br /></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(29, 29, 29); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: #f7f7f7; color: #1d1d1d; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 21px; text-align: center;"><span style="font-family: STIX Two Text; font-size: medium;"><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(29, 29, 29); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: #f7f7f7; color: #1d1d1d; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="font-family: STIX Two Text; font-size: medium;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span></span></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjv0VavctSSiaAE8pWNF7i8LS5UcztLMrbzkEKu3JH49cbLAwJGOLU6-JGUGqGUAlHQjfXerWRhuZHBjrsZts-1hR-c4LKpWqQ9fgDgd6TtFwex14ESN9pemQHc3y4XdxpOEXx6GsHe4y-3lr_4FQRdo3dQE7cibdPb4RGTq5bXisoLRkIHX23hPeGt/s1500/l_npg.19.95_edmonson-sisters.jpg" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"></a></div><span style="font-family: STIX Two Text; font-size: medium;">In his youth, Frederick Douglass, as a slave, was purposefully bereft of an education, that in such condition, the ability to control his humanity and labor, would be easiest. That singular truth would bare the greatest epiphany for him as he struggled at first fitfully, and later eloquently, reverse engineering his understanding of that premise echoed from the lips of one of his slave owners against the slave owners wife, who had taken to instructing young Frederick in reading and writing. Coupled with his partial newfound liberty of being allowed to walk alone in the streets of Baltimore, and having heard here and there of the words ‘liberty,’ ‘abolition,’ and ‘slavery’ being used in junction with one another, Frederick brought together his separated grasps of intellect to understand that education was the path to the opportunity to possibly self-determine his life and bring a greater sense of courage, freedom, and dignity to his life. In his first autobiography, he recounts that he wondered at their meaning, initially trying to push the outer reaches of his mind to comprehend, for as yet he could not simply enter a library, purchase a book, or partake in open discussion on the matters of interest to him, for he was a slave without human rights. Still, an innate, uninformed awareness grew within him; he, recognizing a yearning and onset of a wherewithal for the right to natural self-determination. </span><span style="font-family: STIX Two Text; font-size: medium;"><div><span style="font-family: STIX Two Text; font-size: medium;"><br /></span></div><div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgEtLfTubH1i3IaV0fUuBw3MuQ2I7ydDWJCTzkrNRdUJ_JWzT1JgPsf2li6QltLS0gJnccw3AcCw0NENc01XA84oUhkh3_nykZnreSbz4REAqS-9L2P30rSragfjz7JFAvcLsBYh04B8RARZryP-LL2avHpVWjC7jeiyv7RsIDdxt22uHaFOtebgj47/s1347/2C87E946-328C-4339-BBE5-E1C56DD758FF.jpeg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="684" data-original-width="1347" height="324" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgEtLfTubH1i3IaV0fUuBw3MuQ2I7ydDWJCTzkrNRdUJ_JWzT1JgPsf2li6QltLS0gJnccw3AcCw0NENc01XA84oUhkh3_nykZnreSbz4REAqS-9L2P30rSragfjz7JFAvcLsBYh04B8RARZryP-LL2avHpVWjC7jeiyv7RsIDdxt22uHaFOtebgj47/w640-h324/2C87E946-328C-4339-BBE5-E1C56DD758FF.jpeg" width="640" /></a></div></div><div><span style="font-family: STIX Two Text; font-size: medium;"><br /></span></div>Did the <i>process itself</i> of laying claim to the natural law of humanity and the promise of the ordered liberty found in the American Constitution signal hope for Frederick Douglass? To stand still would have been as fire in his bones, and a dimming of his soul, though as of yet he had no words to describe such ideas or grasp such understandings. How could he? As has been said, reading and writing where purposefully kept from the ‘negro slave,’ that they may not encounter insights of their enslaved condition, nor a mind to ask, ponder, and rectify the course of their life. Knowledge and the application of knowledge, being a dormant and then active application of the shaping and refining of intellect; a power of the individual unto self-determination, was understood as the one thing that had to be kept from a slave, less they approach and understand that the American foundation of natural law was human right: that the human being aware of their individual human rights, be kept ignorant and distracted from laying claim upon these, and therein bring a defense of the same, --</span><span style="font-family: STIX Two Text; font-size: medium;">— was key to the slave owner’s design in maintaining the slave in an oppressed mode of servitude.</span><p></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(29, 29, 29); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: #f7f7f7; color: #1d1d1d; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 21px;"><span style="font-family: STIX Two Text; font-size: medium;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><b><i></i></b></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(29, 29, 29); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: #f7f7f7; color: #1d1d1d; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="font-family: STIX Two Text; font-size: medium;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><b><i>Is it not so that such a ‘process of searching, laying claim, and defense thereof’ </i></b></span><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal;"><b><i>IS </i></b></span><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><b><i>the heritage and duty of human beings, and the true spirit of the formation and tradition of Americans?</i></b></span></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(29, 29, 29); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: #f7f7f7; color: #1d1d1d; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 21px;"><span style="font-family: STIX Two Text; font-size: medium;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(29, 29, 29); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: #f7f7f7; color: #1d1d1d; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><span style="font-family: STIX Two Text; font-size: medium;">Later on, as a critically thinking public speaker and writer,— in having pieced together that passion for self-determination through observance, analyzation, grit, tenacity, and an unrelentingness to sharpen his intellect as his best instrument, the American slave turned ‘man of the century,’ selflessly endeavors on a bold path never before trodden in the manner that he had uniquely set out upon it: as an outsider, born a slave, bearing the story of his humanity while laying claim on the word and spirit of a promissory note, the Declaration of Independence, and the ordered liberty of government of and for the people that is directed in our Constitution.</span></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(29, 29, 29); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: #f7f7f7; color: #1d1d1d; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 21px;"><span style="font-family: STIX Two Text; font-size: medium;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(29, 29, 29); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: #f7f7f7; color: #1d1d1d; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><span style="font-family: STIX Two Text; font-size: medium;">Somehow, Frederick Douglass had walked a path that is the only one of two ways to defend liberty: he had sought out the meaning of ‘liberty,’ and of ‘justice,’ had studied the function and express duty of the American government, had read the words of the Declaration of 1776, and the Constitution of 1787; and proceeded to lay claim on those liberties; from thenceforth with solemn self-determination,—defending his fundamental individual human rights <b><i>and that of others</i></b>, as written and intended in those documents, to the best of his altruist understanding, <b><i>in the intention of the spirit that they were written with. </i></b>That understood ‘spirit of intention’ of the founders and key defenders of that generation of 1776, informed a foundation of human equality in him that gave credence to his passion, and fueled his magnanimity of spirit to ‘plow forth’ in his work— long past mental and physical exhaustion.</span></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(29, 29, 29); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: #f7f7f7; color: #1d1d1d; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 21px;"><span style="font-family: STIX Two Text; font-size: medium;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(29, 29, 29); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: #f7f7f7; color: #1d1d1d; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><i><span style="font-family: STIX Two Text; font-size: medium;">Only a few others have walked such a path and seen it through to its end, finding themselves active players on an extraordinary stage, often times cold and fierce, yielding nothing, promising nothing, granting nothing. </span></i></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(29, 29, 29); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: #f7f7f7; color: #1d1d1d; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 21px;"><span style="font-family: STIX Two Text; font-size: medium;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(29, 29, 29); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: #f7f7f7; color: #1d1d1d; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; text-align: center;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><span style="font-family: STIX Two Text; font-size: medium;">2</span></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(29, 29, 29); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: #f7f7f7; color: #1d1d1d; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 21px;"><span style="font-family: STIX Two Text; font-size: medium;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(29, 29, 29); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: #f7f7f7; color: #1d1d1d; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><span style="font-family: STIX Two Text; font-size: medium;">What is the true interest of government then, and what is this call from so many sentinels that have warned us that our liberty is always but one generation from being eradicated? </span></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(29, 29, 29); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: #f7f7f7; color: #1d1d1d; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 21px;"><span style="font-family: STIX Two Text; font-size: medium;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(29, 29, 29); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: #f7f7f7; color: #1d1d1d; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhQE1nrMZxNJogMHZIBE50mEA4VWuYGb0ob-ZCdAmEUGEkisf4nF5L2P31Q-qL8-QCUO4rWPbQUf7Vo-NBTFb8nnGTMvooEQ79ZRXhIX6_trsW-jS4o3h4BSMzclZXS4K4XpTbpUsKl4Wdwgv5A-ynDJKNA-ePB45YX4RgpoCRou1I1bFjz_SWOSuFN/s632/4115B9BC-1DD7-4F61-B5B0-F8C4EE4B01B3.jpeg" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><span style="font-family: STIX Two Text; font-size: medium;"><img border="0" data-original-height="631" data-original-width="632" height="319" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhQE1nrMZxNJogMHZIBE50mEA4VWuYGb0ob-ZCdAmEUGEkisf4nF5L2P31Q-qL8-QCUO4rWPbQUf7Vo-NBTFb8nnGTMvooEQ79ZRXhIX6_trsW-jS4o3h4BSMzclZXS4K4XpTbpUsKl4Wdwgv5A-ynDJKNA-ePB45YX4RgpoCRou1I1bFjz_SWOSuFN/s320/4115B9BC-1DD7-4F61-B5B0-F8C4EE4B01B3.jpeg" width="320" /></span></a></div><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><b><i><span style="font-family: STIX Two Text; font-size: medium;">“Those who are factious must have time to improve their sleights and projects, and disguising their designs, drawing in instruments, and worming out their opposites.”</span></i></b></span><p></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(29, 29, 29); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: #f7f7f7; color: #1d1d1d; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 21px;"><span style="font-family: STIX Two Text; font-size: medium;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(29, 29, 29); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: #f7f7f7; color: #1d1d1d; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; text-align: right;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><span style="font-family: STIX Two Text; font-size: medium;">from John Adams, ‘A Defense Of The Constitution, Letter VI’ (1788)</span></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(29, 29, 29); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: #f7f7f7; color: #1d1d1d; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 21px;"><span style="font-family: STIX Two Text; font-size: medium;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(29, 29, 29); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: #f7f7f7; color: #1d1d1d; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><span style="font-family: STIX Two Text; font-size: medium;">Is the interest of government exclusively beholden to the definition and interpretation of the holders of government office? In a simple democracy of minority or majority rule, are not the interests of the former and the latter factious? Was not the founding interest of the American Republic intent on an government power balance equilibrium split into three branches with ‘checks and balances’ upon each other, —that the growth and longevity of self-interest groups (factions) with an <b>“interest distinct from the true interest of the state”</b> (John Adams, Letter VI, <i>A Defense Of The Constitution)</i>, be stifled, rooted out, and ultimately, though it may convulse the nation, --not unsurp, nor supplant the original spirit and word of the law as an instrument of equal liberty and justice, and the foundation of the American republic as the true interest of all its people? <b><i>Therefore,</i></b> for the American nation, presently in the 21st century, and having in existence such diversity of thought, varied ethnicity, religions, creeds, and walks of life, how is such interest rightfully addressed to include the complete number of all its people, and not only the desire and politic of a minority or a majority? Only the words and spirit of protection of individual liberty in our Declaration of Independence and the Bill of Rights immediately answers that, —with the division of our representative government into those three separate branches of power sustaining and bringing order to the integrity of that unity, founded on the all-inclusive, unalienable claim and awareness that the people are individual co-sovereigns in a nation of laws with a constitution that has brought order to that liberty, yet anchored in that spirit of individual right to claim equality of individual creation, equality of the right to life, liberty, the right to be safe and happy, and the right to assure that said government is maintained to be as such, through the guaranteed right to alter and/ or abolishment of that government, --if it is found, that after a long train of transgressions, it has departed from that original intention.</span></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(29, 29, 29); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: #f7f7f7; color: #1d1d1d; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 21px;"><span style="font-family: STIX Two Text; font-size: medium;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(29, 29, 29); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: #f7f7f7; color: #1d1d1d; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><span style="font-family: STIX Two Text; font-size: medium;">John Adams, ‘A Defense Of The Constitution’ (1788)</span></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(29, 29, 29); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: #f7f7f7; color: #1d1d1d; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 21px; text-align: center;"><span style="font-family: STIX Two Text; font-size: medium;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><i></i></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(29, 29, 29); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: #f7f7f7; color: #1d1d1d; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><b><i><span style="font-family: STIX Two Text; font-size: medium;">“The magnitude of territory, the population, the wealth and commerce, and especially the rapid growth of the United States, have shown such a government to be inadequate to their wants; and the new system, which seems admirably calculated to unite their interests and affections, and bring them to an uniformity of principles and sentiments, is equally well combined to unite their wills and forces as a single nation. A result of accommodation cannot be supposed to reach the ideas of perfection of anyone; but the conception of such an idea, and the deliberate union of so great in various of people in such a plan, is, without all partiality or prejudice, if not the greatest exertion of human understanding, the greatest single effort of national deliberation that the world has ever seen.”</span></i></b></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(29, 29, 29); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: #f7f7f7; color: #1d1d1d; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 21px;"><span style="font-family: STIX Two Text; font-size: medium;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><b><i></i></b></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(29, 29, 29); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: #f7f7f7; color: #1d1d1d; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><span style="font-family: STIX Two Text; font-size: medium;">It has only been in the words and sentiment of the Declaration of Independence that we have unanimous agreement, <i>and</i> because of the balance of government equilibrium of our Constitution that allows the people the correcting mechanism when deviation from the true interest of the government appears.</span></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(29, 29, 29); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: #f7f7f7; color: #1d1d1d; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 21px;"><span style="font-family: STIX Two Text; font-size: medium;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(29, 29, 29); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: #f7f7f7; color: #1d1d1d; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="font-family: STIX Two Text; font-size: medium;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">But is it not so, that in the writings of John & Abigail Adams, in the congressional work of their son, John Quincy Adams, in the exhaustive work of Frederick Douglass, and the altruist example of Abraham Lincoln that we, as studious readers soon find, that the work of liberty oft times pits the complete apparatus and resources of the adherents of the ‘status quo’ against such individuals,—because the self-interest of faction, the avarice, greed, and selfishness of some will seek to gain the powers of the office of government to exact their own purposes? <b>Certainly, the command & control </b>of enslaved human labor, <b>or of manipulation of particular industries within our economies is an imposition on the self-determination of the people, of its trade & commerce, and of the true interest of the American constitutional republic, and as so, both, within and outside of government, the duty of responsibility exists to assure government is 'of and for the people,' and not according to the political desires of a minority or majority, of a political party, but instead, that the function of government constitutionally be unanimous in its process to serve all, without partiality,</b> (see U.S. Supreme Court opinion of </span><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal;">WEST VIRGINIA v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY</span><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">, June 30, 2022, <a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/20-1530_n758.pdf"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none;">https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/20-1530_n758.pdf</span></a>).</span></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(29, 29, 29); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: #f7f7f7; color: #1d1d1d; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 21px;"><span style="font-family: STIX Two Text; font-size: medium;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(29, 29, 29); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: #f7f7f7; color: #1d1d1d; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="font-family: STIX Two Text; font-size: medium;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">The true interest of government is then to serve all and to protect all, that the people be safe and happy to self-determine their life, and enjoy the effect of their labor, according to the word of law and founding spirit of that law that was employed in the deliberation and writing of our U.S. Constitution, without partiality to the ethnicity, religion, creed, walk of life, or politic of the individual, of the minority, or of the majority, free of factious spirit, and maintaining that unalloyed original spirit of liberty and justice that is the promised living heritage and true American tradition, first </span><span style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: initial;">chartered in the proclamation of the fundamental, natural law of our Declaration of Independence that formed the first agreement of our nation in that generation of 1776, and later in that process of ordered liberty of the formation of our government: the Articles of Confederation (1777) and finally the Constitution, (1787).</span></span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(29, 29, 29); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: #f7f7f7; color: #1d1d1d; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="font-family: STIX Two Text; font-size: medium;"><span style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: initial;"><br /></span></span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(29, 29, 29); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: #f7f7f7; color: #1d1d1d; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="font-family: STIX Two Text; font-size: medium;"></span></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><span style="font-family: STIX Two Text; font-size: medium;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjha3fBCJ5PSwa3q8FISHuE51o64085EyORVnmD7LlLIMqzWwTWvxF6Rr61Zzd80_gb6pWzAKJY2m84BrY4Z-5Zi4c6Ike3ejqBCd_xyb3ufQX4t38EhiHpARFSOtb7i-RsuMofZ_ZTdCtnHxWRX9SPYZwgKAZiHfrcLHYAz9zWPqij3_rwlilKvzsn/s626/486C842A-EAD2-4CD4-B50D-697BDA0CD9E0.jpeg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="626" data-original-width="398" height="640" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjha3fBCJ5PSwa3q8FISHuE51o64085EyORVnmD7LlLIMqzWwTWvxF6Rr61Zzd80_gb6pWzAKJY2m84BrY4Z-5Zi4c6Ike3ejqBCd_xyb3ufQX4t38EhiHpARFSOtb7i-RsuMofZ_ZTdCtnHxWRX9SPYZwgKAZiHfrcLHYAz9zWPqij3_rwlilKvzsn/w406-h640/486C842A-EAD2-4CD4-B50D-697BDA0CD9E0.jpeg" width="406" /></a></span></div><span style="font-family: STIX Two Text; font-size: medium;"><span style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: initial;"><br /></span></span><p></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(29, 29, 29); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: #f7f7f7; color: #1d1d1d; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 21px;"><span style="font-family: STIX Two Text; font-size: medium;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(29, 29, 29); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: #f7f7f7; color: #1d1d1d; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><b><i><span style="font-family: STIX Two Text; font-size: medium;">“Those who are factious must have time to improve their sleights and projects, and disguising their designs, drawing in instruments, and worming out their opposites.”</span></i></b></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(29, 29, 29); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: #f7f7f7; color: #1d1d1d; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 21px;"><span style="font-family: STIX Two Text; font-size: medium;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(29, 29, 29); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: #f7f7f7; color: #1d1d1d; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="font-family: STIX Two Text; font-size: medium;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span></span></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"></div><span style="font-family: STIX Two Text; font-size: medium;"><br />What duty do we, as a people, have then in bringing light unto factious construction in government and throughout our national community? Shall there be an exclusivity of people who define the true interest of government and make laws to establish curriculum to instruct the youth on such things in our American schools? Will they not grow up and consent, direct, vote, and manage the government in their generation? Unto whom is the solemness of heritage and duty to selflessly make such a diligent search and defense? Should Frederick Douglass not have begun his work, and instead rested on the wisdom of the U.S. Supreme Court and that of Congress, and the Presidency during the times of slavery? John Quincy Adams certainly rises to answer with a resounding “<i>no</i>”! The son of the second President, himself our 6th President, saw that the good beginnings and strength of the promise of the Declaration of Independence and the functionality of our Constitution as the founding documents of the American Republic <b><i>did not in fact </i></b>equate a perfection of the national reality at the time of the nation’s creation, but <b><i>that a nation of laws</i></b>, founded on a fundamental equanimity of individual liberty and justice for all, with a government split into a balance of three branches of governance (executive, judicial, legislative), all having a negative upon each other<b><i>, even if it not be so at all times and across all situations and generations, that because we are a nation of just laws, our national political unity could withstand the discord of self-interested factious spirit</i></b> that has plagued all governments across all human civilizations,<b><i> and in time, we would surely</i></b> <b><i>have the means wherein the people could root out faction. </i></b></span><div><span style="font-family: STIX Two Text; font-size: medium;"><br /></span></div><div style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-family: STIX Two Text; font-size: medium;"><img border="0" data-original-height="667" data-original-width="1000" height="426" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiJBapccgOEHz_Eh_AS6pDKaycZqI7atuKo00tpcV7RsXkeyeOJ4V0YAocGKgx8n6cW9VFCH81WmW52yiTIWuS9Q26jCO8DQzQ1HKMkLGCGb4jYH95IxfjUyg14g_EYh3t_xMNEy7LR2JHSWsB7ofYwYjWXezp1sf-Jeo4mWMH94V3sblvGt_LLG4vj/w640-h426/shutterstock_314955134.jpg" width="640" /></span><span style="font-family: STIX Two Text; font-size: medium;"><br /></span></div><div><span style="font-family: STIX Two Text; font-size: medium;"><br /></span></div><div><span style="font-family: STIX Two Text; font-size: medium;"><br /></span></div><div><span style="font-family: STIX Two Text; font-size: medium;">To do so, should it be self-interested or selfless individuals who would needs be required to correct the interpretation, understanding, and direction of what the true interest of government is, that ultimately, the gentle promises of that equal liberty be justly safeguarded within each generation? <span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; -webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(29, 29, 29); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: #f7f7f7; color: #1d1d1d;">What if a factious spirit has made its way into a political majority and the interpretation of the laws, and the government directives are unto centralizing a command and control of the American heritage narrative and the understanding of its traditions,— shifting educational curriculum away from shaping a financially independent, self-determined, critical thinking people and unto their own self-interested purposes distinct from that originalist spirit of liberty and unanimous justice for all? The civil solution is to write and speak, to vote, and to initiate discussion.