Skip to main content

The Man with the Open Heart / #ElieWiesel #servantleader #Israel #RIP




"Human suffering anywhere, concerns men and women everywhere."

Elie Wiesel

When I turned eighteen years of age, I moved from Puerto Rico to Boston to attend college at Boston University. The feeling of being out on my own was liberating. All my experiences in Boston had become novel and a constant point of discovery, be it new people I met or new places I went to.

Behind Commonwealth avenue, on 147 Bay State Road sat Elie Wiesel's Center for Judaic Studies. He was a university professor for B.U.'s religion and philosophy departments and well-known for being a champion of liberty and disadvantaged people. After having survived the Buchenwald concentration camp in Germany during the second world war, he moved to Paris in 1945 upon his liberation by Allied troops. By 1954 he published what would be the first of nearly thirty books on the subject of being a brother's keeper to one's fellow man.

In 1986, when Mr. Wiesel accepted the Nobel Peace prize for his work towards sowing peace and justice, his grandson rose up with him to accept the honor. Did it signal a continuation of the work that needs to still be done? Undeniably, Elie Wiesel was a jewish man who cared deeply for the plight of Jews throughout the world, but he transcended his ethnicity and nationality as a Jew, as a Romanian-born citizen (Transylvania) and then as an American to simply be a human being who cared for others.

His level of empathy showed a commitment to justice that held strong for decades, all the way to his passing away on July 2, 2016, at the age of 87. Himself, originally a victim of the worst atrocities the jews have ever experienced, he rose to shed his victim label, conquering it and any semblance of possible apathy with the practice of empathy. Surely, Mr. Wiesel could have led a quiet life after being freed from the concentration camp with his sister, yet he boldly set out to live a life with his heart on his sleeve for others. That makes him a servant leader and a hero to his adopted country, the United States of America. America is a land that binds people together by their exercise of liberty and caring for one another. Elie Wiesel role-modeled just that. His life will serve as an example for generations to come as to what it means to be human and what we should do with the little time each of us is afforded on earth.

May you rest in peace, Elie or be having a grand old time with the Lord right about now. You deserve it.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Clinical Teachers: Armies of One / #edchat #criticalthinking #education

It is not the responsibility of empty vessels to create the motivation to learn, but rather, the prerogative to teach, the very responsibility of it, must be entrusted to the teacher. It can be so, that according to a child’s social-economic status, a affluent upbringing can be infused with a ‘comfort space’ of human development not generally experienced in the life of the child who hails from a low-income community. 
This juxtaposition in the human development and daily experiences of the affluent child and the child who lives at or near the poverty line bring a different array of positive and negative forces which impact their general well-being. As these two general sets of children age, the difference becomes more contrasted and is clearly evident at the time both reach middle school years. One need only look at children who receive private schooling as opposed to those who receive public school education in low-income neighborhoods. A child who attends private schooling and then e…

The Golden Rule & The Duty of Critical Thinkers / #socialresponsibility #edchat #TeamUSA

updated 2:24 pm est 11/10/17 The idea of cultivating critical thinkers is easily a lofty ideal purported to be achieved throughout academia and espoused as the hallmark of journalistic integrity.  Achieving the critical thinking mind requires a certain bravery, wherein, once our ability to tap into our own knowledge of content matter is done, we must require it upon ourself to contrast our assessment and infer from an ‘outsiders’ point of view what is true and right and what is inaccurate and, even possibly, the propagandization of a special interest.
.
For the critical thinker, the affinity to discern is attached to our decision to look at the hard truth and favor this over our viewpoints, our political inclinations, and our stance on any given subject. This is hard to do.
.
In the following essay, I ask what exercise in democracy is achieved if political forces practice varying levels of indoctrination, in effect swaying public interest towards their ‘camp,’ rather than promoting …