Skip to main content

The Right to a 'Fair' Education: Rocking the Boat, series 1 of 4

An exceptional learner is basically any learner who has a special gift, talent, and/ or a disability, thus requiring specialized educational services, as well as related professional services. In local parlance then, in order to receive a fair education, a learner's profile must be understood by his or her Educators, and related service professionals. The degree to which the Educator or professional knows the learner, will, to a great degree, generate educational programs which are more finely customized, and tailored to the learner. This process of knowing the learner is key to a overall successful outcome for both the Educator, professional, learner, and parent.

In the state of Connecticut though, many parents are coming forward with some grievances. I see them on the local news channel more and more. Lawsuits are gearing up, and momentum is really racheting up. Racheting up like a wave that is beginning to break on the shore. These parents are frustrated, they are worried, and they are unhappy. Many parents feel that they have tried and tried different ways to work with public school districts, but they meet up with passive, and not so passive defensive strategies. Schools are known to deflect, dismiss, 'unacknowledge' previously acknowledged agreements, or straight out ignore pleas for more tailored educational programs for the learners.

There are a variety of reasons for their behavior, some of it is what it is, lack of professionalism, yet another part is more complex, blame or fault, within public school Special Education programs is nuanced. The buck does not stop start or stop with each public school district. It starts in Washington D.C. and the historical lack of necessary funding of Special Education. This obviously impacts a school districts ability to bring in top talent, continuously train Special Educators in effective and efficient ways of the best instructional practices and methods, and lastly, move beyond reactionary, defensive positions to cover their legal rear-ends. Not fully funding Special Education budgets on the Federal level directly impacts learners who are in need of specific supports and accommodations. Corners are cut, some issues are overlooked, and discussions begin getting rather political when well-informed parents request tailored services which require money output by schools.

In the next posting of this series, I will discuss how our civic leaders are responding to the rising public din demanding accountability for fair education, how parents are responding to their response, and finally some concepts that can help all move forward to solve this systemic problem. It is shortchanging the ability of generations of learners be as independent as possible. It is wrong to keep the status-quo. The boat needs to be rocked.

For more, go to http://www.CoachBill.US
Twitter.Com @CoachBill007
Instagram: CoachBill007
Youtube: CoachBill007


Popular posts from this blog

Clinical Teachers: Armies of One / #edchat #criticalthinking #education

It is not the responsibility of empty vessels to create the motivation to learn, but rather, the prerogative to teach, the very responsibility of it, must be entrusted to the teacher. It can be so, that according to a child’s social-economic status, a affluent upbringing can be infused with a ‘comfort space’ of human development not generally experienced in the life of the child who hails from a low-income community. 
This juxtaposition in the human development and daily experiences of the affluent child and the child who lives at or near the poverty line bring a different array of positive and negative forces which impact their general well-being. As these two general sets of children age, the difference becomes more contrasted and is clearly evident at the time both reach middle school years. One need only look at children who receive private schooling as opposed to those who receive public school education in low-income neighborhoods. A child who attends private schooling and then e…

The Golden Rule & The Duty of Critical Thinkers / #socialresponsibility #edchat #TeamUSA

updated 2:24 pm est 11/10/17 The idea of cultivating critical thinkers is easily a lofty ideal purported to be achieved throughout academia and espoused as the hallmark of journalistic integrity.  Achieving the critical thinking mind requires a certain bravery, wherein, once our ability to tap into our own knowledge of content matter is done, we must require it upon ourself to contrast our assessment and infer from an ‘outsiders’ point of view what is true and right and what is inaccurate and, even possibly, the propagandization of a special interest.
For the critical thinker, the affinity to discern is attached to our decision to look at the hard truth and favor this over our viewpoints, our political inclinations, and our stance on any given subject. This is hard to do.
In the following essay, I ask what exercise in democracy is achieved if political forces practice varying levels of indoctrination, in effect swaying public interest towards their ‘camp,’ rather than promoting …