</span></span></div><div><span style="color: #1d1d1d; font-family: STIX Two Text; font-size: medium;"><span style="background-color: #f7f7f7; caret-color: rgb(29, 29, 29);"><br /></span></span><span style="font-family: STIX Two Text; font-size: medium;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; -webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(29, 29, 29); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: #f7f7f7; color: #1d1d1d;"><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiUQu1HPNx4EWtvCViDgeh9l7rIkXfXr0S1JCEzfnZDySqAVA3RsWu4eBYekjlKnmfWungqRpFiUPaUawGvS3nzfcgU97gbgH2BTmTNU3WbSpPJOvZplk6r7fl8LwyY133y2nEiikRS2F7_Z1IcwUc5ocACPHvgSiaoX8in-wD6Lu8NgskMn0mDocL8/s474/A040863E-D0FB-463C-B35E-C155B52449F3_4_5005_c.jpeg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="474" data-original-width="303" height="640" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiUQu1HPNx4EWtvCViDgeh9l7rIkXfXr0S1JCEzfnZDySqAVA3RsWu4eBYekjlKnmfWungqRpFiUPaUawGvS3nzfcgU97gbgH2BTmTNU3WbSpPJOvZplk6r7fl8LwyY133y2nEiikRS2F7_Z1IcwUc5ocACPHvgSiaoX8in-wD6Lu8NgskMn0mDocL8/w410-h640/A040863E-D0FB-463C-B35E-C155B52449F3_4_5005_c.jpeg" width="410" /></a></div></span></span></div><div><span style="font-family: STIX Two Text; font-size: medium;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; -webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(29, 29, 29); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: #f7f7f7; color: #1d1d1d;"><br /></span></span></div><div><span style="font-family: STIX Two Text; font-size: medium;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; -webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(29, 29, 29); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: #f7f7f7; color: #1d1d1d;">It is the trodden path of John & Abigail Adams, of John Quincy Adams, of Frederick Douglass, of Abraham Lincoln, of the early work of Attorney Thurgood Marshall; it is the work of Martin Luther King, and, if you can withstand it,— it is the </span><span style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(29, 29, 29); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: #f7f7f7; color: #1d1d1d;">work of Ronald Reagan (Abortion & The Conscious of a Nation, 1983). The civil solution then, is in seeking to effect the correcting of our trajectory, while preserving the understanding of what our nation was founded upon, and how it has been inclusively defended without partiality,—for you and me. </span></span><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(29, 29, 29); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: #f7f7f7; color: #1d1d1d; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="clear: right; float: right; font-size: medium; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"></span></p><br /></div><div class="blogger-post-footer">ScalziOriginals.US
Build ecosystems & individuals
to strengthen & sustain
integrated community health. </div>@CoachBill007http://www.blogger.com/profile/00964006939825613259noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4249677153801659195.post-59741464068982673472022-06-27T14:01:00.009+03:002022-06-29T15:57:06.327+03:00An Economy of Dynamic Economies/ Individual Self-Determination v. Command & Control<p> </p><p></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEisAmZ2nu2xd7FFsNdqnOgcggGPPGmf7rLmbrS2CRKlT_IYbLL9RYQmZhqtQZyy7EOwWIa34Ao2sli2RKji4A13CtNmoqAU19p-Qu80TDiH2cU9qG0KRuUGsRS1dfK9z-m7qap0e_IUzxh1UWHqOSAPDur134P3KxJgVbAkEIbT5QYpU5b8MPK8B7q9/s640/e8bf035d4b8f72a24f54882b51101e47.jpg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="510" data-original-width="640" height="510" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEisAmZ2nu2xd7FFsNdqnOgcggGPPGmf7rLmbrS2CRKlT_IYbLL9RYQmZhqtQZyy7EOwWIa34Ao2sli2RKji4A13CtNmoqAU19p-Qu80TDiH2cU9qG0KRuUGsRS1dfK9z-m7qap0e_IUzxh1UWHqOSAPDur134P3KxJgVbAkEIbT5QYpU5b8MPK8B7q9/w640-h510/e8bf035d4b8f72a24f54882b51101e47.jpg" width="640" /></a></div><span style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral;"><br /></span><p></p><p><span style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral;">In all of the civilizations of the world across all time, not in Rome, nor Egypt, not in England, or in China, not in India, nor in Russia, has such unification of mind and heart met together in agreement to become a political community of people of such diversity, and with such an adherence to individual liberty and justice, as was accomplished in 1776 with the creation of the United States of America, and its founding charter, our Declaration of Independence. A writing incasing a proclamation of natural, fundamental law: after great deliberations amongst representatives of the diverse people of its land, and also amongst the local assemblies of the people, closely following, supporting, and placing the sentiment of their hearts, and their best understandings of the spirit of liberty that had to be the core of a better government for and of the people. That entire process itself, (1) the formation and support of our first government (the Continental Congress, 1774-76), and (2) the clarity of a political stance based on the establishment of a political union founded on natural law,—</span><span style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral;"> </span><span style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral;">the people’s individual co-sovereignty, and their spirit of the right to individual self-determination being expressed through those local assemblies and their Congressional delegates, altogether (3) informing a sentiment: a spirit of individual liberty and justice that was to be written and recorded upon parchment: a solemn proclamation of the complete sovereign independence of the individual human being, in all stages of physical-biological actuality (“created equal,” Declaration of Independence, 1776)</span><span style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral;"> </span><span style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral;">from the onset of its creation-conception start; across the midst of our life span, being wholly and inherently protected in our person, thus our complete liberty from having such said rights being bestowed or taken from a governing body; hence, an unalienable right founded on the unequivocal awareness of the natural law of humanity.</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">But the natural law of individual liberty that was avowed, asserted, and proclaimed in 1776, though inherent and unalienable, it was not being respected as such a that time by the English government. And in 1787, only a few years later, it was understood by three of the same founders who were part of that original establishment of government for and of the people, that the search and awareness for future encroachments upon the understandings and sentiments that gave a ballast of distinct vocabulary to that proclamation of 1776, would find its most subtle oppositions from within the American political body in the form of factions: self-interest groups with narrow ends who see the instrumentality of government as a apparatus to be manipulated, and seek to enter government office in order to sustain and establish their particular ideology ahead of the original charter of understood agreement that is the ‘open source code:’ a nation of individual self-determination and equal claim to natural liberty and justice. Therefore, the ideology of faction, put into effect through the instrumentality of the acquisition of government office is an activist ‘construction’ upon that original sentiment and understanding of the people of what style of union based on natural human law they chose to have.</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><span style="font-family: STIXGeneral;">Are we free to add unto our liberties, or has the list of natural, fundamental rights been exhausted? Our 9th amendment in our Bill of Rights clearly </span></span><span style="font-family: STIXGeneral;">identifies that we can certainly have other rights not listed within our Declaration of Independence, or in our Constitution (1787). But should we agree to play the political strategy of identity politics and tarnish the character and integrity of both the founders of the American government, and altogether dismiss the sentiment, political understanding, and expression of the people of the generation of 1776 as ‘passé,’ as stale, as a people of limited understanding without education, as a strange people from a distant time?</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">The America of 1776 was ethnically diverse; it was religiously varied, and teemed with a varied assortment of people who immigrated from a great number of nations whose monarchical governments did not the respect natural, sovereign law of humanity, disallowing the people’s quality of life to rise above a feudal, caste hierarchy that was oppressive and slanted in favor of an elite few. America represented a new beginning for the improvement of the economic, religious, intellectual life of humans: they recognized that something new and special was starting: an ‘open source’ government based on the liberty of the individual, and that that government was to be of and for the people. So it happens that the people of that generation understood the American dream to be the complete opposite of what all other nations on Earth were, because people could begin to self-determine their life and could enfranchise themselves, without asking permission unto the government.</span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><br /></span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh2XOxjVQ2ddIf1Xx3iMpZ_S3TtKua_mRTmJt8tFyWwfNzpX3SR2Ub0JPEa-eIt5LQxUemUzqLnOZMl9mdN40ABk3lLhG_SUzaJw6y1oLwjPiPvE_SLti4YFzOimkVhat1DxgsFN7OkxRNF0GOPMAv0E3jrUWVvOzDi73CGl57eEL-e_K7_l4cbU-X7/s919/Douglass_portrait01.jpg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="919" data-original-width="555" height="645" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh2XOxjVQ2ddIf1Xx3iMpZ_S3TtKua_mRTmJt8tFyWwfNzpX3SR2Ub0JPEa-eIt5LQxUemUzqLnOZMl9mdN40ABk3lLhG_SUzaJw6y1oLwjPiPvE_SLti4YFzOimkVhat1DxgsFN7OkxRNF0GOPMAv0E3jrUWVvOzDi73CGl57eEL-e_K7_l4cbU-X7/w389-h645/Douglass_portrait01.jpg" width="389" /></a></div><p></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">But then again, the writings of John Adams, and the words of the writers of ‘The Federalist Essays’ (Madison, Jay, Hamilton) return: human nature is such that though it be that selfless altruism may accomplish its good work, there is also in each generation, and unfortunately found more commonly,<i> the self-interest of so many who find that government office can be manipulated to their own ends</i>. So these writers and founders of our government warned us; and so it does become our duty to defend the foundation of our republic: our republic being so much more than the physical building of government in our nation’s capital; its life finding strength in our hearts and minds, <i>according to our knowledge and awareness</i> that we should remain being a co-sovereignty of people, acquiescing unto each other’s right to the same fundamental liberty’s for the mutual right to self-determine the course of our life, that in that individual pursuit, we be safe and happy. It is that republic that is central to our American heritage and tradition, and gives the only sure credence for the best form of government.</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">Such a nation has not existed upon the face of the Earth heretofore. No, the history of human government has been one, and continues to be so, a factious tendency for the accruement of centralizing ‘power’ from many unto a few; with an imbalance of elite factions actively looking to exact ideological agendas that directly oppose the natural strengthening of individual self-determination, and of the unique, dynamic ‘economy of economies’ that can always flourish from the allowance of that varied, and diversely empowered people. Government, always an instrument, and being viewed as a ‘stronghold’ that can be manipulated to serve factious ideology, rather than as an instrumental means of solemn service and protection ‘of the people unto the people,’ begins to approach, through varying degrees, despotism and tyranny.</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">What is ‘ordered liberty’ that is not tethered to the right understanding and sentiment of the generation and vine of liberty that set its roots in 1776? Ordered liberty is nothing more than a respect and natural function of the fundamental laws that are our true heritage. Champions of liberty having sprung up since that time made it their cause to both identify that true spirit-vine of ordered liberty, and to remind the people to return with acknowledgement unto those gentle waters of equal liberty and justice, as a people who are created equal.</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">Does not our disabling of our solemn duty to protect the original intention for the American way of life lay the groundwork for a plethora of factious political division and unto a self-serving command & control of education, economy, political discourse, and society? The inculcation of the ‘care not’ doctrine of indifference, the denominator for factious spirit to then push a multitude of agendas contrary to the spirit of liberty that upholds individual self-determination was spoken of again and again by Abraham Lincoln. Why is this not taught in our schools?</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">Factions, as Abraham Lincoln and the writers of the Federalist Essays put forth in their writings, speeches, and letters, require the liberty that we all enjoy in order to scaffold and construct their machinations, and then they deploy their activist constructions while they command and control information in order to curate what is spoken about, what receives the greater discourse, and what opposing narratives can be brought against the same: it is called censorship and the manipulation of the powers of informational production in order to command and control national discussion. </span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><br /></span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjDKb3mxOiHn79C1nwQ7ySUoOryjXKs4t7-RntRLkHXUDly1Ex-gBUXxOMGA0M7MVi9pM29jnk4B_-jrCZDFvNUK2XiAZ8ntPGGZvv1WyILi3GrCCeurAPqjO8OT1hIbYNgEsx5jpGbxW2VLg7eLx3eYpbu-Z46SZDXicusBU-eqb8nUeUMK3-HyFxk/s1024/studio_3055_650809dc6d238b66b89c1f64ad133e1d-1024x768.jpeg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="768" data-original-width="1024" height="480" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjDKb3mxOiHn79C1nwQ7ySUoOryjXKs4t7-RntRLkHXUDly1Ex-gBUXxOMGA0M7MVi9pM29jnk4B_-jrCZDFvNUK2XiAZ8ntPGGZvv1WyILi3GrCCeurAPqjO8OT1hIbYNgEsx5jpGbxW2VLg7eLx3eYpbu-Z46SZDXicusBU-eqb8nUeUMK3-HyFxk/w640-h480/studio_3055_650809dc6d238b66b89c1f64ad133e1d-1024x768.jpeg" width="640" /></a></div><br /><p></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">So it is that the instrumentality of government can be ideologized, manifesting a contortion of education in order to indoctrinate a like-minded citizenry, rather than free people’s minds and hearts to be uniquely powerful individuals who compliment that original ‘open source’ code: the promise and spirit of 1776. The former leads to political division and a national reckoning that polarizes the people, whereas the later,—a shaping of an independent, community-minded, entrepreneurial people who are strengthened 21st century Americans: a dynamic, financially independent, critical thinking citizenry with a great solemn awareness that the spirit of liberty and justice for all is a promise that must be defended and celebrated through good works that reflect the individuality of each person, and yet compliment the promise of peace that is begotten in the defense of a national people who uphold that spirit of our Declaration of Independence. To do so, a greater volume of the people must create their own economies and also have the correct understanding and awareness of the original sentiment, passion, and political desire that created the ‘open source’ code that led to the 1776 natural law proclamation of inherent and unalienable co-sovereignty. With the knowledge of the founding of our nation, including the sentiment and passion that instructed that unalloyed ordered liberty, we are then ready to defend those liberties that give ballast to our right to self-determine our life through a diversity of individual economy— because each individual has the potential of creating their own economy. Therein, a national economic community of individual economies continues and maintains America in a new and better balance wherein a great increase in the decentralization of economic and political power strengthens the furtherance of the American dream of prosperity through their ownership of caretaking for community. The unique individuality of each American citizen can be economically unleashed: their passions and sentiments being self-employed, would perhaps naturally find that an increasingly entrepreneurial national character brings its focus and attention unto serving the greater good of community.</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none;">What is the value and understanding a spirit of individual liberty and justice, a sentiment and passion to be free? Should not our schools shape a people who are writers, public speakers, and community entrepreneurs, and cast off the racist ideology of dwelling upon the racial significances of slavery upon America and typifying people with a certain (white) skin color as historical aggressors and oppressors of humanity? Where will those teaching lead us into? Is it not the opposite of the dream that Martin Luther King spoke of? Did he not call on our hearts and minds to judge one another according to our character and our integrity and to depart from racial division? The way forward, and the way for political unification is not in tarnishing the generation of 1776, the founders of our government, or a social, political and judicial dismissal of our Declaration of Independence: that is our promissory note for co-sovereign self-determination, and those founders both established a government of and for the people, and warned us of the self-interest of factions. Nothing answers faction and ideology best as an unrelenting passion to own the understanding of all that went into that spirit of 1776 that acknowledged our natural rights as an ‘open source’ code for us to self-determine our economic prosperity as a people who vow to be mutually safe and happy, as a people who are created equal with the right to life and liberty.</span></p><div class="blogger-post-footer">ScalziOriginals.US
Build ecosystems & individuals
to strengthen & sustain
integrated community health. </div>@CoachBill007http://www.blogger.com/profile/00964006939825613259noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4249677153801659195.post-18341878772990061642022-06-04T16:38:00.007+03:002022-06-13T03:12:43.529+03:00On Ordered Liberty & American Tradition: A Response To The 'Alito Draft Opinion' on Roe v. Wade<p></p><table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><tbody><tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgtvHiWY4Q-x-cuNrQXzVs9XgUaLasaSLhIZNBNsSb479fhIA5Pbr36iCQe1KoZ1TLlzxRXn0FTWM4_I2OOl5L9VVXRJ4eTSWz1pmUCm6fELY4KNr3DfRdxPPETcCJoCCEfnU_1WVOdeidic5X6ozXlhk5J8vIkJ6sN61R4ZL6dcnrsDe7vgjZcqUJf/s400/4-chuck-berry-retro-images-archive.jpg" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" data-original-height="400" data-original-width="320" height="640" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgtvHiWY4Q-x-cuNrQXzVs9XgUaLasaSLhIZNBNsSb479fhIA5Pbr36iCQe1KoZ1TLlzxRXn0FTWM4_I2OOl5L9VVXRJ4eTSWz1pmUCm6fELY4KNr3DfRdxPPETcCJoCCEfnU_1WVOdeidic5X6ozXlhk5J8vIkJ6sN61R4ZL6dcnrsDe7vgjZcqUJf/w512-h640/4-chuck-berry-retro-images-archive.jpg" width="512" /></a></td></tr><tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><br /></td></tr></tbody></table><p></p><p><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; -webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: Times; font-size: 13px;">In the judicial process of the personnel in our U.S. Supreme Court, namely, the manner of approach unto the question of constitutionality of abortion in what is known as the ‘Alito Draft Opinion,’ an authentic opinion voted upon of all the justices, with the exception of Chief Justice John Roberts having not yet inputed his vote, and such an opinion not formally announced as an official decision, </span><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; -webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: Times; font-size: 14px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal;"><i>yet released to the ‘media press’ from within that Court</i></span><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; -webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: Times; font-size: 13px;">, the voting of Justices Gorsuch, Barrett, Alito, and Thomas, are tendered in support of the framing of the issue by Alito, and in his solution unto the issue, whereas, Justices Sotomayor, Breyer, and Kagan, voted in opposition to the resolution.</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: Times; font-size: 13px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">Justice Alito cites the national, political contention of the issue of abortion, and brings our attention to his understanding of the matter as he officially frames it. Given his position as a Justice in our U.S. Supreme Court, the gravity of the issue before him and his colleagues, the exercise of his scholarism and the reaches of his professional process are laid before us to read and consider his best approach of the salient points of the issue, and how resolution of the matter is to be disposed. The preliminary voting of nearly all Justices on the issue, and a draft of the lengthy work produced; the action of the release of the draft opinion being publicly admonished by the Chief Justice, yet the contents of the draft withstanding any rebuke from the Court, it is fair for the people to look into the matter and examine such opinion, the framing of the issue, the approach of the scholarism, and the methods and logistics of the resolution.</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: Times; font-size: 13px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 16px;"><br /><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: Times; font-size: 13px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">In Alito’s perspective, and with the acquiescence of four of the nine justices, the role of the responsibility of the U.S. Supreme Court as to the legitimacy of the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision that legalized the ending of human life in the womb, after its point of initial creation, and in its early stage of formation, is to look into the Constitution to find wherein it may be interpreted that there is such a right to end the right of life of a human being while in the womb. Justice Alito, quickly settles his understanding and expresses his response that the action of human abortion is in the Constitution, and therefore unconstitutional. All would seem well and good, but it is in the continuance of Alito’s opinion that an interruption of his decisive opinion, and one would hope, deliberately thoughtful and carefully researched finding— that the right to end the life of an individual human in the womb is neither constitutional nor to be found in the ‘traditions’ of the American life historicity. Alito speaks at length of the traditions of America, as he frames his explanation of how he finds the issue to be best approached,—‘is abortion constitutional?’ Alito dismisses the obligation of that court to defend foundational, natural law as clearly proclaimed in the Declaration of Independence and in the 9th Amendment to the Constitution, and he also dismisses the originalist judicial interpretation of the founding spirit of the signers of the Declaration of Independence, whose sum congressional works from 1776 through 1820, saw slavery as in direct opposition to the spirit of liberty and justice for all. ‘Tradition’ and ‘ordered liberty,’ as Alito invoked often in his 92 page opinion, become abstract language instruments that can be given whatever value and interpretation Alito so chooses as he used his judicial position to review our fundamental laws, and laws derived from these. </span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: Times; font-size: 13px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><br /></span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: Times; font-size: 13px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">What is American tradition without the scholarism of the writings of Abraham Lincoln as he, himself (1) defended the spirit of 1776, (2) the language of our first national political agreement to be a people, (3) and the sum intention of the signers of the Declaration of Independence as evidenced through their governmental works up to 1820? What scholarly research, critical observation that is unbiased, objective, and altruist, professes to render finality of serious opinion without addressing the work to end slavery that was begun by George Washington, that was continued through the efforts of Frederick Douglass,—an American slave transformed into a practical intellectual who called and advocated for the ‘ordered liberty’ that was begin with the promise of the Declaration of 1776? The traditions of these mentioned, if we were to only read their words understand and adhere to the ‘ordered liberty’ that was initiated with the proclamation and promise that we are created equal, with the right to life & liberty, that we be safe and happy, with the right and solemn duty to assure, through the altering or abolishment of it, that government of and for the people remain.</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: Times; font-size: 13px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 16px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiB0wb9WjmjKQERxkfHT_d-P7wUYdsVTEAJRGXD_mnAvFVMsr0tNPkZmPsaxLO2GVU3vp5O5Utlicld761noxplAUDpGtX1zBXqYqNa6j6GrBNptFcYRc3KV4F_Lt9t5t7q4dfSkCUu9D5ogFcO6-KJG8NB-0eLnDIAMwnA2ndmRIHKd9I14A0bZGm0/s576/DTYDcVxW0AII1nf.jpg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="324" data-original-width="576" height="360" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiB0wb9WjmjKQERxkfHT_d-P7wUYdsVTEAJRGXD_mnAvFVMsr0tNPkZmPsaxLO2GVU3vp5O5Utlicld761noxplAUDpGtX1zBXqYqNa6j6GrBNptFcYRc3KV4F_Lt9t5t7q4dfSkCUu9D5ogFcO6-KJG8NB-0eLnDIAMwnA2ndmRIHKd9I14A0bZGm0/w640-h360/DTYDcVxW0AII1nf.jpg" width="640" /></a></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br /></div><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: Times; font-size: 13px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 16px;"><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: Times; font-size: 13px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">But the inalienable rights that we are created equal, and our right to life & liberty are nowhere to be found in the Alito Draft Opinion. The exemplification of the traditions of ordered liberty of the best champions of our American liberty are not mentioned, nor is the objective acclaim of their work found in the Alito invocation of American tradition and ordered liberty. What we are left with is Alito’s abstract judicial review of the law, and his activism that though the matter of abortion is to be found unconstitutional, the matter of the right to life and that we are created equal is carefully not mentioned in his opinion! What he gives to us is the directive of judicial abdication on the matter after he has called the issue of abortion unconstitutional: he tells us that it shall be for both the people and the state governments to decide for themselves if they will legislate protection of abortion or protection of life. He does not give us a defense of our fundamental law, nor a professional account of American tradition that would support the ordered liberty he speaks of—</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: Times; font-size: 13px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 16px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: Times; font-size: 13px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">Justice Alito gives us a return to the Missouri Compromise of 1820 wherein the formalization of free states and slave states was enacted. What Justice Alito gives us is the finding that Abraham Lincoln so often described in his debates with Stephen Douglas: he gives us ‘Popular Sovereignty:’ that a person can own a person, and a third person, nor government can object.</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: Times; font-size: 13px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 16px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: Times; font-size: 13px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">That is not sound, or professional jurisprudence, but a judicial review that chooses to ignore foundational, fundamental natural law. Justice Alito reviewed our Constitution, and as a Supreme Court Justice obligated to apply the interpretation of the law as it was originally intended, has instead ignored the 9th Amendment of our Constitution that at its very least, supports the foundational proclamations of natural law in our Declaration of Independence. No, what Justice Alito and all the other Justices that affirmed his opinion put before us have done is to continue to water down their professional integrity: appeasing unto a political and populist rhetoric cloaked in constitutional language that cannot find its way to connecting the 9th Amendment with the self-evident natural law declarations of 1776. And that is judicial review,— and it is an ideological activism of the personnel of that court.</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: Times; font-size: 13px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 16px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: Times; font-size: 13px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">Judicial review: a precedent created in 1803 by Chief Justice John Marshall in the Marbury v. Madison court opinion: The ‘review’ of the law is not merely a research of it, but a selective judgement of prioritization of it that does not equally apply its entirety or original intention to a particular case. In example, Justice Alito’s selectivity of ignoring the 9th Amendment and the natural law in the Declaration of Independence that specifically speaks of the most elemental of America’s laws, the right to life & liberty.</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: Times; font-size: 13px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 16px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: Times; font-size: 13px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">What ordered liberty and American traditions Justice Alito speaks of is more akin to the convoluted narratives of the Slavery Democrats, themselves reviewing our fundamental, foundational laws and still choosing to find humanity of black skin color as not equal to humanity of white skin color, nor a human at all. Alito would do better had he brought himself to read all the Congressional actions of the signatories of the Declaration of Independence, he would have done better had he paused at John Quincy Adams and his tradition of being the solitary defense of the spirit of liberty and justice for all, he would have done better had he read the words of Abraham Lincoln,—then would have Justice Alito understood the heart and minds of the true American tradition for ordered liberty and justice for all. Because human life is precious, and the value of it is not a political triviality to be dismissed. Those innocent ‘baby’s’, as God calls us in Judeo-Christian scripture surely feel the pain of having their limbs severed and their necks cut in half. What political process of gradualism that was effected in the time of slavery, cannot be logically or morally correct as it pertains to the matter of humanity in the womb: the slaves were not being daily cut asunder in horrific death three thousand times a day. So it is that the preservation of the political union of our nation is as important now as it was then, yet the policy of gradualism in the face of horrific daily death is not ordered liberty, but a departure from it and a barbarity. </span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: Times; font-size: 13px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 16px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhLybw2Blrs4DfISZHe9ZGqPinGgap4s54JblYTkV4RMyD_3Ao6lM7j_AcjsKUZ6ZHjEXZSxUeaY7h8DrORe73N0SeGWybePWqxgKrV7HcfQptWcCIK8dzpHgGCejzM707Gm0rACjWgL2_PRUNyOWFsHLnrMBGAVL8XNtVvs0ywURsQIKDO8m7pMEzb/s1489/81fRA7RZrML._AC_SL1495_.jpg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="1489" data-original-width="1199" height="640" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhLybw2Blrs4DfISZHe9ZGqPinGgap4s54JblYTkV4RMyD_3Ao6lM7j_AcjsKUZ6ZHjEXZSxUeaY7h8DrORe73N0SeGWybePWqxgKrV7HcfQptWcCIK8dzpHgGCejzM707Gm0rACjWgL2_PRUNyOWFsHLnrMBGAVL8XNtVvs0ywURsQIKDO8m7pMEzb/w516-h640/81fRA7RZrML._AC_SL1495_.jpg" width="516" /></a></div><br /><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: Times; font-size: 13px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 16px;"><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: Times; font-size: 13px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">Justice Alito’s Draft Opinion is not a professional judicial work, but an aberration in opposition to foundational, fundamental natural law, an imposition of ideological activism too appease abortionism, and a formalization of political division that asks the people and its government to accept that the office of the U.S. Supreme Court has the power to render opinions that conflict with the true ordered liberty and American traditions, with the Constitution, and with the Declaration of Independence. The personnel of our U.S. Supreme Court asks that we accept the reverse of our original spirit of liberty and justice for all, and to become a national people who acquiesce to the continuity of murdering our children, and that these be considered not humans, but the property of the women whose wombs they grow in. That is the same exact playbook of the Slavery Democrats, and it is called ‘Popular Sovereignty.’ <i>The ordered liberty and American traditions that Alito is abstractly and opaquely explaining to us as he words the continuance of his opinion, is a false option that is not founded on the true side of the defense of liberty from its altruist defending champions, but an unscholarly attempt to give judicial credence to that slavery doctrine of popular sovereignty, and the policy of legal gradualism, that so often works in so many situations, but not when the torturous loss of human life is happening 3,000 times a day. </i></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: Times; font-size: 13px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 16px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: Times; font-size: 13px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">Does Justice Alito’s ideology, as we can now understand it, based in some other heritage that is estranged from the gentle promise of our foundational, fundamental law? What has been our heritage, if not a human desire to self-determine our life, that we be at liberty, that we be safe, and that we be happy?</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: Times; font-size: 13px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 16px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: Times; font-size: 13px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">What was the heritage of the pilgrims that arrived unto the shores of the new world, if not a purposed venture into the unknown to settle a life where they would be able to have the liberty to worship God as they chose, and not as it was ordered unto them? What is the legacy of the colonists, if not that they labored an existence as individuals and families desirous to live a life as distant as possible from the monarchical governing system caste social order that was Europe? They saw an opportunity of a better life based on increased individual liberty and self-determination. The American Revolutionary epoch defining that spirit in both word and action. What was the sum effect of the Congressional actions Abraham Lincoln outlined in his research of the times between 1776 and 1820 unto the protection of individual life & liberty, if not a purposed repeated action to limit, constrain, hinder, and ultimately extinguish the enslavement of people of black skin color. Such an injustice being a wrong against humanity, and a direct opposition against the spirit of human liberty and self determination that is the natural canon of the Declaration of Independence, and our Constitution. </span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: Times; font-size: 13px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 16px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: Times; font-size: 13px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">What was the abolitionist era, but a relentless defense of both humanity and an affirmation of our founding spirit of the American political body,— these written proclamations of 1776, creating our first government, and identifying natural law as the foundation of the American nation.</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: Times; font-size: 13px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 16px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: Times; font-size: 13px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">Is it not so that the servant leaders of each of these eras have either called on others or exemplified that we must care about the rights of humanity?, their struggles, journeys, patient endurances, careful deliberations, and inner spirit all coming to the declaration of independence? That is ordered liberty! A declaration of the rights of humanity, that we must not be indifferent; that we must defend and preserve the spirit of liberty and the understanding of the spirit of liberty and justice for all, with the end purpose that we all be safe and happy: actively seeking the freedom, liberty and protection of, and if need be, the restoration of a quality life that declares we are all created equal, and if created equal, with the inalienable rights to individual life & liberty; and that natural right to <i>assure </i>that the ordered liberty that is supposed to be the establishment of good government, the altering or abolishment of government if it is found to be in continual egregious unsurpation of that foundation; that such a requirement of the civilian citizen be exercised and completed as a solemn duty unto the American way of life,— is our right to alter and abolish; that solemn duty to observe and study the workings of government and the quality of life in our society; that government reflect the original understanding of that spirit of liberty and justice for all—is our ordered liberty and our American tradition.</span></p><div class="blogger-post-footer">ScalziOriginals.US
Build ecosystems & individuals
to strengthen & sustain
integrated community health. </div>@CoachBill007http://www.blogger.com/profile/00964006939825613259noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4249677153801659195.post-80726606247545009652022-05-20T21:59:00.022+03:002022-10-06T18:00:34.628+03:00 It Will Become All One Thing, Or All The Other<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhgzlp5jHPZFvSFOfyoCraJEW6Dv_Fq751PZkJMLDR5Wo3xXn6SRoqW3rk5hdMRnj85IopfuZud0onyvI1YvdPmau2yPIMRjPEKAppZbfHH0CcvLOZhkXx2F71h9coB2eHDlQGSS5jdFHCztoJ6GQF-4kKCOYKGV1udtdH6PatfRF0j6hwgkU9X-yWS/s2419/memorial-inside-tall.jpg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><br /><img border="0" data-original-height="2419" data-original-width="2000" height="640" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhgzlp5jHPZFvSFOfyoCraJEW6Dv_Fq751PZkJMLDR5Wo3xXn6SRoqW3rk5hdMRnj85IopfuZud0onyvI1YvdPmau2yPIMRjPEKAppZbfHH0CcvLOZhkXx2F71h9coB2eHDlQGSS5jdFHCztoJ6GQF-4kKCOYKGV1udtdH6PatfRF0j6hwgkU9X-yWS/w530-h640/memorial-inside-tall.jpg" width="530" /></a></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br /></div><p></p><p><span style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral;">A political scientist does not have a physical lab and a white coat with safety glasses on as they aggregate informational flows, sifting through information, unearthing tangible ideas and opinions, analyzing these and the conclusions thereof they arrive to, but they are on the cusp of practicing informed, independent, open-mined critical thinking. Their focus is on an understanding of the interaction of weak and powerful systems, organizations and entities, political movement flows, local, national and global culture dynamics, and the relationships between governments and the people that constitute these.</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">Abraham Lincoln was a political scientist; a critical thinker; a selfless individual who looked into the matter of what the original spirit of liberty and justice for all was, and what the sum intentions of the founding fathers of the American nation were. He was a man who loved to learn and had an early appreciation for the value of selfless objectivity, recognizing it as an honest principle that would anchor his determination to safeguard the true pillars of America’s foundation: the protection of individual human rights, that there be liberty and justice for all, that therefore, the people be genuinely safe and happy.</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 17px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">Abraham Lincoln saw slavery as an institution that had to be safely brought to a halt through legislative works and directly beseeching the people— who had the power of the vote in choosing the representatives of our constitutional republic. His chosen path required patience, inner fortitude, exemplary personal conduct, tremendous physical energy, and brilliance of mind as he delivered the language of his message with a cadence to respectfully awake, yet gently urge the people unto choosing to do the right thing for the sake of the blessings of goodness that should belong to the American people, if they would so allow it. He was a tactical, nimble political genius, altogether anchored in goodness and an earnest expectancy of peace, liberty and justice unto all. The anchor of this inner man was truly American in its nature, and is what allowed the informational structure and delivery of his political language to be so carefully strategic and successful: surely, his adherence to basic values of Christianity: temperance, peace, love, goodnesss, faith, meekness, longsuffering, and gentleness had there strengthening effect in solidifying selflessness in him, but that alone would not endear him to the national face of a people so diverse in religion, ethnicity, skin color, or creed;— his political savviness to ‘stay national’ was the ‘next level’ quality that identified Abraham Lincoln, as both, an individual citizen with his own strong beliefs, and a national individual who was interested in unifying the people in alignment unto the formula of the original spirit of 1776.</span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><br /></span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"></p><table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><tbody><tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg8Gm1U_1dQiDd_w1BTAohLe38ogWk6kdMVfzsxGBv07_ojA41sUVjMjHiqYz7eJQnHfxzisq-COyoHMcOJGpPt6pFef2SPGceTyUmF-Va4BXbfDGwD07aLTGkiBHlqrbfmt6rCuC84fLzxSgeU15UmtfB6BALi8mIZSOjkRnYOUhRfBx5v9n5OH_q1/s950/853DDB1E-4009-4B10-B487-AA14DCFB3314_1_105_c.jpeg" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" data-original-height="558" data-original-width="950" height="376" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg8Gm1U_1dQiDd_w1BTAohLe38ogWk6kdMVfzsxGBv07_ojA41sUVjMjHiqYz7eJQnHfxzisq-COyoHMcOJGpPt6pFef2SPGceTyUmF-Va4BXbfDGwD07aLTGkiBHlqrbfmt6rCuC84fLzxSgeU15UmtfB6BALi8mIZSOjkRnYOUhRfBx5v9n5OH_q1/w640-h376/853DDB1E-4009-4B10-B487-AA14DCFB3314_1_105_c.jpeg" width="640" /></a></td></tr><tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><span style="background-color: #faf9f5; caret-color: rgb(160, 154, 146);"><b><span style="font-family: times;">George Washington was selfless, meek, gallant, bold, gentle, & strong-all at once.</span></b></span></td></tr></tbody></table><p></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 17px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">And what does Abraham Lincoln give to us as a national American? If we read his words, we read that he calls us to care: he calls on our hearts and minds to bring our intellect and sober hearts to look into the matter of what American way of life we will effect. Will we default our solemn duty to assure the only formula of national peace: liberty and justice for all, and if so, how is it that we default? How does our educational curriculum shape Americans to be critical thinkers who are anchored in the goodly ground of altruism? And if it does not, how are parents, and American individuals responding to ideologies that misconstrue, ignore, and denigrate the people who first established our nation? </span>Abraham Lincoln spoke through his words as much as he spoke his words: he called for the exertion of intellect, and for the patience to withstand until the machinery and designs of factious ideology could be brought forth into the light, that the people be gently called unto the promise of our first national agreement, our first Declaration of the Rights of Humanity: the Declaration of Independence.</p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 17px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 17px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><b>On the effect of the institution of slavery upon the political union of the people of the United States of America:</b></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 17px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span></p><blockquote><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">“I do not expect the Union to be <i>dissolved</i>—I do not expect the house to <i>fall</i>—but I <i>do </i>expect it will cease to be divided. </span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 17px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">It will become all one thing, or all the other.</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 17px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">Either the opponents of slavery, will arrest the further spread of it, and place it where the public mind shall rest in the belief that it is in course of ultimate extinction; or its advocates will push it forward, till it shall become alike lawful in all the States, old as well as new—North as well as South.</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 17px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">Have we no tendency to the latter condition?</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 17px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">Let any one who doubts, carefully contemplate that now almost complete legal combination—piece of machinery so to speak—compounded of the Nebraska doctrine, and the Dred Scott decision. Let him consider not only what work the machinery is adapted to do, and how well adapted; but also, let him study the history of its construction, and trace, if he can or rather fail, if he can, to trace the evidences of design, and concert of action, among its chief bosses, from the beginning.”</span></p></blockquote><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 17px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; text-align: right;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><b>Abraham Lincoln in his “House Divided Speech at Springfield, Illinoise, June 16, 1858</b></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 17px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><b></b></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">Lincoln was of the same tenacity as John Quincy Adams, and of Frederick Douglass; complimenting, furthering, and paralleling their unalloyed, allegiance and scholarly propensity for simple legal clarity in expressing the necessary founding values and principles required to remain a national people in the spirit and promise of 1776. Carefully, and with solemness of duty unto the gravity of their work to communicate with the people on such a manner that their message would be in its best form to be as graciously received as could be, these sentinels exemplified a politically scientific approach that would identify and deconstruct the designs of the slavery industry and its factious intention (political self-interest) in our national government. The doctrine of ‘Popular Sovereignty,’ that a person can own a person, and a third person, nor government can object,guided the ideology of Supreme Court Justices: directing a narrow interpretation of the Constitution and our natural law proclamations found in our initial Bill of Rights, the Declaration of Independence, that they then identify the intent of the founding fathers of our nation in the opaque perspective that the promises of liberty and justice were not granted unto all, that these were not self-evident and inalienable, but conferred, granted privileges. Further, the false doctrine of Popular Sovereignty hinges on the supposition that the person of black skin color was not a human being, and as such, discussion on the matter would not be initiated (identity politics). </span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 17px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">Since the Supreme Court ruling that legalized the right to end human life in the womb in 1973 and into 2022, the same premise from the same political party, the Democrat Political Party, has been presented without identifying it in the vocabulary of ‘Popular Sovereignty,’ but through a defacto set of phrases and terms uniformly focused on disallowing recognition of individual humanity, claiming right of ownership to choose if that separate human being can have its life spared or ended, and declaring the matter of choosing to allow the human in the womb to live or die, and the act of killing it, an exercise in liberty and a exemplification of individual human right. </span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 17px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">The maintenance of the doctrine surely needs the consent of the people whom vote our representatives into government office, and these decree (Executive Office), opine into law (Supreme Court, and legislate (U.S. Congress) language that regulates the content and intention of our children’s education, the future adult Americans who will continue the process of consenting to the national way of life that condones the practice of Popular Sovereignty. In 2021, for example, instead of creating an educational law to prioritize that 21st century Americans be independently-minded, critical thinkers who can weld a community-minded entrepreneurial purposed on individual financial independence unto their chosen professions and interests, the Democrat Party, a faction of factions (the Big Tent), has instituted critical race theory, a doctrine that places and dismisses the intention of the founding fathers and the spirit of 1776 as racist, oppressive, and stale, while pushing students to ultimately dwell on the emotional upheaval of a different historical narrative story that forces people of white skin color into an apologetic position. That is ‘gas lighting’ and targeting the white-skinned color American people into codifying themselves as historical aggressors. Critical (of the white) race theory is then a politically divisive timber that is part of a larger construction of the Democrat Party as they seek to distance themselves from the true spirit of equal liberty and justice for all that symbolizes the Revolutionary Spirit of 1776: an intention to protect individual human rights and the right to self-determination of one’s life as a national people of different ethnicities, religions, skin colors, and creeds; these establishing and consenting to a government that recognizes that spirit of individual liberty and justice for all, again, beginning with the first national agreement that initiated the political union of the people as Americans, our Declaration of Independence.</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 17px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">Abraham Lincoln:</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 17px;"></p><blockquote><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 17px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">“Let any one who doubts, carefully contemplate that now almost complete legal combination—piece of machinery so to speak—compounded of the Nebraska doctrine, and the Dred Scott decision. Let him consider not only what work the machinery is adapted to do, and how well adapted; but also, let him study the history of its construction, and trace, if he can or rather fail, if he can, to trace the evidences of design, and concert of action, among its chief bosses, from the beginning.”</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 17px;"></p></blockquote><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 17px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">Lincoln understood the call to defend was not merely on the physical battle field, where it could be more apparent where and who the enemy was, but to intellectually defend the original spirit of individual liberty and justice for all, with a political science-minded approach that was critically thinking about how ideological constructions from narrow-minded, self-serving factions are always looking to co-op the heart of our constitutional republic with an end goal of manipulating it as an instrument for their own political, ideological, or monetary gain. </span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 17px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">In 2021 and 2022, the insertion of Critical Race Theory in our school system will not produce a people who are objective thinkers, creative problem solvers who are solution-oriented, and analytical, but generations of people further detached from understanding that George Washington was not simply a slave holder and only that defines him, but that since 1786 he is speaking out against slavery and is making personal and official actions to limit, hinder, and contain the institution, placing it on the path to extinction. Critical race theory proponents will not teach that because they do not know about George Washington and they do not care to know. The fact that he owned a slave is all that they need to know. And that is not critical thinking. That is not even shallow, pseudo-intellectualism, but a flagrant emotional rant, presented as a railing rebuke against the generation of 1776 and the works of the founding fathers.</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 17px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">Why?</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 17px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">Because the abortion industry faction, same as the slavery industry faction, can only survive in the absence or<i> misconstruing</i> of the knowledge of the ideas of equal liberty and justice that were and are the core of our first national agreement, that ultimately we be safe and happy. Attainment of factual knowledge of the writings and congressional works that our nation was truly founded on is not in the prerogative of the Democrat Party echelon because it would break the ideological construction of narratives that they are piecing together. Actually reading the words and selfless gallant actions of George Washington, the duty-bound loyalty to doing things the right way and for the right reasons of John Adams, and the patient endurance of John Quincy Adams to ‘go it alone’ in defense of Native Americans and of people of black skin color; the arrival of Frederick Douglass and his passion for learning and sharing why individual liberty and justice is so valuable: he, as an American slave and as a free man with no legal protections upholding the spirit and promise of 1776; and of course, the brilliant genius of Abraham Lincoln, with his legalistic, political science, critically thinking mind, calmly, methodically, with a love for his country and the promise of what it could be: identifying and deconstructing the machinery and ideological constructions of a slavery faction that had found that the instrumentality of government office would prolong and entrench its mainstay of access to (power) setting national policy that preferred its agenda, and access to printing or raising tax money to further its purpose. </span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 17px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">As it was stated by President Ronald Reagan in his March 8, 1983 speech that shared his public policy and administrations position on the protection and value of human life, he emphasized that the push for a watering down of traditions and long-held national family values were being enacted by the abortion industry’s instrumentality of national government: he implored the American people to block the abortion industry’s attempts to sidestep parental notification of youth who were seeking abortions. </span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><br /></span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">(Included below are excerpts of that speech in chronological order:)</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 17px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><i></i></span></p><blockquote><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><i>An example of that vocal superiority is evident in a controversy now going on in Washington. And since I’m involved, I’ve been waiting to hear from the parents of young America. How far are they willing to go in giving to government their prerogatives as parents?</i></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><i></i></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><i>Let me state the case as briefly and simply as I can. An organization of citizens, sincerely motivated, deeply concerned about the increase in illegitimate births and abortions involving girls well below the age of consent, some time ago established a nationwide network of clinics to offer help to these girls and, hopefully, alleviate this situation. Now, again, let me say, I do not fault their intent. However, in their well-intentioned effort, these clinics decided to provide advice and birth control drugs and devices to underage girls without the knowledge of their parents.</i></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><i></i></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><i>But the fight against parental notification is really only one example of many attempts to water down traditional values and even abrogate the original terms of American democracy.</i></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><i></i></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><i>Human life legislation ending this tragedy will someday pass the Congress, and you and I must never rest until it does. Unless and until it can be proven that the unborn child is not a living entity, then its right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness must be protected.</i></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><i></i></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><i>You may remember that when abortion on demand began, many, and indeed, I’m sure many of you, warned that the practice would lead to a decline in respect for human life, that the philosophical premises used to justify abortion on demand would ultimately be used to justify other attacks on the sacredness of human life..”</i></span></p></blockquote><p><br /></p><p></p><table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><tbody><tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEivvwP-bzWqOJNp6IQ7tyXv79TuwtrWuzuASFCXfkLTA4df41ZDZs0VZVyvkEkb6OpG1mvkznZddghCprSgYF1MYEWJ5WH9C9wPEfRxSUqRqE5SG7xyOSH7b__AfRhdZ2NkuJ6GAj8bxq0LHUczcDmx-Zd53u2Ub7mN2pRhWOtGZknC2iR1l7IYlVYF/s1200/martin-luther-king-1965-selma-hero-fix.jpg" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" data-original-height="900" data-original-width="1200" height="480" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEivvwP-bzWqOJNp6IQ7tyXv79TuwtrWuzuASFCXfkLTA4df41ZDZs0VZVyvkEkb6OpG1mvkznZddghCprSgYF1MYEWJ5WH9C9wPEfRxSUqRqE5SG7xyOSH7b__AfRhdZ2NkuJ6GAj8bxq0LHUczcDmx-Zd53u2Ub7mN2pRhWOtGZknC2iR1l7IYlVYF/w640-h480/martin-luther-king-1965-selma-hero-fix.jpg" width="640" /></a></td></tr><tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Martin Luther King</td></tr></tbody></table><br /><p></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">The United States of America; a national, political union of a diverse people, it was found in 1776,—could only find agreement that at the least, we were created equal, with the rights to life & liberty, with the right to be safe and happy, and the liberty that is also our solemn duty, to alter or abolish government these ceases to uphold these foundational natural laws. Now, if it be so that Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, Amy Coney Barrett, and Chief Justice John Roberts, cannot find how the 9th Amendment of the Constitution, “<i>the enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people;” </i>that the first foundational natural law declarations of 1776 are not in and of themselves our first written liberties, and that these same Supreme Court Justices be found to be in lockstep agreement unto what is the ‘Alito Draft Opinion’ that was released to the public in May of 2022, calling the Roe v. Wade opinion legalizing abortion as unconstitutional, and yet, absolving itself of its national judicial duty to do its job and protect the original spirit of individual liberty and justice for all; putting forth that such decision of abortion shall be parceled out to the state governments and the people of those states, then the Alito opinion is in actuality, selling Popular Sovereignty: that the Supreme Court deny its judicial authority and duty to protect individual life and stating that it is up to the people of the land, --is to proclaim that government will not actually object to the ownership of a human as property, and that each state may choose or not choose to defend the value of human life.</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">What the Alito Draft Opinion offers is to absolve itself of wrongdoing; to absolve itself of the bloodiness that is human abortion, and to place into effect a construction that is reminiscent of the free states and slave states dichotomy of the times immediately before the Civil War; an opinion meant to maintain a political appeasement that sets up a greater reckoning at a later time, and also, a watering down of the intention, the very spirit of our first national agreement of 1776, and the foundational promise that America was built on: the equal protection of individual human rights that we be a safe and happy people who self-determine our own lives.</span></p><div class="blogger-post-footer">ScalziOriginals.US
Build ecosystems & individuals
to strengthen & sustain
integrated community health. </div>@CoachBill007http://www.blogger.com/profile/00964006939825613259noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4249677153801659195.post-9364882670800441832022-05-02T21:50:00.006+03:002022-10-06T17:49:10.554+03:00 The People Agree To Form A Nation Of Civility On The Promise Of The Declaration Of Independence<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><tbody><tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjZXIxPGYYCEnlkklC5bolz2drNyf3Af-gBWahaaRuJK052jFOuPqoEyWF0F_RbwcWFJxspoFYK9NESFGlKyPCx9QVQ9MY7G_EAqDf0s0uw_AFHL6x1X86bpi0pmcua1YHA6GJscZ7MzJyGL8Frn6dP0N3RSy4oq4SwL8kT6R6Zuv_RoLc_Oavo56YE/s1024/gettyimages-807801_custom-6119d7f56d982c8e297f61a358d3fe2b11dd44a3-s1100-c50.jpg" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><img border="0" data-original-height="804" data-original-width="1024" height="502" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjZXIxPGYYCEnlkklC5bolz2drNyf3Af-gBWahaaRuJK052jFOuPqoEyWF0F_RbwcWFJxspoFYK9NESFGlKyPCx9QVQ9MY7G_EAqDf0s0uw_AFHL6x1X86bpi0pmcua1YHA6GJscZ7MzJyGL8Frn6dP0N3RSy4oq4SwL8kT6R6Zuv_RoLc_Oavo56YE/w640-h502/gettyimages-807801_custom-6119d7f56d982c8e297f61a358d3fe2b11dd44a3-s1100-c50.jpg" width="640" /></a></td></tr><tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><br /></td></tr></tbody></table><p></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: Helvetica; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 13px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-family: Helvetica; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal;">“</span><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">Two roads diverged in a yellow wood..” (Robert Frost’s 1915 poem, ‘The Road Not Taken.’ )</span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><br /></span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">What is ‘that road that Americans should take, if not the road that is of peace and tranquility, a road that gifts us with national civility (genuinely treating each other with kindness, respect & politeness)? What other road is there that we can nationally consent to as a diverse people, with our different ethnicities, religions, politics, and walks of life? Was not the matter deliberated upon with much thoughtful discussion in our Continental Congress’s of (1774-1776), a committee created to draft a document that could stand the test of time and still maintain itself after 246 years as the promissory note that was the first agreement to national community? It ‘was and is’ a promise; a road’ a national agreement, a first Bill of Rights, and a charter that the American society would be founded and established on the protection of individual human rights, that we may self-determine the course of our life, in as much as we respect the same rights of all others, without partiality given to the ethnicity, religion, politic, skin color, or walk of life of any other individual, and only in respecting the value of our humanity.</span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 17px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">That document is the Declaration of Independence, and it is a promise of national civility, if we agree that the value of human life is accepted as equal since the time of its creation; that the unalienable claim to life & liberty belongs to all of us, that in that mutual agreement, we are safe & happy, and in that itself, we enjoy the reward of civility.</span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 17px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">There is no other way, road, or formula that works for all of us; only the mutual respect that our human life has equal value to all human life, and that these rights are not given, parceled out, or bestowed upon us by another individual, or by government. These rights, these liberties are self-evident, unalienable, God-endowed, and understood to be the natural law of humanity. </span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 17px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">That some of us may pay lip service to the name of the document, and not adhere to defend the spirit and complete word of it, in not teaching and establishing the importance of the understanding of it; —the heritage of actions exacted by the American government between 1776-1820, and by individual government officials in defense of that good spirit is the crux of the break in the walls of a ‘city on a hill’ that should always reside brightly in our hearts & minds. Think not that the work should be left unto others better suited, but accept and teach that it is the solemn duty of the American individual civilian to look into the matters of how government performs in alignment with the foundational first laws of that Declaration and our Constitution; not only in word, but in spirit and originalist understanding of the intentions of our founding fathers: liberty and justice for all, without partiality, starting at creation.</span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><br /></span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"></p><table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><tbody><tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgdrraQOGGbUhqqNJHWR_zzZ_XYxhkoZE65XPqvEh4726tSKeBFdxpXDaiYfcoIpSp44fmxhEfT7VH-R6RxE1E5yMAJs2jjnMU9hBVyALG-gP1bYAVnxKb4ymBuMRhi4R8qhvzSLGfhoONrjrn_tbB5ID0x1dEmGcfde-n27iihNJbioTM9Od1IvlIZ/s703/default.jpg" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" data-original-height="527" data-original-width="703" height="480" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgdrraQOGGbUhqqNJHWR_zzZ_XYxhkoZE65XPqvEh4726tSKeBFdxpXDaiYfcoIpSp44fmxhEfT7VH-R6RxE1E5yMAJs2jjnMU9hBVyALG-gP1bYAVnxKb4ymBuMRhi4R8qhvzSLGfhoONrjrn_tbB5ID0x1dEmGcfde-n27iihNJbioTM9Od1IvlIZ/w640-h480/default.jpg" width="640" /></a></td></tr><tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">The people of America are like a fleet of ships. We move best when we move together, encouraging one another onward, yet all with the same ballast of agreement unto the value and protection of each others life and liberty.</td></tr></tbody></table><p></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 17px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">That we may agree or not agree about the biological start time of human life is our liberty, but that I, you, or any third person, or government may take upon itself the judicial activism to take away the right to life is unlawful, not in the Constitution, and expressly against the spirit & word of the promise of the Declaration of Independence: that these liberties are unalienable, and not attributed to us by another person or government. It is the doctrine of ‘care not’ that Abraham Lincoln so clearly outlined and spoke on in the 1850s; the doctrine of ‘Popular Soverignty:’ a person can own a person, and a third person, nor government can object.—We can have our diverse politics, we can have our different view points, we can disagree, but we do not have the right to end innocent life, nor claim humanity as our property, be it brought in chains from another continent, or forming after its creational start within the female body. </span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 17px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">That human formation takes on different stages of growth and metamorphosis across its life span, is a separate point from when that formation is created. That an extremist view point may counter the standard biological understanding of when life begins is solely their right, but that they harness the judicial and legislative instrumentality of government in order to allow the slaughter of humanity in the womb is evil, and in open and direct opposition to the core of the values and principle that the United States of America was founded upon: the value and protection of individual human life, that we may be safe and happy to self-determine our life.</span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><br /></span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"></p><table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody><tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgdnXHdWAI0Ra4yB-FhZIHLznHf1LDqBjlYTst4WZGH8drJrZ93MJ8Odu0sQBkAks1ivyoPoCa60nS30SVZTSFGj5jpq6mnHTv6s_HyDFjHRlT-xUljbJdQ9gVtjxW82wVAV4EvEog23uZGqHqeR65GC3eWgyKZG0cLpVxxrd1MZG2raSW5HvtJBAvk/s1159/90.jpeg" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" data-original-height="911" data-original-width="1159" height="504" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgdnXHdWAI0Ra4yB-FhZIHLznHf1LDqBjlYTst4WZGH8drJrZ93MJ8Odu0sQBkAks1ivyoPoCa60nS30SVZTSFGj5jpq6mnHTv6s_HyDFjHRlT-xUljbJdQ9gVtjxW82wVAV4EvEog23uZGqHqeR65GC3eWgyKZG0cLpVxxrd1MZG2raSW5HvtJBAvk/w640-h504/90.jpeg" width="640" /></a></td></tr><tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">How do we strengthen the foundation of the spirit, word, & originalist intention to value and protect human life, and our right to be safe and happy? We must be a people, who at the least can agree to form a nation of civility upon the understanding of the promise of true liberty & justice for all starting with the first laws in our Declaration of Independence.<br /><br /></td></tr></tbody></table><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">The work of a remnant of champions of liberty, of George Washington, of John Quincy Adams, of the U.S. Congress in all its forms, before and after the Constitution, between 1776 and 1820, the work of Frederick Douglass, and Abraham Lincoln, of Senator Charles Sumner, though their message is unspoken, hindered and limited in our American schools, and their championing of a spirit of liberty & justice for all is not officially brought forth to defend against the present day doctrines of ‘critical of the white race theory,’ these same works and the persons who made them remain triumphant champions who will ultimately be joined by new generations of champions, themselves, having taken the time to learn what was the selflessness and wise understanding of these men and women who stood up with all their might, all their intellect, all their soul strength to stand in front of the continual onslaught upon the national spirit of our union. These, having experienced tremendous opposition, vilification, censorship, threat of death, threat of loss of livelihood, and altogether, persecution, are our champions. They did no harm; they were relentless in their staying power to be the exemplification of American civilians, and as individuals they became mighty because of their long-suffering endurance; their work of patience unto preserving the goodness of national peace, done right, both in meekness, and with great temerity of heart and mind, and with love unto all.</span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-size: 11px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 17px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p><div><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><br /></span></div><div class="blogger-post-footer">ScalziOriginals.US
Build ecosystems & individuals
to strengthen & sustain
integrated community health. </div>@CoachBill007http://www.blogger.com/profile/00964006939825613259noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4249677153801659195.post-33497047352741426452022-04-27T20:13:00.005+03:002022-10-06T17:48:28.090+03:00How Will We Fashion & Conduct Our Appeals Unto The Nation?<p></p><table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><tbody><tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjRvRgyDfrRORNYXD5ZHUoTGUsvg9sX8ij0xU5CIPY1a2xCK8yXdd9DRxULoAsQ01l_447cUKLB3aLBXAOGhKS3D1I-OG1sFMvERx49Ui0bhpnz4FZse1xBRVQhgL0tLUYlVtRtPMqWuVlZu5Y9R_IYYeTf0zPBZndAhhOcXX90OEs0_hWs1n115tfC/s600/peoriaspeechpanoramapainting600.jpg" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" data-original-height="491" data-original-width="600" height="524" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjRvRgyDfrRORNYXD5ZHUoTGUsvg9sX8ij0xU5CIPY1a2xCK8yXdd9DRxULoAsQ01l_447cUKLB3aLBXAOGhKS3D1I-OG1sFMvERx49Ui0bhpnz4FZse1xBRVQhgL0tLUYlVtRtPMqWuVlZu5Y9R_IYYeTf0zPBZndAhhOcXX90OEs0_hWs1n115tfC/w640-h524/peoriaspeechpanoramapainting600.jpg" width="640" /></a></td></tr><tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Abraham Lincoln's relentless appeals unto the people were tactical and direct; that they return to the gentle waters of the promise of the Declaration of Independence.</td></tr></tbody></table> <p></p><blockquote><p style="text-align: right;"> <b style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-size: 11px; text-align: right;"><i>George Washington To Marquis de Lafayette</i></b></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-size: 11px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; text-align: right;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><b><i>Mount Vernon 10th May 1786</i></b></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-size: 11px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 16px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><b><i></i></b></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-size: 11px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><b><i>“…It is one of the evils of democratical governments that the people, not always seeing & frequently mislead, must often feel before they can act right—but then evils of this nature seldom fail to work their own cure. It is to be lamented nevertheless that the remedies are so slow, & that those who may wish to apply them seasonably are not attended to before they suffer in person, in interest & in reputation.”</i></b></span></p></blockquote><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-size: 11px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><b><i></i></b></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: Papyrus; font-size: 11px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 17px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">What expectancy of national peace can be effected if the foundational spirit and original intentions of our founding fathers for America are misconstrued in ignorance and with designed purpose to change its meaning, with the desired end that present generations of the people become untethered from the understanding of the original spirit of union? Our American schools being ordered through legislative authority to popularize the ideologies and spokespersons of a factious spirit that lift up a spirit of anger, of scorn, of political division, and of the ideological aggrandizement of Constitutional word and spirit, of restraining the Declaration of Independence as some historical parchment, of heaping contempt upon George Washington, of ignoring the goodness of John Quincy Adams, and contorting, picking and choosing of what Abraham Lincoln actually spoke of and stood for. </span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">How shall appeals be fashioned, to what extent, and unto what listening audience shall the calls be made to return to the gentle promise of our Declaration of Independence that makes us a sovereign people with equality of claim to the protection of our life & liberty? Do our American schools educate the people to be financially empowered, to be critical thinkers, to understand the importance of protecting the natural law agreements that are the basis for the spirit of our political union, or is our American society being taught to dwell in the mire to be critical of a specific ethnicity of people? A critical thinking people become a direct challenge to the instrumentalization of government by factions (self-interest, ideological political groups) because as individuals, the protection of individual rights is prioritized as an ever-prescient goal. Therefore, in not prioritizing the empowerment of people to be critical thinkers, ignorance & indifference can be indoctrinated through default, assuring an uncontesting of the decision making and policy-setting of people working in government. Thus, a people who are effected to be spectators of government, and sidelined from partaking in important local and national discussions on the well-being of the nation, rather than be community-minded, caretakers who assure the legitimacy of the spirit and laws of the nation be attached unto the original spirit of our political union—that spirit of 1776, wherein establishing a constitutional republic prioritizing the protection of individual human rights was the intention, are left to be a people easily exploited, manipulated, and made subject to the self-interest of ruling factions.</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">In the Federalist Essays, we are warned of faction; it is explained to us that a factious spirit, the narrow interest of a few are a continuous danger upon the fundamental core principles of the American union: wherein the decentralization of power springs like a fountain from the people, the centralization of power is consented upon of the people unto the formation and establishment of government, and yet, the people must remain critical thinkers, and astute observers, both ready to join national discussion and active as civil participants performing the solemn duty to maintain the American government in line with the original spirit of liberty, as can be understood from the writings, and sum of the governmental works of the founding fathers.</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-size: 11px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><i></i></span></p><blockquote><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-size: 11px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><i><b>Washington continues in his letter to the Marquis de Lafayette:</b></i></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-size: 11px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 17px;"><b><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><i></i></span><br /></b></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-size: 11px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><b><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><i>“The benevolence of your heart my Dr Marquis is so conspicuous upon all occasions, that I never wonder at any fresh proofs of it; but your late purchase of an Estate in the Colony of Cayenne with a view of emancipating the slaves on it, is a generous and noble proof of your humanity. Would to God a like spirit diffuse itself generally in the the minds of the people of this country, but I despair of seeing it—some petitions were presented to the Assembly at its last Session, for the abolition of slavery, but they could scarcely obtain a reading. </i></span><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none; text-decoration: underline;"><i>To set them afloat at once would, I really believe, be productive of much inconvenience & mischief; but by degrees it certainly might, & assuredly ought to be effected & that too by Legislative authority.”</i></span></b></p></blockquote><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-size: 11px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none; text-decoration: underline;"><i></i></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p><table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><tbody><tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhf_YU7KVe09VMbKW9FI-AHkWfh6e9mME5ZYrjqXUHCAWqEcObtsHoE64PvvRMKBJf9R5mMJDKQRUW-VJkHwrIyLczlx8BhNYHCJ8_YzPEFTjkJTsZeGD1XVMrc7jqdOFWLj7xUA44jGqpWYcjvjjEa5_GhmFyBEWklnjQaKIWDUfb4jr9E9EkdoEOm/s550/george-washington-writing-at-his-desk-by-candlelight_u-l-q1j4vmt0.jpg" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" data-original-height="550" data-original-width="550" height="640" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhf_YU7KVe09VMbKW9FI-AHkWfh6e9mME5ZYrjqXUHCAWqEcObtsHoE64PvvRMKBJf9R5mMJDKQRUW-VJkHwrIyLczlx8BhNYHCJ8_YzPEFTjkJTsZeGD1XVMrc7jqdOFWLj7xUA44jGqpWYcjvjjEa5_GhmFyBEWklnjQaKIWDUfb4jr9E9EkdoEOm/w640-h640/george-washington-writing-at-his-desk-by-candlelight_u-l-q1j4vmt0.jpg" width="640" /></a></td></tr><tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">George Washington was instant in his selflessness, understanding that his character and integrity were pivotal to the formation of the spirit of the American union.</td></tr></tbody></table><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><br /></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">Where and to whom shall the appeals be made to bring about the government to the spirit and original intention of the standard that is expressed in our Declaration of Independence? Shall it be made to a people who have received an education purposefully and ignorantly rendering them as indoctrinated to ‘not care’ about the value of human life? Shall such appeals reach deaf ears, blind eyes, and seared consciences? Will America’s way of life, established on a foundation of and for the protection of individual life & liberty, that Americans may in their diversity of ethnicity, of religion, of politic, and ‘walk of life,’ be made subject to what the people say only, or, since we are a constitutional republic, appeal to the people, appeal to the government, and also maintain allegiance unto the original spirit of 1776? A constitutional republic is not a democracy in the sense that popular opinion can supplant the natural laws (Declaration of Independence) that were the first charter of our political union, but we have these representatives who have the solemn duty to listen to their constituents, but to adhere unto the harmless spirit of our Declaration of Independence: we are created equal, and our rights as humans have a set starting point in time—human creation happens at the time of human fertilization. That it be so that the self-interest of factious groups may manipulate our government to create an economic platform to self-sustain themselves, as does the abortion industry, is what the slavery faction effected. John Quincy Adams and Abraham Lincoln recognizing the factious strategy of infiltrating the branches of government with the purpose of commandeering their manipulation of power ‘were and remain,’ great works.</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">Why are the writings and critical thinking works of these Americans not taught as they ought to be? Is it because the evil of faction would once again be brought to light? The slave industry and its judicial, legislative, and executive apparatus in government strategized the ‘care not’ doctrine, or teaching of ‘Popular Sovereignty,’ that a person can own a person, and a third person, nor government can object. Is that not what the abortion industry and its spokespersons in government also require of the people? They call it ‘pro-choice:’ A person does not have to approve of abortion, but they are not to have the right to object that another person end the life of the human in the womb. That is that ‘popular sovereignty' all over again! We are bullied and intimidated by the abortion industry and its amalgamation of political operatives to silence ourselves, and our American schools herald their spokespersons to our children. Ruth Ginsburg, Sonia Sotomayor, and even Chief Justice John Roberts— these personnel in the Supreme Court have not cared about the excruciating pain that humans in the womb endured as their precious limbs and head are severed before being vacuumed out of the womb, or procured for organ harvesting while being maintained alive during the organ extraction. How long have they given tacit approval to ‘popular sovereignty?’ Should people who condone these atrocities be presented as hero’s to our children? What appeals can be made to return to the gentle promise of valuing and protecting human life unto a people who approve of such torture and destruction of human life? Our appeals would be met with deaf ears, blind eyes, and fierce hearts. Our words would be censored as John Quincy Adams was censored from speaking about slavery within our U.S. Congress.</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">But we must appeal nonetheless. We must, with long-suffering, with goodness, with peace, with joy, with faith, with temperance, with meekness, and yet with temerity, with strength of heart,—we must appeal in the valleys, on the mountaintop, in written word, and unto our elected officials, in our town halls, and unto those who shape our educational curriculum for our children. We must appeal to the people and unto the government—relentlessly without ceasing, with patience, with savviness, and harmless as doves, yet as intellectual strongholds for the defense of the first promise of our Declaration of Independence, that first spirit of our American union.</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><br /><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">Though it be that a factious, divisive spirit prioritizes its grasp on the power of our economy, and reverses the promise of our first laws and that original spirit of liberty; shaping multitudes of the people to largely enter their adult life without the knowledge of determining and establishing their financial independence, that they may have enough wealth to then become a people who value civility, a state of being wherein we treat each other with politeness and respect, we cannot despair. Abraham Lincoln did not despair. Nor did George Washington, or John Quincy Adams. We must have faith in the first formula of our union, and go forth to defend it.</span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><br /></span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"></p><table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><tbody><tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjIZSDC7Q_x6wsGcM5S-mS7-7xyYafd4zRk-N-X7VkNwFNtE8r4AaCTAC7Ae4-Ts8qMFlRuqv3RMkpElOXAp5RidtkGYn5IdWLZ9mfUbU7j_3MPhi20yRZ5HLQFrDfVTotHadQGNFLqpfh12C8qGbbX_X3c7uoT8mmmbB1NUWHAzuu6X7GDzovbkS7Z/s400/s-l400.jpg" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" data-original-height="400" data-original-width="320" height="640" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjIZSDC7Q_x6wsGcM5S-mS7-7xyYafd4zRk-N-X7VkNwFNtE8r4AaCTAC7Ae4-Ts8qMFlRuqv3RMkpElOXAp5RidtkGYn5IdWLZ9mfUbU7j_3MPhi20yRZ5HLQFrDfVTotHadQGNFLqpfh12C8qGbbX_X3c7uoT8mmmbB1NUWHAzuu6X7GDzovbkS7Z/w512-h640/s-l400.jpg" width="512" /></a></td></tr><tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Young Abraham Lincoln was a voracious book reader, and grew to be a scholarly, critical thinker; an American political scientist, and defender of the national spirit of the American union, as it was originally intended.</td></tr></tbody></table><p></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">As it is, the appeals must be made; they must be continuously brought forth in the most thoughtful and responsible manner, as it was in the spirit and action of John Quincy Adams bringing forth hundreds of petitions to abolish slavery as a Congressman in the House of Representatives. The words of the galant, selfless and kind George Washington, long having been silent from his mouth, remain written in his published works gently calling on us to understand that the spirit of faction that is today, was also present so long ago. His spirit of peace, yet instant and ready to defend, of properness, of responsibility as a servant ‘of and for’ the people— form a cornerstone of the American character that must be understood and defended, because he ‘was and is’ innately pivotal to the formation of the quality and trajectory of America, and its continuity, and because his integrity does uphold the strength of his communication and his warnings to us on what challenges to expect and how to address these with good conduct. And how can we understand the man and his message, if we are not taught to study his writings throughly? How shall we know of the mighty intellectual strength of Abraham Lincoln in the 1850s, and of his strategic, tactical genius, if he is not plainly opened unto us through his writings? </span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: STIXGeneral; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">The thorough study of written works of these sentinels transcend politics; and are powerful enough to furnish the intellectual capability to once again raise up altruism in the population, that enough individuals find muster passion, ardor, and patience to address the people and our government on the erroneous trajectory that these factious strongholds represent.</span></p><div class="blogger-post-footer">ScalziOriginals.US
Build ecosystems & individuals
to strengthen & sustain
integrated community health. </div>@CoachBill007http://www.blogger.com/profile/00964006939825613259noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4249677153801659195.post-86924714471398994062022-04-12T18:38:00.007+03:002022-04-18T16:49:23.494+03:00America, Without Imposition<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: Helvetica; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 12px;"></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEhWYNh1XZycZpCi25Vph4FUSesEkCJJPbAZgNRUfx-qqODMa7JfKkgPoYSy67KgRTJ3toAjNwE2DHPquW2OeIPepNvSqW8A-KHGuD6YgTwXZ7XWjKBYAbzE8PqS2auFlVYA1BbFfml0JsI4Dz5IkTgUtNRPyk5k-dNoXVuUmajL-a0s-okPsUY9e841" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><br /><img alt="" data-original-height="794" data-original-width="1024" height="495" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEhWYNh1XZycZpCi25Vph4FUSesEkCJJPbAZgNRUfx-qqODMa7JfKkgPoYSy67KgRTJ3toAjNwE2DHPquW2OeIPepNvSqW8A-KHGuD6YgTwXZ7XWjKBYAbzE8PqS2auFlVYA1BbFfml0JsI4Dz5IkTgUtNRPyk5k-dNoXVuUmajL-a0s-okPsUY9e841=w640-h495" width="640" /></a></div><br /><p></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: Helvetica; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 12px;">What is the right spirit for the people of the United States of America, and should a diversity of thought be brought to change the originalist establishment of the American republic, or is that diversity of thought alive because of that established foundational liberty of self-determination? Is an amendment of ideological activism unto that first construction required, therein reorganizing the understanding of our nation and opening the reinterpretation of the original intentions of our founders unto the first, natural laws? Unto whom shall we appeal if we motion to stand fast in our defense of the gentle promise of our Declaration of Independence, that the public good be secured without imposition?</p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: Helvetica; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 12px;"><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: Helvetica; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">In the Federalist Essays, the warning of the works of ‘faction’ is greatly deliberated upon as the singular danger to government of and for the people, and in the 1850’s the selfless Abraham Lincoln continued the footsteps begun before the foundation of America was established, and since that landmark of 1776, to defend the right to self-determination, without the imposition of foreign or domestic government to control the individual’s right to life and liberty, and the right to be safe and happy.</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: Helvetica; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 12px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: Helvetica; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">In Federalist #10, James Madison, identifies the effects and works of ‘factious spirit’ in government, as a selfish operation that renders unsteadiness and injustice in the function of government, and general well-being of society; placing its self interest first and the care of the people last, if at all; always searching for preeminence at the cost of individual rights, and a reinterpretation of the first laws according to its needs and purposes, until all that becomes of that government, if left uncontested from within government and from outside of it, is despotism and tyranny. Madison, continues in the breadth of the volume of the essays upon how such self-interested political groups are always in existence on the sidelines of power; ironically, gathering their strength from the same spirit of individual liberty that is the promised heritage of Americans, because national spirit of our union, founded upon individual liberty, values diversity of thought. In essence, the right to liberty provides political space for that diversity of thought, even faction. </span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: Helvetica; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 12px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: Helvetica; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">Should the self-interest of the ideology of a few, a majority, or a supermajority be imposed unto a nation of diverse people? As ideologies there be many that abound, can a point be made that some ideologies are benign and so the risk of imposing the will of some unto all, therein abridging liberty to an extent, yet in supposed favor of the public good, be a construct that can be imposed on the national body? The care of the physical environment is of importance to the public good, and so a fuel industry that purposes to grow renewable energy for the good of the the physical environment could be thought of as a benign self-interested political association that is for the good of the people. The question of manipulating government powers as an instrument of imposing ideology, though a case may be brought forth that it is for the good of the people, would be an activist addition unto the constitutional powers that limit the branches of federal and state government; allowing the instrumentalization of it by faction in its purpose to impose ideology. Is not our Declaration of Independence the distilled foundational agreement that houses a distinct national spirit of union that with such a diversity of people, of different ethnicities, politics, religions, and walks of life, the only ideas we can at least all agree upon, is that all humanity has equal claim to being created equal, with the right to life and liberty, that we be safe and happy, with the duty to care about how government functions, that it be in alignment unto the original spirit of liberty as intended and written in that spirit of equal right to individual liberty of 1776?</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: Helvetica; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 12px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: Helvetica; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">Could it also be that the self-interest of an industry that becomes a political group, however benign, could easily see the political advantage of joining a strategy of conglomerating with other self-interest groups, all brought under one political party, and these, altogether, a faction of factions, the good, the not so good, and the outright bad for the public good, become a monetized political behemoth of ideologies, with the intent of imposing new constructions on our education curricula, on our fuel energy industry, on our immigration processes, and all aspects of society? Such a construction of constructions is in opposition to the gentle waters that are the heritage due until Americans from the promise that is the Declaration of Independence. It would be a tyranny on the public good of the people, and a despotism of those factions, commanding and controlling; socially engineering American society in condescension to that spirit of respecting diversity of thought, economy, education, and always, the individual human right of self-determination.</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: Helvetica; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 12px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: Helvetica; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">John Adams, in his own writings, mentions that scarcely an individual can be found in each generation, whom when tested with the responsibility of power, succeeds in proving their altruism; their selflessness, and goodness of heart in doing good works for the people on a national scale. George Washington thought upon the matter of selflessness himself, asking in his writings that schools and centers of learning be created to help produce such a style of citizen; foreseeing that the American republic would undoubtedly be prolonged with such spirit, self-determination, ardor and hallowed devotion to the cause of individual right to life and liberty; the protection of that cause being carried forth with genuine care for humanity, matched with solemnity and understanding of purpose for the needs of the good of the people.</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: Helvetica; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 12px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: Helvetica; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">George Washington, John Adams, John Quincy Adams, Abraham Lincoln, and Ronald Reagan who worked within government were of that caliber, but they were rare exceptions, as was the sum of the whole works of the 56 signatories of our Declaration of Independence. Senator Charles Sumner, a contemporary of John Quincy Adams’s golden years as a Congressman in the House of Representatives, was of such strength of mind and heart, with good understanding that he and Quincy Adams were staunch defenders of the originalist constitutional purpose of protecting the foundation of the American republic as being that of one for self-determination based on the defense of individual human rights. </span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: Helvetica; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 12px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: Helvetica; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">Interestingly, and quite often, we are forewarned in the Federalist Essays, and of John Adams in his writings, about how government office is procured by individuals seeking a host of benefits, and aggrandizements of self interest, including: honor, legacy (love of glory), wealth (financial security), responsibility over others (love of power), and instrumentalization of the functions of government in order to implement ideological agendas (tyranny).</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: Helvetica; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 12px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: Helvetica; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">Outside of government, numerous individuals who have served the cause of protection unto individual liberty, but of these, only a few have served the good of the people so faithfully and selflessly as two individuals, Frederick Douglass and Dr. Martin Luther King. Beyond these two mighty individuals, a cadre or host of excellent people exhibited great devotion unto a love of humanity, the love of people; in caring for the good of others, and doing so with such intellectual execution and success, that their works speak for them. These include George Washington Carver, the Woman Suffragists of black and white skin color of 1848-1920, and Attorney Thurgood Marshall.</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: Helvetica; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 12px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: Helvetica; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">The common thread that connects all these individuals was the cause of an unalloyed, selfless defense of individual liberty and justice for all; having found that in its present form, the government of and for the people was not in accord with the promise of the fundamental laws that began the national spirit of our political union, as written in our Declaration of Independence, and clearly intended as proven in the congressional works of the surviving 56 signatories from 1776 through 1820 as being a document for all humanity, of all skin colors, religions, ethnicities, gender, politics, and walks of life.</span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: Helvetica; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br /></div><br /><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgwOJ_quZf9SJFg18tgvf0nEyYjtiKPo0Anm3jYESlwMqldMKbdijvVVLZeBGCBKUmXSUQIl2PSK9KR2NM6A7DKRKM2C5t3_PZV3jLqJ0qAcos5cvhH65KNmXqm2wqSA4ioVRrNQ3Q49rAUx0YPlMwtuLy405ebAiqOWma7NNdoFRkWA2tnIsyIc92b/s1152/SnapTheWhip.jpg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="768" data-original-width="1152" height="426" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgwOJ_quZf9SJFg18tgvf0nEyYjtiKPo0Anm3jYESlwMqldMKbdijvVVLZeBGCBKUmXSUQIl2PSK9KR2NM6A7DKRKM2C5t3_PZV3jLqJ0qAcos5cvhH65KNmXqm2wqSA4ioVRrNQ3Q49rAUx0YPlMwtuLy405ebAiqOWma7NNdoFRkWA2tnIsyIc92b/w640-h426/SnapTheWhip.jpg" width="640" /></a></div><br /><p></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: Helvetica; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 12px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: Helvetica; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">Now, in the 21st century, we are experiencing that conglomeration of factions that has instrumentalized the three branches of government to impose its consortium of ideologies at the behest of commandeering government to print money for its activism: increasing regulations on the oil and natural gas fuel industry with the effect of blockading its sustenance and growth, creating the conditions though the removal of blocks and the implementation of immigration agendas causing a swarm effect of immigration into the United States of America, therein engineering a radically different political balance of power that will be magnified in the 21st century, and aggressively pushing for the mainstreaming of a human abortion industry that demands the right to end human life at any stage of its formation after its conception has begun, demanding the right to perform macabre experimentation of procured infants with rodents, of the harvesting of organs, including brains while the child is alive. Such human tragedy that we sever the limbs of living humans, that we suction them from the womb, these altogether are a disrespect unto the national spirit of our American union, unto basic decency, and unto the prolongation of our American republic.</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: Helvetica; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 12px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: Helvetica; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">The imposition of ideology, however well-intended it may be, is a slippery methodology that is counter to the promise that we cherish and value the right to life, liberty, and the right to self-determination, that we be safe and happy. It can be asked, why should I or you have the right to impose my way of life unto others? That is expressly what America is guarding against. Why should we turn all that has allowed our freedom around and disparage what makes us happy?</span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: Helvetica; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: Helvetica; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">In the case that the government has been overrun by a conglomerate of factions, as evidenced by the Democrat Political Party, what appeals can be made to the same governing body, and what expectation can be had that a just deliberation of the appeal will be faithfully executed (Federalist #50)? Certainly, it cannot be expected from a government overtaken in all its branches by faction.</span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: Helvetica; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><br /></span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: Helvetica; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEi1EnisL6zY0XK8Mz_RVKPJWkT9a4JRYor4Ci0ShlLTT7APUkKWJ7KznDo8ClvmNHVxCagNwBgDkZMBkWbY7FwDaJVABNSMq4R_85oRdrbbugFfCjG4o5ftsoxU1IYAinQNWR8wgfiZPXp7GpnlAe3oOzS8dH81hVmvOhaCIWXxHSkoct93UKA4VMle" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img alt="" data-original-height="400" data-original-width="533" height="480" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEi1EnisL6zY0XK8Mz_RVKPJWkT9a4JRYor4Ci0ShlLTT7APUkKWJ7KznDo8ClvmNHVxCagNwBgDkZMBkWbY7FwDaJVABNSMq4R_85oRdrbbugFfCjG4o5ftsoxU1IYAinQNWR8wgfiZPXp7GpnlAe3oOzS8dH81hVmvOhaCIWXxHSkoct93UKA4VMle=w640-h480" width="640" /></a></div><br /><br /><p></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: Helvetica; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">The appealing to the people unto the methods of guarding against the encroachments of what the Democrat Political Party has become, cannot be made unto a Supreme Court that has only one originalist Constitutional Justice (Clarence Thomas), but it must be made from the people unto the people: that we return unto the gentle waters of our Declaration of Independence, allowing no further imposition of ideology, no further ending of human life, and no continuance of commanding and controlling aspects of our national economy, or the imposition of ideological educational constructions (‘critical (of the white) race theory’).</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: Helvetica; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 12px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: Helvetica; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none;">Our towns, cities, and rural communities will have to become sanctuary cities that resolutely defend and uphold the original promise of our Declaration of Independence, as it was first intended: a living charter document for the pubic good, proclaiming our precious value of individual human life and liberty; our right to be co-sovereigns in a land that thoughtfully and responsibly defends; that solemnly respects, with liberty and justice for all, without imposition.</span></p><div><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><br /></span></div><div class="blogger-post-footer">ScalziOriginals.US
Build ecosystems & individuals
to strengthen & sustain
integrated community health. </div>@CoachBill007http://www.blogger.com/profile/00964006939825613259noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4249677153801659195.post-73315968111650776072022-04-05T17:10:00.010+03:002022-10-06T17:37:15.629+03:00The Design To Reduce The People's Spirit Of National Union<p></p><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: left;"><tbody><tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhC6QQnF8q0JpUrA7Is1AajROWFMYY4KwEgQK0F3-QvCg0PvkgNekwAG2aKRpKAAS7awHfQuu4J2UeLys-FSpy9bEf-OoB9pv9vbrT6NhIWR0duKUvM9KJaxbE7votyhf3XIkKVTFU-nl4yDIyQM9GEdAEvmzvpmXEayvAVNGTtT28O5l7hxHZXVl6N/s386/0C9F34F1-7177-4A37-93DD-E83B99D6E137_4_5005_c.jpeg" style="clear: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" data-original-height="386" data-original-width="303" height="400" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhC6QQnF8q0JpUrA7Is1AajROWFMYY4KwEgQK0F3-QvCg0PvkgNekwAG2aKRpKAAS7awHfQuu4J2UeLys-FSpy9bEf-OoB9pv9vbrT6NhIWR0duKUvM9KJaxbE7votyhf3XIkKVTFU-nl4yDIyQM9GEdAEvmzvpmXEayvAVNGTtT28O5l7hxHZXVl6N/w257-h400/0C9F34F1-7177-4A37-93DD-E83B99D6E137_4_5005_c.jpeg" width="257" /></a></td></tr><tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Painting of Alexander Hamilton</td></tr></tbody></table> <span style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: Papyrus; font-size: 17.8px;">“We have warned them</span><span style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: Papyrus; font-size: 17.8px;"> </span><span style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: Papyrus; font-size: 17.8px;">from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.”</span><p></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: Papyrus; font-size: 17.8px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><span> <span> <span> <span><span><span><span> <span><span><span><span><span><span><span><span><span> <span> </span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span>Declaration of Independence, 1776</p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 16px;"><span style="font-family: times;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-family: times; font-kerning: none;">As faction increases in government, the intentions of the process of its self-interest working the gears of government: legislating, creating laws, and managing according to the ideology of a few, become the more obvious, and the observance of the people unto the usurpations becomes more precise. A study of American history parcels a distinct separation between the unified national mood of independency of the times immediately before and during the American Revolutionary War, and the political-judicial change that began at the onset of a political divide that was begun in about 1800. The beginning of a change in the national mood, brought on by political party politicking,— exacted a division in the national government, and signaled the end of the militant-like awareness of the American revolutionary spirit. The establishment of the newspaper industry, the sophistry of identity politics, and a change in the standards on how to approach constitutional interpretation (Marbury v. Madison), signaled a steady entrenchment towards control of the shape, direction, and understanding of the social, political, judicial reality of what American would be. That is where we are today in the 21st century.</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 16px;"><span style="font-family: times;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-family: times; font-kerning: none;">It was the beginning of ‘factions,’ groups of people who see that government can be manipulated as a mechanism to accomplish their own self-interest, and / or <i>ideological </i>instrumentalization of government, rather than a selfless regard of what is best for the good of the people.— A shift towards what would become a constant battle of ideas, when as before, during the unified solidarity of the Revolutionary Era, the needs required a singular unification of the people gathered around establishing the defense of a spirit of individual liberty: the promise of that first national spirit of union being a nation that was innately about the value of individual human life, in complete recognition that the people were diverse, and of different heritages.</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 16px;"><span style="font-family: times;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-family: times; font-kerning: none;">John Adams favored the continuance of strengthening, not necessarily enlarging bureaucracy, but a strengthening of central, yet limited national government, in order to maintain political national union, and a complimentary Federal & state balance of power, amongst the nascent states. Adams (and his closest advisor, wife Abigail) saw that the strength of the Constitution and the national spirit of union that was sparked with the Declaration of Independence had to be protected to avoid entering a strong state sovereignty-weak national government geopolitical reality. In such a mode, a sovereign state within the context of a weaker central union that would have an extremely limited national duty, could possibly disregard the call to limit, hinder, and end the enslavement of people, though the Declaration proclaims “all men are created equal.” In a sense, Congressional actions from most of the 56 signatories of the Declaration of Independence, as outlined by Abraham Lincoln later on in his speeches and writings, held steadfast enough unto a spirit of national union centered on a solemn remembrance and defense of the promissory note that is our Declaration of Independence. </span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 16px;"><span style="font-family: times;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></span></p><table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><tbody><tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh8PUzxOjquCUfHxNQyDBbr05jxm-AQYOvO_o8ZI9sNB6bA3RjJV_obMgSHcYJagKqNoTINr1-tkuJc0L_we8ATcTE5O7orC6PiDBqjYMPeHKryUlpTHuxnbe0BYg_B10d6O9n_iZg599Re5iVlcl0ViZwMfDVIZF3OwPrzZhTmVlg0IOWfgf24Q-8T/s550/washington-s-inauguration-at-philadelphia-in-1793_u-l-q1nk6q20.jpg" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><span style="font-family: times;"><img border="0" data-original-height="413" data-original-width="550" height="480" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh8PUzxOjquCUfHxNQyDBbr05jxm-AQYOvO_o8ZI9sNB6bA3RjJV_obMgSHcYJagKqNoTINr1-tkuJc0L_we8ATcTE5O7orC6PiDBqjYMPeHKryUlpTHuxnbe0BYg_B10d6O9n_iZg599Re5iVlcl0ViZwMfDVIZF3OwPrzZhTmVlg0IOWfgf24Q-8T/w640-h480/washington-s-inauguration-at-philadelphia-in-1793_u-l-q1nk6q20.jpg" width="640" /></span></a></td></tr><tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-family: times; text-align: left;">Presidential Inauguration of George Washington </span></td></tr></tbody></table><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 16px;"><span style="font-family: times;"><br /></span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 16px;"><span style="font-family: times;"><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-family: times; font-kerning: none;">It was from that framework of natural law that champions of our fundamentals hearkened unto protecting an unalloyed, altruist defense of the spirit of liberty of 1776. John Quincy Adams worked hard in that defense, going far beyond any in government, as the principal lawyer in defense of the freedom of foreigners of black skin color who were to be enslaved (‘Amistad’) in America. Abraham Lincoln’s opposition to Stephen Douglas in the 1850’s centered on the protection of the standard of the Declaration of Independence, of that spirit of 76,’ of the intention of the 56 signatories as exhibited in their works and writings, and the issue of slavery as an opposition anathema unto a standard of government in alignment with the (1) intentions of the founding fathers, (2) the spirit of valuing individual human rights and independency of the American Revolutionary era, and (3) the written word of our fundamental laws.</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 16px;"><span style="font-family: times;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-family: times; font-kerning: none;">So the national sentiment was not around the pillars of a central, national government, but the <i>foundation of those pillars</i>, the Declaration of 1776. As a writer, Senator, Secretary of State, President, and then Congressman, John Quincy Adams stood in the breach of obfuscating the awareness and understanding of those standards created by the early Jeffersonian Democrat-Republicans ideology of pushing for a new balance of power, or ‘geopolitical power-differential’ of state and central government. He did so as the southern region of the United States increased its economy on the forced labor of humans of black skin color. Itself, an institution diametrically opposed to the originalist charter agreement of the national spirit of the union, and a call to instead strengthen state sovereignty, that such an economy, based on the institution of human enslavement may grow unhindered from the growing legal-political sentiment to respect our fundamental, natural laws centered around human rights; the foundation of America.</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 16px;"><span style="font-family: times;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-family: times; font-kerning: none;">The abolitionist movement itself, was a social-religious mission, but it also had a national focus that fine-tuned its message to a national point of construction, ultimately leaving behind its religious vernacular, and simply invoking the national message of the Declaration of Independence. It was Frederick Douglass, a Christian, an American slave, and then a free man who all at once became a public speaker, writer, publisher, and American intellectual, finding strength through education and the support of a community spanning three countries, becoming the most well-known abolitionist, and in that process, a strengthener of the national document charter that is the Declaration of Independence. His determination to uphold the national promise of individual equality of liberty that is our Declaration of Independence, and to seek redress through the judiciary and the hearts and minds of people across towns, cities, states, and different countries, was itself a compliment to the gentle, yet determined manner of intellectually protecting and exercising the foundation of that spirit of individual liberty that would historically strengthen that national charter, itself that foundation of our national government, and the true spirit of our union. </span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 16px;"><span style="font-family: times;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-family: times; font-kerning: none;">Increasingly, the work to bring slavery to end, to preserve the political union, and to maintain the promise of the promissory note of 1776 was an endeavor that required a diversity of voices, strategies, and interplay of players both in and outside the government. The Federalist Political Party, for example, found its end of purpose at the onset of a fervor for individual human rights that was completely national, born from the concerted ardor, and the political and social intensity and determination of John Quincy Adams, the abolitionists and Frederick Douglass, Senator Charles Sumner, Abraham Lincoln, the start of the Woman Suffragists Movement (1849), and the families and communities of so many ordinary Americans that supported these people, and those endeavors. From those ashes, the Republican Party would be founded, styled almost entirely on the persona, intellectual balance of Abraham Lincoln. Abraham Lincoln could do this because he put himself aside; he was selfless, and he was intellectually aware of the value of being selfless. This endeared him to many in the nation.</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 16px;"><span style="font-family: times;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 16px;"><span style="font-family: times;"><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="font-family: times;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space: pre;"> <span> <span> <span> <span> <span> <span> <span> <span> <span> </span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span>2</p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-family: times; font-kerning: none;"><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"></span></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgGSx_eqWiC83s67h6SB0AXLFxrmKXEE5iVEUTPHJPZHCkjuONCUZfL4HJeA_xJZnwPwgeAiqoAJBJM9BwkSkILndXHyqlpGOCx3Wti0whVlJ6uI1KwtyEYRzAPsN6UCYnEjOi_Aau5Pcgm-LaEuJIBwfL8r5TOi2P30me8OjZC0u3levr95fPOvnC3/s700/aa_madison_father_2_e.jpg" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><span style="font-family: times;"><img border="0" data-original-height="700" data-original-width="432" height="400" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgGSx_eqWiC83s67h6SB0AXLFxrmKXEE5iVEUTPHJPZHCkjuONCUZfL4HJeA_xJZnwPwgeAiqoAJBJM9BwkSkILndXHyqlpGOCx3Wti0whVlJ6uI1KwtyEYRzAPsN6UCYnEjOi_Aau5Pcgm-LaEuJIBwfL8r5TOi2P30me8OjZC0u3levr95fPOvnC3/w246-h400/aa_madison_father_2_e.jpg" width="246" /></span></a></div><span style="font-family: times;"><br />The making of the necessary components to realign the foundational strength of what America was and truly is requires a diversity of determined Americans who endeavor with focused, selfless passion and an independent critical thinking mind to understand how it is that America works best, that national civility: how we treat each other with kindness, respect, and politeness, will only be experienced if we create the national space for a diversity of voices anchored in the originalist understanding of the shared ideas of our Declaration of Independence. The commonality of agreement that we are all created equal, with the right to life and liberty, that we be safe and happy, and assume the solemn duty to be a check on government, that it be of and for the people in accord with the fundamental law that was first written in 1776. Acceptance of that document implies that we are wholeheartedly agreeing that its message: the value of individual human life is precious and to be protected through a government that is founded on those natural principles. <span style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: initial;">In the absence of the people's duty to be astute as aware individuals who are taught the standard to (1) care about the how government is functioning and (2) how its personnel is aligned unto an originalist interpretation of fundamental law that values protecting human life, government, because it commands powers of law-making, of the printing of money, of the management of commerce, of education, of making war, and economy, —is a temptation unto people who may see it as an ends to instrumentalize their self-interest and possibly, their ideologies. This is ‘activism,’ and it was set as an extra-constitutional precedent in 1803 by Chief Justice John Marshall of the U.S. Supreme Court. He reinterpreted the Constitution according to his own thoughts of how it should be thought of, rather than as it was written and in the spirit of the law, as it was intended. His activism, a precedent itself, invented another precedent, ‘judicial review,’ providing an extra-constitutional power to override Congress and the President’s law-making powers. Marshall’s opinion in Marbury v. Madison was a departure of originalist interpretation, because of its activism in opening the door for Supreme Court personnel to be a law unto themselves, deviating away from the originalist standard of the application of American fundamental law: the spirit of union founded on an agreement of equal individual liberty, of protecting individual life, a thoughtfulness to the intentions of the founding signatories of the Declaration of Independence, as can be studied from their writings and Congressional works, and with that in mind, looking at the written word of the Declaration and the Constitution.</span></span><p></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 16px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-family: times; font-kerning: none;"></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 16px;"><span style="font-family: times;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-family: times; font-kerning: none;">With great care do we approach our care of the national ideas that make us a community founded on the word and spirit of the Declaration, because the quality of life of the people is in that. A battle of ideas for what America means when the answer was already completed in 1776, is useless action on one side, and it begs the question, to what end does the side that is ideological battle? A diversity of voices will obviously create discussion, and yet, the question as to what the foundation of America is, must not be continuously have its meaning overlaid with new interpretations. This is ‘activism’ and review of our fundamental law with the intent to change it to suit a self-interest.</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 16px;"><span style="font-family: times;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-family: times; font-kerning: none;">As James Madison remind us, in Federalist #10, the effects of faction may convulse a society, but it will find its end to the measure that it assumes power, because the people will discern the presence and product of tyranny and despotism as the faction, or conglomerate of factions increase its manipulation of government. Between the end of the John Adams presidency and the start of the Civil War, a sequence of ‘supra-slow-moving social-political confrontations’ had been pushed to the forefront by a national, geopolitical dynamic that was about:</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 16px;"><span style="font-family: times;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></span></p>
<ul>
<li style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="font-family: times;"><span style="font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal;"></span><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">preserving the geopolitical union</span></span></li>
<li style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="font-family: times;"><span style="font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal;"></span><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">abolishing slavery</span></span></li>
<li style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="font-family: times;"><span style="font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal;"></span><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">protecting the originalist spirit of liberty of 1776</span></span></li>
</ul>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 16px;"><span style="font-family: times;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-family: times; font-kerning: none;">These three dynamics were existent all at once, at different times, advocated of by a large array of individuals, and not necessarily all in agreement of one another, and yet, they had quashed the state sovereignty platform of the Jeffersonian Democrat-Republicans that also housed slavery as an institution, and they pressured from within government and outside of it as the short-lived compromising political party of the Whigs managed the Missouri Compromise of 1820 was enacted to find a middle, political ground of slave states and free states. </span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 16px;"><span style="font-family: times;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-family: times; font-kerning: none;">The work of four Americans: John Adams, John Quincy Adams, Frederick Douglass, and Abraham Lincoln, had such a tremendous gravitational weight in giving direction,— ‘gravitas,’ and a determined, selfless spirit to protect what America was supposed to be about, that the effect of their combined intellectual work of duty ‘to care’ shined a light so ardently powerful upon all the ploys and spotted works of the slavery faction, even as they continued to push for new judicial activist inventions (Popular Sovereignty) with the stubborn intent to push slavery unto the entire nation, and its new territories. Seeing no way out legally or intellectually, the slavery faction simply walked away from the civility of discussion and the process of law. The reliance of its ‘go-to’ action of manipulating the branches of government ended, and it simply took up weapons because it would not relent on its economy of human slavery.</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 16px;"><span style="font-family: times;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-family: times; font-kerning: none;">These three forces: </span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 16px;"><span style="font-family: times;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></span></p>
<ul>
<li style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="font-family: times;"><span style="font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal;"></span><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">preserving the geopolitical union</span></span></li>
<li style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="font-family: times;"><span style="font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal;"></span><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">abolishing slavery</span></span></li>
<li style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="font-family: times;"><span style="font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal;"></span><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">protecting the originalist spirit of liberty of 1776</span></span></li>
</ul>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 16px;"><span style="font-family: times;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="font-family: times;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">…weakened the (1) push for states to become something closer to independent sovereignty’s, (2) the call for states governments to be able to exercise the doctrine of ‘Popular Sovereignty, that a person can own a person, and a third person, nor state or national government objecting). </span><span style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: initial;">The dynamic of these brought about a solidarity of American sentiment threading a national spirit of union not willing to stray too far away from the spirit of 1776, a spirit of solemn respect for the protection of individual human rights, and to have a government founded upon such fundamental law.</span></span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: times;"><br /></span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="font-family: times;"><span style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: initial;"><span> <span> <span> <span> <span> <span> <span> <span> <span> <span> <span> <span> <span> <span> <span> <span> <span> <span> <span> <span> <span> <span> <span> <span> <span> <span> 3</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span><br /></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: times;"><br /></span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: times;"><br /></span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"></p><table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><tbody><tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh7Vafu6ss280TCkcFpuNx_5Zsk1izJlelumOlk4E1X7TlRdxMcNRaVLJzADzVSNoF9UGnEuP11gnX0EOdgOr2Tw8AaDeuYtKMAUWM9Lc8MT_CfCLPh2-4bSo17moHJIRziD5W1Nex8cZn0cTljuwV1dV2C8xSfPp4aDJCwuhVEKsdP6fqD3Hgbjiuz/s607/29695293_10155502569669677_7467983847611873041_n.jpg" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><span style="font-family: times;"><img border="0" data-original-height="406" data-original-width="607" height="428" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh7Vafu6ss280TCkcFpuNx_5Zsk1izJlelumOlk4E1X7TlRdxMcNRaVLJzADzVSNoF9UGnEuP11gnX0EOdgOr2Tw8AaDeuYtKMAUWM9Lc8MT_CfCLPh2-4bSo17moHJIRziD5W1Nex8cZn0cTljuwV1dV2C8xSfPp4aDJCwuhVEKsdP6fqD3Hgbjiuz/w640-h428/29695293_10155502569669677_7467983847611873041_n.jpg" width="640" /></span></a></td></tr><tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-family: times;">Dr. Martin Luther King, a selfless champion of liberty.</span></td></tr></tbody></table><p></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 16px;"><span style="font-family: times;"><br /><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-family: times; font-kerning: none;">The resolute refusal of altruist champions of liberty refusing appeasement would not let the matter rest, for doing so would require a reinterpretation of American fundamental law, and a nation no longer for individual human liberty. The hardening of the slavery faction’s position into a geopolitical regional confederation, having its personnel in the highest political offices of the Federal government branches: the office of the President, Congress, and the U.S. Supreme Court (Chief Justice Tanney and his opinion on the Dred Scott case), legislating, and establishing unconstitutional precedents in direct opposition of the national promissory note charter of 1776, our Declaration, all, further heightened national awareness of the people, and the need for a national solution to establish national civiliy, and ultimately, national peace. How would that be created if, the slavery faction refused to end slavery? Can peace amongst people be had if there is a kind, polite, respect in our local and national community interactions, and all Americans, regardless of age from the time of their creation, regardless of their skin color, religion, level of intelligence, ethnicity, or walk of life, be able to enjoy the unalienable, natural right to life, liberty, and the right to be safe and happy? The effect of that national agreement is civility. And who has civility if we are being purposefully brought towards having a binary, oppositional battle of ideas that either interrupt the possibility of tranquilly in our family, in our community, and in our work; or position large regions of the country in general contrariness as it regards unto our understanding of how to accomplish a peace that emanates from true national civility?</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 16px;"><span style="font-family: times;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-family: times; font-kerning: none;">At the rounding of the first quarter of the 21st century, does it behoove the American people to return unto an altruist understanding of America’s founding as a nation for the unequivocal protection of individual human rights? Can it be so that we have been led to shift away from the first and only true agreement that created our national union and have been pitted into a binary, oppositional ideological battle of ideology, and away from a national community understanding that has the Declaration and spirit of 1776 at its center, that we experience a diversity of individual voices? Where is the voice of justice and what is its sound that we may know its calling? How do we become a people with civility, that there can be national peace? A diverse people, --whose fundamental fountain spring and spirit of civil solidarity can only be found in the awareness and determined defense of the promise of the Declaration of Independence because the acceptance of those shared ideas that proclaim a national agreement that all human life is precious and of great value, each individual having the right to life, liberty; to be safe and happy, and the right to institute a government in solemn defense and respect of these unalienable rights. The last liberty proclaimed in the Declaration, that individual right to alter or abolish government that is not in alignment or accord with these liberties, is expounded upon in the breadth of the promissory note. So important is the solemn duty of the individual American to care about how government aligns and exercises its duties unto our fundamental law, that the right to assure government’s duty to meet those standards is entrusted unto the people.</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 16px;"><span style="font-family: times;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-family: times; font-kerning: none;">Intellectual awareness, critical understanding and selfless defense of the originalist interpretation of fundamental law within government and amongst the people is the requisite to accomplish national civility, because it strengthens the foundation of valuing individual human life, and the unequivocal protection of human life and liberty, that we be safe and happy, therein, bringing about the end of societal strife.</span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 16px;"><span style="font-family: times;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-family: times; font-kerning: none;">The people’s education would need to be of such solemness itself to emphasize that duty and determination to care about how government works in accord with the original spirit of liberty of our nation’s founding fathers, and the fundamental laws they created to form a national union of such diverse people. Ultimately, a standard of altruist critical thinkers, anchored in an originalist understanding of the foundation of our fundamental laws: the protection of individual human rights; and having financial independence, would needs be the required educational and financial reality for such Americans to earnestly exercise their duty as individuals, and altogether as a nation to uphold such a standard. Critical thinkers listen, observe, ponder, are reasonable and practical, they are trained to be altruist (selfless and unspotted) in their conclusions and reasonings; they are problem solvers, and solution creators; they are analytical, and scientific; they are altogether, intellectuals of the best order.</span></p><div class="blogger-post-footer">ScalziOriginals.US
Build ecosystems & individuals
to strengthen & sustain
integrated community health. </div>@CoachBill007http://www.blogger.com/profile/00964006939825613259noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4249677153801659195.post-64605916116265047052022-03-26T14:50:00.006+02:002022-04-06T15:43:23.146+03:00Ideology & Activism: A Study Of The Changing Character of The U.S. Supreme Court As Its Personnel Changes: Pinpointing The Unconstitutional Precedents of Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803)<p><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjbCNCC6O9OZt1yLP9Xs5zzda_Sgbu5pdu-lt1-MR0DJo7xhdd_tPS83Yu7gpxo6AwwvLubxy-9a_mUkSer74tzRpCUj-9xZ8ClY77Qk74VjutYoAjvs-FWS0qr1ZhlsC13DNRb68jUJTucdEnG6ssY3Wuq7EzVXi2JY1XieGpgDmSJgMAeCj9drg7z/s1267/477A14D1-205A-447F-9A94-DF548CF691EC_1_105_c.jpeg" style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(20, 20, 20); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-weight: bold; margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em; text-align: center;"><span style="font-family: times;"><img border="0" data-original-height="532" data-original-width="1267" height="268" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjbCNCC6O9OZt1yLP9Xs5zzda_Sgbu5pdu-lt1-MR0DJo7xhdd_tPS83Yu7gpxo6AwwvLubxy-9a_mUkSer74tzRpCUj-9xZ8ClY77Qk74VjutYoAjvs-FWS0qr1ZhlsC13DNRb68jUJTucdEnG6ssY3Wuq7EzVXi2JY1XieGpgDmSJgMAeCj9drg7z/w640-h268/477A14D1-205A-447F-9A94-DF548CF691EC_1_105_c.jpeg" width="640" /></span></a></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(20, 20, 20); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #141414; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><span style="font-family: times;"><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(20, 20, 20); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #141414; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-family: times; font-kerning: none;"><b>What is the character of the United States Supreme Court, if not an office that has been proven to change according to the change of its personnel? </b></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(20, 20, 20); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #141414; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><span style="font-family: times;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><b></b></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="background-color: white; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="font-family: times;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; -webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(20, 20, 20); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; color: #141414;"><b>What is its duty? And what is the duty of the people unto the processes of that court? If the personnel in our U.S. Supreme Court can say that they are the ultimate word on what our fundamental law is (Declaration of Independence & U.S. Constitution); what the original intentions of the framers of our government were, and what 'was' and 'is' the spirit of </b></span><span style="color: #141414;"><b><span>liberty, how should the people exercise the power balance to make the Supreme Court accountable to the original understanding, intention, and spirit of liberty of our fundamental laws, and laws that have eschewed forth from those first proclamations of liberty? What should be the rigors and duties within our American schools, and</span></b><b><span> political science instruction to assure such a people who care about the processes of our republican constitutional government? </span></b></span></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(20, 20, 20); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #141414; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><span style="font-family: times;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><b></b></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="background-color: white; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="font-family: times;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none;"><b><span style="color: #141414;"><span style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: initial;">The American story ‘has been’ and ‘is’ an exemplification of individual liberty and the determined effort to defend the original understanding of protecting individual liberty, against foreign and domestic enemies. Is that the understanding and degree of care that our children have as they graduate from our grade schools and universities? Undoubtedly, an alignment of our American </span><span>educational goals to bring about such a people would</span><span style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: initial;"> </span><span style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(20, 20, 20); caret-color: rgb(20, 20, 20);">strengthen the national union unto a new level of stability, freedom, civility, and individual advocacy. This would create a political </span></span></b></span><span style="color: #141414;"><b><span>redistribution that shifts an awareness of power (responsibility) unto individual Americans: a reality that would decrease the strength of political factions, and increase an original American heritage: individual self-determination and an equanimity of individual liberty, in the spirit of our Declaration of Independence.</span></b></span></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="font-family: times;"><br /></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="color: #141414;"><b><span style="font-family: times;"></span></b></span></p><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: left; margin-right: 1em; text-align: left;"><tbody><tr><td style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-family: times;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh7Ifiaupxjxg7p5Wgjac0fQAs4_HmHM9sqPanhR9LDdDiAPFQKW_ISaRoaVMA5ks6wLT-Z0YAELtBAjoyqdffmd5v_eGYvS9_zl8l0R5-h-ykuvDhhOC-2JzC_DNZlRTRFgbYRWcHst6HQcY9XE2DaPRvHqi9iqTkWwE8PJ2gEcGT1oLIkawO_jtyV/s458/55EC5A9E-5E1A-41C4-9DD4-29299FE7A173_4_5005_c.jpeg" style="clear: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" data-original-height="458" data-original-width="239" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh7Ifiaupxjxg7p5Wgjac0fQAs4_HmHM9sqPanhR9LDdDiAPFQKW_ISaRoaVMA5ks6wLT-Z0YAELtBAjoyqdffmd5v_eGYvS9_zl8l0R5-h-ykuvDhhOC-2JzC_DNZlRTRFgbYRWcHst6HQcY9XE2DaPRvHqi9iqTkWwE8PJ2gEcGT1oLIkawO_jtyV/s16000/55EC5A9E-5E1A-41C4-9DD4-29299FE7A173_4_5005_c.jpeg" /></a> </span></td></tr><tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-family: times; text-align: start;">Abraham Lincoln: an American intellectual, and astute political scientist who studied the deviation of the government from its original intention and spirit of liberty, & challenged the same to return to its fundamental origins.<br /><br /></span></td></tr></tbody></table><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><span style="color: #141414; font-family: times;"><b></b></span></div><span style="color: #141414; font-family: times;"><b>The processes of government should always interest the American citizen: after all, its personnel taxes us, prints out money, sends us to war, introduces changes in our educational doctrines, has been proven to be ideological and open to being instrumentalized according to the self-interest of political groups (factions), and has the power to decide how to interact with other countries, and at what pace and quality of diplomacy it relates to allies and nation-state governments that do not share the basic values of safeguarding individual human liberty. The people should care, and our schools should be made accountable to place before us an array of academic goals and objectives that are sound in their instruction and end result. To this end, parents, those adults who care, support and protect our future generations, are the final line of defense of liberty.</b></span><p></p><p style="background-color: white; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="font-family: times;"><b style="color: #141414;"><span>As a nation of laws, parents must become greater, more responsible advocates of how our laws are made, (John Adams). Our fundamental laws and the way that these are interpreted by Supreme Court </span></b><b style="color: #141414;"><span>personnel, must also be contested, discussed, and given a thorough 'check' by the American people. Not doing so; in not recognizing our solemn duty to exercise such power of responsibility, our fundamental laws, originalist intention and spirit of liberty can be re-interpreted, according to the 'activism,' abstract methodology, and ideological perspectives of Supreme Court personnel. Themselves, setting precedents upon precedents that were at the first </span></b><b style="color: #141414;"><span>unconstitutional, ultimately bringing the spirit of the American union off its course of equal liberty, and justice for all.</span></b></span></p><p style="background-color: white; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="color: #141414; font-family: times;"><b></b></span></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><span style="color: #141414; font-family: times;"><b><br /></b></span></div><p></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(20, 20, 20); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #141414; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><b><span style="font-family: times;">In Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803), Chief Justice John Marshall made reference to observance of the intention of the Constitution and questioned how it should be interpreted, giving specific examples that he brings forth to help make his points of question: (1) he informs us that the personnel of the Supreme Court have the right to say what the law says; (2) he reviews the law-making process and authority as it pertains to the Constitutional powers the legislative branch has ‘between the Supreme and inferior courts;’ (3) he questions the reasoning of a portion of the Constitution, and opines that it is ‘too extravagant’ and without meaning, (4) he offers that the Supreme Court should have additional constitutional powers not written in the Constitution to put to rest the questions he raises, (5) and reemphasizes the the Supreme Court always has the final say on what is Constitutional, what is not, and if a case should be ruled upon the basis of the law or fundamental law.</span></b></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(20, 20, 20); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #141414; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><span style="font-family: times;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><b></b></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(20, 20, 20); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #141414; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-family: times; font-kerning: none;"><b>Chief Justice John Marshall reviews the law-making processes of Congress, and he is actively emphatic to repeat that it is the personnel of the Supreme Court whom are the ultimate interpreters of fundamental law, the laws, and the Constitutional understanding of the Constitutional power balance relationship amongst the branches of government. </b></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(20, 20, 20); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #141414; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><span style="font-family: times;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><b></b></span><br /></span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(20, 20, 20); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #141414; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><span style="font-family: times;"><br /></span></p><table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: left; margin-right: 1em; text-align: left;"><tbody><tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjh8xjuA6W43oS5uK0TvpYji-U0eKARfqFjJbiEBe4zVuIuvGdlQI8ytLJwKxLKKycfqAQweiVi_AwkzMtGUBtFoPTdZ--PyNCOGGANxIlaAcc9j2BkR3DTt2ABazYC2C0q6TfuDtuWfh3v8_6qT3GAPwE5NEP4GF5SXKdFpbfQeWAlo_rBh7BjZsfw/s636/3CCD5394-1D2A-420F-81FE-A545E26FEB21_4_5005_c.jpeg" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><span style="font-family: times;"><img border="0" data-original-height="360" data-original-width="636" height="226" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjh8xjuA6W43oS5uK0TvpYji-U0eKARfqFjJbiEBe4zVuIuvGdlQI8ytLJwKxLKKycfqAQweiVi_AwkzMtGUBtFoPTdZ--PyNCOGGANxIlaAcc9j2BkR3DTt2ABazYC2C0q6TfuDtuWfh3v8_6qT3GAPwE5NEP4GF5SXKdFpbfQeWAlo_rBh7BjZsfw/w400-h226/3CCD5394-1D2A-420F-81FE-A545E26FEB21_4_5005_c.jpeg" width="400" /></span></a></td></tr><tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(20, 20, 20); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #141414; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px; text-align: left;"><span style="font-family: times;"><br /></span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(20, 20, 20); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #141414; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-family: times;"><b>When John Adams successfully defended the British soldiers of the infamous Boston Massacre, did he defend England, or the processes that defines the best spirit of our American judiciary, that of exercising the just rule of law?</b></span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(20, 20, 20); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #141414; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-family: times;"><b><br /></b></span></p></td></tr></tbody></table><span style="font-family: times;"><br />
</span><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(20, 20, 20); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #141414; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 18px;"><span style="font-family: times;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><b></b></span><br /></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(20, 20, 20); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #141414; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-family: times; font-kerning: none;"><b>His ‘review,’ is the first unconstitutional precedent, and the ‘work’ of review of the Constitution, the second unconstitutional precedent: altogether, they emphasize that from heretofore (1803, Marbury v. Madison), the authority upon the understanding & decision-making of the Constitutional power balance relationship structure amongst government branches must rest with the personnel of the Supreme Court. He thus creates two unsanctioned precedents that shift the balance of governmental power away from the Legislative and Executive branches of government and unto the Judiciary: ‘judicial activism’ & ‘judicial review,’ are a construction upon originalist Constitutional interpretation and application of the ‘spirit’ of the law of liberty, and the intention of the founding fathers of our fundamental laws. It is a change in direction of the authority of how to go about statutory interpretation; opening it to arbitrary understanding, without explicitly written Constitutional rules binding the personnel of the Supreme Court to a processes that can be made accountable unto the people and the other branches of government. They can interpret abstractly, and this opens the law-making processes of that court to continuous ‘review’ and works of ‘activism,’ even ideological interpretation cloaked in a constitutionalization of the word and spirit of fundamental law. The precedents allowed the possibility of a changing personnel of the Supreme Court to be the supreme law themselves, instead of our fundamental laws, and the originalist intentions of the framers of our government: a spirit of protecting individual liberty.</b></span></p>
<blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br /></div><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(20, 20, 20); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #141414; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 28px; text-align: left;"><span style="font-family: times; font-size: medium;"><b>The final paragraphs of the written U.S. Supreme Court opinion of Chief Justice John Marshall,</b></span></p><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(20, 20, 20); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #141414; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 28px; text-align: left;"><span style="font-family: times; font-size: medium;"><b>Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803):</b></span></p></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(20, 20, 20); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Times; font-size: 22px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 28px; text-align: left;"><br /></p></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; font-family: Times; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; text-align: left;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">“If it had been intended to leave it in the discretion of the Legislature to apportion the judicial power between the Supreme and inferior courts according to the will of that body, it would certainly have been useless to have proceeded further than to have defined the judicial power and the tribunals in which it should be vested. The subsequent part of the section is mere surplusage -- is entirely without meaning -- if such is to be the construction. </span><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none; text-decoration: underline;"><b>If Congress remains at liberty to give this court appellate jurisdiction where the Constitution has declared their jurisdiction shall be original, and original jurisdiction where the Constitution has declared it shall be appellate, the distribution of jurisdiction made in the Constitution, is form without substance.</b></span></p></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; font-family: Times; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 14px; text-align: left;"><br /></p></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; font-family: Times; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; text-align: left;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none; text-decoration: underline;"><b>Affirmative words are often, in their operation, negative of other objects than those affirmed, and, in this case, a negative or exclusive sense must be given to them or they have no operation at all.</b></span></p></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; font-family: Times; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 14px; text-align: left;"><br /></p></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; font-family: Times; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; text-align: left;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">It cannot be presumed that any clause in the Constitution is intended to be without effect, and therefore such construction is inadmissible unless the words require it.</span></p></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(9, 37, 103); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #092567; font-family: Times; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; text-align: left;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">Page 5 U. S. 175</span></p></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: Times; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 14px; text-align: left;"><br /></p></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; font-family: Times; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; text-align: left;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">If the solicitude of the Convention respecting our peace with foreign powers induced a provision that the Supreme Court should take original jurisdiction in cases which might be supposed to affect them, yet the clause would have proceeded no further than to provide for such cases if no further restriction on the powers of Congress had been intended. That they should have appellate jurisdiction in all other cases, with such exceptions as Congress might make, is no restriction unless the words be deemed exclusive of original jurisdiction.</span></p></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; font-family: Times; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 14px; text-align: left;"><br /></p></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; font-family: Times; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; text-align: left;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">When an instrument organizing fundamentally a judicial system divides it into one Supreme and so many inferior courts as the Legislature may ordain and establish, then enumerates its powers, and proceeds so far to distribute them as to define the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court by declaring the cases in which it shall take original jurisdiction, and that in others it shall take appellate jurisdiction, the plain import of the words seems to be that, in one class of cases, its jurisdiction is original, and not appellate; in the other, it is appellate, and not original. ,If any other construction would render the clause inoperative, that is an additional reason for rejecting such other construction, and for adhering to the obvious meaning.</span></p></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; font-family: Times; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 14px; text-align: left;"><br /></p></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; font-family: Times; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; text-align: left;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">To enable this court then to issue a mandamus, it must be shown to be an exercise of appellate jurisdiction, or to be necessary to enable them to exercise appellate jurisdiction.</span></p></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; font-family: Times; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; text-align: left;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">It has been stated at the bar that the appellate jurisdiction may be exercised in a variety of forms, and that, if it be the will of the Legislature that a mandamus should be used for that purpose, that will must be obeyed. This is true; yet the jurisdiction must be appellate, not original.</span></p></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; font-family: Times; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; text-align: left;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">It is the essential criterion of appellate jurisdiction that it revises and corrects the proceedings in a cause already instituted, and does not create that case. Although, therefore, a mandamus may be directed to courts, yet to issue such a writ to an officer for the delivery of a paper is, in effect, the same as to sustain an original action for that paper, and therefore seems not to belong to</span></p></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(9, 37, 103); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #092567; font-family: Times; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; text-align: left;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">Page 5 U. S. 176</span></p></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; font-family: Times; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; text-align: left;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">appellate, but to original jurisdiction. Neither is it necessary in such a case as this to enable the Court to exercise its appellate jurisdiction.</span></p></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; font-family: Times; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 14px; text-align: left;"><br /></p></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; font-family: Times; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; text-align: left;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none; text-decoration: underline;"><b>The authority, therefore, given to the Supreme Court by the act establishing the judicial courts of the United States to issue writs of mandamus to public officers appears not to be warranted by the Constitution, and it becomes necessary to inquire whether a jurisdiction so conferred can be exercised.</b></span></p></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; font-family: Times; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; text-align: left;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none; text-decoration: underline;"><b>The question whether an act repugnant to the Constitution can become the law of the land is a question deeply interesting to the United States, but, happily, not of an intricacy proportioned to its interest. It seems only necessary to recognise certain principles, supposed to have been long and well established, to decide it.</b></span></p></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; font-family: Times; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; text-align: left;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none; text-decoration: underline;"><b>That the people have an original right to establish for their future government such principles as, in their opinion, shall most conduce to their own happiness is the basis on which the whole American fabric has been erected. The exercise of this original right is a very great exertion; nor can it nor ought it to be frequently repeated.</b></span><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"> The principles, therefore, so established are deemed fundamental. And as the authority from which they proceed, is supreme, and can seldom act, they are designed to be permanent.</span></p></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; font-family: Times; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; text-align: left;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none; text-decoration: underline;"><b>This original and supreme will organizes the government and assigns to different departments their respective powers.</b></span><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"> It may either stop here or establish certain limits not to be transcended by those departments.</span></p></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; font-family: Times; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 14px; text-align: left;"><br /></p></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; font-family: Times; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; text-align: left;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">The Government of the United States is of the latter description. The powers of the Legislature are defined and limited; and that those limits may not be mistaken or forgotten, the Constitution is written. To what purpose are powers limited, and to what purpose is that limitation committed to writing, if these limits may at any time be passed by those intended to be restrained? The distinction between a government with limited and unlimited powers is abolished if those limits do not confine the persons on whom they are imposed, and if acts prohibited</span></p></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(9, 37, 103); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #092567; font-family: Times; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; text-align: left;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">Page 5 U. S. 177</span></p></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; font-family: Times; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; text-align: left;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">and acts allowed are of equal obligation.</span><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none; text-decoration: underline;"><b> It is a proposition too plain to be contested that the Constitution controls any legislative act repugnant to it, or that the Legislature may alter the Constitution by an ordinary act.</b></span></p></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; font-family: Times; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; text-align: left;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">Between these alternatives there is no middle ground. </span><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none; text-decoration: underline;"><b>The Constitution is either a superior, paramount law, unchangeable by ordinary means, or it is on a level with ordinary legislative acts, and, like other acts, is alterable when the legislature shall please to alter it.</b></span></p></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; font-family: Times; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; text-align: left;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none; text-decoration: underline;"><b>If the former part of the alternative be true, then a legislative act contrary to the Constitution is not law; if the latter part be true, then written Constitutions are absurd attempts on the part of the people to limit a power in its own nature illimitable.</b></span></p></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; font-family: Times; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; text-align: left;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">Certainly all those who have framed written Constitutions contemplate them as forming the fundamental and paramount law of the nation, and consequently the theory of every such government must be that an act of the Legislature repugnant to the Constitution is void.</span></p></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; font-family: Times; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; text-align: left;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">This theory is essentially attached to a written Constitution, and is consequently to be considered by this Court as one of the fundamental principles of our society. It is not, therefore, to be lost sight of in the further consideration of this subject.</span></p></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; font-family: Times; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 14px; text-align: left;"><br /></p></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; font-family: Times; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; text-align: left;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">If an act of the Legislature repugnant to the Constitution is void, does it, notwithstanding its invalidity, bind the Courts and oblige them to give it effect? Or, in other words, though it be not law, does it constitute a rule as operative as if it was a law? This would be to overthrow in fact what was established in theory, and would seem, at first view, an absurdity too gross to be insisted on. It shall, however, receive a more attentive consideration.</span></p></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; font-family: Times; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; text-align: left;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none; text-decoration: underline;"><b>It is emphatically the province and duty of the Judicial Department to say what the law is.</b></span><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"> Those who apply the rule to particular cases must, of necessity, expound and interpret that rule. </span><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none; text-decoration: underline;"><b>If two laws conflict with each other, the Courts must decide on the operation of each.</b></span></p></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(9, 37, 103); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #092567; font-family: Times; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; text-align: left;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">Page 5 U. S. 178</span></p></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: Times; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 14px; text-align: left;"><br /></p></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; font-family: Times; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; text-align: left;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">So, if a law be in opposition to the Constitution, if both the law and the Constitution apply to a particular case, so that the Court must either decide that case conformably to the law, disregarding the Constitution, or conformably to the Constitution, disregarding the law, </span><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none; text-decoration: underline;"><b>the Court must determine which of these conflicting rules governs the case. </b></span><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">This is of the very essence of judicial duty.</span></p></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; font-family: Times; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; text-align: left;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none; text-decoration: underline;"><b>If, then, the Courts are to regard the Constitution, and the Constitution is superior to any ordinary act of the Legislature, the Constitution, and not such ordinary act, must govern the case to which they both apply.</b></span></p></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; font-family: Times; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; text-align: left;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">Those, then, who controvert the principle that the Constitution is to be considered in court as a paramount law are reduced to the necessity of maintaining that courts must close their eyes on the Constitution, and see only the law.</span></p></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; font-family: Times; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; text-align: left;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none; text-decoration: underline;"><b>This doctrine would subvert the very foundation of all written Constitutions.</b></span><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"> It would declare that an act which, according to the principles and theory of our government, is entirely void, is yet, in practice, completely obligatory. It would declare that, if the Legislature shall do what is expressly forbidden, such act, notwithstanding the express prohibition, is in reality effectual. It would be giving to the Legislature a practical and real omnipotence with the same breath which professes to restrict their powers within narrow limits. It is prescribing limits, and declaring that those limits may be passed at pleasure.</span></p></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; font-family: Times; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; text-align: left;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">That it thus reduces to nothing what we have deemed the greatest improvement on political institutions -- a written Constitution, would of itself be sufficient, in America where written Constitutions have been viewed with so much reverence, for rejecting the construction. But the peculiar expressions of the Constitution of the United States furnish additional arguments in favour of its rejection.</span></p></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; font-family: Times; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; text-align: left;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">The judicial power of the United States is extended to all cases arising under the Constitution.</span></p></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(9, 37, 103); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #092567; font-family: Times; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; text-align: left;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">Page 5 U. S. 179</span></p></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: Times; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 14px; text-align: left;"><br /></p></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; font-family: Times; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; text-align: left;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none; text-decoration: underline;"><b>Could it be the intention of those who gave this power to say that, in using it, the Constitution should not be looked into? That a case arising under the Constitution should be decided without examining the instrument under which it arises?</b></span></p></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; font-family: Times; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; text-align: left;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none; text-decoration: underline;"><b>This is too extravagant to be maintained.</b></span></p></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; font-family: Times; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; text-align: left;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">In some cases then, the Constitution must be looked into by the judges. And if they can open it at all, what part of it are they forbidden to read or to obey?</span></p></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; font-family: Times; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; text-align: left;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">There are many other parts of the Constitution which serve to illustrate this subject.</span></p></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; font-family: Times; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; text-align: left;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">It is declared that "no tax or duty shall be laid on articles exported from any State." Suppose a duty on the export of cotton, of tobacco, or of flour, and a suit instituted to recover it. Ought judgment to be rendered in such a case? ought the judges to close their eyes on the Constitution, and only see the law?</span></p></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; font-family: Times; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; text-align: left;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">The Constitution declares that "no bill of attainder or <i>ex post facto</i> law shall be passed."</span></p></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; font-family: Times; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; text-align: left;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">If, however, such a bill should be passed and a person should be prosecuted under it, must the Court condemn to death those victims whom the Constitution endeavours to preserve?</span></p></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; font-family: Times; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; text-align: left;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">"No person,' says the Constitution, 'shall be convicted of treason unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on confession in open court."</span></p></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; font-family: Times; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; text-align: left;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><b>Here. the language of the Constitution is addressed especially to the Courts. It prescribes, directly for them, a rule of evidence not to be departed from. If the Legislature should change that rule, and declare one witness, or a confession out of court, sufficient for conviction, </b></span><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none; text-decoration: underline;"><b>must the constitutional principle yield to the legislative act?</b></span></p></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; font-family: Times; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; text-align: left;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><b>From these and many other selections which might be made, it is apparent that the framers of the Constitution</b></span></p></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(9, 37, 103); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #092567; font-family: Times; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; text-align: left;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><b>Page 5 U. S. 180</b></span></p></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; font-family: Times; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; text-align: left;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><b>contemplated that instrument as a rule for the government of courts, as well as of the Legislature.</b></span></p></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; font-family: Times; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; text-align: left;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><b>Why otherwise does it direct the judges to take an oath to support it? This oath certainly applies in an especial manner to their conduct in their official character. </b></span><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none; text-decoration: underline;"><b>How immoral to impose it on them if they were to be used as the instruments, and the knowing instruments, for violating what they swear to support!</b></span></p></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; font-family: Times; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; text-align: left;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">The oath of office, too, imposed by the Legislature, is completely demonstrative of the legislative opinion on this subject. It is in these words:</span></p></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; font-family: Times; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; text-align: left;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">"I do solemnly swear that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich; and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge all the duties incumbent on me as according to the best of my abilities and understanding,</span><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none; text-decoration: underline;"><b> </b></span><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">agreeably to the Constitution and laws of the United States."</span></p></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; font-family: Times; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; text-align: left;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none; text-decoration: underline;"><b>Why does a judge swear to discharge his duties agreeably to the Constitution of the United States if that Constitution forms no rule for his government? if it is closed upon him and cannot be inspected by him?</b></span></p></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; font-family: Times; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; text-align: left;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">If such be the real state of things, this is worse than solemn mockery. To prescribe or to take this oath becomes equally a crime.</span></p></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; font-family: Times; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; text-align: left;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none; text-decoration: underline;"><b>It is also not entirely unworthy of observation that, in declaring what shall be the supreme law of the land, the Constitution itself is first mentioned, and not the laws of the United States generally, but those only which shall be made in pursuance of the Constitution, have that rank.</b></span></p></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; font-family: Times; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; text-align: left;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;">Thus, the particular phraseology of the Constitution of the United States confirms and strengthens the principle, supposed to be essential to all written Constitutions, that a law repugnant to the Constitution is void, and that courts, as well as other departments, are bound by that instrument.</span></p></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; font-family: Times; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 14px; text-align: left;"><br /></p></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px; text-align: left;"><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; font-family: Times; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; text-align: left;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none; text-decoration: underline;"><b>The rule must be discharged.”</b></span></p></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(20, 20, 20); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Times; font-size: 22px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 28px; text-align: center;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><b></b></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(20, 20, 20); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; color: #141414; font-family: Times; font-size: 22px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 28px; text-align: center;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"><b></b></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; font-family: Times; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 14px; text-align: center;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none; text-decoration: underline;"><b></b></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; font-family: Times; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 14px; text-align: center;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none; text-decoration: underline;"><b></b></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: Times; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 14px; text-align: center;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; font-family: Times; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 14px; text-align: center;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; font-family: Times; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 14px; text-align: center;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; font-family: Times; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 14px; text-align: center;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; font-family: Times; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 14px; text-align: center;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; font-family: Times; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 14px; text-align: center;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: Times; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 14px; text-align: center;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; font-family: Times; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 14px; text-align: center;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span></p>
<p style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; background-color: white; font-family: Times; font-size: 12px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; min-height: 14px; text-align: center;"><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none;"></span></p>
<div><span style="-webkit-font-kerning: none; font-kerning: none; text-decoration: underline;"><b><br /></b></span></div><div class="blogger-post-footer">ScalziOriginals.US
Build ecosystems & individuals
to strengthen & sustain
integrated community health. </div>@CoachBill007http://www.blogger.com/profile/00964006939825613259noreply@blogger.com0